Abstract
Although commercial forest plantations have experienced a major growth in the tropics over the past decades, little attention has been paid to their role in the conservation of epigeal arthropod communities. We studied diversity patterns of the epigeal beetle community in monoculture and polyculture forest plantations with big-leaf mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla). Likewise, we explored the existence of indicator species of each plantation type. Our findings highlight that each plantation type promotes multiple impacts on diversity patterns. We found that monocultures positively influenced overall beetle species richness and ecological diversity. When broken down by guild, both predator and decomposer species richness were similar between monoculture and polyculture, whereas for beetle diversity we found contrasting responses by guild: decomposer diversity was greater in monoculture whereas predator diversity was higher in polyculture. In addition, species composition differed between monoculture and polyculture, except for the predator guild. Species turnover was the main component explaining beta diversity patterns at all levels, indicating that each plantation type promotes biologically distinct epigeal assemblages. Few superabundant heliophile species dominated the beetle community structure; moreover, monocultures had a composition skewed towards heliophile species whereas polyculture favored umbrophile species. These patterns could be attributed to differences in habitat complexity between plot types, namely differences in tree cover. Additionally, indicator species only were identified in polycultures, reflecting their higher spatial complexity. Monoculture and polyculture plantations with big-leaf mahogany are complementary agroecosystems for preserving diverse epigeal beetle communities and should be considered valuable tools for conservation purposes in the tropics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdala-Roberts L, Mooney KA, Quijano-Medina T, Campos-Navarrete MJ, González-Moreno A, Parra-Tabla T (2015) Comparison of tree genotypic diversity and species diversity effects on different guilds of insect herbivores. Oikos 11:1527–1535. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02033
Alvarado F, Escobar F, Williams DR, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Escobar-Hernández F (2018) The role of livestock intensification and landscape structure in maintaining tropical biodiversity. J Appl Ecol 55:185–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12957
Arellano L, León-Cortés J, Halffter G, Montero J (2013) Acacia woodlots, cattle and dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in a Mexican silvopastoral landscape. Rev Mex Biodivers 84:650–660. https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.32911
Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecol Biogeogr 19:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x
Beiroz W, Audino LD, Queiroz ACM, Rabello AM, Boratto IA, Silva Z, Rivas CR (2014) Structure and composition of edaphic arthropod community and its use as bioindicators of environmental disturbance. Appl Ecol Env Res 12:481–491. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1202_481491
Bhagwat SA, Willis KJ, Birks HJB, Whittaker RJ (2008) Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity? Trends Ecol Evol 23:261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.005
Bitencourt B, Dimas TM, Da Silva PG, Morato EF (2019) Forest complexity drives dung beetle assemblages along an edge-interior gradient in the southwest Amazon rainforest. Ecol Entomol. 45:259–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12795
Bouget C (2009) Methods proposed by the Inv.Ent.For. group for temperate forests: Pitfall traps. In: Nageleisen LM, Bouget C (eds) Forest insect studies: methods and techniques, key considerations for standardisation. An overview of the reflections of the Entomological Forest Inventories working group (Inv.Ent.For.). ONF, pp 53–57
Brown GG, Fragoso C, Barois I, Rojas P, Patrón JC, Bueno J, Moreno AG, Lavelle P, Ordaz V, Rodríguez C (2001) Diversidad y rol funcional de la macrofauna edáfica en los ecosistemas tropicales mexicanos. Acta Zool Mex 1:79–110. https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2001.8401847
Caballero U, León-Cortés JL (2012) High diversity beetle assemblages attracted to carrion and dung in threatened tropical oak forests in Southern Mexico. J Insect Conserv 16:537–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-011-9439-y
Campos-Navarrete MJ, Munguía-Rosas M, Abdala-Roberts L, Parra-Tabla V (2015) Are tree species diversity and genotypic diversity effects on insect herbivores mediated by ants? PLoS ONE 10:e0132671. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132671
Carvalho JC, Cardoso P, Gomes P (2012) Determining the relative roles of species replacement and species richness differences in generating beta-diversity patterns. Global Ecol Biogeogr 21:760–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00694.x
Chao A, Jost L (2012) Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 93:2533–2547. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1952.1
Chen H, Boutros PC (2011) VennDiagram: a package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R. BMC Bioinformatics 12:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-35
Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2015) PRIMER v7. PRIMER-E, Plymouth. https://www.primer-e.com/our-software/primer-version-7/
Costa C, Oliveira VHF, Maciel R, Beiroz W, Korasaki V, Louzada J (2017) Variegated tropical landscapes conserve diverse dung beetle communities. PeerJ 5:e3125. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3125
Da Silva PG (2018) Revisiting spatial and temporal patterns of dung beetles in Brazilian Pampa: the role of β-diversity process-related components. Rev Bras Zoo 19:6–24. https://doi.org/10.34019/2596-3325.2018.v19.24683
De Cáceres M, Legendre P (2009) Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90:3566–3574. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1823.1
De Cáceres M, Legendre P, Moretti M (2010) Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites. Oikos 119:1674–1684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18334.x
De Cáceres M, Legendre P, Wiser SK, Brotons L (2012) Using species combinations in indicator value analyses. Methods Ecol Evol 3:973–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00246.x
De Farias PM, Arellano L, Hernández MIM, López Ortiz S (2015) Response of the copro-necrophagous beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) assemblage to a range of soil characteristics and livestock management in a tropical landscape. J Insect Conserv 19:947–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9812-3
Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:SAAIST]2.0.CO;2
Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R (2002) Dung beetles in continuous forest, forest fragments and in an agricultural mosaic habitat island at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 11:1903–1918. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020896928578
Fagundes C, Di Mare R, Wink C, Manfio D (2011) Diversity of the families of Coleoptera captured with pitfall traps in five different environments in Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. Braz J Biol 71:381–390. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-69842011000300007
Favila ME, Halffter G (1997) The use of indicator groups for measuring biodiversity as related to community structure and function. Acta Zool Mex 72:1–25
Ferret-Bouin P (1995) Clé illustrée des familles des coléoptères de France. L’Entomologiste, Paris
Filgueiras BK, Tabarelli M, Leal IR, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Peres AA, Iannuzzi L (2016) Spatial replacement of dung beetles in edge affected habitats: biotic homogenization or divergence in fragmented tropical forest landscapes? Divers Distrib 22:400–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12410
García-López A, Martínez-Falcón AP, Micó E, Estrada P, Grez AA (2016) Diversity distribution of saproxylic beetles in Chilean Mediterranean forests: influence of spatiotemporal heterogeneity and perturbation. J Insect Conserv 20:723–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9905-7
Giraldo C, Escobar F, Chará J, Calle Z (2011) The adoption of silvopastoral systems promotes the recovery of ecological processes regulated by dung beetles in the Colombian Andes. Insect Conserv Diver 4:115–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00112.x
Goehring DM, Daily GC, Şekerçioglu CH (2002) Distribution of ground-dwelling arthropods in tropical countryside habitats. J Insect Conserv 6:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020905307244
Gormley LHL, Furley PA, Watt AD (2007) Distribution of ground-dwelling beetles in fragmented tropical habitats. J Insect Conserv 11:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9026-9
Grimbacher PS, Catterall CP, Kanowski J, Proctor HC (2007) Responses of ground-active beetle assemblages to different styles of reforestation on cleared rainforest land. Biodivers Conserv 16:2167–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9146-2
Halffter G (2003) Tribu Scarabaeini. In: Morón MA (ed) Atlas de los escarabajos de México, Vol. 2: Scarabaeidae, Trogidae, Passalidae y Lucanidae. Argania. Barcelona, Spain, pp 21-43
Halffter G, Arellano L (2002) Response of dung beetle diversity to human–induced changes in a tropical landscape. Biotropica 34:144–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2002.tb00250.x
Hartshorn GS, Whitmore JL (1999) Anthropogenic disturbance and tropical forestry: Implications for sustainable management (Chapter 19). In: Walker LR (ed) Ecosystems of disturbed ground. Elsevier, New York, pp 467–486
Harvey CA, Medina A, Merlo Sánchez D, Vílchez S, Hernández B, Saenz JC, Maes JM, Casanoves F, Sinclair FL (2006) Patterns of animal diversity in different forms of tree cover in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Appl 16:1986–1999. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1986:poadid]2.0.co;2
Healy C, Gotelli NJ, Potvin C (2008) Partitioning the effects of biodiversity and environmental heterogeneity for productivity and mortality in a tropical tree plantation. J Ecol 96:903–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01419.x
Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A (2019) iNEXT: iNterpolation and EXTrapolation for species diversity. R package version 2.0.19. http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/blog/software-download/
Jiménez-Sánchez E, Zaragoza-Caballero S, Noguera FA (2009) Variación temporal de la diversidad de estafilínidos (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) nocturnos en un bosque tropical caducifolio de México. Rev Mex Biodivers 80:157–168. https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2009.001.593
Jiménez-Sánchez E, Quezada-García R, Padilla-Ramírez J, Moreno ML, Angel MA (2019) Variation of the diversity of Staphylinidae, Silphidae and Trogidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) in a urban-agricultural gradient in a semiarid region of Estado de Mexico, Mexico. Acta Zool Mex 35:e3502152. https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2019.3502152
Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x
Kanowski J, Catterall C, Wardell-Johnson G, Proctor H, Reis T (2003) Development of forest structure on cleared rainforest land in eastern Australia under different styles of reforestation. Forest Ecol Manag 183:265–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00109-9
Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter, Tscharntke T (2002) Predator–prey ratios on cocoa along a land-use gradient in Indonesia. Biodivers Conserv 11:683–693. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015548426672
Lassau SA, Hochuli DF, Cassis G, Reid CAM (2005) Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity: do functional groups respond consistently? Divers Distrib 11:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00124.x
Lavelle P, Dangerfield M, Fragoso C, Eschenbrenner V, López-Hernández D, Pashanasi B, Brussaard L (1994) The relationship between soil macrofauna and tropical soil fertility. In: Woomer PL, Swift MJ (eds) The biological management of tropical soil fertility. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 137–169
Maleque MA, Maeto K, Ishii HT (2009) Arthropods as bioindicators of sustainable forest management, with a focus on plantation forests. Appl Entomol Zool 44:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2009.1
Márquez J (2003) Ecological patterns in necrophilous Staphylinidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) from Tlayacapan, Morelos, México. Acta Zool Mex 89:69–83
Mazón M, Sánchez-Angarita D, Díaz FA, Gutiérrez N, Jaimez R (2018) Entomofauna associated with agroforestry systems of timber species and cacao in the Southern region of the Maracaibo Lake Basin (Mérida, Venezuela). Insects 9:E46. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9020046
Moreira X, Abdala-Roberts L, Parra-Tabla V, Mooney KA (2014) Positive effects of plant genotypic and species diversity on anti-herbivore defenses in a tropical tree species. PLoS ONE 9:e105438. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105438
Navarrete-Heredia JL, Newton AF, Thayer MK, ASHE JS, Chadler DS (2002) Guía ilustrada para los géneros de Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) de México. Universidad de Guadalajara, CONABIO, México
Neita JC, Escobar F (2012) The potential value of agroforestry to dung beetle diversity in the wet tropical forests of the Pacific lowlands of Colombia. Agrofor Syst 85:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9445-9
Nichols E, Larsen T, Spector S, Davis AL, Escobar F, Favila M, Vulinec K (2007) Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: a quantitative literature review and meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 137:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.023
Nichols E, Spector S, Louzada J, Larsen T, Amezquita S, Favila ME (2008) Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biol Conserv 141:1461–1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.011
Nichols E, Uriarte M, Bunker DE, Favila ME, Slade EM, Vulinec K, Larsen T, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Louzada J, Naeem S, Spector SH (2013) Trait-dependent response of dung beetle populations to tropical forest conversion at local and regional scales. Ecology 94:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0251.1
Novais SMA, Macedo-Reis LE, Neves FS (2017) Predatory beetles in cacao agroforestry systems in Brazilian Atlantic forest: a test of the natural enemy hypothesis. Agroforest Syst 91:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9917-z
Paul GS, Montagnini F, Berlyn GP, Craven DJ, van Breugel M, Hall JS (2011) Foliar herbivory and leaf traits of five native tree species in a young plantation of Central Panama. New Forest 43:69–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-011-9267-7
Piotto D, Víquez E, Montagnini F, Kanninen M (2004) Pure and mixed forest plantations with native species of the dry tropics of Costa Rica: a comparison of growth and productivity. Forest Ecol Manag 190:359–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.11.005
Plath M, Dorn S, Barrios H, Mody K (2012) Diversity and composition of arboreal beetle assemblages in tropical pasture afforestations: effects of planting schemes and tree species identity. Biodivers Conserv 21:3423–3444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0372-5
Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2007) Rove beetles and ground beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae, Carabidae) as indicators of harvest and regeneration practices in western Canadian foothills forests. Biol Conserv 137:294–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.011
Price PW, Denno RF, Eubanks MD, Finke DL, Kaplan I (2011) Insect ecology: behavior, populations and communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria https://www.R-project.org/
Ramírez-Ponce A, Calderón-Patrón JM, Guzmán Vásquez HM, Moreno CE (2019) Biotic heterogeneity among scarab beetle communities in an anthropized landscape in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico. J Insect Conserv 23:765–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-019-00169-3
Reddy MV, Venkataiah B (1990) Seasonal abundance of soil-surface arthropods in relation to some meteorological and edaphic variables of the grassland and tree-planted areas in a tropical semi-arid savanna. Int J Biometeorol 34:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01045820
Reyes-Novelo E, Delfín-González H, Morón MA (2007) Copro-necrophagous beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) diversity in an agroecosystem in Yucatan, Mexico. Rev Biol Trop 55:83–99. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v55i1.6059
Salomão RP, Pordeus LM, de Araujo Lira AF, Iannuzzi L (2018) Edaphic beetle (Insecta: Coleoptera) diversity over a forest-matrix gradient in a tropical rainforest. J Insect Conserv 22:511–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-018-0079-3
Salomão RP, Brito LC, Ianuzzi L, Lira AFA, Albuquerque CMR (2019) Effects of environmental parameters on beetle assemblage in a fragmented tropical rainforest of South America. J Insect Conserv 23:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-018-00120-y
Sánchez-de-Jesús H, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Andresen E, Escobar F (2016) Forest loss and matrix composition are the major drivers shaping dung beetle assemblages in a fragmented rainforest. Landsc Ecol 31:843–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0293-2
Siewers J, Schirmel J, Buchholz S (2014) The efficiency of pitfall traps as a method of sampling epigeal arthropods in litter rich forest habitats. Eur J Entomol 111:69–74. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2014.008
Sopsop GO, Lit IL Jr (2015) Soil-litter arthropod assemblage in dipterocarp forest, agroforestry area and mahogany plantation in Makiling Forest Reserve, Laguna. Journal of Nature Studies 14:47–65
Uribe-Valle G, Dzib-Echeverría R (2006) Micorriza arbuscular (Glomus intraradices), Azospirillum brasilense y Brassinoesteroide en la producción de maíz en suelo luvisol. Agric Téc Méx 32:67–76
Vanbergen AJ, Woodcock BA, Watt AD, Niemelä J (2005) Effects of land-use heterogeneity on carabid communities at the landscape scale. Ecography 28:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03991.x
Verdú JR, Numa C, Hernández-Cuba O (2011) The influence of landscape structure on ants and dung beetles diversity in a Mediterranean savanna–Forest ecosystem. Ecol Indic 11:831–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.10.011
Warren MW, Zou X (2002) Soil macrofauna and litter nutrients in three tropical tree plantations on a disturbed site in Puerto Rico. Forest Ecol Manag 170:161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00770-8
Acknowledgements
We want to thank the research Projects 128856 and 250925 of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT, Mexico). To INIFAP Administration for their logistic help in the maintenance of the plots. We should also like to thank M.J. Campos and A. González for their assistance in the fieldwork, and E. Fonseca and J. Tun for their help in the processing of samples. We are grateful with the assistance given by R. Anderson, E. Arriaga Varela, J. Asiain, T. Atkinson, M. Caterino, D.S. Chandler, P. Cifuentes, A.R. Cline, A. Díaz, M. Gimmel, T.L. Grzymala, D.G.H. Halstead, H.A. Hespenheime, P. Leblanc, E. Montes de Oca, M.C., S.T. O’Keef, Thomas and R. Westcott. We appreciate the comments of the two anonymous reviewers and of the associated editor on an earlier draft of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by CONACyT (128856 and 250925).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Javier Quinto, Víctor Parra-Tabla, and Luis Abdala-Roberts contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Javier Quinto, Ana Paola Martínez-Falcón, and Johanna I. Murillo-Pacheco. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Javier Quinto. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Edited by Pedro HB Togni
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quinto, J., Martínez-Falcón, A.P., Murillo-Pacheco, J.I. et al. Diversity Patterns of Tropical Epigeal Beetle Assemblages Associated with Monoculture and Polyculture Plantations with Big-Leaf Mahogany. Neotrop Entomol 50, 551–561 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-021-00870-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-021-00870-6