Abstract
Climate change is arguably the most pressing issue facing humanity today. There is significant research to support the argument that climate change is a human-created problem and it can only be addressed by changing human behavior. Despite the magnitude of the issue and the potential for behavior science to make a significant contribution, there are few behavior analysts/scientists currently working in climate change. One possible explanation is that there is limited access to preparation for and opportunities to apply our science to large-scale issues. In response, the Behaviorists for Social Responsibility Special Interest Group of the Association for Behavior Analysis International developed the Matrix Project as a way to apply Behavioral Systems Analysis to issues of social importance. By understanding the contingencies that hinder or promote working in a particular area we can begin to create the conditions that will facilitate such work. The purpose of this article is twofold: 1) to demonstrate how the Matrix Project may be used to increase the likelihood that behavior analysts/scientists will work in areas of social importance using environmental sustainability as an example, and 2) encourage behavior analysts/scientists to target and understand complex systems by providing examples of actionable steps that could be generalized to other important social issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a full bibliography of articles pertaining to sustainability in behavior analytic/scientific journals, see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EkO8kYef0pc41SqcBg6MvvkXcHlIRBJqpaV3SgMcnMI/edit
Behavior Analysis in Practice, Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, Behavior and Social Issues, Behavioral Assessment, Behavioral Intervention, Behavior Modification, European Journal of Behavior Analysis, Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, The Behavior Analyst
These data are derived from an unpublished literature review conducted by Dr. Derek Reed and Brett Gelino. Details of this search are provided later in the document.
At the BFSR website readers can find an explanation of what the Matrix Project is as well as links to descriptions of each sector. For each sector feasible practices are identified and analyzed in terms of opposing practices, necessary antecedents, and potential reinforcers. The analyses are continually evolving. If the antecedents identified and arranged do not evoke the target practices, then new antecedents must be identified and arranged. If the consequences do not sustain the target practices, then new consequences must be identified and arranged.
For a complete list of all 28 sectors, see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e2GxlPF6gQhWmObK0tbcmVu5W8bOgTr6KsWe-0LDOWs/edit
These antecedents might be arranged by members of that sector or by members of other sectors. The example of the course units described later in the manuscript is an example of antecedents for individual faculty members, arranged by members of the BFSR SIG to set the occasion for faculty members to include sustainability-related content in their courses.
Behavior Analysis in Practice, Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, Behavior and Social Issues, Behavioral Assessment, Behavioral Intervention, Behavior Modification, European Journal of Behavior Analysis, Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, The Behavior Analyst
Sustainability articles were coded with respect to the BCBA/BCaBA Task List (5th ed.) as an example of how sustainability could be added as focus of behavior-analytic/scientific training. Future improvements to the model syllabi might include references to other relevant training requirements (e.g., ABAI accreditation, training toward a sustainability-specific certification).
References
Alavosius, M., & Newsome, W. D. (2012). Cooperatives, green behavior, and environmental protection. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologìa, 44(1), 77–85.
Austin, J., Hatfield, D. B., Grindle, A. C., & Bailey, J. S. (1993). Increasing recycling in office environments: The effects of specific, informative cues. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26(2), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1993.26-247.
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2017). BCBA/BCaBA task list (5th ed.). Littleton, CO: Author.
Biglan, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices: A contextualist framework for intervention research. Reno, NV: Context Press.
Binder, C. (2017). What it really means to be accomplishment-based. Performance Improvement, 56(4), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21702.
Burgess, R. L., Clark, R. N., & Hendee, J. C. (1971). An experimental analysis of anti-litter procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4(2), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1971.4-71.
Carvalho, L. C., Sandaker, I., & Ree, G. (2017). An ethnographic study of tagging cultures. Behavior & Social Issues, 26, 67–94. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v26i0.6621.
Chance, P. (2007). The ultimate challenge: Prove B. F. Skinner wrong. The Behavior Analyst, 30, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392152.
Chance, P., & Heward, W. L. (2010). Climate change: Meeting the challenge. The Behavior Analyst, 33(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392219.
Cihon, T. M. (2018). Building Behavior Analysis Courses Around Social Issues [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://science.abainternational.org/building-behavior-analysis-courses-around-social-issues/traci-cihonunt-edu/
Clayton, M., & Nesnidol, S. (2017). Reducing electricity use on campus: The use of prompts, feedback, and goal setting to decrease excessive classroom lighting. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(2), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2017.1325823.
Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Rehfeldt, R. A., & Root, W. B. (2018). Why we are still not acting to save the world: The upward challenge of a post-Skinnerian behavior science. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 1–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0162-9
Fawcett, S. B. (1991). Social validity: A note on methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(2), 235–239. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-235.
Geller, E. S. (1981). Evaluating energy conservation programs: Is verbal report enough? Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), 331–335 Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2488892.
Geller, E. S. (1990). Editorial: Behavior analysis and environmental protection: Where have all the flowers gone? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 269–273.
Geller, E. S. (1995). Actively caring for the environment: An integration of behaviorism and humanism. Environment & Behavior, 27(2), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916595272004.
Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R. A., Sandaker, I., et al. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior & Social Issues, 25, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6634.
Grant, L. (2011). Sustainability: From excess to aesthetics. Behavior & Social Issues, 19, 7–47. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v19i0.2789.
Hake, D. F., & Zane, T. (1981). A community-based gasoline conservation project: Practical and methodological considerations. Behavior Modification, 5(4), 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/014544558154001.
Hayes, S. C., & Cone, J. D. (1977). Reducing residential electrical energy use: Payments, information and feedback. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10(3), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1977.10-425.
IPCC. (2018). Summary for policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5 C. An IPCC Special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty Ed. V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, & T. Waterfield. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.
LeBlanc, L. A., Heinicke, M. R., & Baker, J. C. (2012). Expanding the consumer base for behavior-analytic services: Meeting the needs of consumers in the 21st century. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391813.
Leigland, S. (2011). Beyond freedom and dignity at 40: Comments on behavioral science, the future, and Chance (2007). The Behavior Analyst, 34(2), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392258.
Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Science, 45, 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0.
Luke, M. M., Roose, K. M., Rakos, R. F., & Mattaini, M. A. (2017). The history and current status of Behavior and Social Issues: 1978–2016. Behavior & Social Issues, 26, 111–127. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v.26i0.7728.
Manuel, J. C., Sunseri, M. A., Olson, R., & Scolari, M. (2007). A diagnostic approach to increase reusable dinnerware selection in a cafeteria. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.143-05.
Matrix Project. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e2GxlPF6gQhWmObK0tbcmVu5W8bOgTr6KsWe-0LDOWs/edit.
Mattaini, M. A. (2013). Strategic nonviolent power: The science of satyagraha. Edmonton, Canada: AU Press.
Mattaini, M. A., & Aspholm, R. (2016). Contributions of behavioral systems science to leadership for a new progressive movement. The Behavior Analyst, 39(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-015-0043-4.
Mattaini, M. A., & Luke, M. (2014). Editorial: “Saving the World” with a matrix. Behavior & Social Issues, 23, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v23i0.5860.
Mayors Climate Protection Center. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.usmayors.org/mayors-climate-protection-center/.
Nevada Institute for Sustainability (n.d.). Retrieved from see https://www.unr.edu/nvis
O’Connor, R. T., Lerman, D. C., & Fritz, J. N. (2010). Effects of number and location of bins on plastic recycling at a university. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(4), 711–715. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-711.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.
Rumph, R., Ninness, C., McCuller, G., & Ninness, S. K. (2005). Guest editorial: Twenty years later, commentary on Skinner's "Why we are not acting to save the world". Behavior and Social Issues, 14(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v14i1.117.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Free Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1987). Why we are not acting to save the world. In Upon further reflection (pp. 1–14). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall (Original work published 1982).
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Tuso, M. A., & Geller, E. S. (1976). Behavior analysis applied to environmental/ecological problems: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9(4), 526. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1976.9-526.
We Mean Green Fund. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://studentaffairs.unt.edu/we-mean-green-fund.
Wilhite, C., & Weinman, B. (2018). Interdisciplinary sustainability at Fresno State. Paper presented as part of a symposium Fighting Climate Change Together: Successes and Opportunities for Behavior Analysis Principles in the Mainstream at the 44th annual Association for Behavior Analysis International Convention.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The information presented here is in compliance with the ethical standards of this journal.
Conflict of Interest
Holly A. Seniuk, Traci M. Cihon, Molly Benson, and Molli M. Luke declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
No human or animal subjects took part in the current study.
Additional information
All reviews and editorial decisions for this manuscript were handled independently by Associate Editor Dr. Ingunn Sandaker.
The authors of this manuscript extend their immense gratitude to the Behaviorists for Social Responsibility Special Interest Group for their dedication to addressing important social issues and their work on the BFSR Matrix Project, without which this manuscript and the work that it describes would not be possible.
This article is not an official position of the Behavior Analyst Certification Board.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seniuk, H.A., Cihon, T.M., Benson, M. et al. Making a Footprint in Environmental Sustainability: A Behavioral Systems Approach to Engaging the Behavioral Community. Perspect Behav Sci 42, 911–926 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00233-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00233-y