Abstract
This paper theorises a curriculum model containing four features. We use these features as criteria to analyse and evaluate two distinctive curriculum design types: ‘21st Century Learning’ and ‘Powerful Knowledge’. The four features are: (i) the underpinning theory of knowledge in each curriculum design type; (ii) the knowledge structures used to organise the curriculum material; (iii) the organisation of the concepts and content according to the principle of conceptual progression; and (iv) the pedagogy associated with the curriculum design, such as direct instruction or personalised learning. The distinction we make between the two curriculum design types and the comparative approach taken in the paper is justified by the differences found in each of the types with respect to all of the four features. Following the analysis of each feature in the body of the paper we judge the relative merits of each design type in terms of the logical connections between the four theorised features and the ways in which they are realised in 21st Century Learning and Powerful Knowledge respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbiss, J. (2013). Social sciences and “21st century education” in schools: Opportunities and challenges. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 48(2), 5–18.
Andreotti, V., Abbiss, J., & Quinlivan, K. (2012). Shifting conceptualisations of knowledge and learning in the integration of the New Zealand curriculum in teacher education. Summary Report. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz.
Barrett, B., & Rata, E. (Eds.). (2014). Knowledge and the future of the curriculum: International studies in social realism. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (Rev ed.). Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality. London, UK: Verso Books.
Bolstad, R. (2011). Taking a “future focus” in education—what does it mean? NZCER working paper from the Future-Focussed Issues in Education project. Wellington: NZCER. Retrieved from http://www.nzcer.org.nz/research/publications/taking-future-focus-education-what-does-it-mean.
Bolstad, R. (2012). Principles for a future-oriented education system. New Zealand Review of Education, 21, 77–95.
Bolstad, R., & Gilbert, J. (2008). Disciplining or drafting, or 21 st century learning? Rethinking the New Zealand senior secondary curriculum for the future. Wellington, NZ: NZCER Press.
Bolstad, R., Gilbert, J., McDowall, S., Bull, A., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2012). Supporting future-oriented learning & teaching: A New Zealand perspective. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2012). Student inquiry and curriculum integration: Shared origins and points of difference. Set, 3, 15–22.
Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2012). The global auction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
Counsell, C. (2011). Disciplinary knowledge for all, the secondary history curriculum and history teachers’ achievement. The Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 201–225.
Delors, J. (Ed.). (1998). Education for the twenty-first century. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation.
Derry, J. (2014). Abstract rationality in education: From Vykotsky to Brandom. In M. Young & J. Muller (Eds.), Knowledge, expertise and the professions (pp. 33–46). London, UK: Routledge.
Durkheim, E. (2001). The elementary forms of religious life. New York, NY: The Free Press. (Original work published 1912).
Fisher, M., Goddu, M. K., & Keil, F. C. (2015). Searching for explanations: How the internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 674–687.
Friedman, J. (2000). Globalisation, class and culture in global systems. Journal of World Systems Research, 6(3), 636–656.
Gamble, (2014). Sequencing rules as a condition of knowledge structure. In B. Barrett & E. Rata (Eds.), Knowledge and the future of the curriculum: International studies in social realism (pp. 169–180). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Gilbert, J. (2005). Catching the knowledge wave. Wellington, NZ: NZCER.
Gilbert, J., & Bull, A. (2014). Exploring teacher professional learning for future-oriented schooling. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from www.nzcer.org.nz/research/publications/exploring-teacher-professional-learning-future-oriented-schooling.
Habermas, J. (2001). Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. In S. Seidman & J. C. Alexander (Eds.), The new social theory reader, contemporary debates (pp. 31–38). London, UK: Routledge.
Hepplestone, S., Holden, G., Irwin, B., Parkin, H. J., & Thorpe, L. (2011). Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: a literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), 117–127.
Hipkins, R. (2005). Learning to “be” in a new century: Reflections on a curriculum in transition. Curriculum Matters, 1, 71–86.
Howard, S., & Maton, K. (2011). Theorising knowledge practices: A missing piece of the educational technology puzzle. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 191–206.
