Abstract
Driving simulator (DS) can be introduced as a popular tool in the transport industry for the analysis of driving behavior. Simulators should be validated in term of each specific recorded data, separately. When DSs are the source of data, each part of data which indicates a maneuver or a behavior should be validated separately. This paper is dedicated to the validation of car-following distance in the presence of considerable traffic flow which may increase mental load. In general, the results showed that DSs could be used for determining the behaviors of a driver by focusing on headway and car-following behavior. The distance kept by male drivers was shorter than female participants. It was seen that drivers between the ages of 20–40 were suitable for car-following tests in the DS by considering all real driving tasks in a congested traffic condition. Car-following threshold headway was less than 2 s for 85% of the participants, which is quite similar to the past results from real data in Iran. The average car-following headway threshold in the DS was 0.8 s, which is less than field data (1.2 s).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlström C, Bolling A, Sörensen G, Eriksson O, Andersson A (2012) Validating speed and road surface realism in VTI driving simulator III, 1st edn. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), Sweden
Amini E (2016) Car-following modeling based on Iranian drivers’ behavior. MSc thesis, Amir Kabir University of Technology (in Persian)
Bédard M, Parkkari M, Weaver B, Riendeau J, Dahlquist M (2010) Assessment of driving performance using a simulator protocol: validity and reproducibility. Am J Occup Ther 64(2):336–340
Bella F (2008) Driving simulator for speed research on two-lane rural roads. Accid Anal Prev 40(3):1078–1087
Dastrup E, Lees MN, Dawson JD, Lee JD, and Rizzo M, “Differences in simulated car following behavior of younger and older drivers,” in Proceedings of the... International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design 2009: 76
De Winter JCF, De Groot S, Mulder M, Wieringa PA, Dankelman J, Mulder JA (2009) Relationships between driving simulator performance and driving test results. Ergonomics 52(2):137–153
De Winter J, Van Leuween P, Happee P (2012) Advantages and disadvantages of driving simulators: a discussion. In: Proceedings of Measuring Behavior. Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 47–50
Engen T (2008) Use and validation of driving simulators. PhD thesis, Department of Civil and Transport Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Godley ST, Triggs TJ, Fildes BN (2002) Driving simulator validation for speed research. Accid Anal Prev 34(5):589–600
Gunay B, Woodward D (2007) Lateral position of traffic negotiating horizontal bends. Proc Inst Civil Eng Trans 160(1):1–11
Kawano N et al (2012) Slower adaptation to driving simulator and simulator sickness in older adults aging clinical and experimental research. Aging Clin Exp Res 24(3):285–289
Kazemzadehazad S, Monajjem S, Larue G, and King MJ (2018) “Driving Simulator Validation for Speed Research on Curves of Two-Lane Rural Roads,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport pp. 1–18
Khansari ER, Tabibi M, and Moghadas Nejad F (2017) “Lane-based car-following behaviour based on inductive loops,” in Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers–Transport 170(1) pp. 38–45
Khansari ER, Tabibi M, Nejad FM (2020) A study on following behavior based on the time headway. J Kejuruter 32(2):187–195
Lee HC (2003) The validity of driving simulator to measure on-road driving performance of older drivers. Transp Eng Aust 8(2):89
Lew HL, Poole JH, Lee EH, Jaffe DL, Huang H-C, Brodd E (2005) Predictive validity of driving-simulator assessments following traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study. Brain Inj 19(3):177–188
Loulizi A, Bichiou Y, Rakha H (2019) Steady-state car-following time gaps: an empirical study using naturalistic driving data. J Adv Transp 2019:1–9
Mueller JA (2015) “Driving in a simulator versus on-road: the effect of increased mental effort while driving on real roads and a driving simulator.” Montana State University-Bozeman, College of Engineering
Nakamura H, Yamabe S, Nakano K, Yamaguchi D, Suda Y (2010) Driver risk perception and physiological state during car-following experiments using a driving simulator. Int J Intell Transp Syst Res 8(3):140–150
Overton RA (2012) “Driving simulator transportation safety: Proper warm-up testing procedures, distracted rural teens, and gap acceptance intersection sight distance design,”
Ramezani Khansari E and Tabibi M (2017) “Time Headway Distribution in congested and uncongested traffic flow,” in The 16th International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 16
Risto M, Martens MH (2014) Driver headway choice: a comparison between driving simulator and real-road driving. Transp Res part F traffic Psychol Behav 25:1–9
Slob JJ (2008) State-of-the-art driving simulators, a literature survey. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
Tabibi M (2009) “Narrow Time Headway and its Impact on Reducing the Speed Enforcement Camera Effectiveness,” in 16th ITS World Congress and Exhibition on Intelligent Transport Systems and ServicesITS AmericaERTICOITS Japan
Vlaar TJ (2015) “Car following model of the distracted driver,” Delft University of Technology
Yoshizawa R, Shiomi Y, Uno N, Iida K, Yamaguchi M (2012) Analysis of car-following behavior on sag and curve sections at intercity expressways with driving simulator. Int J Intell Transp Syst Res 10(2):56–65
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramezani-Khansari, E., Tabibi, M. & Moghadas Nejad, F. Validating Driving Simulator for Car-Following Distance. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 45, 281–290 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00576-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00576-6