Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigation of effectiveness of pine cone biochar activated with KOH for methyl orange adsorption and CO2 capture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, pyrolysis of pine cone, a lignocellulosic biomass, was carried out in a fixed bed reactor. The biochar product obtained was activated by using chemical activation method. KOH was used as the activating agent with the impregnation ratio was ¼. Activated pine cone biochars were characterized by using analysis techniques such as SEM, BET, and FT-IR. The usage potential of the activated biochar product with a surface area of 1714.5 m2/g has been investigated in two different application areas. As the first application area, the CO2 holding capacity of activated biochar was measured by using the thermogravimetric analysis method. The CO2 adsorption capacity of the activated biochar was determined as 160 mg/g (3.64 mmol/g) at 25 °C. As a second application area, the effectiveness of activated biochar product in the removal of dyestuff (methyl orange) from aqueous solutions was investigated. The methyl orange adsorption capacity of the activated biochar in optimum conditions (pH 2, temperature of 25 °C, initial concentration of 100 mg/L, adsorbent amount 0.8 g/L) was calculated as 109.5 mg/g. Isotherm modeling and kinetic investigations showed that Freundlich and pseudo-second-order models describe the adsorption equilibrium and kinetic behavior well. As a result, this type of biomass could be successfully evaluated in removing both methyl orange dye, which is a potential pollution risk for aquatic environment, and CO2 that is responsible for climate change and greenhouse effect in the atmosphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kambo HS, Dutta A (2015) A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 45:359–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang Z, Zhu Z, Shen B, Liu L (2019) Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: a review. Energy 171:581–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang J, Wang S (2019) Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: a review. J Clean Prod 227:1002–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cha JS, Park SH, Jung SC, Ryu C, Jeon JK, Shin MC, Park YK (2016) Production and utilization of biochar: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 40:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun Y, Zhang Z, Sun Y, et al (2020) One-pot pyrolysis route to Fe-N-Doped carbon nanosheets with outstanding electrochemical performance as cathode materials for microbial fuel cell. Int J Agric & Biol Eng doi: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20201306.5765

  6. Sasi Kumar N, Grekov D, Pre P, Alappat BJ (2020) Microwave mode of heating in the preparation of porous carbon materials for adsorption and energy storage applications- an overview. Renew Sust Energ Rev 124:109743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Creamer AE, Gao B, Zhang M (2014) Carbon dioxide capture using biochar produced from sugarcane bagasse and hickory wood. Chem Eng J 249:174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ojo T, Ojedokun A, Bello O (2019) Functionalization of powdered walnut shell with orthophosphoric acid for congo red dye removal. Part Sci Technol 37(1):74–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2017.1340914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aygün A, Yenisoy-Karakaş S, Duman I (2003) Production of granular activated carbon from fruit stones and nutshells and evaluation of their physical, chemical and adsorption properties. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 66:189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2003.08.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alade AO, Amuda OS, Afolabi AO, Adelowo FE (2012) Adsorption of acenaphthene unto activated carbon produced from agricultural wastes. J Environ Sci Technol 5:192–202. https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2012.192.209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Savova D, Apak E, Ekinci E et al (2001) Biomass conversion to carbon adsorbents and gas. Biomass Bioenergy 21:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00027-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rafatullah M, Sulaiman O, Hashim R, Ahmad A (2010) Adsorption of methylene blue on low-cost adsorbents: a review. J Hazard Mater 177:70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin H, Capareda S, Chang Z et al (2014) Biochar pyrolytically produced from municipal solid wastes for aqueous As(V) removal: adsorption property and its improvement with KOH activation. Bioresour Technol 169C:622–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng P, Lang Y-H, Wang X-M (2016) Adsorption behavior and mechanism of pentachlorophenol on reed biochars: pH effect, pyrolysis temperature, hydrochloric acid treatment and isotherms. Ecol Eng 90:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reza MS, Yun CS, Afroze S, Radenahmad N, Abu Bakar MS, Saidur R, Taweekun J, Azad AK (2020) Preparation of activated carbon from biomass and it's applications in water and gas purification, a review. Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 27(1):208–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Z, Sun Y, Xu X, Meng X, Qu J, Wang Z, Liu C, Qu B (2020) Preparation, characterization and application of activated carbon from corn cob by KOH activation for removal of Hg(II) from aqueous solution. Bioresour Technol 306:123154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wong S, Ngadi N, Inuwa IM, Hassan O (2018) Recent advances in applications of activated carbon from biowaste for wastewater treatment: a short review. J Clean Prod 175:361–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang H, Xie R, Zhang J, Zhao J (2018) Preparation and characterization of distillers’ grain based activated carbon as low cost methylene blue adsorbent: mass transfer and equilibrium modeling. Adv Powder Technol 29(1):27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmed MJ (2016) Preparation of activated carbons from date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) palm stones and application for wastewater treatments: review. Process Saf Environ Prot 102:168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Anastopoulos I, Kyzas GZ (2014) Agricultural peels for dye adsorption: a review of recent literature. J Mol Liq 200:381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gonzalez-Garcıa P (2018) Activated carbon from lignocellulosics precursors: a review of the synthesis methods, characterization techniques and applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:1393–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeguirim M, Belhachemi M, Limousy L, Bennici S (2018) Adsorption/reduction of nitrogen dioxide on activated carbons: textural properties versus surface chemistry– a review. Chem Eng J Biochem Eng J 347:493–504

    Google Scholar 

  23. Green FJ (1990) The Sigma Aldrich Handbook of Stains, Dyes and Indicators. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc., pp 461

  24. Boutaieb M, Guiza M, Román Suero S et al (2020) Pine cone pyrolysis: optimization of temperature for energy recovery. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 39:e13272. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaya N, Uzun Z (2020) Investigation of effectiveness of pyrolysis products on removal of alizarin yellow GG from aqueous solution: a comparative study with commercial activated carbon. Water Sci Technol 81(6):1191–1208. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Creamer AE, Gao B, Wang S (2016) Carbon dioxide capture using various metal oxyhydroxide–biochar composites. Chem Eng J 283:826–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Saha P, Chowdhury S, Gupta S, Kumar I (2010) Insight into adsorption equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics of Malachite Green onto clayey soil of Indian origin. Chem Eng J 165:874–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.10.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Martín-Lara MA, Blázquez G, Ronda A, Calero M (2016) Kinetic study of the pyrolysis of pine cone shell through non-isothermal thermogravimetry: effect of heavy metals incorporated by biosorption. Renew Energy 96:613–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cha JS, Park SH, Jung S-C et al (2016) Production and utilization of biochar: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 40:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Uzun BB, Yaman E (2017) Pyrolysis kinetics of walnut shell and waste polyolefins using thermogravimetric analysis. J Energy Inst 90:825–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu Z, Singer S, Tong Y et al (2018) Characteristics and applications of biochars derived from wastewater solids. Renew Sust Energ Rev 90:650–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tan X, Liu S, Liu Y et al (2017) Biochar as potential sustainable precursors for activated carbon production: multiple applications in environmental protection and energy storage. Bioresour Technol 227:359–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li S, Chen X, Liu A et al (2015) Co-pyrolysis characteristic of biomass and bituminous coal. Bioresour Technol 179:414–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Biswas S, Siddiqi H, Sen T et al (2020) Preparation and characterization of raw and inorganic acid-activated pine cone biochar and its application in the removal of aqueous-phase Pb2+ metal ions by adsorption. Water, Air, Soil Pollut Focus 231:3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4375-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018) Special Report of Global Warming of 1.5 oC

  36. Kohlz AL, Nielsen RB (1997) Preface. In: Kohl AL, Nielsen RB (eds) Gas Purification, Fifth Edition. Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston, pp vii–viii

  37. Anwar MN, Fayyaz A, Sohail NF et al (2018) CO2 capture and storage: a way forward for sustainable environment. J Environ Manag 226:131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Koytsoumpa EI, Bergins C, Kakaras E (2018) The CO2 economy: review of CO2 capture and reuse technologies. J Supercrit Fluids 132:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.07.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Staciwa P, Narkiewicz U, Sibera D et al (2019) Carbon spheres as CO2 sorbents. Appl Sci 9:3349. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Garg S, Das P (2019) Microporous carbon from cashew nutshell pyrolytic biochar and its potential application as CO2 adsorbent. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00506-1

  41. Zhang X, Zhang S, Yang H et al (2015) Effects of hydrofluoric acid pre-deashing of rice husk on physicochemical properties and CO2 adsorption performance of nitrogen-enriched biochar. Energy 91:903–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.08.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Manyà JJ, González B, Azuara M, Arner G (2018) Ultra-microporous adsorbents prepared from vine shoots-derived biochar with high CO2 uptake and CO2/N2 selectivity. Chem Eng J 345:631–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Matabosch Coromina H, Walsh D, Mokaya R (2016) Biomass-derived activated carbon with simultaneously enhanced CO2 uptake for both pre and post combustion capture applications. J Mater Chem A 4:280–289. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA09202G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Li D, Ma T, Zhang R et al (2015) Preparation of porous carbons with high low-pressure CO2 uptake by KOH activation of rice husk char. Fuel 139:68–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.08.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vargas DP, Giraldo L, Silvestre-Albero J, Moreno-Piraján JC (2011) CO2 adsorption on binderless activated carbon monoliths. Adsorption 17:497–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-010-9309-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Serafin J, Narkiewicz U, Morawski AW, et al (2017) Highly microporous activated carbons from biomass for CO2 capture and effective micropores at different conditions. J CO2 Util 18:73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.01.006

  47. Deng S, Wei H, Chen T et al (2014) Superior CO2 adsorption on pine nut shell-derived activated carbons and the effective micropores at different temperatures. Chem Eng J 253:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.04.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ghasemian Lemraski E, Sharafinia S (2016) Kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics studies of Pb2+ adsorption onto new activated carbon prepared from Persian mesquite grain. J Mol Liq 219:482–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.03.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Atas MS, Dursun S, Akyildiz H et al (2017) Selective removal of cationic micro-pollutants using disulfide-linked network structures. RSC Adv 7:25969–25977. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA04775D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Al-Rubayee WT, Abdul-Rasheed OF, Ali NM (2016) Preparation of a modified nanoalumina sorbent for the removal of alizarin yellow R and methylene blue dyes from aqueous solutions. J Chem 2016:4683859. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4683859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rattanapan S, Srikram J, Kongsune P (2017) Adsorption of methyl orange on coffee grounds activated carbon. Energy Procedia 138:949–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yakout S, Hassan M, El-Zaidy M et al (2020) Kinetic study of methyl orange adsorption on activated carbon derived from pine (pinus strobus) sawdust. Bioresources 14:4560–4574

    Google Scholar 

  53. Moreno-Castilla C (2004) Adsorption of organic molecules from aqueous solutions on carbon materials. Carbon N Y 42:83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2003.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Chowdhury S, Chakraborty S, Saha P (2011) Biosorption of Basic Green 4 from aqueous solution by Ananas comosus (pineapple) leaf powder. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 84:520–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Changmai M, Banerjee P, Nahar K, Purkait MK (2018) A novel adsorbent from carrot, tomato and polyethylene terephthalate waste as a potential adsorbent for Co (II) from aqueous solution: kinetic and equilibrium studies. J Environ Chem Eng 6:246–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen J, Shi X, Zhan Y et al (2017) Construction of horizontal stratum landform-like composite foams and their methyl orange adsorption capacity. Appl Surf Sci 397:133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Gao M, Ma Q, Lin Q et al (2015) Combined modification of fly ash with Ca(OH)2/Na2FeO4 and its adsorption of methyl orange. Appl Surf Sci 359:323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Martini BK, Daniel TG, Corazza MZ, de Carvalho AE (2018) Methyl orange and tartrazine yellow adsorption on activated carbon prepared from boiler residue: kinetics, isotherms, thermodynamics studies and material characterization. J Environ Chem Eng 6:6669–6679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. León G, García F, Miguel B, Bayo J (2016) Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies of methyl orange removal by adsorption onto granular activated carbon. Desalin Water Treat 57(36):17104–17117. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1072063

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kumar V, Srinivas G, Wood B et al (2019) Characterization of adsorption site energies and heterogeneous surfaces of porous materials. J Mater Chem A 7:10104–10137. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA00287A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Doğan M, Abak H, Alkan M (2009) Adsorption of methylene blue onto hazelnut shell: kinetics, mechanism and activation parameters. J Hazard Mater 164:172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Mahmoudi K, Hamdi N, Kriaa A, Srasra E (2012) Adsorption of methyl orange using activated carbon prepared from lignin by ZnCl2 treatment. Russ J Phys Chem A 86:1294–1300. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024412060180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Yönten V, Sanyürek NK, Kivanç MR (2020) A thermodynamic and kinetic approach to adsorption of methyl orange from aqueous solution using a low cost activated carbon prepared from Vitis vinifera L. Surfaces and Interfaces 20:100529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Subbaiah MV, Kim D-S (2016) Adsorption of methyl orange from aqueous solution by aminated pumpkin seed powder: kinetics, isotherms, and thermodynamic studies. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 128:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Goldfarb JL, Ceylan S (2015) Second-generation sustainability: application of the distributed activation energy model to the pyrolysis of locally sourced biomass–coal blends for use in co-firing scenarios. Fuel 160:297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.07.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Liu G, Song H, Wu J (2015) Thermogravimetric study and kinetic analysis of dried industrial sludge pyrolysis. Waste Manag 41:128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Odeh AO (2015) Oualitative and quantitative ATR-FTIR analysis and its application to coal char of different ranks. J Fuel Chem Technol 43:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5813(15)30001-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Plis A, Lasek J, Skawińska A, Zuwała J (2015) Thermochemical and kinetic analysis of the pyrolysis process in Cladophora glomerata algae. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 115:166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Yorgun S, Yıldız D (2015) Preparation and characterization of activated carbons from Paulownia wood by chemical activation with H3PO4. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 53:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.02.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Hitit University and Ondokuz Mayıs University for their support and also would like to thank Assoc. Prof. Dr. Yunus Onal for his support in the preparation of activated biochar product.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nihan Kaya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaya, N., Uzun, Z.Y. Investigation of effectiveness of pine cone biochar activated with KOH for methyl orange adsorption and CO2 capture. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 11, 1067–1083 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01063-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01063-8

Keywords

Navigation