Lambert, D. (2011). Reviewing the case for geography, and the “knowledge turn” in the English National Curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 243–264.
Maton, K. (2013). Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building. Linguistics and Education, 23, 8–22.
Maton, K., & Moore, R. (Eds.). (2010). Social realism, knowledge and the sociology of education: Coalitions of the mind. London, UK: Continuum.
McLean, M., & Abbas, A. (2009). The “biographical turn” in university sociology teaching: A Bernsteinian analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(5), 529–539.
McPhail, G. (2013a). Informal and formal knowledge: The curriculum conception of two rock graduates. British Journal of Music Education, 30(1), 43–57.
McPhail, G. (2013b). Mixed pedagogic modalities: The potential for increased student engagement and success. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 48(1), 113–126.
McPhail, G. (2015). The fault lines of recontextualisation: The limits of constructivism in education. British Educational Research Journal. doi:10.1002/berj.3199.
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (2014). Future-focused learning in connected communities. A report by the 21st Century Learning Reference Group. Retrieved from www.minedu.govt.nz/theMinistry/EducationInitiatives/UFBInSchools/FutureFocusedLearning.aspx.
Moore, R. (2013). Basil Bernstein: The thinker and the field. London, UK: Routledge.
Morgan, J. (2013). The management of ignorance? The ‘future-focus’ and New Zealand social science teaching. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 48(2), 19–33.
Muller, J. (2000). Reclaiming knowledge: Social theory, curriculum and education. London: Routledge.
Muller, J. (2009). Forms of knowledge and curriculum coherence. Journal of Education and Work, 22(3), 205–226.
Oates, T. (2011). Could do better: Using international comparisons to refine the national curriculum in England. Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 121–150.
Openshaw, R. (2009). Reforming New Zealand secondary education. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capitalism in the 21 st century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
Popper, K. (1978). The Tanner Lecture on Human Values, Three Worlds, presented at The University of Michigan. Retrieved from http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/p/popper80.pdf.
Rata, E. (2012). The politics of knowledge in education. London & New York: Routledge
Rata, E. (2014). Knowledge and democracy: The strife of the dialectic. In B. Barrett & E. Rata (Eds.), Knowledge and the future of the curriculum: International studies in social realism (pp. 79–91). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Rata, E., & Barrett, B. (2014). Introduction: Knowledge and the future of the curriculum. In B. Barrett & E. Rata (Eds.), Knowledge and the future of the curriculum: International studies in social realism (pp. 1–22). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Rata, E. (2015). A pedagogy of conceptual progression and the case for academic knowledge. British Educational Research Journal. doi: 10.1002/berj.3195.
Shalem, Y., & Slonimsky, L. (2014). Practical knowledge of teaching: What counts? In B. Barrett & E. Rata (Eds.), Knowledge and the future of the curriculum: International studies in social realism (pp. 198–212). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Simmons, L., & Worth, H. (2001). Derrida downunder. Sydney, NSW: Cengage Learning Australia.
Sinnema, C., &, Aitken, G. (2013). Emerging international trends in curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 141–163). London, UK: Bloomsbury.
Taylor, M., Urry, J., & Burgess, A. (2012). Social studies integrity in an integrated inquiry unit. Set, 1, 29–34.
Turner, T. (2003). Class projects, social consciousness, and the contradictions of “globalization”. In J. Friedman (Ed.), Globalization, the state and violence (pp. 35–66). Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
Vidal, M. (2013). Inequality and the growth of bad jobs. Contexts, 12(4), 70–72.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why knowledge matters in the curriculum. London, UK: Routledge.
Winch, C. (2013). Curriculum design and epistemic ascent. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(1), 128–146.
Young, M. F. D. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. London, UK: Routledge.
Young, M., & Muller, J. (2010). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11–27.
Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 3, 229–250.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McPhail, G., Rata, E. Comparing Curriculum Types: ‘Powerful Knowledge’ and ‘21st Century Learning’. NZ J Educ Stud 51, 53–68 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0025-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0025-9