Abstract
Satellite- and reanalysis-based precipitation products are important data source for precipitation, particularly in areas with a sparse gauge network. Here, five open-access precipitation products, including the newly released China Meteorological Assimilation Driving Datasets for the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model (CMADS) reanalysis dataset and four widely used bias-adjusted satellite precipitation products [SPPs; i.e., Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis 3B42 Version 7 (TMPA 3B42V7), Climate Prediction Center (CPC) morphing technique satellite-gauge blended product (CMORPH-BLD), Climate Hazards Group Infrared Precipitation with Station Data (CHIRPS), and Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks-Climate Data Record (PERSIANN-CDR)], were assessed. These products were first compared with the gauge observed data collected for the upper Huaihe River basin, and then were used as forcing data for streamflow simulation by the Xin’anjiang (XAJ) hydrological model under two scenarios with different calibration procedures. The performance of CMADS precipitation product for the Chinese mainland was also assessed. The results show that: (1) for the statistical assessment, CMADS and CMORPH-BLD perform the best, followed by TMPA 3B42V7, CHIRPS, and PERSIANN-CDR, among which the correlation coefficient (CC) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) values of CMADS are optimal, although it exhibits certain significant negative relative bias (BIAS; −22.72%); (2) CMORPH-BLD performs the best in capturing and detecting rainfall events, while CMADS tends to underestimate heavy and torrential precipitation; (3) for streamflow simulation, the performance of using CMADS as input is very good, with the highest Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values (0.85 and 0.75 for calibration period and validation period, respectively); and (4) CMADS exhibits high accuracy in eastern China while with significant negative BIAS, and the performance declines from southeast to northwest. The statistical and hydrological evaluations show that CMADS and CMORPH-BLD have high potential for observing precipitation. As high negative BIAS values showed up in CMADS evaluation, further study on the error sources from original data and calibration algorithms is necessary. This study can serve as a reference for selecting precipitation products in data-scarce regions with similar climates and topography in the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) era.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartier, P. M., and C. P. Keller, 1996: Multivariate interpolation to incorporate thematic surface data using inverse distance weighting (IDW). Comput. Geosci., 22, 795–799, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(96)00021-0.
Beven, K., and J. Freer, 2001: Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. J. Hydrol., 249, 11–29, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8.
Bitew, M. M., and M. Gebremichael, 2011: Evaluation of satellite rainfall products through hydrologic simulation in a fully distributed hydrologic model. Water Resour. Res., 47, W06526, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009917.
Casse, C., M. Gosset, C. Peugeot, et al., 2015: Potential of satellite rainfall products to predict Niger River flood events in Niamey. Atmos. Res., 163, 162–176, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.01.010.
Chen, T., L. L. Ren, F. Yuan, et al., 2019: Merging ground and satellite-based precipitation data sets for improved hydrological simulations in the Xijiang River basin of China. Stock. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 33, 1893–1905, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01731-w.
Dee, D. P., S. M. Uppala, A. J. Simmons, et al., 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828.
Duan, Q. Y., S. Sorooshian, and V. K. Gupta, 1994: Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. J. Hydrol., 158, 265–284, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4.
Duan, Z., J. Z. Liu, Y. Tuo, et al., 2016: Evaluation of eight high spatial resolution gridded precipitation products in Adige Basin (Italy) at multiple temporal and spatial scales. Sci. Total Environ., 573, 1536–1553, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.213.
Duan, Z., Y. Tuo, J. Z. Liu, et al., 2019: Hydrological evaluation of open-access precipitation and air temperature datasets using SWAT in a poorly gauged basin in Ethiopia. J. Hydrol., 569, 612–626, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.026.
Friedl, M. A., D. K. McIver, J. C. F. Hodges, et al., 2002: Global land cover mapping from MODIS: Algorithms and early results. Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 287–302, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00078-0.
Funk, C., P. Peterson, M. Landsfeld, et al., 2015: The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—a new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Sci. Data, 2, 150066, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66.
Gao, X. C., Q. Zhu, Z. Y. Yang, et al., 2018: Evaluation and hydrological application of CMADS against TRMM 3B42V7, PERSIANN-CDR, NCEP-CFSR, and gauge-based datasets in Xiang River basin of China. Water, 10, 1225, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091225.
Gao, Z., D. Long, G. Q. Tang, et al., 2017: Assessing the potential of satellite-based precipitation estimates for flood frequency analysis in ungauged or poorly gauged tributaries of China’s Yangtze River basin. J. Hydrol., 550, 478–496, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.025.
Gebregiorgis, A. S., P.-E. Kirstetter, Y. E. Hong, et al., 2018: To what extent is the day 1 GPM IMERG satellite precipitation estimate improved as compared to TRMM TMPA-RT? J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 123, 1694–1707, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027606.
Gelaro, R., W. McCarty, M. J. Suárez, et al., 2017: The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1.
Golian, S., S. Moazami, P.-E. Kirstetter, et al., 2015: Evaluating the performance of merged multi-satellite precipitation products over a complex terrain. Water Resour. Manag., 29, 4885–4901, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1096-6.
Golian, S., M. Javadian, and A. Behrangi, 2019: On the use of satellite, gauge, and reanalysis precipitation products for drought studies. Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 075005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2203.
Guo, B. B., J. Zhang, T. B. Xu, et al., 2018: Applicability assessment and uncertainty analysis of multi-precipitation datasets for the simulation of hydrologic models. Water, 10, 1611, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111611.
Guo, H., A. M. Bao, T. Liu, et al., 2016: Evaluation of PER-SIANN-CDR for meteorological drought monitoring over China. Remote Sens., 8, 379, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8050379.
Hou, A. Y., R. K. Kakar, S. Neeck, et al., 2014: The Global Precipitation Measurement mission. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 701–722, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1.
Huffman, G. J., D. T. Bolvin, E. J. Nelkin, et al., 2007: The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasiglobal, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J. Hydrometeor., 8, 38–55, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM560.1.
Huffman, G. J., D. T. Bolvin, D. Braithwaite, et al., 2019: NASA Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Integrated Multi-SatellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG). Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) Version 06, NASA, Washington, 34 pp.
Jiang, S. H., L. L. Ren, Y. Hong, et al., 2012: Comprehensive evaluation of multi-satellite precipitation products with a dense rain gauge network and optimally merging their simulated hydrological flows using the Bayesian model averaging method. J. Hydrol., 452–453, 213–225, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.055.
Jiang, S. H., L. L. Ren, Y. Hong, et al., 2014: Improvement of multi-satellite real-time precipitation products for ensemble streamflow simulation in a middle latitude basin in South China. Water Resour. Manag., 28, 2259–2278, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0612-4.
Jiang, S. H., L. L. Ren, C.-Y. Xu, et al., 2018a: Quantifying multisource uncertainties in multi-model predictions using the Bayesian model averaging scheme. Hydrol. Res., 49, 954–970, doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2017.272.
Jiang, S. H., S. Y. Liu, L. L. Ren, et al., 2018b: Hydrologic evaluation of six high resolution satellite precipitation products in capturing extreme precipitation and streamflow over a medium-sized basin in China. Water, 10, 25, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010025.
Jiang, S. H., L. L. Ren, C.-Y. Xu, et al., 2018c: Statistical and hydrological evaluation of the latest Integrated Multi-SatellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) over a midlatitude humid basin in South China. Atmos. Res., 214, 418–429, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.08.021.
Jiang, S. H., M. H. Wang, L. L. Ren, et al., 2019: A framework for quantifying the impacts of climate change and human activities on hydrological drought in a semiarid basin of northern China. Hydrol. Process., 33, 1075–1088, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13386.
Joyce, R. J., J. E. Janowiak, P. A. Arkin, et al., 2004: CMORPH: A method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution. J. Hydrometeor., 5, 487–503, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0487:CAMTPG>2.0.CO;2.
Lai, C. G., R. D. Zhong, Z. L. Wang, et al., 2019: Monitoring hydrological drought using long-term satellite-based precipitation data. Sci. Total Environ., 649, 1198–1208, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.245.
Li, Y., Y. J. Wang, J. H. Zheng, et al., 2019: Investigating spatial and temporal variation of hydrological processes in western China driven by CMADS. Water, 11, 435, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030435.
Li, Z., D. W. Yang, and Y. Hong, 2013: Multi-scale evaluation of high-resolution multi-sensor blended global precipitation products over the Yangtze River. J. Hydrol., 500, 157–169, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.07.023.
Liu, J., D. H. Shanguan, S. Y. Liu, et al., 2018: Evaluation and hydrological simulation of CMADS and CFSR reanalysis datasets in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Water, 10, 513, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040513.
Maggioni, V., and C. Massari, 2018: On the performance of satellite precipitation products in riverine flood modeling: A review. J. Hydrol., 558, 214–224, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.039.
Maggioni, V., P. C. Meyers, and M. D. Robinson, 2016: A review of merged high-resolution satellite precipitation product accuracy during the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) era. J. Hydrometeor., 17, 1101–1117, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0190.1.
Mei, Y. W., E. I. Nikolopoulos, E. N. Anagnostou, et al., 2016: Evaluating satellite precipitation error propagation in runoff simulations of mountainous basins. J. Hydrometeor., 17, 1407–1423, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0081.1.
Meng, X. Y., and H. Wang, 2017: Significance of the China Meteorological Assimilation Driving Datasets for the SWAT model (CMADS) of East Asia. Water, 9, 765, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100765.
Meng, X. Y., H. Wang, C. X. Shi, et al., 2018: Establishment and evaluation of the China Meteorological Assimilation Driving Datasets for the SWAT model (CMADS). Water, 10, 1555, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111555.
Saha, S., S. Moorthi, H.-L. Pan, et al., 2010: The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 1015–1058, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1.
Sahoo, A. K., J. Sheffield, M. Pan, et al., 2015: Evaluation of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Multi-Satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) for assessment of large-scale meteorological drought. Remote Sens. Environ., 159, 181–193, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.11.032.
Seyyedi, H., E. N. Anagnostou, E. Beighley, et al., 2015: Hydrologic evaluation of satellite and reanalysis precipitation datasets over a mid-latitude basin. Atmos. Res., 164–165, 37–48, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.03.019.
Shi, P., C. Chen, R. Srinivasan, et al., 2011: Evaluating the SWAT model for hydrological modeling in the Xixian Watershed and a comparison with the XAJ model. Water Resour. Manag., 25, 2595–2612, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9828-8.
Skofronick-Jackson, G., W. A. Petersen, W. Berg, et al., 2017: The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission for science and society. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 98, 1679–1695, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00306.1.
Sorooshian, S., K.-L. Hsu, X. G. Gao, et al., 2000: Evaluation of PERSIANN system satellite-based estimates of tropical rainfall. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, 2035–2046, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081<2035:EOPSSE>2.3.CO;2.
Su, J. B., H. S. Lü, J. Q. Wang, et al., 2017: Evaluating the applicability of four latest satellite-gauge combined precipitation estimates for extreme precipitation and streamflow predictions over the upper Yellow River basins in China. Remote Sens., 9, 1176, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9111176.
Sulugodu, B., and P. C. Deka, 2019: Evaluating the performance of CHIRPS satellite rainfall data for streamflow forecasting. Water Resour. Manag., 33, 3913–3927, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02340-6.
Sun, Q. H., C. Y. Miao, Q. Y. Duan, et al., 2018: A review of global precipitation data sets: Data sources, estimation, and intercomparisons. Rev. Geophys., 56, 79–107, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000574.
Sun, R. C., H. L. Yuan, X. L. Liu, et al., 2016: Evaluation of the latest satellite-gauge precipitation products and their hydrologic applications over the Huaihe River basin. J. Hydrol., 536, 302–319, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.054.
Tan, M. L., A. L. Ibrahim, Z. Duan, et al., 2015: Evaluation of six high-resolution satellite and ground-based precipitation products over Malaysia. Remote Sens., 7, 1504–1528, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70201504.
Tian, Y. D., C. D. Peters-Lidard, and J. B. Eylander, 2010: Realtime bias reduction for satellite-based precipitation estimates. J. Hydrometeor., 11, 1275–1285, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JHM1246.1.
Vu, T. T., L. Li, and K. S. Jun, 2018: Evaluation of multi-satellite precipitation products for streamflow simulations: A case study for the Han River basin in the Korean Peninsula, East Asia. Water, 10, 642, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050642.
Wang, N., W. B. Liu, F. B. Sun, et al., 2020: Evaluating satellite-based and reanalysis precipitation datasets with gauge-observed data and hydrological modeling in the Xihe River Basin, China. Atmos. Res., 234, 104746, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104746.
