Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies allow the manufacturing of parts directly from 3D models. These technologies, initially focused on rapid prototyping applications, have been increasingly considered for the production of final functional parts with high value added. The strengths and advantages of current AM processes include support for improved geometry for complex parts, reduction in tooling costs, material savings, and reduction in design to manufacturing lead-times. Along with those benefits, there are still production quality and performance factors, such as dimensional accuracy, strength of parts, and surface roughness, which may need to be improved depending on the product requirements. Therefore, there is a demand to increase the understanding of how AM production factors influence the final part parameters. This paper focuses on the investigation and optimization of material consumption, manufacturing time and dimensional accuracy (including linear error and surface flatness), for fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology. A design of experiments (DOE) is planned, executed and analyzed. Results indicate that print speed and the number of contours are the most important factors for the quality of the final part of the FDM process studied. Further research may consider the same approach, and the factors presented could be extended for AM technologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonnard R, Mognol P, Hascoët J-Y (2010) A new digital chain for additive manufacturing processes, Virtual and Physical Prototyping. Virtual Phys Prototyp 5:75–88
ASTM subcommittee: F42.91 (2015) ASTM F2792-12a Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies
Bikas H, Stavropoulos P, Chryssolouris G (2016) Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:389–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7576-2
Garg A, Tai K, Savalani MM (2014) State-of-the-art in empirical modelling of rapid prototyping processes. Rapid Prototyp J 20:164–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2012-0072
Mançanares CG, de S. Zancul, Cavalcante da Silva E, Cauchick Miguel J P a (2015) Additive manufacturing process selection based on parts’ selection criteria. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7092-4
Upcraft S, Fletcher R (2003) The rapid prototyping technologies. Assem Autom 23:318–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445150310698634
Wittbrodt BT, Glover AG, Laureto J et al (2013) Life-cycle economic analysis of distributed manufacturing with open-source 3-D printers. Mechatronics 23:713–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.06.002
Berman B (2012) 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution. Bus Horiz 55:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003
Durão LFCS, Christ A, Anderl R, Schützer K, Zancul E (2016) Distributed manufacturing of spare parts based on additive manufacturing: use cases and technical aspects. Procedia CIRP 57:704–709
Ali F, Chowdary BV, Maharaj J (2014) Influence of some process parameters on build time, material consumption, and surface roughness of FDM processed parts: inferences based on the Taguchi design of experiments. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IAJC/ISAM joint international conference
Gajdoš I, Slota J (2013) Influence of printing conditions on structure in FDM prototypes. Tech Gaz 20:231–236. doi: 658.512.2:004.896
Galantucci LM, Bodi I, Kacani J, Lavecchia F (2015) Analysis of dimensional performance for a 3D open-source printer based on fused deposition modeling technique. Procedia CIRP 28:82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.014
Lužanin O, Movrin D, Plančak M (2014) Effect of layer thickness, deposition angle, and infill on maximum flexural force in fdm-built specimens. J Technol Plast 39:49–58
Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS (2010) Grey taguchi method for improving dimensional accuracy of FDM Process. AIMS Int Conf Value-based Manag 608–613
Sreedhar P, Manikandan CM, Jothi G (2012) Experimental investigation of surface roughness for fused deposition modeled part with different angular orientation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 5:21–27
Vijayaraghavan V, Garg A, Lam JSL et al (2014) Process characterisation of 3D-printed FDM components using improved evolutionary computational approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 781–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6679-5
Anitha R, Arunachalam S, Radhakrishnan P (2001) Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. J Mater Process Technol 118:385–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-3
Wu W, Geng P, Li G et al (2015) Influence of layer thickness and raster angle on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PEEK and a comparative mechanical study between PEEK and ABS. Materials (Basel) 8:5834–5846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8095271
Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2016) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters for dimensional accuracy using I-optimality criterion. Measurement 81:174–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7
Moza Z, Kitsakis K, Kechagias J, Mastorakis N (2015) Optimizing dimensional accuracy of fused filament fabrication using taguchi design, In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on instrumentation, measurement, circuits and systems (IMCAS '15), pp 110–114
Nancharaiah T, Raju DR, Raju VR (2010) An experimental investigation on surface quality and dimensional accuracy of FDM components. Int J Emerg Technol 1:106–111
Sahu RK, Mahapatra SS, Sood AK (2013) A study on dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modeling (FDM) processed parts using fuzzy logic. J Manuf Sci Prod 13:183–197. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmsp-2013-0010
Cochran JK, Lee KJ, McDowell D et al (2000) Low Density Monolithic Metal Honeycombs by Thermal Chemical Processing. Fourth Conf. Aerosp. Mater Process Environ Technol
Wu CFJ, Hamada MS (2009) Experiments—planning, analysis, and optimization, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL (2015) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Adv Manuf 3:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7
Dimitrov D, Wijck W, Van Schreve K, Beer N, De (2006) Investigating the achievable accuracy of three dimensional printing. Rapid Prototyp J 12:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610637264
Stratasys Direct Manufacturing How To Prepare STL Files (2016) https://www.stratasysdirect.com/resources/how-to-prepare-stl-files/. Accessed 16 Sep 2016
Bagsik A, Schöoppner V (2011) Mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling parts manufactured with ULTEM 9085. In: Proceedings 69th annual technical conference of the society of plastics engineers (ANTEC)
Brajlih T, Valentan B, Balic J, Drstvensek I (2011) Speed and accuracy evaluation of additive manufacturing machines. Rapid Prototyp J 17:64–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541111098644
Minetola P, Iuliano L, Marchiandi G (2016) Benchmarking of FDM machines through part quality using It grades. Proc CIRP 41:1027–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.075
Geeentech (2016) Prusa Mendel I3. http://www.geeetech.com/wiki/index.php/Acrylic_Prusa_Mendel_I3. Accessed 16 Sep 2016
Swcopiadoras (2016) 3d Cloner ST. http://www.swcopiadoras.com.br/lista_equipamentos.php?CategoriaID=9. Accessed 16 Sep 2016
Deng Y, Cao SJ, Chen A, Guo Y (2016) The impact of manufacturing parameters on submicron particle emissions from a desktop 3D printer in the perspective of emission reduction. Build Environ 104:311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.021
3D HUBS (2016) Best Printing Practices on Makerbot Replicator 2 and 2X. https://www.3dhubs.com/talk/thread/best-printing-practices-makerbot-replicator-2-and-2x. Accessed 21 Sep 2016
Verbatim (2016) 3D Filaments—FAQs and General Information. http://www.verbatim.com.au/technotes/3D_FAQs.pdf. Accessed 21 Sep 2016
Cruz Sanchez FA, Boudaoud H, Muller L, Camargo M (2014) Towards a standard experimental protocol for open source additive manufacturing: This paper proposes a benchmarking model for evaluating accuracy performance of 3D printers. Virtual Phys Prototyp 9:151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2014.919553
Simplify3D (2016) Simplify3D Software Tutorials
Tymrak BM, Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58:242–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038
Garlotta D (2001) A literature review of Poly(Lactic Acid). J Polym Environ 9:63–84. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020200822435
Mee RW (2009) A comprehensive guide to factorial two-level experiments. Springer Dordrecht, Heidelberg
Le Bourhis F, Kerbrat O, Hascoet J-Y, Mognol P (2013) Sustainable manufacturing: evaluation and modeling of environmental impacts in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:1927–1939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5151-2
Saqib S, Urbanic J (2011) An experimental study to determine geometric and dimensional accuracy impact factors for fused deposition modelled parts. In: 4th Int Conf chang agil reconfigurable virtual prod. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23860-4_48
Ponche R, Hascoet JY, Kerbrat O, Mogno P (2012) A new global approach to design for additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 7:93–105
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (Capes), the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), and the German Research Foundation (DFG) for supporting related projects.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Durão, L.F.C.S., Barkoczy, R., Zancul, E. et al. Optimizing additive manufacturing parameters for the fused deposition modeling technology using a design of experiments. Prog Addit Manuf 4, 291–313 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-019-00075-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-019-00075-9