Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Electric vehicles to renewable-three unequal areas-hybrid microgrid to contain system frequency using mine blast algorithm based control strategy

  • Original article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an economical approach to control frequency of an isolated three area hybrid micro grid system (3A-HµGS) with the coordinated participation of plug in electric vehicles (PEVs). In addition to diesel generators, an integration of EV fleets to the micro grid as a dynamic device makes the system more reliable and highly controllable. PEVs are connected to the hybrid system as a source and a load under the scenario of deficit and surplus power respectively. It is thus here used as an economical load frequency controller. The performance of the proposed system with PEVs has been analyzed under the degree of penetration of different renewable energy sources like wind energy, parabolic trough, photovoltaic arrays, and biogas power system in all three different areas respectively. Moreover, artificial intelligence like genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, and mine blast algorithm based proportional-integral-derivative controllers are also implemented to contain the system frequency under different circumstances such as load variation, unpredictable change in wind velocity and uncontrolled solar irradiance. Comparative analysis of the dynamic responses and the numerical results of the system with different algorithms ascertain that the coordinated participation of PEVs diminishes the power and frequency deviation of the proposed hybrid micro grid system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(R_{1} ,R_{2} {\text{~}}\,{\text{and~}}\,R_{3}\) :

Droops in area-1, area-2 and area-3 respectively

\(B_{{1,}} B_{2} {\text{~}}\) and \(B_{3}\) :

Frequency bias constants of area-1, area-2 and area-3 respectively

\(T_{{12}} ,~T_{{13}} ,~\,{\text{~and}}\,~T_{{23}}\) :

Coefficient of synchronization between area-1 & 2, area-1 & 3, and area-2 & 3 respectively

\(\Delta F_{1} ,\Delta F_{2} ,{\text{~}}\) and \(\Delta F_{3}\) :

Frequency deviations in area-1, area-2 and area-3 respectively

\(\Delta P_{{tie~1.2}} ,{\text{~}}\Delta P_{{tie~1.3}} ,{\text{~}}\) and \(\Delta P_{{tie~2,3}}\) :

Change in tie line power exchange between area-1 & 2, area-1 & 3, area-2 & 3 respectively

\(P_{{WT}}\) :

Power of wind turbine

\(\beta {\text{~}}\) :

Pitch angle

\(C_{P}\) :

Performance coefficient

\(\lambda {\text{~}}\) :

Tip speed ratio

\(\rho {\text{~}}\) :

Air density (typically ranges from 1.2 to 1.25 kg/m3)

\(\eta _{{MPPT}}\) :

Efficiency of MPPT

\({\text{A}}\) :

Swept area by the rotor blades

\(v_{W}\) :

Wind velocity

\(c_{1} - c_{8}\) :

Constants for each wind turbine/specific

\(w_{t}\) :

Mechanical turbine blade speed

\(v_{{cut - in}}\), \({\text{~}}v_{{cut - out}}\) :

Cut-in wind speed, maximum cut-out wind speed

\({\text{r}}\) :

Radius of swept

\(v_{{rated}}\) :

Nominal wind speed

\(\Delta v_{W}\) :

Change in wind speed

\(P_{{solar}}\) :

Power output of solar PV system

\(\Delta P_{{solar}}\) :

Change in output power of PV system

\(P_{{PV}}\) :

Rated power of solar PV system under standard test condition (STC)

\(G~\) :

Solar radiation for PV arrays in W/m2

\(G_{{STC}}\) :

Reference sun irradiance for PV arrays at STC 1000 (W/m2)

\(T_{{STC}}\) :

Reference temperature (i.e. 25 °C)

\(K_{t}\) :

Constant (≜ − 3.7e-3 (°C − 1))

\(T_{a}\) :

Ambient temperature

\(\Delta G\), and \(\Delta T_{a}\) :

Changes in solar radiation and temperature respectively

\(K_{{WTG}} ,~K_{{PTC}} ,{\text{~}}K_{{PV,}} K_{{DEG}} ,{\text{~}}\,{\text{and}}~\,K_{{PEV}}\) :

Gain of wind turbine generator, parabolic trough solar power, PV arrays, diesel generator, and plug in electric vehicles respectively

\(T_{{WTG}} ,~T_{{PTC}} ,~{\text{~}}T_{{PV}} ,~T_{{DEG}} ,{\text{~}}~\,{\text{and}}\,~T_{{PEV}}\) :

Time constant of wind turbine generator, parabolic trough solar power, PV arrays, diesel generator, and plug in electric vehicles respectively

\(K_{{P1}} ,~K_{{P2}} ,{\text{~}}~\,{\text{and}}~\,K_{{P3}}\) :

Gain of the rotor swing of area-1, area-2, and area-3 respectively

\(T_{{P1}} ,~T_{{P2}} ,~\,{\text{~and}}\,~T_{{P3}}\) :

Time constant of the rotor swing of area-1, area-2, and area-3 respectively

References

  • Ahcene F, Bentarzi H (2020) Automatic voltage regulator design using particle swarm optimization technique. In: International conference on electrical engineering (ICEE), Istanbul, Turkey, 2020, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEE49691.2020.9249789

  • Alattar AH, Selem SI, Metwally HMB, Ibrahim A, Aboelsaud R, Tolba MA, El-Rifaie AM (2019) Performance enhancement of micro grid system with SMES storage system based on mine blast optimization algorithm. Energies 12(16):3110. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12163110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali MH, Wu B, Dougal RA (2010) An overview of SMES applications in power and energy systems. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 1(1):38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Nasser AM (2010) Performance and economics of a solar thermal power generation plant in Jubail, Saudi Arabia: Parabolic Trough Collector. IEEE Int Energy Conf. https://doi.org/10.1109/ENERGYCON.2010.5771781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borhanazad H, Mekhilef S, Ganapathy VG (2014) Optimization of micro-grid system using MOPSO. Renew Energy 71:295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y et al (2012) An optimized EV charging model considering TOU price and SOC curve. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3(1):388–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YS, Lin SM, Hong BS (2013) Experimental study on a passive fuel cell/battery hybrid power system. Energies 6(12):6413–6422. https://doi.org/10.3390/en6126413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das DC, Roy AK, Sinha N (2012) GA based frequency controller for solar thermal–diesel wind hybrid energy generation/energy storage system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 43:262–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das DC, Roy AK, Sinha N (2014) Automatic generation control of an organic Rankine cycle solar thermal- wind-diesel hybrid energy system. Energy Technol (Wiley) 2(8):721–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daud A-K, Ismail MS (2012) Design of isolated hybrid systems minimizing costs and pollutant emissions. Renew Energy 44:215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanalakshmi R, Palaniswami S (2011) Load frequency control of wind diesel hydro hybrid power system using conventional PI controller. Eur J Sci Res 60(4):630–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley VE, Kolb GJ, Mahoney AR, Mancini TR, Matthews CW, Sloan MI, Kearney D (1994) Test results: SEGS LS-2 solar collector. Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States); 1994 Dec 1. https://doi.org/10.2172/70756

  • El-Fergany AA, El-Hameed MA (2017) Efficient frequency controllers for autonomous two-area hybrid microgrid system using social-spider optimizer. IET Gener Transm Distrib 11(3):637–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gheisarnejad M, Khooban HM (2018) Secondary load frequency control for multi-microgrids: HiL real-time simulation. Soft Comput: 1–14

  • Gopi P, Reddy PL (2013) A critical review on AGC strategies in interconnected power system. In: IET Chennai fourth international conference on sustainable energy and intelligent systems (SEISCON 2013), 2013, pp 85–92

  • Govardhan N, Santhi RV (2015) Design of fuzzy PI load frequency controller for hybrid wind diesel system with SMES unit. Int Res J Eng Technol 2(4):167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque A (2017) A fast and reliable perturb and observe maximum power point tracker for solar PV system. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8:773–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0523-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasanien HM (2014) A set-membership affine projection algorithm-based adaptive-controlled SMES units for wind farms output power smoothing. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 5(4):1226–1233. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2014.2340471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hêmin G, Hassan B (2014) A framework for economic load frequency control design using modified multi-objective genetic algorithm. Electric Power Compon Syst 42(8):788–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2014.893545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izadkhast S, Garcia-Gonzalez P, Frías P (2015) An aggregate model of plug-in electric vehicles for primary frequency control. IEEE Trans Power Syst 30(2):1475–1482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal DK, Barisal AK, Tripathy M (2018) Load frequency control of multi area interconnected microgrid power system using grasshopper optimization algorithm optimized fuzzy PID controller. Recent Adv Eng Technol Comput Sci (RAETCS): 1–6

  • Latif A, Pramanik A, Das DC (2018) Plug in hybrid vehicle-wind-diesel autonomous hybrid power system: frequency control using FA and CSA optimized controller. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 9:1147–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-018-0721-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Hu Z, Song Y, Wang J, Xie X (2015) Vehicle-to-grid control for supplementary frequency regulation considering charging demands. IEEE Trans Power Syst 30(6):3110–3119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masuta T, Yokoyama A (2012) Supplementary load frequency control by use of a number of both electric vehicles and heat pump water heaters. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3(3):1253–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed OH, Amirat Y, Benbouzid M, Elbast A (2014) Optimal design of a pv/fuel cell hybrid power system for the city of Brest in France. In: IEEE ICGE, pp 119–123

  • Montes MJ, Abanades A, Martinez-Val JM, Valdes M (2009) Solar multiple optimization for asolar-only thermal power plant, using oil as a heat transfer fluid in the parabolic trough collectors. Sol Energy 83(12):2165–2176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthu D, Venkatasubramanian C, Ramakrishnan K, Sasidhar J (2017) Production of biogas from wastes blended with cowdung for electricity generation—a case study. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 80(1):012055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandar CSA (2013) Robust PI control of smart controllable load frequency for frequency stabilization of microgrid power system. Renew Energy 56:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.10.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngamroo I (2009) Robust frequency control of wind–diesel hybrid power system using superconductivity magnetic energy storage. Int J Emerg Electr Power Syst 10(2):1553–1559. https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-779X.2156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey SK, Mohanty SR, Kishor N (2014) Frequency regulation in hybrid power systems using particle swarm optimization and linear matrix inequalities based robust controller design. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 63:887–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.06.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasul MG, Ault C, Sajjad M (2015) Bio-gas mixed fuel micro gas turbine cogeneration for meeting power demand in Australian remote areas’. Energy Proc 75:1065–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray PK, Mohanty SR, Kishor N (2010) Small–signal analysis of autonomous hybrid distributed generation systems in presence of ultra-capacitor and tie–line operation. J. Electr. Eng. 61(4):205–214. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10187-010-0029-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Cortes M, Gonzalez-Romera E, Lopes RA (2018) Optimal charge/discharge scheduling of batteries in microgrids of prosumers. IEEE Trans Energy Convers. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2018.2878351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadollah A et al (2012) Mine blast algorithm for optimization of truss structures with discrete variables. Comput Struct 102:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadollah A et al (2013) Mine blast algorithm: a new population based algorithm for solving constrained engineering optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput 5(13):2592–2612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian R, Alzola RP (2011) Simulation of an isolated wind diesel system with battery energy storage. Electr Power Syst Res 81(2):677–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2010.10.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senjyu T, Nakaji T, Uezato K, Funabashi T (2005) A Hybrid Power system using alternative energy facilities in isolated island. IEEE Trans Energy Conver 20(2):406–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar R, Chatterjee K, Bhushan R (2015) Impact of energy storage system on load frequency control for diverse sources of interconnected power system in deregulated power environment. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 79:11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.12.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim JW, Cho Y, Kim SJ, Min SW, Hur K (2013) Synergistic control of SMES and battery energy storage for enabling dispatchability of renewable energy sources. IEEE Trans Appl Superconduct 23(3):5701205–5701205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su W, Chow MY (2012) Performance evaluation of an EDA-based large scale plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging algorithm. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3(1):308–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tungadio DH, Bansal RC, Siti MW (2017) Optimal control of active power of two micro-grids interconnected with two AC tie-lines. Electric Power Compon Syst 45(19):2188–2199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vachirasricirikul S, Ngamroo I (2014) Robust LFC in a smart grid with wind power penetration by coordinated V2G control and frequency controller. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 5(1):371–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Lee DJ, Lee WJ (2008) Analysis of a novel autonomous marine hybrid power generation/energy storage system with a high-voltage direct current link. J Power Sources 185(2):1284–1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.08.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WINDPOWER (2016) http://www.thewindpower.net/turbine_en_42_gamesa_g52–850.php. Accessed 12 Mar 2016

