Abstract
Several strategies ought to be considered to reduce the disillusionment and potentially paralyzing impact of the current political climate and anti-environmental stance of the US administration, which risk diminishing both environmental activism and the attractiveness of environmental studies courses. Examples demonstrate the potentials for refocusing both environmental activism and education on subnational levels, broadening the appeal of participation in environmental groups by bolstering socio-emotive rewards, capitalizing on the increasing convergence of environmental and corporate interests through internships, and linking environmental education more closely with subjects less vulnerable to the current mood. Additional efforts could be focused on bringing conservatives into environmental activism through a reorientation of environmental communications to correspond more closely to their interests (e.g., hunting and its dependence on habitat conservation) and their distinctive moral-value orientations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelman D, Engel K (2008) Adaptive federalism: the case against reallocating environmental regulatory authority. Minnesota Law Rev 92:1796–1850
Aron P (2001) Youth activism and global engagement: part II global interdependence initiative http://www.benton.org/OneWorldUS/Aron/aron2.html
Ascher D, Ascher W (2016) Inducing better stakeholder searches for environmental information relevant to coastal conservation. In: MacDonald B, Soomai S, De Santo E, Wells P (eds) Science, information, and policy interface for effective coastal and ocean management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 153–174
Ascher W, Steelman T (2006) Valuation in the environmental policy process. Policy Sci 39(1):73–90
Bandura A (1991) Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In: William Kurtines W, Gewirtz J (eds) Handbook of moral behavior and development, volume 1: theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 45–103
Bem D (1967) Self-perception: an alternative explanation of cognitive dissonance. Psychol Rev 7:183–200
Bliese J (1997) Traditionalist conservatism and environmental ethics. Environ Ethics 19(2):135–151
Buzbee W (2007) Asymmetrical regulation: risk, preemption, and the floor/ceiling distinction. N Y Univ Law Rev 82:1547–1619
Carlson A (2009) Iterative federalism and climate change. Northwest Univ Law Rev 103:1097–1162
Ducks Unlimited (2017) Climate change and waterfowl http://www.ducks.org/conservation/public-policy/climate-change-and-waterfowl
Esty D (1996) Revitalizing environmental federalism. Michigan Law Rev 95:570–653
Feinberg M, Willer R (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychol Sci 24(1):56–62
Glicksman R, Levy R (2008) A collective action perspective on ceiling preemption by federal environmental regulation: the case of global climate change. Northwest Univ Law School Rev 102:579–648
Graham J, Haidt J, Nosek B (2009) Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J Pers Soc Psychol 96:1029–1046
Haidt J, Graham J (2007) When morality opposes justice: conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Soc Justice Res 20(1):98–116
Lasswell H, McDougal M (1992) Jurisprudence for a free society. New Haven Press, New Havwn
National Rifle Association (2007) NRA comments on proposed rule to list polar bear as threatened species, April 9. https://www.nraila.org/articles/20070409/nra-comments-on-proposed-rule-to-list-p
NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council) (2014) About NRDC. http://www.nrdc.org/about/
Osofsky H (2013) The geography of solving global environmental problems: reflections on polycentric efforts to address climate change. N Y Law School Law Rev 58:777–827
Prothro J, Grigg C (1960) Fundamental principles of democracy: bases of agreement and disagreement. J Polit 22(2):276–294
Revesz R (1992) Rehabilitating interstate competition: rethinking the “race-to-the-bottom” rationale for federal environmental regulation. N Y Univ Law Rev 67:1210–1255
Schapiro R (2005) Toward a theory of interactive federalism. Iowa Law Rev 91:243–318
Sigman H (2005) Transboundary spillovers and decentralization of environmental policies. J Environ Econ Manag 50(1):82–101
Spence D (2013) Federalism, regulatory lags, and the political economy of energy production. Univ Pennsylvania Law Rev 16:431–508
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ascher, W. Safeguarding the enthusiasm for environmental studies: small is even more beautiful than before. J Environ Stud Sci 8, 104–109 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-017-0442-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-017-0442-9