Abstract
This paper briefly describes the issues surrounding death as a penalty as applied to the late adolescent class, individuals ages 18 years through 20 years, in the USA. A neuroscience perspective is provided that is keyed to the issues decided by the US Supreme Court in 2005 in their decision in Roper v. Simmons to ban the application of death as a penalty to persons under the age of 18. Reviews of the issues and summaries of current science are provided as an introduction to the remaining papers of this special issue of the Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology. We also provide our own conclusion that current neuroscience, when considered in the context of the Supreme Court’s logic in Roper v. Simmons, supports ending death as a penalty for persons who commit capital crimes prior to the age of 21.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Bar Association. (2018). Death penalty due process review project: Section of Civil Rights and Social Justice Report to the House of Delegates Resolution. ABA Death Penalty Due Process Review Project (americanbar.org) (last retrieved March 15, 2021)
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). In American Psychiatric Pub.
Arain, M., Haque, M., Johal, L., Mathur, P., Nel, W., Rais, A., Sandhu, R., & Sharma, S. (2013). Maturation of the adolescent brain. In Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 9, 449–461). Dove Press. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S39776.
Bassett, D. S., Xia, C. H., & Satterthwaite, T. D. (2018). Understanding the emergence of neuropsychiatric disorders with network neuroscience. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 3(9), 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.03.015.
Blume, J. H., Freedman, H. L., Vann, L. S., & Hritz, A. C. (2020). Death by numbers: Why evolving standards compel extending roper’s categorical ban against executing juveniles from eighteen to twenty-one. Texas Law Review, 98(5), 921–951.
Casey, B. J., Tottenham, N., Liston, C., & Durston, S. (2005). Imaging the developing brain: What have we learned about cognitive development? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(3), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.01.011.
Casey, B. J., Jones, R. M., & Hare, T. A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.010.
Casey, B. J., Jones, R. M., & Somerville, L. H. (2011). Braking and accelerating of the adolescent brain. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00712.x.
Dosenbach, N. U. F., Nardos, B., Cohen, A. L., Fair, D. A., Power, J. D., Church, J. A., Nelson, S. M., Wig, G. S., Vogel, A. C., Lessov-Schlaggar, C. N., Barnes, K. A., Dubis, J. W., Feczko, E., Coalson, R. S., Pruett, J. R., Barch, D. M., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2010). Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Science, 329(5997), 1358–1361. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194144.
Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 153, (1976).
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, (1972).
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, (1976).
Gogtay, N., Giedd, J. N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A. C., Nugent, T. F., Herman, D. H., Clasen, L. S., Toga, A. W., Rapoport, J. L., & Thompson, P. M. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(21), 8174–8179. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402680101.
Hedman, A. M., van Haren, N. E. M., Schnack, H. G., Kahn, R. S., & Hulshoff Pol, H. E. (2012). Human brain changes across the life span: A review of 56 longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 33(8), 1987–2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21334.
Jordan, Z. (2019). The Roper extension: A California perspective. Hastings Law Journal, 71, 197–227.
Lebel, C., & Beaulieu, C. (2011). Longitudinal development of human brain wiring continues from childhood into adulthood. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(30), 10937–10947. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5302-10.2011.
Roberts V. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 153, (1976).
Luria, A. R. (1971). The origin and cerebral organization of man’s conscious action. British Psychological Society, 37–52.
Morgan, S. E., White, S. R., Bullmore, E. T., & Vértes, P. E. (2018). A network neuroscience approach to typical and atypical brain development. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 3(9), 754–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.03.003.
National Institute of Mental Health. (2011). The teen brain: Still under construction. National Institute of Mental Health.
Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 153, (1976).
Pfefferbaum, A., Rohlfing, T., Rosenbloom, M. J., Chu, W., Colrain, I. M., & Sullivan, E. V. (2013). Variation in longitudinal trajectories of regional brain volumes of healthy men and women (ages 10 to 85 years) measured with atlas-based parcellation of MRI. NeuroImage, 65, 176–193.
Reynolds, E. K., MacPherson, L., Schwartz, S., Fox, N. A., & Lejuez, C. W. (2014). Analogue study of peer influence on risk-taking behavior in older adolescents. Prevention Science, 15(6), 842–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0439-x.
Rudolph, M. D., Miranda-Domínguez, O., Cohen, A. O., Breiner, K., Steinberg, L., Bonnie, R. J., Scott, E. S., Taylor-Thompson, K., Chein, J., Fettich, K. C., Richeson, J. A., Dellarco, D. V., Galván, A., Casey, B. J., & Fair, D. A. (2017). At risk of being risky: The relationship between “brain age” under emotional states and risk preference. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.01.010.
Ryan, C. (2020). The Law of Emerging Adults. Washington University Law Review, 97, 1131–1178.
Roper V Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, (2005).
Somerville, L. H. (2016). Searching for signatures of brain maturity: What are we searching for? Neuron, 92(6), 1164–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.059.
Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 153, (1976).
Atkins V. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, (2002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Special Issue: Law, Neuroscience, and Death as a Penalty for the Late Adolescent Class; Dr. Robert Leark, Guest Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCaffrey, R.J., Reynolds, C.R. Neuroscience and Death as a Penalty for Late Adolescents. J Pediatr Neuropsychol 7, 3–8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40817-021-00104-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40817-021-00104-y