Skip to main content
Log in

Remember the MaineRx

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2000, Maine became the first state in the US to enact a law to establish maximum retail prices for prescription drugs for all qualified state residents—MaineRx. The purpose was to lower prescription drug prices for all eligible residents of the state. The state was to have the ability to negotiate manufacturer rebates and pharmacy discounts. Major drug manufacturers, represented by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, challenged MaineRx in the courts, going to the Supreme Court where it was upheld in 2003. Fifteen other states enacted, proposed, or filed price-control bills in their state legislatures. The result would have been downward pressure on prices outside of the public programs, and the first instance of state-sponsored monopsony power in the US. MaineRx is viewed as one of the proximate causes of the pharmaceutical industry’s successful lobbying effort to implement Medicare Part D in 2004. Medicare Part D is administered through private Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs); it made administration via state government PBMs illegal. The lower prices that could have resulted from MaineRx-type laws did not occur and the magnitude of these reductions is commented upon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mello M, Studdert D, Brennan TA. The pharmaceutical industry versus Medicaid: limits on state initiatives to control prescription-drug costs. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:608–613.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Court rules in favor of MaineRx price controls. http://www.pnhp.org/news/2001/may/court_rules_in_favor.php. Accessed 11 Jan 2008.

  3. State health care laws and proposals: The Massachusetts Health Plan. http://www.therubins.com/geninfo/maine.htm. Accessed 11 Jan 2008.

  4. Executive summary. Cutting drug costs: different approaches, different results; evaluating the effectiveness of voluntary and “carrot and stick” state drug discount programs in Ohio and Maine. 2005. http://www.policychoices.org/reports/CutDrugCostsExecSumFINAL.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2008.

  5. Impact report. Maine enacts drug price controls; 15 other states taking similar action. 2000. http://csdd.tufts.edu/_documents/www/Doc_233_7254_826.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2008.

  6. Governor abandons Maine Rx plan. Heartland, 1 Jul 2003. http://news.heartland.org/newspaper-article/2003/07/01/governor-abandons-maine-rx-plan.

  7. Congressional Budget Office. Prices for brand-name drugs under selected federal programs. 2005. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/64xx/doc6481/06-16-PrescriptDrug.pdf. Accessed 24 Jul 2009.

  8. Squires DA. The U.S. health system in perspective: a comparison of twelve industrialized nations. Vol. 16. The Commonwealth Fund, Jul 2011

  9. Medicare Part D. Drug pricing and manufacturer windfalls, United States House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform. 2008.

  10. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, National Health Statistics Group; and US. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis and US Bureau of the Census. http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/NationalHealthAccountsHistorical.html.

  11. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary, National Health Statistics Group; US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; US Bureau of the Census. Table 16: retail prescription drugs expenditures; levels, annual percent change and percent distribution, by source of funds: selected calendar years 1970–2011. http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/tables.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author did not have any financial support for the writing of this article and does not belong to any group that would have a conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Kemp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kemp, R. Remember the MaineRx. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 12, 1–5 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-013-0076-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-013-0076-3

Keywords

Navigation