Abstract
We review some aspects of the dramatic consequences of supersymmetry breaking on string vacua. In particular, we focus on the issue of vacuum stability in ten-dimensional string models with broken, or without, supersymmetry, whose perturbative spectra are free of tachyons. After formulating the models at stake, we introduce their unified low-energy effective description and present a number of vacuum solutions to the classical equations of motion. In addition, we present a generalization of previous no-go results for de Sitter vacua in warped flux compactifications. Then we analyze the classical and quantum stability of these vacua, studying linearized field fluctuations and bubble nucleation. Then, we describe how the resulting instabilities can be framed in terms of brane dynamics, examining in particular brane interactions, back-reacted geometries and commenting on a brane-world string construction along the lines of a recent proposal. After providing a summary, we conclude with some perspectives on possible future developments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We remark that, in this context, modular invariance arises as the residual gauge invariance left after fixing world-sheet diffeomorphisms and Weyl rescalings. Hence, violations of modular invariance would result in gauge anomalies.
We work in ten space–time dimensions, since non-critical string perturbation theory entails a number of challenges.
Non-vanishing values of the argument z of Jacobi \(\vartheta \) functions are nonetheless useful in string theory. They are involved, for instance, in the study of string perturbation theory on more general backgrounds and D-brane scattering.
We remark that different combinations of characters reflect different projections at the level of the Hilbert space.
In the present context, spin-statistics amounts to positive (resp. negative) contributions from space–time bosons (resp. fermions).
Despite this fact the type IIB superstring is actually anomaly-free, as well as all five supersymmetric models owing to the Green–Schwarz mechanism [48]. This remarkable result was a considerable step forward in the development of string theory.
The “hatted” characters appear since the modular paramater of the covering torus of the Möbius strip is not real, and they ensure that states contribute with integer degeneracies.
Since the \(\text {D}9\)-branes are on top of the \(\text {O}9_-\)-plane, counting conventions can differ based on whether one includes “image” branes.
The corresponding orientifold projections of the type 0A model were also investigated. See [45], and references therein.
Strictly speaking, the anomalous U(1) factor carried by the corresponding gauge vector disappears from the low-lying spectrum, thus effectively reducing the group to SU(32).
One can alternatively build heterotic right-moving sectors using ten-dimensional strings with auxiliary fermions.
At the level of the space–time effective action, the vacuum energy contributes to the string-frame cosmological constant. In the Einstein frame, it corresponds to a runaway exponential potential for the dilaton.
The case \(\gamma = 0\), which at any rate does not arise in string perturbation theory, would not complicate matters further.
In Eq. (3.5) we have used the notation \(F_3 = dC_2\) in order to stress the Ramond-Ramond (RR) origin of the field strength.
At any rate, it is worth noting that world-sheet conformal field theories on \(\mathrm {AdS}_3\) backgrounds have been related to WZW models, which can afford \(\alpha '\)-exact algebraic descriptions [81].
For a similar analysis of a T-dual version of the USp(32) model, see [82].
The supersymmetry-breaking tadpoles cannot be sent to zero in a smooth fashion. However, it is instructive to treat them as parameters, in order to highlight their rôle.
The Laplacian spectrum of the internal space \({\mathscr {M}}_q\) can have some bearing on perturbative stability.
The flux n in Eq. (3.31) is normalized for later convenience, although it is not dimensionless nor an integer.
Analogous results in tachyonic type 0 strings were obtained in [90].
Despite conceptual and technical issues, non-supersymmetric dualities connecting the heterotic model to open strings have been explored in [91, 92]. Similar interpolation techniques have been employed in [93]. A non-perturbative interpretation of non-supersymmetric heterotic models has been proposed in [94].
For recent results on the issue of scale separation in supersymmetric \(\mathrm {AdS}\) compactifications, see [97].
The same result was derived in [118].
The constraint \({\mathscr {V}} > 0\) can also be recast in terms of \(\phi \) and \(\rho \) only, with no parametric dependence left.
Notice that, in order to canonically normalize the radion, one needs to rescale the field \(\psi (x)\) that we have introduced in Sect. 3.
An analogous idea in the context of higher-dimensional \({\text {dS}}\) space–times was put forth in [125].
The same conclusion can be reached computing the effective nine-dimensional Newton constant [31].
We reserve the symbol B for scalar perturbations of the form field, which we shall introduce in Sect. 4.3.
The stability analysis of scalar perturbations can also be carried out in general dimensions and for general parameters without additional difficulties, but we have not found such generalizations particularly instructive in the context of this review.
Here and in the following \(\epsilon \) denotes the Levi-Civita tensor, which includes the metric determinant prefactor.
Choosing a different internal space would require knowledge of its (tensor) Laplacian spectrum.
In all these expressions that refer to vector perturbations \(\ell \ge 1\), as described in Appendix A.
We use the convention in which the mass matrix \({\mathscr {M}}^2\) appears alongside the d’Alembert operator in the combination \(\Box - {\mathscr {M}}^2\).
The overall derivative can be removed on account of suitable boundary conditions.
For recent results on unstable modes of non-vanishing angular momentum in \(\mathrm {AdS}\) compactifications, see [139].
Projections that leave a sub-variety fixed could entail subtleties related to twisted states that become massless.
For a recent investigation along these lines in the context of the (massive) type IIA superstring, see [127].
It is worth noting that this large-N limit is not uniform, since factors of \(\frac{1}{N}\) are accompanied by factors that diverge in the near-horizon limit. In principle, a resummation of \(\frac{1}{N}\) corrections could cure this problem.
We shall not discuss the Gibbons–Hawking–York boundary term, which is to be included at any rate to consistently formulate the variational problem.
For a detailed exposition of the resulting (distributional) differential equations, see [148].
On the other hand, as we have mentioned, the extreme case \(\delta n = n\) would correspond to the production of a bubble of nothing [151].
Notice that Eq. (5.17) takes the form of an effective action for a \((p+1)\)-brane in \(\mathrm {AdS}\) electrically coupled to \(H_{p+2}\). This observation is the basis for the microscopic picture that we shall present shortly.
Notice that in the gravitational picture the charge of the membrane does not appear. Indeed, its contribution arises from the volume term of Eq. (5.14) in the thin-wall approximation.
The alternative case of \(\mathrm {AdS}_7\) could be studied, in principle, via \(\text {M}5\)-brane stacks.
Indeed, our results suggest that the solutions of [31], which are not fluxed, correspond to 8-branes.
For a discussion of this type of phenomenon in Calabi-Yau compactifications, see [12].
One can verify that this ansatz is consistent with the equations of motion for linearized perturbations.
As we have anticipated, verifying the charge-tension equality in the non-supersymmetric case presents some challenges. We shall elaborate upon this issue in Sect. 6.2.3.
The systematics of computations of this type in the bosonic case were developed in [164].
Even if one were to envision a pathological Minkowski solution with “\(\phi = -\infty \)” as a degenerate background (for instance, by introducing a cut-off), no asymptotically flat solution with \(\phi \; \rightarrow \; -\infty \) can be found.
Up to the sign of r and rescalings of \(R_0\), this realization of \({\mathrm {AdS}\times {\mathbb {S}}}\) with given L and R is unique.
In either case we shall find that the geodesic distance is finite.
In the supersymmetric case the contribution arising from the dilaton tadpole is absent, and the resulting system is integrable. Moreover, for \(p = 8 \, , q = 0\) the system is also integrable, since only the dilaton tadpole contributes.
The sub-linear case is controlled by the parameters \(\phi _1 \, , v_1 \, , b_1\), which can be tuned as long as the constraint is satisfied. In particular, the differences \(L - L_{n,c}\) do not contain \(v_1\).
More precisely, the asymptotics for the metric in Eq. (6.48) refer to the exponents in the warp factors, which are related to v and b. Subleading terms could lead to additional prefactors in the metric.
In particular, on account of the analysis that we described in the preceding section, it is reasonable to expect that in the orientifold models the Dudas–Mourad solution corresponds to \(\text {D}8\)-branes.
The generalization to non-extremal p-branes of different dimensions would entail solving non-integrable systems, whose correct boundary conditions are not well-understood hitherto. Moreover, a reliable probe-brane regime would exclude the pinch-off asymptotic region, thereby requiring numerical computations.
While the number \(N_8\) of 8-branes does not appear explicitly in the solution, there is a single free parameter \(g_s \equiv e^{\varPhi _0}\), which one could expect to be determined by \(N_8\) analogously to the extremal case, with \(g_s \ll 1\) for \(N_8 \gg 1\).
As we have discussed in Sect. 6.2.4, the leading-order behavior of the pinch-off singularity is expected to be applicable to the non-extremal case, since it is dominated by the dilaton potential.
The ensuing string amplitude computation is expected to be reliable as long as \(N_p\) and \(N_q\) are \({\mathscr {O}}\!\left( 1\right) \), complementary to the probe regimes \(N_p \gg N_q\) and \(N_p \ll N_q\).
For a more recent analysis in the case of the five-sphere, see [181].
References
A.M. Polyakov, Quantum geometry of bosonic strings, ed. I. Khalatnikov and and V. Mineev. Phys. Lett. B 103, 207–210 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(81)90743-7
A.M. Polyakov, Quantum geometry of fermionic strings, ed. by I. Khalatnikov, V. Mineev. Phys. Lett. B 103, 211–213 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(81)90744-9
J. Callan Curtis, E. Martinec, M. Perry, D. Friedan, Strings in background fields. Nucl. Phys. B 262, 593–609 (1985)
J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2,231(1998)], 1113–1133 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9711200
T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. Shenker, L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: A Conjecture. Phys. Rev. D 55, 5112–5128 (1997). arXiv:hep-th/9610043
E. Witten, String theory dynamics in various dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B 443, 85–126 (1995). arXiv:hep-th/9503124
W. Fischler, L. Susskind, Dilaton Tadpoles, String Condensates and Scale Invariance. Phys. Lett. B 171, 383–389 (1986)
W. Fischler, L. Susskind, Dilaton tadpoles, string condensates and scale invariance. 2. Phys. Lett. B 173, 262–264 (1986)
E. Dudas, G. Pradisi, M. Nicolosi, A. Sagnotti, On tadpoles and vacuum redefinitions in string theory, Nucl. Phys. B708, 3–44 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0410101
N. Kitazawa, Tadpole resummations in string theory. Phys. Lett. B 660, 415–421 (2008). arXiv:0801.1702 [hep-th]
R. Pius, A. Rudra, A. Sen, String perturbation theory around dynamically shifted vacuum. JHEP 10, 70 (2014). arXiv:1404.6254 [hep-th]
