Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae FT858 is an industrial yeast strain with high fermentative efficiency, but marginally studied so far. The aim of this work was to evaluate the biotechnological potential of S. cerevisiae FT858 through kinetic growth parameters, and the influence of the concentration of the substrate on the synthesis of the invertase enzyme. Invertases have a high biotechnological potential and their production through yeast is strongly influenced by the sugars in the medium. S. cerevisiae FT858 has an excellent biotechnological potential compared to the industrial yeast reference S. cerevisiae CAT-1, as it presented a low glycerol yield on the substrate (YGLY/S) and a 10% increase in ethanol yield on sucrose in cultures with sucrose at 37 °C. The substrate concentration directly interfered in invertase production and the enzymatic expression underwent strong regulation through glucose concentration in the culture medium and S. cerevisiae CAT-1 presented constitutive behavior for the invertase enzyme.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alipourfard I, Datukishvili N, Bakhtiyari S, Haghani K, di Renzo L, de Miranda RC, Mikeladze D (2019) MIG1 glucose repression in metabolic processes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: genetics to metabolic engineering. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol 11:215–220
Barbosa PMG, Morais TP, Silva CAA, Santos FRS, Garcia NFL, Fonseca GG, Leite RSR, Paz MF (2018) Biochemical characterization and evaluation of invertases produced from Saccharomyces cerevisiae CAT-1 and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa for the production of fructooligosaccharides. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 48:506–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826068.2018.1466155
Basso LC, de Amorim HV, de Oliveira AJ, Lopes ML (2008) Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res 8:1155–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00428.x
Basso LC, Basso TO, Rocha SN (2011) Ethanol production in Brazil: the industrial process and its impact on yeast fermentation. In: Bernardes MAS (ed) Biofuel production—recent developments and prospects. Intech, Rijeka, pp 85–100
Batistote M, Cardoso CAL, Ramos DD, Ernandes JR (2010) Desempenho de leveduras obtidas em indústrias de Mato Grosso do Sul na produção de etanol em mosto a base de cana de açúcar. Ciên Nat 32:83–95
Bisson LF, Fan Q, Walker GA (2016) Sugar and glycerol transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv Exp Med Biol 892:125–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25304-6_6
Borges EP, Lopes ML, Bernardino C, Godoy A, Ré FE, Cherubin RA, Paulillo SCL, Amorim HV (2015) The benefits of applied research: 37 years of discoveries, adaptations and solutions. Sugar Ind 4:209–216
Bro C, Knudsen S, Regenberg B, Olsson L, Nielsen J (2005) Improvement of galactose uptake in saccharomyces cerevisiae through overexpression of phosphoglucomutase: example of transcript analysis as a tool in inverse metabolic engineering. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:6465–6472. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.11.6465-6472.2005
Camargo JZ, Nascimento VM, Stefanello I, Silva CAA, Gonçalves FA, Perdomo IC et al (2018) Biochemical evaluation, molecular characterization and identification of novel yeast strains isolated from Brazilian savannah fruits, chicken litter and a sugar and alcohol mill with biotechnological potential for biofuel and food industries. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 16:390–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.09.006
Della-Bianca BE, Gombert AK (2013) Stress tolerance and growth physiology of yeast strains from the Brazilian fuel ethanol industry. Anton Leeuw 104:1083–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-013-0030-2
Della-Bianca BE, Basso TO, Stambuk BU, Basso LC, Gombert AK (2013) What do we know about the yeast strains from the Brazilian fuel ethanol industry? App Microbiol Biotechnol 97:979–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4631-x
Fonseca GG, De Carvalho NMB, Gombert AK (2013) Growth of the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus CBS 6556 on different sugar combinations as sole carbon and energy source. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:5055–5067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4748-6
Gancedo JM, Flores C, Gancedo C (2015) The repressor Rgt1 and the cAMP-dependent protein kinases control the expression of the SUC2 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Acta—Gen Subj 1850:1362–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.03.006
Hong K, Vongsangnak W, Vemuri GN, Nielsen J (2011) Unravelling evolutionary strategies of yeast for improving galactose utilization through integrated systems level analysis. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 108:12179–12184. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103219108
Ideker T, Thorsson V, Ranish JA, Christmas R, Buhler J, Eng KJ, Bumgarner R, Goodlett DR, Aebersold R, Hood L (2001) Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 229:929–934. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.292.5518.929
Marques WL, Raghavendran V, Stambuk BU, Gombert AK (2016) Sucrose and Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a relationship most sweet. FEMS Yeast Res 16:fov107. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fov107
Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
Morales IV, Ojeda EE, Lugo SRE, Valencia RDE, Ortega GJ (2014) Evaluación de tres cepas de levadura comercial en la producción de etanol a partir de Melaza. Invurnus 9:31–36
Nascimento VM, Fonseca GG (2019) Effects of the carbon source and the interaction between carbon sources on the physiology of the industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae CAT-1. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826068.2019.1703192
Ostergaard S, Roca C, Rønnow B, Nielsen J, Olsson L (2000) Physiological studies in aerobic batch cultivations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains harboring the MEL1 gene. Biotechnol Bioeng 68:252–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(20000505)68:3<252::aid-bit3>3.0.co;2-k
Qureshi AS, Khushk I, Ali CH, Majeed H, Ahmad A (2017) Production of invertase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae Angel using date syrup as a cost effective carbon source. Afr J Biotechnol 16:777–781. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2015.15174
Santos EFS, Schautz LCA, Cardoso CAL, Ernandes JR, Batistote M (2013) O efeito da complexidade estrutural da fonte de carbono e nitrogênio no desempenho fermentativo de leveduras industriais. Ciênc. Nat. 2:009–014
Santos MSM, Cardoso CAL, Silva EM, Batistote M (2018) Potential of saccharine substrates for ethanol production. Orbital: Elect J Chem 10:1–8. https://doi.org/10.17807/orbital.v10i1.1013
Silva CAA, Oka ML, Fonseca GG (2019) Physiology of yeast strains isolated from Brazilian biomes in a minimal medium using fructose as the sole carbon source reveals potential biotechnological applications. Biotech 9:191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1721-9
Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP (1992) Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration an alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 8:501–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.320080703
Zaman S, Lippman SI, Zhao X, Broach JR (2008) How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients. Annu Rev Genet 42:27–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130206
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Pro-rectory of Research and Post-graduation of the Federal University of Grande Dourados and the Brazilian research funding agencies CAPES, CNPq and FUNDECT for their financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
VMN: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing—original draft. GTUA: investigation. RSRL: methodology, visualization, formal analysis. GGF: project administration, supervision, visualization, writing—original draft, review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nascimento, V.M., Antoniolli, G.T.U., Leite, R.S.R. et al. Effects of the carbon source on the physiology and invertase activity of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae FT858. 3 Biotech 10, 348 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02335-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02335-w