Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Commentary on Shelby Hunt’s “The theoretical foundations of strategic marketing and marketing strategy: foundational premises, R-A theory, three fundamental strategies, and societal welfare”

  • Theory/Conceptual
  • Published:
AMS Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Resource-Advantage theory has been an important addition to the marketing literature generally, and the marketing strategy literature in particular. Twenty years after its introduction, this paper explores R-A theory in the context of marketing strategy research and considers three main issues. First, while R-A theory has clearly been impactful, why it has not been relatively more impactful. Second, it identifies and elaborates on some important marketing strategy phenomena and questions that have not been explicitly addressed by R-A theory. Third, it offers some suggestions for the further development of R-A theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I confess that I have not read every R-A paper and book ever published, and thus such a set of unique R-A theory characteristics and predictions may exist somewhere in the extant literature. However, I would also say that I am not a marketing (or management or economics) theory neophyte—at least relative to the bulk of my colleagues, so this explanation may hold for many marketing academics, even if factually incorrect.

  2. However, I am not sure that this is true with “superior value” vs. “differentiation” in this respect since superior value can be delivered by reducing costs relative to benefits (consistent with a cost-reduction strategy) and by increasing benefits relative to costs which is more consistent with a differentiation strategy (Narver and Slater 1990).

References

  • Alderson, W. (1957). Marketing behavior and executive action. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, W. (1965). Dynamic marketing behavior. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99–120.

  • Carpenter, G. S., Glazer, R., & Nakamoto, K. (1994). Meaningful brands from meaningless differentiation: the dependence on irrelevant attributes. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. (2015). The theoretical foundations of strategic marketing and marketing strategy: foundational premises, R-A theory, three fundamental strategies, and societal welfare. AMS Review. doi:10.1007/s13162-015-0069-5

  • Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1995). The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1996). The resource-advantage theory of competition: dynamics, path dependencies, and evolutionary dimensions. Journal of marketing, 107–114.

  • Hunt, S. D. (2000). A General Theory of Competition: Resources, Competences, Productivity, Economic Growth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Madhavaram, S., & Hunt, S. D. (2008). The service-dominant logic and a hierarchy of operant resources: developing masterful operant resources and implications for marketing strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, N. A. (2012). Marketing and business performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 102–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of marketing, 20–38.

  • Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 20–35.

  • Rust, R. T., Moorman, C., & Dickson, P. R. (2002). Getting return on quality: revenue expansion, cost reduction, or both? Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509–533.

  • Varadarajan, R. (2010). Strategic marketing and marketing strategy: domain, definition, fundamental issues and foundational premises. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. (2003). A configuration theory assessment of marketing organization fit with business strategy and its relationship with marketing performance. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 100–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. (2005). Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 80–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171–180.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, 1309 East Tenth Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405-17010, USA

    Neil A. Morgan

Authors
  1. Neil A. Morgan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil A. Morgan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morgan, N.A. Commentary on Shelby Hunt’s “The theoretical foundations of strategic marketing and marketing strategy: foundational premises, R-A theory, three fundamental strategies, and societal welfare”. AMS Rev 5, 91–97 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-015-0070-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-015-0070-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation