Skip to main content
Log in

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Corner A, Whitmarsh L, Xenias D (2011) Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate change: biased assimilation and attitude polarisation. Clim Chang 114(3–4):463–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton LC (2008) Who cares about polar regions? Results from a survey of U.S. Public opinion. Arct Antarct Alp Res 40(4):671–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton LC (2011) Education, politics and opinions about climate change: Evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change 104:231–242. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8

  • Hamilton LC (2012) Did the Arctic ice recover? Demographics of true and false climate facts. Weather, Clim, Soc 4(4):236–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton LC, Saito K (2015) A four-party view of U.S. environmental concern. Environmental Politics doi:10.1080/09644016.2014.976485

  • Hamilton LC, Cutler MJ, Schaefer A (2012) Public knowledge and concern about polar-region warming. Polar Geogr 35(2):155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan DM (2013) Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment Decis Making 8(4):407–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, DM (forthcoming) Climate science communication and the measurement problem. Advances in Political Psychology.

  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Hmielowski JD (2011) Politics & global warming: democrats, republicans, independents, and the Tea party. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change: Political polarization in the American public’s views of global warming. Sociol Q 52:155–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro GD, Ditto PH (1997) Biased assimilation, attitude polarization, and affect in reactions to stereotype-relevant scientific information. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 23(6):636–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber CS, Lodge M (2006) Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am J Polit Sci 50(3):755–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linden SL, Leiserowitz AA, Feinberg GS, Maibach EW (2014) How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: Plain facts, pie charts or metaphors? Clim Chang 126(1–2):255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Arctic and Antarctic science questions on the Granite State Poll have been supported by grants from the National Science Foundation for the PoLAR Climate Change Education Partnership (DUE-1239783), and Sea Ice Prediction Network (PLR-1303938). Surveys were conducted by the University of New Hampshire Survey Center, with assistance from the Carsey School of Public Policy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Hamilton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamilton, L. What people know. J Environ Stud Sci 5, 54–57 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0222-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0222-3

Keywords

Navigation