Wang, Z. L., R. D. Zhong, C. G. Lai, et al., 2017: Evaluation of the GPM IMERG satellite-based precipitation products and the hydrological utility. Atmos. Res., 196, 151–163, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.020.
Wu, H., R. F. Adler, Y. D. Tian, et al., 2014: Real-time global flood estimation using satellite-based precipitation and a coupled land surface and routing model. Water Resour. Res., 50, 2693–2717, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014710.
Wu, Z. Y., Z. G. Xu, F. Wang, et al., 2018: Hydrologic evaluation of multi-source satellite precipitation products for the upper Huaihe River basin, China. Remote Sens., 10, 840, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060840.
Xu, H. L., C.-Y. Xu, S. D. Chen, et al., 2016: Similarity and difference of global reanalysis datasets (WFD and APHRODITE) in driving lumped and distributed hydrological models in a humid region of China. J. Hydrol., 542, 343–356, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.011.
Xue, X. W., Y. Hong, A. S. Limaye, et al., 2013: Statistical and hydrological evaluation of TRMM-based Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis over the Wangchu Basin of Bhutan: Are the latest satellite precipitation products 3B42V7 ready for use in ungauged basins? J. Hydrol., 499, 91–99, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.042.
Yong, B., L.-L. Ren, Y. Hong, et al., 2010: Hydrologic evaluation of Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis standard precipitation products in basins beyond its inclined latitude band: A case study in Laohahe basin, China. Water Resour. Res., 46, W07542, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008965.
Yong, B., B. Chen, Y. D. Tian, et al., 2016: Error-component analysis of TRMM-based multi-satellite precipitation estimates over mainland China. Remote Sens., 8, 440, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8050440.
Yuan, F., L. M. Zhang, K. W. W. Win, et al., 2017: Assessment of GPM and TRMM multi-satellite precipitation products in streamflow simulations in a data-sparse mountainous watershed in Myanmar. Remote Sens., 9, 302, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9030302.
Yuan, F., L. M. Zhang, K. M. W. Soe, et al., 2019: Applications of TRMM- and GPM-era multiple-satellite precipitation products for flood simulations at sub-daily scales in a sparsely gauged watershed in Myanmar. Remote Sens., 11, 140, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11020140.
Zhang, S. J., D. H. Wang, Z. K. Qin, et al., 2018: Assessment of the GPM and TRMM precipitation products using the rain gauge network over the Tibetan Plateau. J. Meteor. Res., 32, 324–336, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-018-7067-0.
Zhang, Z. X., J. X. Tian, Y. H. Huang, et al., 2019: Hydrologic evaluation of TRMM and GPM IMERG satellite-based precipitation in a humid basin of China. Remote Sens., 11, 431, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11040431.
Zhao, F. B., Y. P. Wu, L. J. Qiu, et al., 2018: Parameter uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model in a mountain-loess transitional watershed on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Water, 10, 690, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060690.
Zhao, R.-J., 1992: The Xinanjiang model applied in China. J. Hydrol., 135, 371–381, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(92)90096-E.
Zhong, R. D., X. H. Chen, C. G. Lai, et al., 2019: Drought monitoring utility of satellite-based precipitation products across mainland China. J. Hydrol., 568, 343–359, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.072.
Zhou, Z. H., X. C. Gao, Z. Y. Yang, et al., 2019: Evaluation of hydrological application of CMADS in Jinhua River basin, China. Water, 11, 138, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010138.
Zhu, Q., X. C. Gao, Y.-P. Xu, et al., 2019: Merging multi-source precipitation products or merging their simulated hydrological flows to improve streamflow simulation. Hydrol. Sci. J., 64, 910–920, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1612522.
Acknowledgments
The CMADS, TMPA 3B42V7, CMORPH-BLD, CHIRPS, and PERSIANN-CDR were freely obtained from their corresponding data centers. The authors are grateful to the Editor and two anonymous reviewers for providing insightful comments that have significantly improved the quality of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0601504), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51979069), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (B200204029), and Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities by the Ministry of Education and State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs, China (B08048).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, S., Liu, R., Ren, L. et al. Evaluation and Hydrological Application of CMADS Reanalysis Precipitation Data against Four Satellite Precipitation Products in the Upper Huaihe River Basin, China. J Meteorol Res 34, 1096–1113 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-0026-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-020-0026-6