S. Kachru, J. Pearson, H. L. Verlinde, Brane / flux annihilation and the string dual of a nonsupersymmetric field theory, JHEP 06, 021 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0112197
S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde, S.P. Trivedi, De Sitter vacua in string theory. Phys. Rev. D 68, 046005 (2003). arXiv:hep-th/0301240
F. Gautason, V. Van Hemelryck, T. Van Riet, The Tension between 10D Supergravity and dS Uplifts. Fortsch. Phys. 67, 1800091 (2019). arXiv:1810.08518 [hep-th]
Y. Hamada, A. Hebecker, G. Shiu, P. Soler, Understanding KKLT from a 10d perspective. JHEP 06, 019 (2019). arXiv:1902.01410 [hep-th]
F. Gautason, V. Van Hemelryck, T. Van Riet, G. Venken, A 10d view on the KKLT AdS vacuum and uplifting. JHEP 06, 074 (2020). arXiv:1902.01415 [hep-th]
H. Ooguri, C. Vafa, Non-supersymmetric AdS and the Swampland, (2016), arXiv:1610.01533 [hep-th]
T. D. Brennan, F. Carta, C. Vafa, The String Landscape, the Swampland, and the Missing Corner, PoS TASI2017, 015 (2017), arXiv:1711.00864 [hep-th]
G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko, C. Vafa, De Sitter Space and the Swampland, (2018), arXiv:1806.08362 [hep-th]
E. Palti, The Swampland: Introduction and Review. Fortsch. Phys. 67, 1900037 (2019). arXiv:1903.06239 [hep-th]
N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis, C. Vafa, The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force, JHEP 06, 060 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0601001
I. Basile, J. Mourad, A. Sagnotti, On Classical Stability with Broken Supersymmetry. JHEP 01, 174 (2019). arXiv:1811.11448 [hep-th]
R. Antonelli, I. Basile, Brane annihilation in non-supersymmetric strings. JHEP 11, 021 (2019). arXiv:1908.04352 [hep-th]
I. Basile, S. Lanza, de Sitter in non-supersymmetric string theories: nogo theorems and brane-worlds. JHEP 10, 108 (2020). arXiv:2007.13757 [hep-th]
I. Basile, On String Vacua without Supersymmetry: brane dynamics, bubbles and holography, PhD thesis (Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore, 2020), arXiv:2010.00628 [hep-th]
S. Sugimoto, Anomaly cancellations in type I D-9 - anti-D-9 system and the USp(32) string theory, Prog. Theor. Phys. 102, 685–699 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9905159
A. Sagnotti, Some properties of open string theories, in Supersymmetry and unification of fundamental interactions. Proceedings, International Workshop, SUSY 95, Palaiseau, France, May 15-19 (1995), pp. 473–484, arXiv:hep-th/9509080
A. Sagnotti, Surprises in open string perturbation theory,Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 56B, 332–343 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9702093
L. Alvarez-Gaume, P.H. Ginsparg, G.W. Moore, C. Vafa, An O(16) x O(16) heterotic string. Phys. Lett. B 171, 155–162 (1986)
L. J. Dixon, J. A. Harvey, String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B274, [93(1986)], 93–105 (1986)
E. Dudas, J. Mourad, Brane solutions in strings with broken supersymmetry and dilaton tadpoles, Phys. Lett. B486, 172–178 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/0004165
J. Mourad, A. Sagnotti, AdS vacua from dilaton tadpoles and form fluxes. Phys. Lett. B 768, 92–96 (2017). arXiv:1612.08566 [hep-th]
G. Gibbons, ASPECTS OF SUPERGRAVITY THEORIES, in XV GIFT Seminar on Supersymmetry and Supergravity (June 1984)
J.M. Maldacena, C. Nunez, Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, edited by M. J. Duff, J. Liu, and J. Lu, 822–855 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0007018
H. Ooguri, C. Vafa, On the geometry of the string landscape and the swampland. Nucl. Phys. B 766, 21–33 (2007). arXiv:hep-th/0605264
H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu, C. Vafa, Distance and de Sitter conjectures on the swampland. Phys. Lett. B 788, 180–184 (2019). arXiv:1810.05506 [hep-th]
D. Lüst, E. Palti, C. Vafa, AdS and the Swampland. Phys. Lett. B 797, 134867 (2019). arXiv:1906.05225 [hep-th]
S. Banerjee, U. Danielsson, G. Dibitetto, S. Giri, M. Schillo, Emergent de Sitter cosmology from decaying anti-de sitter space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 261301 (2018). arXiv:1807.01570 [hep-th]
S. Banerjee, U. Danielsson, G. Dibitetto, S. Giri, M. Schillo, de Sitter Cosmology on an expanding bubble. JHEP 10, 164 (2019). arXiv:1907.04268 [hep-th]
S. Banerjee, U. Danielsson, S. Giri, Dark bubbles: decorating the wall. JHEP 20, 085 (2020). arXiv:2001.07433 [hep-th]
I. Antoniadis, E. Dudas, A. Sagnotti, Brane supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Lett. B464, 38–45 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9908023
C. Angelantonj, Comments on open string orbifolds with a nonvanishing B(ab). Nucl. Phys. B 566, 126–150 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/9908064
G. Aldazabal, A.M. Uranga, Tachyon free nonsupersymmetric type IIB orientifolds via Brane-anti-brane systems. JHEP 10, 024 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9908072
C. Angelantonj, I. Antoniadis, G. DAppollonio, E. Dudas, A. Sagnotti, Type I vacua with brane supersymmetry breaking. Nucl. Phys. B 572, 36–70 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/9911081 [hep-th]
C. Angelantonj, A. Sagnotti, Open strings, Phys. Rept. 371, [Erratum: Phys. Rept.376, no.6, 407(2003)], 1–150 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0204089
