Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Characteristics of Caragana korshinskii and Hippophae rhamnoides stemflow and their significance in soil moisture enhancement in Loess Plateau, China

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stemflow of xerophytic shrubs represents a significant component of water replenishment to the soil-root system and influences water utilization of plant roots at the stand scale, especially in water-scarce semi-arid ecosystems. The stemflow of two semi-arid shrubs (Caragana korshinskii and Hippophae rhamnoides) and its effect on soil moisture enhancement were evaluated during the growing season of 2011 in the semi-arid loess region of China. The results indicated that stemflow averaged 12.3% and 8.4% of the bulk precipitation for C. korshinskii and H. rhamnoides, respectively. Individual stemflow increased in a linear function with increasing rainfall depth. The relationship between funneling ratios and rainfall suggested that there existed a rainfall depth threshold of 11 mm for both C. korshinskii and H. rhamnoides. Averaged funneling ratios were 156.6±57.1 and 49.5±30.8 for C. korshinskii and H. rhamnoides, respectively, indicating that the canopy architecture of the two shrubs was an effective funnel to channel stemflow to the root area, and C. korshinskii showed a greater potential to use stemflow water in the semi-arid conditions. For individual rainfall events, the wetting front depths were approximately 2 times deeper in the rooting zone around the stems than in the bare area outside canopy for both C. korshinskii and H. rhamnoides. Correspondingly, soil water content was also significantly higher in the root area around the shrub stem than in the area outside the shrub canopy. This confirms that shrub stemflow conserved in the deep soil layers may be an available moisture source for plant growth under semi-arid conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboal J R, Morales D, Hernandez M, et al. 1999. The measurement and modelling of the variation of stemflow in a laurel forest in Tenerife, Canary Islands. Journal of Hydrology, 221(3–4): 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams M, Angradi T. 1996. Decomposition and nutrient dynamics of hardwood leaf litter in the Fernow whole-watershed acidification experiment. Forest Ecology and Management, 83(1–2): 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belmonte S F, Romero D A. 1998. A simple technique for measuring rainfall interception by small shrub: “interception flow collection box”. Hydrological Processes, 12(3): 471–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui E N, Box J E. 1992. Stemflow, rain throughfall, and erosion under canopies of corn and sorghum. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56(1): 242–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cape J N, Brown A F H, Robertson S M C, et al. 1991. Interspecies comparisons of throughfall and stemflow at three sites in northern Britain. Forest Ecology and Management, 46(3–4): 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle A, Brown A H F, White E J. 1966. The organic matter and nutrient elements in the precipitation beneath a sessile oak (Quercus petraea) canopy. The Journal of Ecology, 54(1): 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle-Moses D E. 2004. Throughfall, stemflow, and canopy interception loss fluxes in a semi-arid Sierra Madre Oriental matorral community. Journal of Arid Environments, 58(2): 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle-Moses D E, Price A G. 2006. Growing-season stemflow production within a deciduous forest of southern Ontario. Hydrological Processes, 20(17): 3651–3663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crockford R H, Richardson D P. 1990. Partitioning of rainfall in a eucalypt forest and pine plantation in southeastern Australia: II Stemflow and factors affecting stemflow in a dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest and a Pinus radiata plantation. Hydrological Processes, 4(2): 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durocher M G. 1990. Monitoring spatial variability of forest interception. Hydrological Processes, 4(3): 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enright N J. 1987. Stemflow as a nutrient source for nikau palm (Rhopalostylis sapida) in a New Zealand forest. Australian Journal of Ecology, 12(1): 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford E D, Deans J D. 1978. The effects of canopy structure on stemflow, throughfall and interception loss in a young Sitka spruce plantation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 15(3): 905–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrer I, Papritz A, Kasteel R, et al. 2000. Quantifying dye tracers in soil profiles by image processing. European Journal of Soil Science, 51(2): 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez J A, Vanderlinden K, Giraldez J V, et al. 2002. Rainfall concentration under olive trees. Agricultural Water Management, 55(1): 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herwitz S R. 1985. Interception storage capacities of tropical rainforest canopy trees. Journal of Hydrology, 77(1–4): 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herwitz S R. 1986. Infiltration-excess caused by stemflow in a cyclone-prone tropical rainforest. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 11(4): 401–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herwitz S R. 1987. Raindrop impact and water flow on the vegetative surfaces of trees and the effects on stemflow and throughfall generation. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 12(4): 425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabro J D, Lotse E G, Simmons K E, et al. 1991. A field study of macropore flow under saturated conditions using a bromide tracer. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 46(5): 376–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson M S, Lehmann J. 2006. Double-funneling of trees: stemflow and root-induced preferential flow. Ecoscience, 13(3): 324–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard R E. 1961. Net precipitation in a northern hardwood forest. Journal of Geophysical Research, 66(8): 2417–2421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levia D F, Frost E E. 2003. A review and evaluation of stemflow literature in the hydrologic and biogeochemical cycles of forested and agricultural ecosystems. Journal of Hydrology, 274(1–4): 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X Y, Liu L Y, Gao S Y, et al. 2008. Stemflow in three shrubs and its effect on soil water enhancement in semiarid loess region of China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(10): 1501–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X Y, Yang Z P, Li Y T, et al. 2009. Connecting ecohydrology and hydropedology in desert shrubs: stemflow as a source of preferential flow in soils. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13: 1133–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S. 1998. Estimation of rainfall storage capacity in the canopies of cypress wetlands and slash pine uplands in North-Central Florida. Journal of Hydrology, 207(1–2): 32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llorens P, Gallart F. 2000. A simplified method for forest water storage capacity measurement. Journal of Hydrology, 240(1–2): 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llorens P, Domingo F. 2007. Rainfall partitioning by vegetation under Mediterranean conditions. A review of studies in Europe. Journal of Hydrology, 335(1–2): 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Meza E, Whitford W G. 1996. Stemflow, throughfall and channelization of stemflow by roots in three Chihuahuan desert shrubs. Journal of Arid Environments, 32(3): 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Návar J, Bryan R. 1990. Interception loss and rainfall redistribution by three semi-arid growing shrubs in northeastern Mexico. Journal of Hydrology, 115(1–4): 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Návar J. 1993. The causes of stemflow variation in three semi-arid growing species of northeastern Mexico. Journal of Hydrology, 145(1–2): 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Návar J. 2011. Stemflow variation in Mexico’s northeastern forest communities: its contribution to soil moisture content and aquifer recharge. Journal of Hydrology, 408(1–2): 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nulsen R A, Bligh K J, Baxter I N, et al. 1986. The fate of rainfall in a mallee and heath vegetated catchment in southern Western Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology, 11(4): 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira F L, Gash J H C, David J S, et al. 2009. Modelling interception loss from evergreen oak Mediterranean savannas: application of a tree-based modelling approach. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149(3–4), 680–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressland A J. 1973. Rainfall partitioning by an arid woodland (Acacia aneura F. Muell.) in south-western Queensland. Australian Journal of Botany, 21(2): 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi M, Tsujimura M, Tanaka T. 1996. Significance of stemflow in groundwater recharge. 1: evaluation of the stemflow contribution to recharge using a mass balance approach. Hydrological Processes, 10(1): 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tromble J. 1988. Water interception by two arid land shrubs. Journal of Arid Environments, 15(2): 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt G K. 1960. Distribution of rainfall under forest stands. Forest Science, 6(1): 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt G K, Zwolinski M J. 1964. Absorption of stemflow by bark of young red and white pines. Forest Science, 10(3): 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X P, Li X R, Xiao H L, et al. 2007. Effects of surface characteristics on infiltration patterns in an arid shrub desert. Hydrology Process, 21(1): 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X P, Cui Y, Pan Y X, et al. 2008. Effects of rainfall characteristics on infiltration and redistribution patterns in revegetation-stabilized desert ecosystems. Journal of Hydrology, 358(1–2): 134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiler M, Flühler H. 2004. Inferring flow types from dye patterns in macroporous soils. Geoderma, 120(1–2): 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitford W G, Anderson J, Rice P M. 1997. Stemflow contribution to the ‘fertile island’ effect in creosotebush, Larrea tridentata. Journal of Arid Environments, 35(3): 451–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood M K, Jones T L, Vera-Cruz M T. 1998. Rainfall interception by selected plants in the Chihuahuan Desert. Journal of Range Management, 51(1): 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Grassland and Agro-Ecosystems, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    ShengQi Jian, ChuanYan Zhao & ShuMin Fang

  2. College of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    ShuMin Fang

  3. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Western China Environmental Systems, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    Kai Yu

Authors
  1. ShengQi Jian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. ChuanYan Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. ShuMin Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kai Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ChuanYan Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jian, S., Zhao, C., Fang, S. et al. Characteristics of Caragana korshinskii and Hippophae rhamnoides stemflow and their significance in soil moisture enhancement in Loess Plateau, China. J. Arid Land 6, 105–116 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-013-0189-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-013-0189-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation