Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond Absenteeism: Father Incarceration and Child Development

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

High rates of incarceration among American men, coupled with high rates of fatherhood among men in prison, have motivated recent research on the effects of parental imprisonment on children’s development. We use data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study to examine the relationship between paternal incarceration and developmental outcomes for approximately 3,000 urban children. We estimate cross-sectional and longitudinal regression models that control not only for fathers’ basic demographic characteristics and a rich set of potential confounders, but also for several measures of pre-incarceration child development and family fixed effects. We find significant increases in aggressive behaviors and some evidence of increased attention problems among children whose fathers are incarcerated. The estimated effects of paternal incarceration are stronger than those of other forms of father absence, suggesting that children with incarcerated fathers may require specialized support from caretakers, teachers, and social service providers. The estimated effects are stronger for children who lived with their fathers prior to incarceration but are also significant for children of nonresident fathers, suggesting that incarceration places children at risk through family hardships including and beyond parent-child separation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Further details on the disposition data are available from the authors upon request.

  2. Missing data on individual survey items is modeled using a series of dummy variables.

  3. As noted earlier, fathers are not asked about incarceration at year 5, although they are asked about criminal charges and convictions. The father-based report in Table 1 therefore notes any disposition reports of incarceration; indirect reports of incarceration; or, in cases where the fathers report conviction, reports of incarceration by their partners. We consider these reports as part of the fathers’ measure under the assumption that their self-reported conviction suggests willingness to report antisocial activity. These reports therefore reduce any bias created by the error in the survey questionnaire.

References

  • Aarnoudse-Moens, C. S. H., Weisgias-Kuperus, N., Van Goudoever, J. B., & Oosterlaan, J. (2009). Meta-analysis of neurobehavioral outcomes in very preterm and/or very low birth weight children. Pediatrics, 124, 717–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2000). Manual for the AESBA preschool forms and profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amato, P. R. (2006). Marital discord, divorce, and children’s well-being: Results from a 20-year longitudinal study of two generations. In A. Clarke-Stewart & J. F. Dunn (Eds.), Families count: Effects on child and adolescent development (pp. 179–202). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arditti, J. A., Lambert-Shute, J., & Joest, K. (2003). Saturday morning at the jail: Implications of incarceration for families and children. Family Relations, 52, 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditti, J. A., Smock, S. A., & Parkman, T. S. (2005). “It’s been hard to be a father”: A qualitative exploration of incarcerated fatherhood. Fathering, 3, 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argys, L., Peters, E., Cook, S., Garasky, S., Nepomnyaschy, L., & Sorensen, E. (2006). Measuring contact between children and nonresident fathers. In S. Hofferth & L. Casper (Eds.), Handbook of measurement issues in family research (pp. 375–398). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank, L., Dishion, T., Skinner, M., & Patterson, G. R. (1990). Method variance in structural equation modeling: Living with GLOP. In G. R. Patterson (Ed.), Depression and aggression in family interaction (pp. 247–279). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D. (2006). Employment-focused programs for ex-prisoners: What have we learned, what are we learning, and where should we go from here? In Research on prisoner reentry: What do we know and what do we want to know. Ann Arbor: Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan.

  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braman, D. S. (2004). Doing time on the outside: Incarceration and family life in urban America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, A., Taylor, A., Smart, M., Jackson, J., Tagami, S., & Moffitt, T. E. (2001). Can women provide reliable information about their children’s fathers? Cross-informant agreement about men’s lifetime antisocial behaviour. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 42, 915–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, M. (2008). Doing time together: Love and family in the shadow of the prison. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosnoe, R., & Cooper, C. E. (2010). Economically disadvantaged children’s transitions into elementary school: Linking family and school contexts to inform policy. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 258–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J., Whiteman, M. C., Starr, J. M., Whalley, L. J., & Fox, H. C. (2004). The impact of childhood intelligence on later life: Following up the Scottish mental surveys of 1932 and 1947. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 130–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman, S. J. (1990). Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: Personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K. (2000). Few good men: Why poor mothers don’t marry or remarry. American Prospect, 11, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K., Nelson, T. J., & Paranal, R. (2004). Fatherhood and incarceration as potential turning points in the criminal careers of unskilled men. In M. Pattillo, D. F. Weiman, & B. Western (Eds.), Imprisoning America: The social effects of mass incarceration (pp. 46–75). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiden, R. D., Edwards, E. P., & Leonard, K. E. (2007). A conceptual model for the development of externalizing behavior problems among kindergarten children of alcoholic families: Role of parenting and children’s self-regulation. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1187–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1998). Predictors, causes, and correlates of male youth violence. Crime and Justice, 24, 421–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, A., Garfinkel, I., Cooper, C. E., & Mincy, R. B. (2009). Parental incarceration and child wellbeing: Implications for urban families. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 1186–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, A., Garfinkel, I., & Western, B. (2011). Incarceration and support for children in fragile families. Demography, 48, 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaze, L. E., & Maruschak, L. M. (2009). Parents in prison and their minor children (Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub, A., Johnson, B. D., Taylor, A., & Liberty, H. J. (2002). The validity of arrestees’ self-reports: Variations across questions and persons. Justice Quarterly, 19, 477–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R. M. (2004). Survey errors and survey costs. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston, C. F. (1998). The forgotten parent: Understanding the forces that influence incarcerated fathers’ relationships with their children. Child Welfare, 77, 617–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P. M., & Beck, A. J. (2005). Prisoners in 2004 (Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, E., & Western, B. (2007). Report on the evaluation of the ComALERT prisoner reentry program. Brooklyn, NY: Kings County District Attorney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. I., & Waldfogel, J. (2002). Parental incarceration: Recent trends and implications for child welfare. Social Service Review, 76, 460–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. S., Zuckerman, B., Bauchner, H., Homer, C. J., & Wise, P. H. (2002). Women’s health after pregnancy and child outcomes at age 3 years: A prospective cohort study. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1312–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal, N. (2007). Do food stamps cause obesity? Evidence from immigrant experience. Journal of Health Economics, 26, 968–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. E., Garfinkel, I., & Gao, Q. (2007). Incarceration and unwed fathers in fragile families. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 34(3), 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, C., & Bir, A. (2008). The national evaluation of the responsible fatherhood, marriage and family strengthening grants for incarcerated and re-entering fathers and their partners: Program overview and evaluation summary (ASPE Research Brief). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S., McLanahan, S., & Rose, E. (2007). Child gender and father involvement in fragile families. Demography, 44, 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHale, S. M., Kim, J.-Y., Dotterer, A. M., Crouter, A. C., & Booth, A. (2009). The development of gendered interests and personality qualities from middle childhood through adolescence: A biosocial analysis. Child Development, 80, 482–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoyd, V. C. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53, 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, S. O., McLanahan, S. S., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2007). Parental depression and anxiety and early childhood behavior problems across family types. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1162–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, F. G., Barratt, E. S., Dougherty, D. M., Schmitz, J. M., & Swann, A. C. (2001). Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1783–1793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2005). Parental imprisonment: Effects on boys’ antisocial behaviour and delinquency through the life-course. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 1269–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2008a). The effects of parental imprisonment on children. Crime and Justice, 37, 133–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2008b). Parental imprisonment: Long-lasting effects on boys’ internalizing problems through the life course. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., Farrington, D. P., Sekol, I., & Olsen, R. F. (2009). Effects of parental imprisonment on child antisocial behaviour and mental health: A systematic review. In Campbell Systematic Reviews. Oslo, Norway: The Campbell Collaboration.

  • New York Times. (2009, December 25). Smart answers to recidivism. P. A30.

  • Parke, R., & Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (2002, January 30–31). Effects of parental incarceration on young children. Paper prepared for the conference “From Prison to Home,” U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.

  • Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner re-entry. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. D., Erkanli, A., Keeler, G. P., Costello, E. J., & Angold, A. (2006). Disentangling the risks: Parent criminal justice involvement and children’s exposure to family risks. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 677–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C., Cox, M. J., & Snow, K. L. (2007). School readiness and the transition to kindergarten in the era of accountability. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, N., Teitler, J., Garfinkel, I., & McLanahan, S. (2001). Fragile families: Sample and design. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, K. M., & Dyson, O. L. (2005). Gatekeeping in context: Babymama drama and the involvement of incarcerated fathers. Fathering, 3, 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1990). Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. American Sociological Review, 55, 609–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz-Soicher, O., Geller, A., & Garfinkel, I. (2011). The effects of paternal incarceration on material hardship. Social Service Review, 85, 447–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A. L., & Zweig, J. (2006, November 6). Overview of the issue: Parents in the criminal justice system and its impact on children and families. In Children of Parents in the Criminal Justice System: Children at Risk. Bethesda, MD.

  • Sroufe, L. A. (1988). The role of infant-caregiver attachment in development. In J. Belsky & T. Nezworski (Eds.), Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 18–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swisher, R. R., & Waller, M. R. (2008). Confining fatherhood: Incarceration and paternal involvement among nonresident white, African American, and Latino fathers. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 1067–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tach, L., Mincy, R., & Edin, K. (2010). Parenting as a “package deal”: Relationships, fertility, and nonresident father involvement among unmarried parents. Demography, 47, 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, S., & Wildeman, C. (2011). Mass imprisonment and racial disparities in childhood behavioral problems. Criminology and Public Policy, 10, 793–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, M. R., & Swisher, R. R. (2006). Fathers’ risk factors in fragile families: Implications for “healthy” relationships and father involvement. Social Problems, 53, 392–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale—Revised (WAIS-R Manual). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, for The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, B., Kling, J. R., & Weiman, D. F. (2001). The labor market consequences of incarceration. Crime and Delinquency, 47, 410–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western, B., & Wildeman, C. (2009). The black family and mass incarceration. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621, 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, R. C., Orzol, S. M., & Kahn, R. S. (2006). Maternal mental health, substance use, and domestic violence in the year after delivery and subsequent behavior problems in children at age 3 years. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 551–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, M. B., Marani, J. E., Appugliese, D., Woods, R., Siegel, J. A., Cabral, H. J., & Frank, D. A. (2007). Socioemotional effects of fathers’ incarceration on low-income, urban, school-aged children. Pediatrics, 120, e678–e685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildeman, C. (2010). Paternal incarceration and children’s physically aggressive behaviors: Evidence from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study. Social Forces, 89, 285–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L. L., & Wolfe, B. L. (2001). Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. We thank them for their support but acknowledge that the findings and conclusions presented in this report are those of the authors alone, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Foundation. The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study was supported by Grant R01HD36916 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), and the project described in this article was supported by Award Number R24HD058486 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD or the National Institutes of Health. We are thankful for the suggestions of the Fragile Families Working Group and of the reviewers and Editor of Demography.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda Geller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geller, A., Cooper, C.E., Garfinkel, I. et al. Beyond Absenteeism: Father Incarceration and Child Development. Demography 49, 49–76 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0081-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0081-9

Keywords

Navigation