Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of mixed-based biochar on water infiltration and evaporation in aeolian sand soil

  • Research article
  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aeolian sandy soil in mining areas exhibits intense evaporation and poor water retention capacity. This study was designed to find a suitable biochar application method to improve soil water infiltration and minimize soil water evaporation for aeolian sand soil. Using the indoor soil column method, we studied the effects of three application patterns (A (0–20 cm was a mixed sample of mixed-based biochar and soil), B (0–10 cm was a mixed sample of mixed-based biochar and soil and 10–20 cm was soil), and C (0–10 cm was soil and 10–20 cm was a mixed sample of mixed-based biochar and soil)), four application amounts (0% (control, CK), 1%, 2%, and 4% of mixed-based biochar in dry soil), and two particle sizes (0.05–0.25 mm (S1) and <0.05 mm (S2)) of mixed-based biochar on water infiltration and evaporation of aeolian sandy soil. We separately used five infiltration models (the Philip, Kostiakov, Horton, USDA-NRCS (United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service), and Kostiakov-Lewis models) to fit cumulative infiltration and time. Compared with CK, the application of mixed-based biochar significantly reduced cumulative soil water infiltration. Under application patterns A, B, and C, the higher the application amount and the finer the particle size were, the lower the migration speed of the wetting front. With the same application amount, cumulative soil water infiltration under application pattern A was the lowest. Taking infiltration for 10 min as an example, the reductions of cumulative soil water infiltration under the treatments of A2%(S2), A4%(S1), A4%(S2), A1%(S1), C2%(S1), and B1%(S1) were higher than 30%, which met the requirements of loess soil hydraulic parameters suitable for plant growth. The five infiltration models well fitted the effects of the treatments of application pattern C and S1 particle size (R2>0.980), but the R2 values of the Horton model exceeded 0.990 for all treatments (except for the treatment B2%(S2)). Compared with CK, all other treatments reduced cumulative soil water infiltration, except for B4%(S2). With the same application amount, cumulative soil water evaporation difference between application patterns A and B was small. Treatments of application pattern C and S1 particle size caused a larger reduction in cumulative soil water evaporation. The reductions in cumulative soil water evaporation under the treatments of C4%(S1), C4%(S2), C2%(S1), and C2%(S2) were over 15.00%. Therefore, applying 2% of mixed-based biochar with S1 particle size to the underlying layer (10–20 cm) could improve soil water infiltration while minimizing soil water evaporation. Moreover, application pattern was the main factor affecting soil water infiltration and evaporation. Further, there were interactions among the three influencing factors in the infiltration process (application amount×particle size with the most important interaction), while there were no interactions among them in the evaporation process. The results of this study could contribute to the rational application of mixed-based biochar in aeolian sandy soil and the resource utilization of urban and agricultural wastes in mining areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad M, Lee S S, Dou X M, et al. 2012. Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soybean stover- and peanut shell-derived biochar properties and TCE adsorption in water. Bioresource Technology, 118: 536–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaa I, Adel R A U, Mohammad I A W, et al. 2017. Effects of conocarpus biochar on hydraulic properties of calcareous sandy soil: influence of particle size and application depth. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 63(2): 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao Z W. 2020. Study on the effect of mixed biochar on soil water and salt transport in gravel-mulched fields. MSc Thesis. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University of Technology. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Basanta R, de Varennes A, Díaz-Raviña M, et al. 2017. Microbial community structure and biomass of a mine soil with different organic and inorganic treatments and native plants. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 17(4): 839–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breus I P, Mishchenko A A, Shinkarev Jr A A, et al. 2014. Effect of organic matter on the sorption activity of heavy loamy soils for volatile organic compounds under low moisture conditions. Eurasian Soil Science, 47(12): 1216–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell L D, Zehetner F, Rampazzo N, et al. 2016. Long-term effects of biochar on soil physical properties. Geoderma, 282: 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan R, Fedler C B, Borrelli J. 2011. Field evaluation of infiltration models in lawn soils. Irrigation Science, 29: 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Githinji L. 2013. Effect of biochar application rate on soil physical and hydraulic properties of a sandy loam. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 60(4): 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green W H, Ampt G A. 1911. Studies of soil physics. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton R E. 1941. An approach toward a physical interpretation of infiltration capacity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 5: 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y J, Hyun J, Yoo S Y, et al. 2021. The role of biochar in alleviating soil drought stress in urban roadside greenery. Geoderma, 404: 115223, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinney T J, Masiello C A, Dugan B, et al. 2012. Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures. Biomass and Bioenergy, 41: 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostiakov A N. 1932. On the dynamics of the coefficient of water percolation in soils and on the necessity of studying it from a dynamic point of view for purposes of amelioration. In: Transactions of the 6th Congress of the International Society of Soil Science. Moscow: Society of Soil Science, 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird D A, Fleming P, Davis D D, et al. 2010. Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma, 158(3–4): 443–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J. 2007. A handful of carbon. Nature, 447(7141): 143–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Rillig M C, Thies J, et al. 2011. Biochar effects on soil biota: A review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(9): 1812–1836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Li J, Cheng K, et al. 2016. Soil organic carbon sequestration, yield and income increment of rotational tillage measures on Weibei highland maize field. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 32(5): 104–111. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S L, Wang X, Wang S, et al. 2016. Effects of application patterns and amount of biochar on water infiltration and evaporation. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 32(14): 135–144. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S L, Zhang Y W, Yan W M, et al. 2018. Effect of biochar application method on nitrogen leaching and hydraulic conductivity in a silty clay soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 183: 100–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S L. 2019. Effects of biochar on soil ecological function under dryland farming. PhD Dissertation. Yangling: Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim T J, Spokas K A, Feyereisen G, et al. 2016. Predicting the impact of biochar additions on soil hydraulic properties. Chemosphere, 142: 136–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J L, Ma X Y, Zhang Z H. 2010. Applicability of explicit functions on cumulative infiltration of Green-Ampt model under different conditions. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 18(1): 11–19. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z L, Dugan B, Masiello C A, et al. 2016. Impacts of biochar concentration and particle size on hydraulic conductivity and DOC leaching of biochar—sand mixtures. Journal of Hydrology, 533: 461–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezencev V J. 1948. Theory of formation of the surface runoff. Meteorologia I Gidrologia, 3: 33–46. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Lal R, Zimmerman A R. 2014. Effects of biochar and other amendments on the physical properties and greenhouse gas emissions of an artificially degraded soil. Science of the Total Environment, 487: 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen B T, Lehmann J, Hockaday W C, et al. 2010. Temperature sensitivity of black carbon decomposition and oxidation. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(9): 3324–3331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philip J R. 1957. The theory of infiltration: 1. The infiltration equation and its solution. Soil Science, 83(5): 345–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi R P, Zhang L, Yan Y H, et al. 2014. Effects of biochar addition into soils in semiarid land on water infiltration under the condition of the same bulk density. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25(8): 2281–2288. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Razzaghi F, Obour P B, Arthur E. 2020. Does biochar improve soil water retention? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geoderma, 361: 114055, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J N, Yang R Y, Li W X, et al. 2018. Effect of biochar amendment on water infiltration in a coastal saline soil. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 18: 3271–3279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tammeorg P, Simojoki A, Mäkelä P, et al. 2014. Short-term effects of biochar on soil properties and wheat yield formation with meat bone meal and inorganic fertiliser on a boreal loamy sand. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 191: 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang X J, Li X, Liu X M, et al. 2015. Effects of inorganic and organic amendments on the uptake of lead and trace elements by Brassica chinensis grown in an acidic red soil. Chemosphere, 119: 177–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources and Conservation Service (USDA-URCS). 1974. National Engineering Handbook: Section 15. Irrigation. Washington D.C.: Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-SCS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C Y, Mao X M, Zhao B. 2010. Experiment and simulation of water infiltration of layered sand column in laboratory. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 26: 61–67. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang D Y, Li C Y, Parikh S J, et al. 2019. Impact of biochar on water retention of two agricultural soils: A multi-scale analysis. Geoderma, 340: 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H L, Tang X G, Zhang W, et al. 2015. Effects of biochar application on tilth soil hydraulic properties of sloping cropland of purple soil. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 31(4): 107–112. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang T T, Stewart C S, Ma J B, et al. 2017. Applicability of five models to simulate water infiltration into soil with added biochar. Journal of Arid Land, 9(5): 701–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T T, Stewart C E, Sun C C, et al. 2018. Effects of biochar addition on evaporation in the five typical Loess Plateau soils. CATENA, 162: 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T T, Li G L, Yang K Q, et al. 2021a. Enhanced ammonium removal on biochar from a new forestry waste by ultrasonic activation: Characteristics, mechanisms and evaluation. Science of the Total Environment, 778: 146295, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T T, Zheng J Y, Liu H T, et al. 2021b. Adsorption characteristics and mechanisms of Pb2+ and Cd2+ by a new agricultural waste—Caragana korshinskii biomass derived biochar. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28: 13800–13818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z P, Xie L K, Liu K, et al. 2019. Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and cotton stalks. Waste Management, 89: 430–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen M, Zheng J Y. 2012. Effects of different sizes of biochar and their addition rates on soil shrinkage characteristics. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 19(1): 46–50, 55. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia W S, Yang W Z, Shao M A. 2000. Effect of soil water hysteresis on evaporation and redistribution for huang mian soil. Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University, 23(2): 83–87. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Q, Zhang H P, Shen Y F, et al. 2015. Effects of biochar on water infiltration, evaporation and nitrate leaching in semi-arid loess area. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 31(16): 128–134. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie Q, Wang L M, Qi R P, et al. 2016. Effects of biochar on water infiltration and water holding capacity of loessial soil. Journal of Earth Environment, 7(1): 65–76, 86. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q Z, Du Z L, Lou Y L, et al. 2015. A one-year short-term biochar application improved carbon accumulation in large macroaggregate fractions. CATENA, 127: 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Chen C, Wang D Z, et al. 2020. Effect of long-term organic amendments on the full-range soil water retention characteristics of a Vertisol. Soil and Tillage Research, 202: 104663, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining, Open Foundation Ecological Self-Repair Mechanism and Promotion Technology in Shendong Mining Area, China (GJNY-18-73.19), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFC1806502).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China

    Yiping Zou, Shuyue Zhang, Ziyue Shi, Huixin Zhou, Haowei Zheng, Jiahui Hu, Jing Mei & Jianli Jia

  2. State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining, Beijing, 102211, China

    Lu Bai

  3. National Institute of Clean-and-Low-Carbon Energy, Beijing, 102211, China

    Lu Bai

Authors
  1. Yiping Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuyue Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ziyue Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huixin Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Haowei Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiahui Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jing Mei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lu Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jianli Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianli Jia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zou, Y., Zhang, S., Shi, Z. et al. Effects of mixed-based biochar on water infiltration and evaporation in aeolian sand soil. J. Arid Land 14, 374–389 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-022-0060-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-022-0060-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation