Skip to main content
Log in

Baseline evaluation of legacy hydrochemical data for the Republican River watershed, southcentral Nebraska, USA

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to comprehensively evaluate and interpret hydrogeochemically the extensive legacy surface-water data for the expansive Republican River watershed in southcentral Nebraska. Historical (1968–1991) hydrochemistry data [major cations and anions, total salinity [specific conductance (SC)] and pH supplied by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality and the US Geological Survey were hydrogeochemically and statistically analyzed. Interpretation of this large legacy dataset (315 sample analyses at 12 Republican River sampling stations) revealed that the Republican River’s range in SC is relatively low (200–1020 µS/cm), with a river-wide median of 587 µS/cm (~ 380 mg/L). The range in SC for 10 tributaries (204 sample analyses) is 190–2910 µS/cm with a median value of 550 µS/cm (~ 360 mg/L). The Ca–HCO3 hydrochemical facies dominates throughout the watershed followed by the Na–HCO3 facies. Hydrochemical equilibrium modeling reveals that most samples occurred in an aqueous environment characterized by gypsum undersaturation but slight calcite and dolomite supersaturation; low supersaturation values comprise a line of evidence for the thermodynamic equilibrium or near equilibrium of the studied surface waters. Scatter plots of meq/L concentrations for selected anions and cations reveal the impact of silicate mineral (e.g., feldspars) weathering on the aqueous hydrochemistry throughout the watershed. These ubiquitous feldspar minerals most likely originated along the eastern slope of the Front Range during Late Cretaceous time (Laramide Orogeny) and were subsequently transported into the study area. The relatively high concentrations of sulfate and sodium in numerous samples collected from the Arikaree River probably originate in the underlying Pierre Shale, rich in S-bearing minerals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Some or all hydrochemical data that support the findings of this study are available from the author through email upon reasonable request.

Code availability

All software used is in the public domain, is free, and is available to everyone.

References

  • Al Farrah N, Martens K, Walraevens K (2011) Hydrochemistry of the Upper Miocene-Pliocene Quaternary aquifer complex of Jifarah plain, NW Libya. Geol Belgica 14:159–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison JD, Brown KJ, Novo-Gradac DS (1991) MINTEQA2/PRODEFA2, A geochemical assessment model for environmental systems. Version 3.0 User’s Manual, Environ Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, USEPA, Athens, p 107

  • American Park Network (2020) Swanson Reservoir (Trenton Dam) http://www.ohranger.com/swanson-reservoir-trenton-dam. Accessed 13 Oct 2020

  • Appelo CA, Postma D (1994) Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 355

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson JC (2011) Geochemistry analysis and evolution of a bolson aquifer, basin and range province in the southwestern United States. Environ Earth Sci 64:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson JC (2012) Geochemical evaluation of sulfate levels in Ponca Creek, northeastern Nebraska. Env Geosciences 19(1):33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson JC (2015) Impact of the Dakota Aquifer on major-ion chemistry of Rock Creek discharge, eastern Nebraska, Midwest region. Environ Geosci 22(1):19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson JC (2018) Evaluation and interpretation of historical major-ion chemistry for the Lodgepole Creek watershed, Nebraska. Environ Earth Sci 77:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson JC (2019) Interpretation of storage and retrieval major-ion chemistry, with emphasis on significant sulfate and sodium concentrations in the White River watershed, northwestern Nebraska, United States. Environ Geosci 26(2):51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Back W (1960) Origin of hydrochemical facies of ground water in the Atlantic Coastal Plain. In: Proceedings of 21st International Geological Congress, Copenhagen, 87–95

  • Back W (1966) Hydrochemical facies and ground-water flow patterns in the northern part of Atlantic Coastal Plain. Prof. Paper 498-A. US Geological Survey

  • Bartos T, Ogle KM (2002) Water quality and environmental isotopic analyses of groundwater samples collected from the Wasatch and Fort Union Formations in areas of coalbed methane development—implications to recharge and ground water flow, eastern Powder River Basin, Wyoming. Water-Resources Invest. Rep. 02–4045. US Geological Survey

  • Bentall R (1991) Facts and figures about Nebraska Rivers. Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 16 p http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/conservationsurvey/156. Accessed 21 Oct 2020

  • Cerling TE, Pederson BL, von Damm KL (1989) Sodium-calcium ion exchange in the weathering of shales: implications for global weathering budgets. Geology 17(6):552–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung SY, Senapathi V, Rajendran R, Selvam S (2020) Processes and characteristics of hydrogeochemical variations between unconfined and confined aquifer systems: a case study of the Nakdong River Basin in Busan City, Korea. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:10087–10102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta PS, Tyagi SK (1996) Major ion chemistry of groundwater in Delhi area: chemical weathering processes and groundwater flow regime. J Geol Soc India 47:179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehnavi AG, Sarikhani R, Nagaraju D (2011) Hydrogeochemical and rock water interaction studies in east of Kurdistan, N-W of Iran. Int J Environ Sci Res 1(1):16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Diffendal Jr. RF, Mohlman DR, Corner RG, Harvey FE, Warren KJ, Summerside S, Pabian RK, Eversoll DA (2002) Educational Circular 16. Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, p 25

  • Ellis MJ (1981) Hydrogeologic reconnaissance of the Republican River Basin in Nebraska. Water Resources Invest., Open-File Report 81–531. US Geological Survey

  • Engberg RA (1984) Appraisal of data for ground-water quality in Nebraska. Water-Supply Paper 2245. US Geological Survey, p 54

  • English J, Johnston ST (2004) The Laramide Orogeny: what were the driving forces? Int Geol Rev 46:833–838. https://doi.org/10.2747/0020-6814.46.9.833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eversoll DA, Dreeszen VH, Burchett RR (1988) Bedrock geologic map showing the configuration of the bedrock surface, McCook 1° × 2° quadrangle, Nebraska and Kansas, and part of the Sterling 1° ×  2° quadrangle, Nebraska and Colorado. Miscellaneous Investigation Series, Map I-1878, 1:250,000. US Geological Survey

  • Fenneman NM (1946) Physiographic divisions of the conterminous United States. Special Map Series, scale 1:7,000,000. US Geological Survey

  • Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 84

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeke JW, Peckenpaugh REC, Dugan JT (1992) Hydrogeology of parts of the Twin Platte and Middle Republican Natural Resources Districts, southwestern Nebraska. Nebraska Water Survey Paper 70, Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, p 89

  • Gomaa MA, Hamouda ME, Abdelfattah MM, Emara MM, El-Sabbah MMB (2013) Assessment of hydrogeochemical processes affecting groundwater quality in the area between Safaga and El-Quseir, eastern desert, Egypt. Middle East J Appl Sci 3(4):129–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson JP (2009) Visual MINTEQ, Version 2.62. KTH School of Architecture and Built Environment, Dept. of Land and Water Resources Engineering, Stockholm

  • Hem JD (1992) Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water. Water-Supply Paper 2254. US Geological Survey

  • Huber NW, Hoppes RR, Slama NL, Sherwood MA (1967) Soil survey of Red Willow County, Nebraska. US Dept of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with the Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, p 52

  • Johnson CR, Brennan R (1960) Geology and ground water in the Platte–Republican Rivers watershed and the Little Blue River basin above Angus, Nebraska. Water-Supply Paper 1489. US Geological Survey, p 142

  • Katz B, Coplen TB, Bullen TD, Davis JH (1998) Use of chemical and isotopic tracers to characterize the interaction between groundwater and surface water in mantled karst. Groundwater 35(6):1014–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korus JT, Howard LM (2019) Maps showing the physical hydrogeology and changes in saturated thickness (predevelopment to spring 2016 and spring 2011 to spring 2016) in the Middle Republican Natural Resources District, southwestern Nebraska. Nebraska Resource Atlas Number 12, 16 pp. + 14 plates, Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

  • Korus JT, Howard LM, Young AR, Divine DP, Burbach ME, Jess JM, Hallum DR (2013) The groundwater atlas of Nebraska. Third (revised) edition, Resource Atlas No. 4b/2013, Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

  • Mackenzie FJ, Garrels RH (1965) Silicates: Reactivity with sea water. Sci J 1505:57–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo AL, Loucks MD (1995) Solute and isotopic geochemistry and groundwater flow in the Central Wasatch Range, Utah. J Hydrol 172:31–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell LE, Bowman G, Yost DA (1974) Soil survey of Harlan County, Nebraska. Soil Conservation Service (SCS), US Dept of Agriculture, in cooperation with Conservation and Survey Division, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, p 65

  • NCEI (National Centers for Environmental Information) (2020) NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) daily precipitation recorded for the McCook, NE, station. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov. Accessed 3 Oct 2020

  • NSSL (National Severe Storms Laboratory) (2020) National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/winter/faq/. Accessed 3 Jan 2020

  • Paden HE (1978) Soil survey of Franklin County, Nebraska. Soil Conservation Service (SCS), US Dept. of Agriculture, in cooperation with Conservation and Survey Division, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln

  • Piper AM (1944) A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analyses. Am Geophys Union Trans 25:914–923. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR025i006p00914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock RS, Davis LL (1978) Soil survey of Nuckolls County Nebraska. Soil Conservation Service (SCS), US Dept. of Agriculture, in cooperation with Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

  • Rajesh R, Brindha K, Murugan R, Elango L (2012) Influence of hydrogeochemical processes on temporal changes in groundwater quality in a part of Nalgonda district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Earth Sci 65:1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajmohan N, Elango L (2004) Identification and evolution of hydrogeochemical processes in the groundwater environment in an area of the Palar and Cheyyar River basins, southern India. Environ Geol 46:47–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieke DL, Yost DA, Culver JR, Brubacher JI (1979) Soil survey of Furnas County Nebraska. Soil Conservation Service (SCS), US Dept of Agriculture in cooperation with Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

  • ScienceDirect (2020) Potassium fertilizers, https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/potassium-fertilizers. Accessed 20 Mar 2020

  • Social Science Statistics (2019a) Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) normality test online calculator. https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/kolmogorov/default.aspx. Accessed 11 Apr 2019

  • Social Science Statistics (2019b) Mann-Whitney U method online calculator. https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/mannwhitney/default2.aspx. Accessed 1 May 2019

  • GraphPad Software, Inc. (2016) t-test online calculator http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/ttest1/. Accessed 2 May 2019

  • Spalding RF, Druliner AD, Whiteside LS, Struempler AW (1984) Uranium geochemistry in groundwater from Tertiary sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48(12):2679–2692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiff HA (1951) The interpretation of chemical water analysis by means of pattern. J Petrol Technol 3(10):15–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd DK (1959) Ground water hydrology. Wiley, New York, p 656

    Google Scholar 

  • University of New England, School of Psychology (2012) Table D. “Critical values for Pearson r.” https://webstat.une.edu.au/unit materials/c6_common_statistical_tests/testsignif_pearson.html. Accessed 21 Oct 2019

  • USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers) (2020) Mainstem and Tributary Reservoir Bulletin https://www.nwd-mr.usace.army.mil/rcc/reports/pdfs/MRBWM_Reservoir.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2020

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2016) ProUCL software. https://www.epa.gov/land-research/proucl-software. Accessed 10 Jul 2020

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2019) Secondary drinking water standards: Guidance for nuisance chemicals. https://www.epa.gov/dwstandardsregulations/secondary-drinking-water-standards-guidance-nuisance-chemicals. Accessed 2 Sep 2019

  • USGS (US Geological Survey) (1976) Hydrologic unit map—1974 State of Nebraska. Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS (US Geological Survey) (2012) GW_Chart software website. http://water.usgs.gov/nrp/gwsoftware/GW_Chart/GW_Chart.html. Accessed 9 Oct 2019

  • USGS (US Geological Survey) (2019) Geologic units by geographic area (state/county). https://mrdata.usgs.gov/geology/state/geog-units.html. Accessed 20 Nov 2018

  • Vishwakarma CA, Sen R, Singh N et al (2018) Geochemical characterization and controlling factors of chemical composition of spring water in a part of eastern Himalaya. J Geol Soc India 92:753–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-018-1098-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JR, Stuebe AJ (2004) Soil survey of Dundy County Nebraska. Natural Resources and Conservation Service (NRCS), US Dept of Agriculture in cooperation with Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

  • WQP (Water Quality Portal) (2019) STORET data. https://www.waterqualitydata.us/. Accessed 5 Feb 2019

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author greatly appreciates the highly professional effort of Mr. Les Howard, Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, in preparing the CADD base map for Fig. 1 and the approval of his supervisor, Paul Hanson, PhD, Associate Director and Professor, to prepare this map. This article is dedicated to my parents—Don and Mildred Atkinson.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study and preparing the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author made 100% of the contributions to produce the study and paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon C. Atkinson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest or competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Retired. Certified Professional Geologist (CPG-07347) conferred by the American Institute of Professional Geologists (AIPG).

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the Republican River at Benkelman (DOCX 18 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the Republican River at Stratton (DOCX 40 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the Republican River at Trenton (DOCX 39 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the Republican River at Culbertson (DOCX 39 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the Republican River at McCook (DOCX 39 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the Republican River at Cambridge (DOCX 38 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the Republican River at Orleans (DOCX 18 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the Republican River at Harlan County Reservoir (DOCX 18 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the Republican River at Naponee (DOCX 18 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the Republican River at Riverton (DOCX 19 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the Republican River at Guide Rock (DOCX 40 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the Republican River at Superior (DOCX 42 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the Arikaree River near Haigler (DOCX 39 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the North Fork, Republican River (DOCX 40 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, the South Fork, Republican River (DOCX 39 KB)

12665_2020_9358_MOESM16_ESM.doc

(a) Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, Frenchman Creek at Culbertson (USGS), (b) Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, Frenchman Creek at Culbertson (NDEQ) (DOCX 39 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, Blackwood Creek at Culbertson (DOCX 19 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, Red Willow Creek at McCook (DOCX 18 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, Red Willow Creek at Indianola (DOCX 39 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, Beaver Creek at Marion (DOCX 18 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, Muddy Creek at Arapahoe (DOCX 38 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, Sappa Creek at Beaver City (DOCX 18 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, Beaver Creek at Beaver City (DOCX 18 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, Sappa Creek at Stamford (DOCX 40 KB)

Summary statistics for chemical-quality parameters, Prairie Dog Creek near Alma (DOCX 18 KB)

Republican River basin exceedances of USEPA SMCLs for TDS, sulfate, and chloride (DOCX 19 KB)

Supplementary file27 (DOCX 15 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atkinson, J.C. Baseline evaluation of legacy hydrochemical data for the Republican River watershed, southcentral Nebraska, USA. Environ Earth Sci 80, 77 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09358-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09358-9

Keywords

Navigation