Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality of Information Available on YouTube Videos Pertaining to Thyroid Cancer

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to assess the quality of information available on YouTube videos pertaining to thyroid cancer. A search of YouTube (http://www.youtube.com) was performed on February 12, 2018, using the search terms “thyroid cancer” and “thyroid cancer treatment.” The first 50 videos that appeared on each search were reviewed and 52 videos were included in the analysis. Videos were independently analyzed by two authors for video characteristics including publishing source of upload, continent of origin, presence of animation, and numbers of views, likes, and dislikes. The quality of information provided was assessed using the DISCERN and JAMA benchmark scores, while video power index was also calculated. The median (min-max) DISCERN score was 19.5 (4–71) for reviewer 1 and 20.0 (4–72) for reviewer 2. The median (min-max) JAMA benchmark score was 2.0 (1–4) for both reviewers. JAMA scores were positively correlated with video power index in both reviewer 1 (r = 0.310, p = 0.025) and reviewer 2 (r = 0.356, p = 0.010) assessment. JAMA and DISCERN scores were positively correlated with duration of videos in both reviewer 1 (r = 0.454, p = 0.001 and r = 0.533, p < 0.001, respectively) and reviewer 2 (r = 0.541, p < 0.001 and r = 0.519, p < 0.001, respectively) assessment. In conclusion, our findings revealed poor quality of information provided by YouTube videos pertaining to thyroid cancer based on DISCERN and JAWA scores. Videos with longer duration and higher video power index seem to be associated with higher quality scores, whereas no impact of using animation was shown on quality scores as well as no association between video duration and video power index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Powell J, Inglis N, Ronnie J, Large S (2011) The characteristics and motivations of online health information seekers: cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study. J Med Internet Res 13(1):e20

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fox S (2011) The social life of health information http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/05/12/the-social-life-of-health-information. Accessed 20 Apr 2018

  3. Fernandez-Llatas C, Traver V, Borras-Morell JE, Martinez-Millana A, Karlsen R (2017) Are health videos from hospitals, health organizations, and active users available to health consumers? An analysis of diabetes health video ranking in YouTube. Comput Math Methods Med 2017:8194940

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh SK, Liu S, Capasso R, Kern RC, Gouveia CJ (2018) YouTube as a source of information for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Otolaryngol 39(4):378–382

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A (2018) Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation: literature review. JMIR Med Educ 4(1):e3

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cassidy JT, Fitzgerald E, Cassidy ES, Cleary M, Byrne DP, Devitt BM, Baker JF (2018) YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(3):840–845

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cassidy JT, Baker JF (2016) Orthopaedic patient information on the World Wide Web: an essential review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:325–338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK (2015) Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Informatics J 21(3):173–194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meldrum S, Savarimuthu BT, Licorish S, Tahir A, Bosu M, Jayakaran P (2017) Is knee pain information on YouTube videos perceived to be helpful? An analysis of user comments and implications for dissemination on social media. Digit Health 3:2055207617698908

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tahara M (2018) Management of recurrent or metastatic thyroid cancer. ESMO Open 3(Suppl 1):e000359

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hundahl SA, Fleming ID, Fremgen AM, Menck HR (1998) A National Cancer Data Base report on 53,856 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the US, 1985–1995. Cancer 83(12):2638–2648

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deen MH, Burke KM, Janitz A, Campbell J (2016) Cancers of the thyroid: overview and statistics in the United States and Oklahoma. J Okla State Med Assoc 109(7–8):333–338

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Smittenaar CR, Petersen KA, Stewart K, Moitt N (2016) Cancer incidence and mortality projections in the UK until 2035. Br J Cancer 115(9):1147–1155

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Thyroid cancer facts and figures. National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Web Site. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/thyro.html. Accessed 25 Nov 2018

  15. Davies L, Welch HG (2006) Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973–2002. JAMA 295(18):2164–2167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Enewold ZK, Ron E, Marrogi AJ, Stojadinovic A, Peoples GE, Devesa SS (2009) Rising thyroid cancer incidence in the United States by demographic and tumor characteristics, 1980–2005. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18(3):784–791

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, Croyle RT, Arora NK, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (2005) Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first health information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med 165(22):2618–2624

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. The National Cancer Intelligence Network (2012) Thyroid cancer – trends by sex, age and histological type NCIN Data Briefing. www.ncin.org.uk/databriefings. Accessed 25 Nov 2018

  19. ReFaey K, Tripathi S, Yoon JW, Justice J, Kerezoudis P, Parney IF, Bendok BR, Chaichana KL, Quiñones-Hinojosa A (2018) The reliability of YouTube videos in patients education for glioblastoma treatment. J Clin Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.07.001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brna PM, Dooley JM, Esser MJ, Perry MS, Gordon KE (2013) Are YouTube seizure videos misleading? Neurologists do not always agree. Epilepsy Behav 29(2):305–307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. MacLeod MG, Hoppe DJ, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Philippon MJ, Ayeni OR (2015) YouTube as an information source for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of video content. Arthroscopy 31:136–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Steinberg PL, Wason S, Stern JM, Deters L, Kowal B, Seigne J (2010) YouTube as source of prostate cancer information. Urology 75(3):619–622

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leong AY, Sanghera R, Jhajj J, Desai N, Jammu BS, Makowsky MJ (2018) Is YouTube useful as a source of health information for adults with type 2 diabetes? A South Asian perspective. Can J Diabetes 42(4):395–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R (1999) DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 53(2):105–111

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA (1997) Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor–let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 277(15):1244–1245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Corcelles R, Daigle CR, Talamas HR, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR (2015) Assessment of the quality of internet information on sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(3):539–544

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP (2012) YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis–a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 39(5):899–903

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M (2013) Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One 8(12):e82469

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Murugiah K, Vallakati A, Rajput K, Sood A, Challa NR (2011) YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 82(3):332–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K (2007) YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. J Am Med Assoc 298(21):2482–2484

    Google Scholar 

  31. Syed-Abdul S, Fernandez-Luque L, Jian WS, Li YC, Crain S, Hsu MH, Wang YC, Khandregzen D, Chuluunbaatar E, Nguyen PA, Liou DM (2013) Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: anorexia on YouTube. J Med Internet Res 15(2):e30

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Briones R, Nan X, Madden K, Waks L (2012) When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube. Health Commun 27(5):478–485

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rapp AK, Healy MG, Charlton ME, Keith JN, Rosenbaum ME, Kapadia MR (2016) YouTube is the Most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation. J Surg Educ 73(6):1072–1076

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fischer J, Geurts J, Valderrabano V, Hugle T (2013) Educational quality of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis. J Clin Rheumatol 19:373–376

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bezner SK, Hodgman EI, Diesen DL, Clayton JT, Minkes RK, Langer JC, Chen LE (2014) Pediatric surgery on YouTube™: is the truth out there? J Pediatr Surg 49(4):586–589

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rossler B, Lahner D, Schebesta K, Chiari A, Plochl W (2012) Medical information on the internet: quality assessment of lumbar puncture and neuroaxial block techniques on YouTube. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 114:655–658

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Larouche M, Geoffrion R, Lazare D, Clancy A, Lee T, Koenig NA, Cundiff GW, Stothers L (2016) Mid-urethral slings on YouTube: quality information on the internet? Int Urogynecol J 27(6):903–908

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rupert DJ, Moultrie RR, Read JG, Amoozegar JB, Bornkessel AS, O'Donoghue AC, Sullivan HW (2014) Perceived healthcare provider reactions to patient and caregiver use of online health communities. Patient Educ Couns 96(3):320–326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Woo BKP (2018) What can we learn from diabetes-related YouTube videos? Can J Diabetes 42(4):342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lam NH, Tsiang JT, Woo BK (2017) Exploring the role of YouTube in disseminating psychoeducation. Acad Psychiatry 41(6):819–822

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Woo BK (2017) Dementia health promotion for Chinese Americans. Cureus 9(6):e1411

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Altinbas University Faculty of Medicine, Medical Park Bahcelievler Hospital, Fevzi Cakmak Cd. Davutoglu Apt. No: 23/10, 34180 Bahcelievler, Istanbul, Turkey

    Mehmet Akif Aydin & Huseyin Akyol

Authors
  1. Mehmet Akif Aydin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huseyin Akyol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Akif Aydin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aydin, M.A., Akyol, H. Quality of Information Available on YouTube Videos Pertaining to Thyroid Cancer. J Canc Educ 35, 599–605 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01502-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01502-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation