Abstract
A detailed study on Recent Ostracoda was carried out in twenty-six surface sediment samples collected from shelf region of the Southwestern part of Bay of Bengal. A total of 21 species of Ostracoda belonging to 18 genera have been identified, of which, seven species are abundant (>5%). The Q-mode and R-mode cluster analyses of the abundant species resulted in two assemblage defining different microenvironments. The shallowest assemblage (I) from 10 to 80 m water depth is characterised by Hemikrithe Orientalis, Pterygocythereis chennaiensis and Lankacythere multifora which are associated with sand to slightly muddy sand. The second assemblage (II) from 80 to 200 m water depth is associated by Keijella reticulata, Bairdoppilata paraalcyonicola, Actinocythereis scutigera and Stigmatocythere indica and the nature of sediments varies from slightly muddy sand to slightly sandy mud. The sediments from 50-100 m water depth are foundto contain higher concentration of organic matter (TOC and TN) suggesting the high productivity zone. The C/N ratio value ranges from 4 to 8 in 52% of sediment samples indicating both marine and terrestrial source. The shallower part of the seafloor up to 30 m depth is dominated by sandysediments, reflecting the occurence of high-energy conditions. The higher mud content in the deeper part is due to the prevalance of low energy condition. The carapace-valve ratio (1:9) indicates that the study area experiencing a slower rate of sedimentation. Our study results revealed that the distribution of Ostracoda in the Southwestern part of Bay of Bengal is controlled by the type of sediment, depth and physicochemical parameters of the bottom water.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Introduction
Ostracods are one of the most triumphant inhabitants of almost every aquatic ecosystem, which includes lakes, brackish water lagoons, mangroves, estuaries, freshwater streams, etc. (Hussain et al. 2007). The carapace of the ostracods is defined by their nature of ornamentation and shape, which varies immensely within their families. The shape of their carapace can be bloated, orbicular, deflated either vertically or laterally and prolonged (Martens and Horne 2009). The distribution and abundance of ostracoda in the marine environment are dependent on temperature, type of sediment, depth, salinity, oxygen and the supply of food. (Neale 1964; Bonaduce et al. 1975; Pokorný 1998; Yassini 1979; Lachenal 1989; Cronin et al. 2002; Didié et al. 2002; Horne 2007; Boomer 2002; Ruiz et al. 2006; Martínez-García et al. 2013). The fossil ostracods are being extensively used in the reconstruction of paleo-environment and paleo-climate (Hussain and Cassey 2016). The bi-valved nature of the ostracods aids in easier preservation and are further analysed for various studies (Martens and Horne 2009). Many researchers have carried out studies on the ostracods in the Bay of Bengal sediments which includes: off Peninsular India (Mohapatra et al. 1992), East coast of India (Hussain and Rajeshwara Rao 1996), Gulf of Mannar (Hussain et al. 1996,1998; Hussain 1998), off Rameswaram (Sridhar 1996; Baskar et al. 2015), off Tuticorin (Hussain et al. 1996), off Pentakota and Kalingapatnam (Naidu et al. 1997), off Karikkattukuppam (Mohan et al. 2001, 2002; Hussain et al. 2009), the inner shelf of Chennai (Hussain et al. 2004, 2009), off Chennai (Hussain et al. 2004), East coast of south India (Mohammed 2006) southern east coast of India and Andaman Islands (Hussain et al. 2007), off Punnaikayal (Ganesan et al. 2008), Kameswaram coast (Elakkiya et al. 2013), Palk strait (Baskar et al. 2013), Northwestern part of Bay of Bengal (Nishath et al. 2015), North Chennai coast (Hussain and Cassey 2016), off central Bay of Bengal (Nishath et al., 2017). The Andaman Islands to have some records of ostracods presence. Some of the work done by the researches are; Madhupratap et al. 1981 found a fair abundance of ostracods presence while investigating for the zooplankton abundance at the Andaman sea. Hussain et al. (2006) have reported the occurrence of ostracoda to be in a minimal amount at the hut bay of Andaman also the reported form of species was found to thrive at Neritic zone.
