-
1.
The interpretatively extractable rule of Art. 2 of Law No. 62/2011, dated 12 December, and Arts. 35(1) and 101(2) of the Industrial Property Code, which establishes that, in the case of a mandatory arbitration established under Law No. 62/2011, dated 12 December, a party cannot be defended by exception by invoking the invalidity of a patent with inter partes effects, is unconstitutional because it disproportionately affects the right to judicial defense.
Author information
Consortia
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Translated by Nuno Sousa e Silva.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
A. & CO.KG and B., Lda. v. C. K.S and D. B.V Law No. 62/2011 of December 12, Art. 2; Industrial Property Code, Arts. 35(1), 101(2); Constitution, Arts. 18(2), 20. “Telmisartan”. IIC 50, 376–388 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-019-00803-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-019-00803-2