Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Making sense of fraction division: domain and representation knowledge of preservice elementary teachers on a fraction division task

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mathematical domain of fraction division continues to be an area of great difficulty for many teachers and preservice teachers (Lo and Luo, Journal for Mathematics Teacher Education 15:481–500, 2012; Newton, American Educational Research Journal 45:1080–1110, 2008; Rizvi and Lawson, International Education Journal 8(2):377–392, 2007; Young and Zientek, Investigations in Mathematics Learning 4(1):1-23, 2011). In this study, preservice teachers were given a fraction division task that sought to investigate their own personal approaches to solving a fraction division problem. Their results were contrasted with their ability to interpret student work on the same task. The purpose was to uncover information and gain greater insight into conceptualizations of fraction division they used and links or connections they made among verbal, diagrammatic, and algebraic representations as they solved the task themselves and then analyzed sample student solutions to the same task. Our findings have implications for future research and instruction on fraction division.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2017). Standards for preparing teachers of mathematics. http://amte.net/standards. Accessed 21 Dec 2018.

  • Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Bossé, M. (2014). Processes and reasoning in representations of linear functions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 167–192.

  • Adu-Gyamfi, K., Bossé, M. J., & Chandler, K. (2017). Student connections between algebraic and graphical polynomial representations in the context of a polynomial relation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 915–938.

  • Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematics understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr, M., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1992). Rational number, ratio, and proportion. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 296–333). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J. L., & Newton, K. J. (2012). Fractions: could they really be the gatekeeper’s doorman? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgar, S. (2009). A longitudinal study of students’ representations for division of fractions. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 6(1), 165–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charalambous, C. Y., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2007). Drawing on a theoretical model to study students’ understandings of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 293–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K., & Wyberg, T. (2009). Efficacy of different concrete models for teaching the part-whole construct for fractions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(4), 226–257.

  • Dienes, Z. P. (1960). Building up mathematics. London: Hutchinson Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. K., Andreasen, J. B., Avila, C. L., Bawatney, Z., Deichert, D. L., Howse, T. D., & Turner, M. S. (2014). Redefining the whole: common errors in elementary preservice teachers’ self-authored word problems for fraction subtraction. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empson, S. (1995). Using sharing situations to help children learn fractions. Teaching Children Mathematics, 2, 110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empson, S. B., & Levi, L. (2011). Extending children’s mathematics: fractions and decimals, innovations in cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, A. (2002). Profound understanding of fraction division. In B. Litwiller (Ed.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions, 2002 yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 237–246). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G. A. (1998). Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 137–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G., & Hall, R. P. (1997). Practicing representation: learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, J., & Gregg, D. U. (2007). Measurement and fair-sharing models for dividing fractions. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School., 12(9), 490–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackenberg, A. J., & Lee, M. Y. (2016). Students’ distributive reasoning with fractions and unknowns. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(2), 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J. (1988). A theory of developing competence with written mathematical symbols. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19, 333–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, A., & Hohensee, C. (2016). Examining and elaborating upon the nature of elementary prospective teachers’ conceptions of partitive division with fractions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(6), 503–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. J. (1987). Toward a theory of symbol use in mathematics. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in mathematics learning and problem solving (pp. 159–195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieren, T. E. (1980). The rational number constructs—its elements and mechanisms. In T. E. Kieren (Ed.), Recent research in number learning (pp. 125–150). Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieren, T. E. (1992). Rational and fractional numbers as mathematical and personal knowledge: implications for curriculum and instruction. In G. Leinhardt, R. Putnam, & R. A. Hattrup (Eds.), Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching (pp. 323–370). Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamon, S. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: towards a theoretical framework for research. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629–666). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. S., & Sztajn, P. (2008). Focusing on units to support prospective elementary teachers’ understanding of division in fractional contexts. School Science and Mathematics, 108, 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Kulm, G. (2008). Knowledge and confidence of prospective mathematics teachers: The case of fraction division. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 833–843.

  • Li, Y., Chen, X., & Kulm, G. (2009). Mathematics teachers’ practices and thinking in lesson plan development: a case of teaching fraction division. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 717–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C., Becker, J., Byun, M., Yang, D., & Huang, T. (2013). Preservice teachers’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of fraction operations: a comparative study of the United States and Taiwan. School Science and Mathematics, 113(1), 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, J., & Luo, F. (2012). Prospective elementary teachers’ knowledge of fraction division. Journal for Mathematics Teacher Education, 15, 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9221-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. N. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

  • Newton, K. J. (2008). An extensive analysis of preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge of fractions. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1080–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, A., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2012). The splitting group. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(5), 557–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olanoff, D., Lo, J., & Tobias, J. (2014). Mathematical content knowledge for teaching elementary mathematics: a focus on fractions. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(2), 267–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, J. M., Snook, D. L., & Gibson, D. L. (1991). Understanding partitive division of fractions. Arithmetic Teacher, 39(2), 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, T. R., Harel, G., Behr, M., & Lesh, R. (1991). Intermediate teachers’ knowledge of rational number concepts. In E. Fennema, T. Carpenter, & S. Lamon (Eds.), Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 177-198). Albany, NY: State University of NY Press.

  • Rizvi, N. F., & Lawson, M. J. (2007). Prospective teachers’ knowledge: concept of division. International Education Journal, 8(2), 377–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, A., & Clarke, D. M. (2013). Primary teachers’ representations of division: assessing mathematical knowledge that has pedagogical potential. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(2), 257–278.

  • Shin, L., & Lee, S. J. (2018). The alignment of student fraction learning with textbooks in Korea and United States. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, 129–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinicrope, R., Mick, H. W., & Kolb, J. R. (2002). Interpretations of fraction division. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions (pp. 153–161). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Son, J.-W., & Senk, S. L. (2010). How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74, 117–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s conceptions: the case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzur, R. (2000). An integrated research on children’s construction of meaningful, symbolic, partitioning-related conceptions, and the teacher’s role in fostering that learning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(2), 123–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzur, R., & Hunt, J. H. (2015). Iteration: Unit fraction knowledge and the French fry tasks. Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(3), 149-157.

  • Van Steenbrugge, H., Lesage, E., Valcke, M., & Desoete, A. (2014). Preservice elementary school teachers’ knowledge of fractions: a mirror of students’ knowledge? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 138–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, M. A. (1997). How children think about division of fractions. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 2, 391–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. H., Mojica, G. F., & Confrey, J. (2013). Learning trajectories in teacher education: supporting teachers’ understandings of students’ mathematical thinking. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32, 103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, E., & Zientek, L. R. (2011). Fraction operations: an examination of prospective teachers’ errors, confidence, and bias. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 4(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambat, I. O. (2015). An alternative route to teaching fraction division: abstraction of common denominator algorithm. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(3), 399–422.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Science, and Instructional Technology Education, College of Education, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA

    Kwaku Adu-Gyamfi, Catherine Stein Schwartz & Rose Sinicrope

  2. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, 28608, USA

    Michael J. Bossé

Authors
  1. Kwaku Adu-Gyamfi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catherine Stein Schwartz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rose Sinicrope
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael J. Bossé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwaku Adu-Gyamfi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adu-Gyamfi, K., Schwartz, C.S., Sinicrope, R. et al. Making sense of fraction division: domain and representation knowledge of preservice elementary teachers on a fraction division task. Math Ed Res J 31, 507–528 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00265-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00265-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation