Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Uncommon and/or bizarre features of dementia: part IV

  • Review article
  • Published:
Acta Neurologica Belgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well established that the clinical picture of dementias is not clinically homogeneous. For example, non-amnestic presentations of Alzheimer’s disease have been referred to as a typical variant. Careful examination of clinical characteristics contributes to understanding the neurobiology of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias and may in turn enhance knowledge of the potential risk factors involved. This study aimed at describing uncommon or bizarre symptoms/syndromes observed in patients suffering from dementia. Medline and Google scholar searches were conducted for relevant articles, chapters, and books published before 2019. Search terms used included dementia, déjà vu, zoophilia, pathological lying, and somatic symptom disorder. Publications found through this indexed search were reviewed for further relevant references. Uncommon/bizarre features of dementia were described as case reports and there were no systematic investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cipriani G, Borin G (2015) Understanding dementia in the sociocultural context: a review. Int J Soc Psychiatry 61:198–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cipriani G, Lucetti C, Carlesi C, Danti S, Nuti A (2015) Depression and dementia. A review. Eur Geriatr Med 6:479–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cipriani G, Lucetti C, Vedovello M, Nuti A (2012) Diogenes syndrome in patients suffering from dementia. Dialog Clin Neurosci 14:455–460

    Google Scholar 

  4. Larner AJ (2006) “Frontal variant Alzheimer’s disease”: a reappraisal. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 108:705–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cipriani G, Lucetti C, Danti S, Ulivi M, Nuti A (2015) Uncommon and/or bizarre features of dementia. Acta Neurol Belg 115:19–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cipriani G, Danti S, Nuti A, Lucetti C, Di Fiorino M (2018) Uncommon and/or bizarre features of dementia. Part II. Acta Neurol Belg 118:187–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cipriani G, Nuti A, Danti S, Picchi L, Di Fiorino M (2018) Uncommon and/or bizarre: part III. Acta Neurol Belg 118:211–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neppe V (1983) The psychology of déjà vu: have I been here before?. Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  9. Augustinus A (1968) De Trinitate. Libri XII, Caput XV, Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina, 50. Typographi Brepols, Turnholti, p 378

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cleary AM, McNeely-White KL, Huebert AM, Claxton AB (2018) Déjà vu and the feeling of prediction: an association with familiarity strength. Memory 1:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arnaud FL (1896) Un cas d’illusion de ‘deja vu’ ou de ‘false memory. Ann Med Psychol 54:455–471

    Google Scholar 

  12. O’Connor AR, Moulin CJ (2010) Recognition without identification, erroneous familiarity, and déjà vu. Curr Psychiatry Rep 12:165–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cleary AM (2008) Recognition memory, familiarity, and De´ja` vu experiences. Curr Dir Psyhol Sci 17:353–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wild E (2005) Deja vu in neurology. J Neurol 252:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sno HN, Linszen DH (1990) The déjà vu experience: remembrance of things past? Am J Psychiatry 147:1587–1595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Connor AR, Moulin CJ (2013) Déjà vu experiences in healthy subjects are unrelated to laboratory tests of recollection and familiarity for word stimuli. Front Psychol 27:881

    Google Scholar 

  17. Burwell RD, Templer VL (2017) Jamais vu all over again. Nat Neurosci 20:1194–1196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chapman A, Mensh I (1951) Déjà-vu experience and conscious fantasy in adults. Psychiatr Q 25–26:163–175

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harper M (1969) Déjà vu and depersonalisation in normal subjects. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 3:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McKellar P, Simpson L (1954) Between wakefulness and sleep: hypnagogic imagery. Br J Psychol 45(266–276):7

    Google Scholar 

  21. Neppe V (1979) An investigation of the relationship between subjective paranormal experience and temporal lobe symptomatology. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  22. Adachi N, Adachi T, Kimura M, Akanuma N, Takekawa Y, Kato M (2003) Demographic and psychological features of déjà vu experiences in a nonclinical Japanese population. J Nerv Ment Dis 191:242–247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moulin CJ, Conway MA, Thompson RG, James N, Jones RW (2005) Disordered memory awareness: recollective confabulation in two cases of persistent déjà vecu. Neuropsychologia 43:1362–1378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown AS (2003) A review of the deja vu experience. Psychol Bull 129:394–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson RG, Moulin CJ, Conway MA, Jones RW (2004) Persistent Déjà vu: a disorder of memory. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 19:906–907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Illman NA, Butler CR, Souchay C, Moulin CJA (2012) Déjà experiences in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res Treat 2012:539567

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Spatt J (2002) Déjà vu: possible parahippocampal mechanisms. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 14:6–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ide M, Mizukami K, Suzuki T, Shiraishi H (2000) A case of temporal lobe epilepsy with improvement of clinical symptoms and single photon emission computed tomography findings after treatment with clonazepam. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 54:595–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moulin CJ (2013) Disordered recognition memory: recollective confabulation. Cortex 49:1541–1552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th end. American Psychiatric Association, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Konrad N, Welke J, Opitz-Welke A (2015) Paraphilias. Curr Opin Psychiatry 28:440–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Aggrawal A (2011) A new classification of zoophilia. J Forensic Leg Med 18:73–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Beetz AM (2004) Bestiality/zoophilia: a scarcely investigated phenomenon between crime, paraphilia, and love. J Forensic Psychol 4:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Grassberger R (1968) Die Unzucht mit Tieren. Kriminologische Abhandlungen, vol 8. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Peretti PO, Rowan M (1982) Variables associated with male and female chronic zoophilia. Soc Behav Personal 10:83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Peretti PO, Rowan M (1983) Zoophilia: factors related to its sustained practice. Panminerva Medica 25:127–131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Othman Z, Razak AA, Zakaria R (2014) Zoophilia in a patient with frontotemporal dementia. Int Med J 21:466–467

    Google Scholar 

  38. Holoyda B, Sorrentino R, Friedman SH, Allgire J (2018) Bestiality: an introduction for legal and mental health professionals. Behav Sci Law 36:687–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cross BS, DeYoung GR, Furmaga KM (2013) High-dose oral medroxyprogesterone for inappropriate hypersexuality in elderly men with dementia: a case series. Ann Pharmacother 4:e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Raina G, Cersosimo MG, Micheli F (2012) Zoophilia and impulse control disorder in a patient with Parkinson disease. J Neurol 259:969–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Simpson J, Weiner E (1989) Oxford English dictionary. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  42. Healy W, Healy MT (1915) Pathological lying, accusation, and swindling: a study in forensic psychology. Little, Brown and Co, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dike CC, Baranoski M, Griffith EE (2005) Pathological lying revisited. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 33:342–349

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Muzinic L, Kozaric-Kovacic D, Marinic I (2016) Psychiatric aspects of normal and pathological lying. Int J Law Psychiatry 46:88–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yang Y, Raine A, Lencz T, Bihrle S, Lacasse L, Colletti P (2005) Prefrontal white matter in pathological liars. Br J Psychiatry 187:320–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang Y, Raine A, Narr KL, Lencz T, Lacasse L, Colletti P, Toga AW (2007) Localisation of increased prefrontal white matter in pathological liars. Br J Psychiatry 190:174–175

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Poletti M, Borelli P, Bonuccelli U (2011) The neuropsychological correlates of pathological lying: evidence from behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol 258:2009–2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dalla Barba G, Cappelletti YJ, Signorini M, Denes G (1997) Confabulation: remembering ‘another’ past, planning ‘another future’. Neurocase 3:425–436

    Google Scholar 

  49. Örulv L, Hydén LC (2006) Confabulation: sense-making, self-making and world- making in dementia. Discourse Stud 8:647–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Thom R, Teslyar P, Friedman R (2017) Pseudologia fantastica in the emergency department: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Psychiatry 2017:8961256

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder, DSM‐IV. American Psychiatric Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  52. Brown FW (1991) Somatization disorder in progressive dementia. Psychosomatics 32:463–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Landqvist Waldö M, Santillo AF, Gustafson L, Englund E, Passant U (2014) Somatic complaints in frontotemporal dementia. Am J Neurodegener Dis 3:84–92

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Robertson EE, Le Roux A, Brown JH (1958) The clinical differentiation of Pick’s disease. J Ment Sci 104:1000–1024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cipriani G, Danti S, Carlesi C (2016) Three men in a (same) boat: Alzheimer, Pick Lewy. Historical notes. Eur Geriatr Med 6:526–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Hodges JR, Patterson K (2007) Semantic dementia: a unique clinicopathological syndrome. Lancet Neurol 6:1004–1014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gan JJ, Lin A, Samimi MS, Mendez MF (2016) Somatic symptom disorder in semantic dementia: the role of alexisomia. Psychosomatics 57:598–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Onofrj M, Bonanni L, Manzoli L, Thomas A (2010) Cohort study on somatoform disorders in Parkinson disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology 74:1598–1606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Onofrj M, Thomas A, Bonanni L, di Giannantonio M, Gambi F, Sepede G (2012) Disease and dementia with Lewy bodies evidence underlying psychotic traits. Adv Biol Psychiatry 27:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Onofrj M, Thomas A, Tiraboschi P, Wenning G, Gambi F, Sepede G, Di Giannantonio M, Di Carmine C, Monaco D, Maruotti V, Ciccocioppo F, D’Amico MC, Bonanni L (2011) Updates on somatoform disorders (SFMD) in Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies and discussion of phenomenology. J Neurol Sci 310:166–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kurlansik SL, Maffei MS (2016) Somatic symptom disorder. Am Fam Physician 93:49–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Henningsen P (2018) Management of somatic symptom disorder. Dialog Clin Neurosci 20:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  63. Van der Flier WM (2016) Clinical heterogeneity in familial Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol 15:1296–1298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Ryan J, Fransquet P, Wrigglesworth J, Lacaze P (2018) Phenotypic heterogeneity in dementia: a challenge for epidemiology and biomarker studies. Front Public Health 6:181

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Cipriani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cipriani, G., Nuti, A., Danti, S. et al. Uncommon and/or bizarre features of dementia: part IV. Acta Neurol Belg 119, 535–540 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-019-01208-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-019-01208-1

Keywords

Navigation