J. Mourad, A. Sagnotti, An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking, (2017), arXiv:1711.11494 [hep-th]
E. Whittaker, G. Watson, A Course of Modern Analysis, A Course of Modern Analysis: An Introduction to the General Theory of Infinite Processes and of Analytic Functions, with an Account of the Principal Transcendental Functions (Cambridge University Press, 1996)
M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz, Anomaly cancellation in supersymmetric D=10Gauge theory and superstring theory. Phys. Lett. B 149, 117–122 (1984)
E. Dudas, J. Mourad, Consistent gravitino couplings in nonsupersymmetric strings. Phys. Lett. B 514, 173–182 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0012071
E. Dudas, J. Mourad, A. Sagnotti, Charged and uncharged D-branes in various string theories. Nucl. Phys. B 620, 109–151 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0107081
A. Sagnotti, Open Strings and their Symmetry Groups, in NATO Advanced Summer Institute on Nonperturbative Quantum Field Theory (Cargese Summer Institute) Cargese, France, July 16-30, 1987 (1987), pp. 521–528, arXiv:hep-th/0208020
G. Pradisi, A. Sagnotti, Open string orbifolds. Phys. Lett. B 216, 59–67 (1989)
P. Horava, Strings on world sheet orbifolds. Nucl. Phys. B 327, 461–484 (1989)
P. Horava, Background duality of open stringmodels. Phys. Lett. B 231, 251–257 (1989)
M. Bianchi, A. Sagnotti, On the systematics of open string theories. Phys. Lett. B 247, 517–524 (1990)
M. Bianchi, A. Sagnotti, Twist symmetry and open stringWilson lines. Nucl. Phys. B 361, 519–538 (1991)
M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi, A. Sagnotti, Toroidal compactification and symmetry breaking in open string theories. Nucl. Phys. B 376, 365–386 (1992)
A. Sagnotti, A Note on the Green–Schwarz mechanism in open string theories. Phys. Lett. B 294, 196–203 (1992). arXiv:hep-th/9210127
E. Dudas, Theory and phenomenology of type I strings and M theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 17, R41.R116 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0006190 [hep-ph]
G. Pradisi, F. Riccioni, Geometric couplings and brane supersymmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B615, 33.60 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0107090 [hep-th]
N. Kitazawa, Brane SUSY Breaking and the Gravitino Mass. JHEP 04, 081 (2018). arXiv:1802.03088 [hep-th]
A. Sagnotti, “Low-\(\ell \) CMB from string-scale SUSY breaking?”, Mod. Phys. Lett. A32, [Subnucl. Ser.53,289(2017)], 1730001 arXiv:1509.08204 [astro-ph.CO]
A. Gruppuso, N. Kitazawa, N. Mandolesi, P. Natoli, A. Sagnotti, Pre- Inflationary Relics in the CMB? Phys. Dark Univ. 11, 68–73 (2016). arXiv:1508.00411 [astro-ph.CO]
A. Gruppuso, N. Kitazawa, M. Lattanzi, N. Mandolesi, P. Natoli, A. Sagnotti, The evens and odds of CMB anomalies. Phys. Dark Univ. 20, 49–64 (2018). arXiv:1712.03288 [astro-ph.CO]
L. Susskind, Supersymmetry breaking in the anthropic landscape, edited by M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, and J. Wheater, 1745– arXiv:hep-th/0405189
M. R. Douglas, Statistical analysis of the supersymmetry breaking scale, (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0405279
K.R. Dienes, New string partition functions with vanishing cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1979–1982 (1990)
K.R. Dienes, Generalized Atkin–Lehner symmetry. Phys. Rev. D 42, 2004–2021 (1990)
S. Kachru, J. Kumar, E. Silverstein, Vacuum energy cancellation in a nonsupersymmetric string. Phys. Rev. D 59, 106004 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9807076
C. Angelantonj, M. Cardella, Vanishing perturbative vacuum energy in nonsupersymmetric orientifolds. Phys. Lett. B 595, 505–512 (2004). arXiv:hep-th/0403107
S. Abel, K.R. Dienes, E. Mavroudi, Towards a nonsupersymmetric string phenomenology. Phys. Rev. D 91, 126014 (2015). arXiv:1502.03087 [hep-th]
S. Abel, R.J. Stewart, Exponential suppression of the cosmological constant in nonsupersymmetric string vacua at two loops and beyond. Phys. Rev. D 96, 106013 (2017). arXiv:1701.06629 [hep-th]
S. Abel, K.R. Dienes, E. Mavroudi, GUT precursors and entwined SUSY: The phenomenology of stable nonsupersymmetric strings. Phys. Rev. D 97, 126017 (2018). arXiv:1712.06894 [hep-ph]
J.M. Ashfaque, P. Athanasopoulos, A.E. Faraggi, H. Sonmez, NonTachyonic semi-realistic non-supersymmetric heterotic string vacua. Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 208 (2016). arXiv:1506.03114 [hep-th]
A.E. Faraggi, String phenomenology from a worldsheet perspective. Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 703 (2019). arXiv:1906.09448 [hep-th]
A.E. Faraggi, V.G. Matyas, B. Percival, Stable three generation standard- like model from a tachyonic ten dimensional heterotic-string vacuum. Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 337 (2020). arXiv:1912.00061 [hep-th]
M. Blaszczyk, S. Groot Nibbelink, O. Loukas, F. Ruehle, Calabi-Yau compactifications of non-supersymmetric heterotic string theory. JHEP 10, 166 (2015). arXiv:1507.06147 [hep-th]
P. G. Freund, M. A. Rubin, Dynamics of Dimensional Reduction, Phys. Lett. B 97, edited by A. Salam and E. Sezgin, 233–[79] E. Silverstein, (A)dS backgrounds fromasymmetric orientifolds, ClayMat. Proc. 1, 179 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0106209
E. Silverstein, (A)dS backgrounds from a symmetric orientifolds. Clay Mat. Proc. 1, 179 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0106209
A. Maloney, E. Silverstein, A. Strominger, De Sitter space in noncritical string theory, in Workshop on Conference on the Future of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology in Honor of Steven Hawking’s 60th Birthday (May 2002), pp. 570–591, arXiv:hep-th/0205316
J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, Strings in AdS(3) and SL(2,R) WZW model 1.: The Spectrum, J. Math. Phys. 42, 2929–2960 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0001053
R. Blumenhagen, A. Font, Dilaton tadpoles, warped geometries and large extra dimensions for nonsupersymmetric strings. Nucl. Phys. B 599, 241–254 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0011269
P. Pelliconi, A. Sagnotti, Integrable models and supersymmetry breaking. Nucl. Phys. B 965, 115363 (2021). arXiv:2102.06184 [hep-th]
P. Fré, A. Sagnotti, A. Sorin, Integrable Scalar Cosmologies I. Foundations and links with String Theory. Nucl. Phys. B 877, 1028–1106 (2013). arXiv:1307.1910 [hep-th]
E. Dudas, N. Kitazawa, A. Sagnotti, On climbing scalars in string theory. Phys. Lett. B 694, 80–88 (2011). arXiv:1009.0874 [hep-th]
C. Condeescu, E. Dudas, Kasner solutions, climbing scalars and bigbang singularity. JCAP 08, 013 (2013). arXiv:1306.0911 [hep-th]
C. Angelantonj, A. Armoni, Nontachyonic type 0B orientifolds, nonsupersymmetric gauge theories and cosmological RG flow. Nucl. Phys. B 578, 239–258 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/9912257
C. Angelantonj, A. Armoni, RG flow, Wilson loops and the dilaton tadpole. Phys. Lett. B 482, 329–336 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/0003050
E. Dudas, J. Mourad, D-branes in nontachyonic 0B orientifolds. Nucl. Phys. B 598, 189–224 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0010179
I.R. Klebanov, A.A. Tseytlin, D-branes and dual gauge theories in type 0 strings. Nucl. Phys. B 546, 155–181 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9811035
J.D. Blum, K.R. Dienes, Duality without supersymmetry: The Case of the SO(16) \(\times \) SO(16) string. Phys. Lett. B 414, 260–268 (1997). arXiv:hep-th/9707148
J.D. Blum, K.R. Dienes, Strong/weak coupling duality relations for nonsupersymmetric string theories. Nucl. Phys. B 516, 83–159 (1998). arXiv:hep-th/9707160
A.E. Faraggi, M. Tsulaia, Interpolations Among NAHE-based supersymmetric and nonsupersymmetric string vacua. Phys. Lett. B 683, 314–320 (2010). arXiv:0911.5125 [hep-th]
A.E. Faraggi, M. Tsulaia, On the Low Energy Spectra of the Nonsupersymmetric Heterotic String Theories. Eur. Phys. J. C 54, 495–500 (2008). arXiv:0706.1649 [hep-th]
D. Lüst, D. Tsimpis, \({{\rm AdS}}_2\) Type-IIA Solutions and Scale Separation, (2020), arXiv:2004.07582 [hep-th]
F. Gautason, M. Schillo, T. Van Riet, M. Williams, Remarks on scale separation in flux vacua. JHEP 03, 061 (2016). arXiv:1512.00457 [hep-th]
F. Marchesano, E. Palti, J. Quirant, A. Tomasiello, On supersymmetric \({{\rm AdS}}_4\) orientifold vacua, (2020), arXiv:2003.13578 [hep-th]
A.R. Brown, A. Dahlen, Small steps and giant leaps in the landscape. Phys. Rev. D 82, 083519 (2010). arXiv:1004.3994 [hep-th]
K. Dasgupta, G. Rajesh, S. Sethi, M theory, orientifolds and G-flux. JHEP 08, 023 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9908088
S.B. Giddings, S. Kachru, J. Polchinski, Hierarchies from fluxes in string compactifications. Phys. Rev. D 66, 106006 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0105097
M.P. Hertzberg, S. Kachru, W. Taylor, M. Tegmark, Inflationary constraints on type IIA string theory. JHEP 12, 095 (2007). arXiv:0711.2512 [hep-th]
S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, T. Weigand, Emergent Strings, Duality and Weak Coupling Limits for Two-Form Fields, (2019), arXiv:1904.06344 [hep-th]
S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, T. Weigand, Emergent Strings from Infinite Distance Limits, (2019), arXiv:1910.01135 [hep-th]
F. Baume, J. Calderón Infante, Tackling the SDC in AdS with CFTs, (2020), arXiv:2011.03583 [hep-th]
E. Perlmutter, L. Rastelli, C. Vafa, I. Valenzuela, A CFT Distance Conjecture, (2020), arXiv:2011.10040 [hep-th]
P. Koerber, L. Martucci, From ten to four and back again: How to generalize the geometry. JHEP 08, 059 (2007). arXiv:0707.1038 [hep-th]
J. Moritz, A. Retolaza, A. Westphal, Toward de Sitter space from ten dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 97, 046010 (2018). arXiv:1707.08678 [hep-th]
R. Kallosh, T. Wrase, dS Supergravity from 10d. Fortsch. Phys. 67, 1800071 (2019). arXiv:1808.09427 [hep-th]
I. Bena, E. Dudas, M. Graña, S. Lüst, Uplifting runaways. Fortsch. Phys. 67, 1800100 (2019). arXiv:1809.06861 [hep-th]
U.H. Danielsson, S.S. Haque, G. Shiu, T. Van Riet, Towards classical de Sitter solutions in string theory. JHEP 09, 114 (2009). arXiv:0907.2041 [hep-th]
C. Córdova, G.B. De Luca, A. Tomasiello, Classical de Sitter solutions of 10-dimensional supergravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 091601 (2019). arXiv:1812.04147 [hep-th]
J. Blåbäck, U. Danielsson, G. Dibitetto, S. Giri, Constructing stable de Sitter in M-theory from higher curvature corrections. JHEP 09, 042 (2019). arXiv:1902.04053 [hep-th]
N. Cribiori, D. Junghans, No classical (anti-)de Sitter solutions with O8planes. Phys. Lett. B 793, 54–58 (2019). arXiv:1902.08209 [hep-th]
D. Andriot, Open problems on classical de Sitter solutions. Fortsch. Phys. 67, 1900026 (2019). arXiv:1902.10093 [hep-th]
C. Córdova, G. B. De Luca, A. Tomasiello, New de Sitter Solutions in Ten Dimensions and Orientifold Singularities, (2019), arXiv:1911.04498 [hep-th]
D. Andriot, P. Marconnet, T. Wrase, New de Sitter solutions of 10d type IIB supergravity. JHEP 08, 076 (2020). arXiv:2005.12930 [hep-th]
D. Andriot, P. Marconnet, T. Wrase, Intricacies of classical de Sitter string backgrounds, (2020), arXiv:2006.01848 [hep-th]
M. Montero, T. Van Riet, G. Venken, A dS obstruction and its phenomenological consequences. JHEP 05, 114 (2020). arXiv:2001.11023 [hep-th]
S.K. Garg, C. Krishnan, Bounds on slow roll and the de sitter swampland. JHEP 11, 075 (2019). arXiv:1807.05193 [hep-th]
J. March-Russell, R. Petrossian-Byrne, QCD, Flavor, and the de Sitter Swampland, (2020), arXiv:2006.01144 [hep-th]
A. Bedroya, C. Vafa, Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland, (2019), arXiv:1909.11063 [hep-th]
A. Bedroya, R. Brandenberger, M. Loverde, C. Vafa, Trans-planckian censorship and inflationary cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 101, 103502 (2020). arXiv:1909.11106 [hep-th]
D. Andriot, N. Cribiori, D. Erkinger, The web of swampland conjectures and the TCC bound. JHEP 07, 162 (2020). arXiv:2004.00030 [hep-th]
S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci, I. Valenzuela, Swampland Conjectures for Strings andMembranes, (2020), arXiv:2006.15154 [hep-th]
S.M. Carroll, M.C. Johnson, L. Randall, Dynamical compactification from de Sitter space. JHEP 11, 094 (2009). arXiv:0904.3115 [hep-th]
F. Apruzzi, M. Fazzi, D. Rosa, A. Tomasiello, All AdS\_7 solutions of type II supergravity. JHEP 04, 064 (2014). arXiv:1309.2949 [hep-th]
F. Apruzzi, G. Bruno De Luca, A. Gnecchi,G. Lo Monaco, A. Tomasiello, On \({{\rm AdS}}_7\) stability, (2019), arXiv:1912.13491 [hep-th]
S.-W. Kim, J. Nishimura, A. Tsuchiya, Expanding (3+1)-dimensional universe from a Lorentzian matrix model for superstring theory in (9+1)- dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 011601 (2012). arXiv:1108.1540 [hep-th]
K.N. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma, Y. Ito, J. Nishimura, S.K. Papadoudis, Complex Langevin analysis of the spontaneous symmetry breaking in dimensionally reduced super Yang–Mills models. JHEP 02, 151 (2018). arXiv:1712.07562 [hep-lat]
N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, A. Tsuchiya, A Large N reduced model as superstring. Nucl. Phys. B 498, 467–491 (1997). arXiv:hep-th/9612115
P. Breitenlohner, D.Z. Freedman, Stability in gauged extended supergravity. Ann. Phys. 144, 249 (1982)
H. Lu, K.-N. Shao, Solutions of free higher spins in AdS. Phys. Lett. B 706, 106–109 (2011). arXiv:1110.1138 [hep-th]
S.S. Gubser, I. Mitra, Some interesting violations of the Breitenlohner– Freedman bound. JHEP 07, 044 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0108239
O. DeWolfe, D.Z. Freedman, S.S. Gubser, G.T. Horowitz, I. Mitra, Stability of AdS(p) x M(q) compactifications without supersymmetry. Phys. Rev. D 65, 064033 (2002). arXiv:hep-th/0105047
Y.P. Hong, I. Mitra, Investigating the stability of a nonsupersymmetric landscape. Phys. Rev. D 72, 126003 (2005). arXiv:hep-th/0508238
H.J. Kim, L.J. Romans, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, The mass spectrum of chiral N=2 D=10 supergravity on S**5. Phys. Rev. D 32, 389 (1985)
E. Malek, H. Samtleben, Kaluza–Klein spectrometry for supergravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 101601 (2020). arXiv:1911.12640 [hep-th]
M. Cesàro, G. Larios, O. Varela, Supersymmetric spectroscopy on \({\rm AdS}_4 \times S^7\) and \({{\rm AdS}}_4 \times S^{6}\), (2021), arXiv:2103.13408 [hep-th]
E. Malek, H. Nicolai, H. Samtleben, Tachyonic Kaluza-Klein modes and the AdS swampland conjecture, (2020), arXiv:2005.07713 [hep-th]
I.R. Klebanov, E. Witten, Superconformal field theory on three-branes at a Calabi-Yau singularity. Nucl. Phys. B 536, 199–218 (1998). arXiv:hep-th/9807080
N. Itzhaki, J.M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein, S. Yankielowicz, Supergravity and the large N limit of theories with sixteen supercharges. Phys. Rev. D 58, 046004 (1998). arXiv:hep-th/9802042
J.D. Brown, C. Teitelboim, Dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant. Phys. Lett. B 195, 177–182 (1987)
J.D. Brown, C. Teitelboim, Neutralization of the cosmological constant by membrane creation. Nucl. Phys. B 297, 787–836 (1988)
S. R. Coleman, The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory, Phys. Rev. D15, [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D16,1248(1977)], 2929–2936 (1977)
C. G. Callan Jr., S. R. Coleman, The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections, Phys. Rev. D16, 1762–1768 (1977)
S.R. Coleman, F. De Luccia, Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay. Phys. Rev. D 21, 3305 (1980)
J.J. Blanco-Pillado, D. Schwartz-Perlov, A. Vilenkin, Quantum tunneling in flux compactifications. JCAP 0912, 006 (2009). arXiv:0904.3106 [hep-th]