  • Yang H, Chung CY, Zhao J (2013) Application of plug-in electric vehicles to frequency regulation based on distributed signal acquisition via limited communication. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(2):1017–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Zeng Z, Tang Y (2015) Load frequency control in isolated micro-grids with electrical vehicles based on multivariable generalized predictive theory. Energies 8(3):2145–2164. https://doi.org/10.3390/en803214.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo JH, Nguyen T-T, Kim H-M (2017) Multi-frequency control in a stand-alone multi microgrid system using a back-to-back converter. Energies 10(6):822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhaosheng LI (2016) The optimization design of PID controller parameters based on particle swarm optimization. In: Fifth international conference on advanced materials and computer science (ICAMCS 2016), Qingdao, China, p 460

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are extremely thankful to NIT Silchar which has supported all the way to execute this study.

Funding

There was no funding or grants received that assisted in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. C. Das.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Block name

Transfer function

Values of parameters

WTG

\(\frac{{{\text{K}}_{{{\text{WTG}}}} }}{{1 + {\text{ST}}_{{{\text{WTG}}}} }}\)

\({\text{K}}_{{{\text{WTG}}}} = 1,\)

\({\text{T}}_{{{\text{WTG}}}} = 1.5\)

PTC

\(\frac{{{\text{K}}_{{{\text{PTC}}}} }}{{1 + {\text{ST}}_{{{\text{PTC}}}} }}\)

\({\text{K}}_{{{\text{PTC}}}} = 1.8,\)

\({\text{T}}_{{{\text{PTC}}}} = 1.8\)

PV arrays

\(\frac{{{\text{K}}_{{{\text{PV}}}} }}{{1 + {\text{ST}}_{{{\text{PV}}}} }}\)

\({\text{K}}_{{{\text{PV}}}} = 1,\)

\({\text{T}}_{{{\text{PV}}}} = 0.03\)

PEVs

\(\frac{{{\text{K}}_{{{\text{PEV}}}} }}{{1 + {\text{ST}}_{{{\text{PEV}}}} }}\)

\({\text{K}}_{{{\text{PEV}}}} = 1\),

\({\text{T}}_{{{\text{PEV}}}} = 1\)

Valve actuator

\(\frac{1}{{1 + {\text{ST}}_{{\text{V}}} }}\)

\({\text{T}}_{{\text{V}}} = 0.05\)

Diesel engine

\(\frac{{{\text{K}}_{{\text{E}}} }}{{1 + {\text{ST}}_{{\text{E}}} }}\)

\({\text{K}}_{{\text{E}}} = 1,\)

\({\text{T}}_{{\text{E}}} = 0.5\)

Rotor swing

\(\frac{{{\text{K}}_{{\text{P}}} }}{{1 + {\text{ST}}_{{\text{P}}} }}\)

\({\text{K}}_{{\text{P}}} = 1\),

\({\text{T}}_{{\text{P}}} = 3\)

Synchronizing coefficients

\(\frac{{{\text{T}}_{{12}} }}{{\text{S}}},{\text{~}}\frac{{{\text{T}}_{{13}} }}{{\text{S}}},\frac{{{\text{T}}_{{23}} }}{{\text{S}}}\)

\({\text{T}}_{{12}} = {\text{T}}_{{23}} = {\text{T}}_{{13}} = 1.4\pi\)

Droops

\({\text{R}}_{1} ,{\text{R}}_{2}\)

\({\text{and~R}}_{3}\)

\({\text{R}}_{1} = {\text{R}}_{2} = {\text{R}}_{3} = 0.05\)

Bias

\({\text{B}}_{{1,}} {\text{B}}_{2} {\text{~and~B}}_{3}\)

\({\text{B}}_{1} = {\text{B}}_{2} = {\text{B}}_{3} = 21\)

 

\({\text{K}}_{{1,}} {\text{K}}_{2} {\text{~and~K}}_{3}\)

\({\text{K}}_{1} = - 0.72,\)

\({\text{K}}_{2} = - 0.33,\)

\({\text{K}}_{3} = - 0.24\)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ranjan, S., Das, D.C., Latif, A. et al. Electric vehicles to renewable-three unequal areas-hybrid microgrid to contain system frequency using mine blast algorithm based control strategy. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 12, 961–975 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01180-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01180-1

Keywords

Navigation