Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Samsung v. Apple”

Decision of the Intellectual Property High Court 16 May 2014 – Case No. 2013 (Heisei 25) (ra) 10007 and 10008

  • Decision • Patent Law
  • Japan
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A patent proprietor who has made a FRAND declaration for standard patent is estopped from claiming injunctive relief based on the infringement of the standard patent against a third party that complies with the FRAND terms and has been willing to obtain a license.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Translated from the original by Christopher Heath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samsung Inc. v. Apple Limited Patent Act, Sec. 100; Civil Code, Sec. 1 para. 3. “Samsung v. Apple”. IIC 46, 124–129 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-015-0299-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-015-0299-y

Keywords

Navigation