A.R. Brown, A. Dahlen, Bubbles of nothing and the fastest decay in the landscape. Phys. Rev. D 84, 043518 (2011). arXiv:1010.5240 [hep-th]
R. Bousso, J. Polchinski, Quantization of four form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant. JHEP 06, 006 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/0004134
A.R. Brown, A. Dahlen, Giant leaps and minimal branes in multi-dimensional flux landscapes. Phys. Rev. D 84, 023513 (2011). arXiv:1010.5241 [hep-th]
E. Witten, Instability of the Kaluza–Klein Vacuum. Nucl. Phys. B 195, 481–492 (1982)
G. Dibitetto, N. Petri, M. Schillo, Nothing really matters, (2020), arXiv:2002.01764 [hep-th]
I. García Etxebarria, M. Montero, K. Sousa, I. Valenzuela, Nothing is certain in string compactifications, (2020), arXiv:2005.06494 [hep-th]
A.R. Brown, A. Dahlen, On nothing as an infinitely negatively curved spacetime. Phys. Rev. D 85, 104026 (2012). arXiv:1111.0301 [hep-th]
R. Antonelli, I. Basile, A. Bombini, AdS vacuum bubbles, holography and dual RG flows. Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 045004 (2019). arXiv:1806.02289 [hep-th]
S. Sethi, Supersymmetry breaking by fluxes. JHEP 10, 022 (2018). arXiv:1709.03554 [hep-th]
J.M. Maldacena, J. Michelson, A. Strominger, Anti-de Sitter fragmentation. JHEP 02, 011 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9812073
N. Seiberg, E. Witten, The D1 / D5 system and singular CFT. JHEP 04, 017 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9903224
E.A. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, S.F. Kerstan, F. Riccioni, IIB supergravity revisited. JHEP 08, 098 (2005). arXiv:hep-th/0506013
E.A. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, S.F. Kerstan, T. Ortin, F. Riccioni, SL(2, R)invariant IIB brane actions. JHEP 02, 007 (2007). arXiv:hep-th/0611036
E.A. Bergshoeff, F. Riccioni, String solitons and T-duality. JHEP 05, 131 (2011). arXiv:1102.0934 [hep-th]
E.A. Bergshoeff, F. Riccioni, Heterotic wrapping rules. JHEP 01, 005 (2013). arXiv:1210.1422 [hep-th]
E.A. Bergshoeff, V.A. Penas, F. Riccioni, S. Risoli, Non-geometric fluxes and mixed-symmetry potentials. JHEP 11, 020 (2015). arXiv:1508.00780 [hep-th]
M. Bianchi, A. Sagnotti, The partition function of the SO(8192) bosonic string. Phys. Lett. B 211, 407–416 (1988)
Q. Bonnefoy, E. Dudas, S. Lüst, On the weak gravity conjecture in string theory with broken supersymmetry. Nucl. Phys. B 947, 114738 (2019). arXiv:1811.11199 [hep-th]
Q. Bonnefoy, E. Dudas, S. Lüst, Weak gravity (and other conjectures) with broken supersymmetry, in 19th Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity (Mar. 2020), arXiv:2003.14126 [hep-th]
N. Kaloper, Bent domain walls as brane worlds. Phys. Rev. D 60, 123506 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9905210
T. Shiromizu, K.-I. Maeda, M. Sasaki, The Einstein equation on the 3-brane world. Phys. Rev. D 62, 024012 (2000). arXiv:gr-qc/9910076
D.N. Vollick, Cosmology on a three-brane. Class. Quant. Grav. 18, 1–10 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/9911181
S.S. Gubser, AdS / CFT and gravity. Phys. Rev. D 63, 084017 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/9912001
S. Hawking, T. Hertog, H. Reall, Brane new world. Phys. Rev. D 62, 043501 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/0003052
G.T. Horowitz, J. Orgera, J. Polchinski, Nonperturbative instability of AdS(5) x S**5/Z(k). Phys. Rev. D 77, 024004 (2008). arXiv:0709.4262 [hep-th]
J.J. Blanco-Pillado, B. Shlaer, Bubbles of nothing in flux compactifications. Phys. Rev. D 82, 086015 (2010). arXiv:1002.4408 [hep-th]
R. Antonelli, Black Objects without a Vacuum, PhD thesis (Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore, 2020)
G.T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, Black strings and P-branes. Nucl. Phys. B 360, 197–209 (1991)
A. Sagnotti, Brane SUSY breaking and inflation: implications for scalar fields and CMB distortion. Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 11, 836–843 (2014). arXiv:1303.6685 [hep-th]
R.C. Myers, Dielectric branes. JHEP 12, 022 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9910053 [hep-th]
G. Giribet, C. Hull, M. Kleban, M. Porrati, E. Rabinovici, Superstrings on \({\rm AdS}_3\) at \(\Vert = 1\). JHEP 08, 204 (2018). arXiv:1803.04420 [hep-th]
M. A. Rubin, C. R. Ordonez, Eigenvalues and degeneracies for n-dimensional tensor spherical harmonics, (1983)
M.A. Rubin, C.R. Ordonez, Symmetric tensor eigen spectrum of the laplacian on \(n\) spheres. J. Math. Phys. 26, 65 (1985)
P. van Nieuwenhuizen, The compactification of IIB supergravity on \(S_5\) revisted, in Strings, gauge fields, and the geometry behind: The legacy of Maximilian Kreuzer, edited by A. Rebhan, L. Katzarkov, J. Knapp, R. Rashkov, and E. Scheidegger (June 2012), pp. 133–157, arXiv:1206.2667 [hep-th]
Z. Ma, Group Theory for Physicists (World Scientific, Singapore, 2007)
Acknowledgements
This review originates from the author’s Ph.D. Thesis, defended at Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa under the supervision of A. Sagnotti. I would like to express my gratitude to him for his invaluable patience and profound insights. I would also like to thank C. Angelantonj, E. Dudas and J. Mourad for their enlightening feedback on my work, and A. Campoleoni, G. Bogna and S. Raucci for discussions and suggestions on this review.
Funding
The work of I.B. was supported by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - FNRS under Grants No. F.4503.20 (“HighSpinSymm”) and T.0022.19 (“Fundamental issues in extended gravitational theories”).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Tensor spherical harmonics: a primer
Tensor spherical harmonics: a primer
In this appendix we review some results that were needed for our stability analysis in Sect. 4, starting from an ambient Euclidean space. In Sect. A.1 we build scalar spherical harmonics, and in Sect. A.2 we extend our considerations to tensors of higher rank. The results agree with the constructions presented in [179, 180].Footnote 81
1.1 Scalar spherical harmonics
Let \(Y^1,\dots Y^{n+1}\) be Cartesian coordinates of \({\mathbb {R}}^{n+1}\), so that the unit sphere \({\mathbb {S}}^{n}\) is described by the constraint
on the radial coordinate r, solved by spherical coordinates \(y^i\) according to
The scalar spherical harmonics on \({\mathbb {S}}^{n}\) can be conveniently constructed starting from harmonic polynomials of degree \(\ell \) in the ambient Euclidean space \({\mathbb {R}}^{n+1}\). A harmonic polynomial of degree \(\ell \) takes the form
and is therefore determined by a completely symmetric and trace-less tensor \(\alpha _{I_1\dots I_\ell }\) of rank \(\ell \), as can be clearly seen applying to it the Euclidean Laplacian
The scalar spherical harmonics \(\mathcal{Y}_{(n)}^{I_1\dots I_\ell }\) are then defined restricting the \(H_{(n)}^{\ell }(Y)\) to the unit sphere \(S^n\), or equivalently as
As a result, the Euclidean metric can be recast as
and the scalar Laplacian decomposes according to
where
for the homogeneous polynomials \(H_{(n)}^{\ell }(Y)\). All in all
and the degeneracy of the scalar spherical harmonics for any given \(\ell \) is the number of independent components of a corresponding completely symmetric and trace-less tensor, namely
1.2 Spherical harmonics of higher rank
In discussing more general tensor harmonics, it is convenient to notice that, in the coordinate system of Eq. (A.6), the non-vanishing Christoffel symbols \({\widetilde{\varGamma }}_{IJ}^K\) for the ambient Euclidean space read
where the labels i, j, k refer, as above, to the n-sphere, whose Christoffel symbols are denoted by \(\varGamma _{ij}^k\).
The construction extends nicely to tensor spherical harmonics, which can be defined starting from generalized harmonic polynomials, with one proviso. The relation in Eq. (A.2) and its differentials imply that the actual spherical components of tensors carry additional factors of r, one for each covariant tensor index, with respect to those naïvely inherited from the Cartesian coordinates of the Euclidean ambient space, as we shall now see in detail. To begin with, vector spherical harmonics arise from one-forms in ambient space, built from harmonic polynomials of the type
where the coefficients \(\alpha _{I_1 \dots I_\ell \,,\,J}\) are completely symmetric and trace-less in any pair of the first \(\ell \) indices. They are also subject to the condition
since the radial component, which does not pertain to the sphere \(S^n\), ought to vanish. This implies that the complete symmetrization of the coefficients vanishes identically,
and on account of the symmetry in the first \(\ell \) indices. As a result, \(H_{n\,,\,J}^{\ell }(Y)\) is thus transverse in the ambient space,
Moreover, any Euclidean vector V such that \(V_I\, Y^I = 0\) couples with differentials according to the general rule inherited from Eq. (A.2),
so that the actual sphere components, which are associated to \(d {\widehat{Y}}^I\), include an additional power of r, and the vector spherical harmonics \({\mathscr {Y}}_{(n)\, i}^{I_1\dots I_\ell \, , \, J}\) are thus obtained from
Therefore,
while the remaining contributions to the Laplacian give
taking into account the Christoffel symbols in Eq. (A.11). Since the total Euclidean Laplacian vanishes by construction, adding Eqs. (A.18) and (A.19) finally results in
with \(\ell \ge 1\).
In a similar fashion, the spherical harmonics \({\mathscr {Y}}_{(n)\, i_1\dots i_p}^{I_1\dots I_\ell \, , \, J_1 \dots J_p}\), corresponding to generic higher-rank transverse tensors which are also trace-less in any pair of symmetric I-indices, can be described starting from harmonic polynomials of the type \(H_{(n) \, J_1\dots J_p}^{\ell }(Y)\), and satisfy
with \(\ell \ge p\).
In Young tableaux language, the scalar harmonics correspond to trace-less single-row diagrams of the type
while the independent vectors associated to vector harmonics correspond to two-row trace-less hooked diagrams of the type
as we have explained. Similarly, the independent tensor perturbations of the metric in the internal space correspond to trace-less diagrams of the type
while the independent perturbations associated to a \((p+1)\)-form gauge field in the internal space correspond, in general, to multi-row diagrams of the type
The degeneracies of these representations can be related to the corresponding Young tableaux, as in [182]. The structure of the various types of harmonics, which are genuinely different for large enough values of n, reflects nicely the generic absence of mixings between different classes of perturbations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basile, I. Supersymmetry breaking and stability in string vacua. Riv. Nuovo Cim. 44, 499–596 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40766-021-00024-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40766-021-00024-9