The carapace-valve ratio accounts for the statistical studies in Ostracods such as closed or isolated valves, Adult or juveniles, left or right valves etc. (Guha 1982). According to Oertli (1971), the higher ratio of carapace-valve suggests rapid sedimentation occurring in that particular region; also, it disarticulates the carapace into separate valves. The sediments mainly droving the carapace - valve ratio at off Chennai region: smooth and finely pitted were preferred for finer substrate whereas the highly calcified and ornamented ones were preferred for the coarser substrate (Hussain et al. 2004); in the north-western part of Bay of Bengal most of the specimens were open valved and a minor amount of them had a complete carapace indicating a slower rate of sedimentation that took place under normal oxygenated environmental conditions (Nishath et al. 2015); off central Bay of Bengal the carapace-valve ratio suggests that there was a lesser amount of transportation of terrigenous material by the rivers from the shallower to deep marine regions which exhibits a gradual and slower rate of sedimentation from the shelf to slope region (Nishath et al. 2015). Most of the population abundance of Ostracoda at off Tuticorin and off Karaikkattukuppam is controlled by the relative increase of temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen content in the bottom waters (Hussain et al. 1996, 2009). The Ostracoda population are also correlated with the sediment characteristics such as organic matter, calcium carbonate and sandy-silt-clay ratio. Wherein the south-east coast of India and the Andaman Islands, the accommodative substrate for the desirable thriving of the ostracods is found to be silty sand (Hussain et al. 2007). In Palk Bay, the favourable substrate is found to be of silty sand, followed by the sand (Sridhar et al. 1998). The seasonal observations on physicochemical parameters were correlated with the population of the Ostracoda, which exhibited a positive correlation for depth, pH, salinity, density, TDS, nitrite and silica. In contrast, a negative correlation was observed for turbidity, nitrate and phosphate (Baskar et al. 2015). Nishath (2017) has reported ostracods from the samples collected in two transects on the northern part of Nellore shelf. The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the abundance and diversity of ostracods and their relationship with environmental parameters like sediment types and physicochemical parameters of bottom water to know the factors influencing ostracods population. Hence, we have carried out a detailed investigation on ostracods in the entire shelf region off Nellore in the Bay of Bengal.
Material and Methods
Study Area
The area of investigation is located in Southwestern part of the Bay of Bengal, India (13.83706 N 80.30813 E to 14.91744 N 80.39536 E) covering an extent of 185 km (Fig. 1). This region experiences a tropical and humid climate conditions with an annual mean temperature of about 29 °C. The coastal brown sands are composed of sandy silt and clays, muddy and silty sands. These sediments, along with the estuarine and alluvial deposits present along the river banks, are transported through the rivers of Pennar, Swarnamukhi and Uppateru. The major contribution of sediment is found to be through the River Pennar, annual flow approximately 3228 million cubic seconds and discharges annually 6.9 × 106 tons of sediment loads to the Bay of Bengal (Rao et al. 1979). Residual weathering of the Archean rocks has led to the formation of capping’s, low-level laterite and sand mixed secondary laterite. These are the important geomorphic features in the coastal region. The other sources of sediment supply to these coasts are provided by the currents, wave action and geomorphic features (Anbuselvan and Senthil Nathan 2017, 2018).
Sample Collection (Surface Sediments and Bottom Water)
A total of 23 surface sediment samples were collected along five transects across the shelf region of Southeastern part of Bay of Bengal. Samples were obtained from sea bottom at different water depths ranging from 10 to 200 m using a Van Veen grab sampler (Table 1). The bottom water samples were collected using Niskin water sampler from all the sediment sampling locations, and their physicochemical parameters such as pH, salinity, temperature, conductivity and dissolved oxygen were measured in the field (Table 3). Both sediments and bottom water samples were collected in a cruise during September 2015. (Coastal Research Vessel Sagar Purvi, cruise IMO no. 9123829, National Institute of Ocean Technology, Ministry of Earth Science, India).
Grain Size Analysis
Initially, the sediment samples were air-dried and then was held back in the oven for 50 °C for further drying. For carrying out the granulometric analysis, 100 g of dried sediment samples were taken which was then sieved with the supporter of stock of ASTM sieves 2.0 mm [−1 Φ (phi)], 1.0 mm (0 Φ), 0.5 mm (1Φ), 0.25 mm (2Φ), 0.125 mm (3Φ) and 0.63 mm (4 Φ). Weight per cent is used to express the amount of fraction for each sample. The sand and mud content for each of the sample is known with the guidance of Udden-Wentworth grain size scale (Folk 1954); whereas the mud content used for the assistance of textural class is known after Pejrup (1988); Reineck and Siefert (1980), modified after (Flemming 2000) (Table 2).
CHNS Analysis
The sediment samples were dried in an oven to 50 °C and were then homogenised before the analysis was carried out. Using FRITSCH Pulverisette 7Agate Ball Mill, the samples that were homogenised were crushed to a finer powder. For decarbonisation, to be processed 1 N solution of Hydrochloric acid was taken for each 5 g of the samples; after this process, the samples were washed thrice by using deionised water from a centrifuge machine that removes the HCl absorbed from the sediment. The following samples were further dried, homogenised and then analysed with the aid of CHNS elemental analyser (Mode: Vario el cube Odu). The resulting values were taken as total organic matter content for each sample (Table 2).
Ostracod Analysis
The samples were washed by using a 0.063 μm sieve; later dried and were observed under a stereo binocular microscope and were arranged in the faunal slides for further analysis. The recent Ostracoda taxa were identified by following Moore (1961), Van Morkhoven (1963) and Hartmann and Puri (1974) classifications and along with other relevant literature has been followed in the present work. Then the identified specimens were cleaned with distilled water under the microscope and mounted on an aluminium stub fixed with double adhesive carbon tape. The specimens were then coated with carbon in the sputtering machine and made ready for Scanning Electron Microscope (Hitachi, Model: S-3400 N). The abundance and distribution of ostracod assemblages present at five transects are discussed further in detail.
Data Analysis
Multivariate statistical analyses such as Cluster (Q and R mode) analysis and diversity indices were carried out with the help of IBM SPSS (version 20) and Paleontological Statistics Software (PAST-Version 2.17). Shannon diversity index (H) was calculated using the following equation: H (S) = Σ [(ni/ n) × ln (ni/ n)], where “n” is the total count of individuals and “ni” is the number of individual present at each taxon (Shannon 1948; Murray 2006). Q-mode cluster analyses were performed to identify the similarity between sampling stations with respect to depth, grain size, organic matter and bottom water parameters. Abundant species (larger than 5%) in the analysed samples were taken for the R mode cluster analyses using the correlation coefficient method.
Results
In the study area, all the environmental parameters and ostracoda species are associated directly with depth changes, it can be eventually inferred that it is a significant ecological factor to be considered.
Bottom Water Characteristics
A similar trend is observable for both of the temperature and pH values; maximum temperature and pH are noticeable at transect 2 with a temperature of about 28.05 °C (35 m); pH of about 8.15 whereas the minimum temperature and pH values are observed at transect 3 with a temperature of 20.6 °C (105 m); pH of 7.61 (Table 3). It can be inferred that as the depth increases the temperature and pH decreases gradually. In the study area, the salinity ranges from 27.1 psu to 32.7 psu (Table 3) The maximum salinity is observed at station 17 (105 m) and the minimum at station 23 (16 m) which infers an increase in salinity with an increasing depth. The dissolved oxygen content in the study area has maximum value observed at station 23 (16 m) with 6.97 mg/l whereas the minimum value is observed at station 7 (200 m) with 3.02 mg/l (Table 3). The dissolved oxygen in bottom water is found to be high in the shallower region and low in the deeper part.
Sediment Characteristics
Textural analysis reveals that the sediment grain size distribution is more associated with depth. The present study area is covered by following type of sediments sand, slightly muddy sand, muddy sand, sandy mud. On considering the depth of about 10-200 m from the study area the following substrates were observed to be occurring: At 15 m depth, the sediment is characterized by sand to muddy sand in composition; in 30 m depth the sediment differs from slightly muddy sand to sand; at 80 m depth the range of sediments is found to be from muddy sand to sandy mud; at 100 m depth the variation of sediments is observed to be muddy sand to sandy mud and at a depth of 200 m it varies from sandy mud to slightly muddy sand in composition (Fig. 2).
Organic Matter Characteristics
The northern part of the study area is found to have higher TOC (Total organic carbon) and TN (Total Nitrogen) content when compared to the southern part. The TOC concentration value ranges between 0.10–1.7% with a mean value of 0.90%; whereas the TN concentration value ranges between 0.08–0.26% with a mean value of 0.18%. The TOC content is found to be increasing in all the four Transects (1, 2,4 and 5) except for Transect 3. The TN content is found to increase with water depth for Transects 3, 4 and 5 whereas decreasing for 1 & 2. The TOC concentration values are found to be highest in Transect 1 (1.79%) and lowest in Transect 2 (0.10%); the TN concentration values are highest in Transect 4 (0.26%) and lowest in Transect 2 (0.08%). The organic matter distribution is found to be more associated with mud compared to sand (Fig. 3).
Ostracod Characteristics
Twenty-two ostracod taxa belonging to 18 genera, 7 families, 5 superfamilies, 2 suborders and 2 orders has been identified. The ostracods identified (Table 4) from the study area are as follows: Cytherelloidea chapmani (Jones and Hinde 1849), Cytherelloidea maalaccaensis (Leroy, 1940), Hemikrithe orientalis (Van den Bold 1950), Actinocythereis scutigera (Brady, 1868), Alocopocythere kedengenesis (Kingma 1948), Echinocythereis sp (Puri 1954), Keijella reticulata (Whatley and Zhao 1988), Keijella karwarensis (Bhatia and Kumar 1979), Stigmatocythere indica (Jain 1978), Chrysocythere sp (Ruggieri 1962), Pterygocythereis chennaiensis (Mohan et al. 2001), Neocytheretta murilineata (Zhao and Whatley 1989), Loxoconcha sp. (Sars 1866), Propontocypris sp. (Sylvester-Bradley 1946), Cytherella sp (Jones, 1849), Lankacythere sp (Bhatia and Kumar 1979), Lankacythere multifora (Mostafawi,1992), Bairdoppilata paraalcyonicola (Titterton and Whatley 1988), Phlyctenophorea orientalis (Brady 1868a, b), Argilloecia sp (Sars 1866) and Pistocythere sp (Brandão and Karanovic 2020) (Fig. 6). At a depth of 15 m, Keijella reticulata is observed to be the dominant species occurring followed by Hemikrithe orientalis, at 30 m depth Hemikrithe orientalis predominates over Keijella reticulata and at 50 m depth again there is an abundance of Keijella reticulata observed followed by the abundance of Actinocythereis scutigera. Hence, the overall depth up to the range of 50 m is found to have species dominated by Keijella reticulata, Hemikrithe orientalis and Actinocythereis scutigera. At about 100 m depth Bairdoppilata paraalcyonicola predominates over Actioncythereis scutigera and at 200 m depth Keijella reticulata is found again to be the abundant form occurring followed by Bairdoppilata paraalcyonicola. So, on considering the overall depth of up to 200 m the study region is dominated by the species Bairdoppilata paraalcyonicola, Actinocythereis scutigera and Keijella reticulata. (Fig. 4). The carapace-valve ratio was observed to be at a ratio of 1:9, where the presence of open valves were higher in number than the carapace. The species diversity varies from 0 to 2.28. Highest is observed at station 18 and lowest at station 6. The dominant ones are found to be in the sub-orders of Cytherocopina and Bairdiocopina, Keijella reticulata is observed from the station 1 to 26 and most dominantly observed at station 21; Bairoppilata paraalcyonicola is observed from stations 11 to 26 and is most dominant at station 11. The remaining forms of taxa are represented by the sub-orders of Cypridocopina (Phlyctenophorea) which exhibits an occurrence at station 23.
Diversity Indices and Cluster Analysis
The calculated values of Shannon diversity indices (H) varies from 0 to 2.28. Dominance was ranging from 0.12 to 1, Evenness from 0.45 to 1, Fisher alpha between 0 and 7.74 and Equitability from 0 to 1 (Fig. 7). The resulting dendrogram of Q-mode (Fig. 5) and R-mode cluster analysis (Fig. 6) represents the grouping of samples according to grain size, bottom water depth and abundance species (> 5%). Based on the Q and R mode cluster analysis, the study area can be divided into two segments and two species assemblages. Cluster analysis (R-mode) of abundant ostracod species (higher than 5%) distinguishes two assemblages; Assemblage I (Hemikrithe orientalis, Pterygocythereis chennaiensis and Lankacythere multifora) and Assemblage II (Actioncythereis scutigera, Bairdoppilata paraalcyonicola, Stigmatocythere indica and Keijella reticulata) (Figs. 6 and 7).
Cluster I
The ostracod assemblage from the shallowest region ranges between 0 and 80 m water depth and is composed of the shallow ostracod species. The accommodative substrate is characterised by sandy to slightly muddy sand, but clay fractions are also found to be high at some of the locations sampled (Table 2). The ostracod assemblage is dominated by Hemikrithe orientalis, Pterygocythereis chennaiensis and Lankacythere multifora (Fig. 4).
Cluster II
This group of ostracod assemblage holds up the highest diversity of population from 80 to 200 m water depth. The accommodative substrates of sediment are slightly muddy sand to slightly sandy mud in composition (Table 2). Abundant species present over here are Actioncythereis scutigera, Bairdoppilata paraalcyonicola, Stigmatocythere indica and Keijella reticulata (Fig. 4).
Discussion
The study area is covered by four types of sediments: sand, slightly muddy sand, muddy sand and sandy mud. The shallower part of the shelf (up to 30 m depth) is dominated by sandy sediments (expect transect 4 and 5) that are deposited under wave action, indicating high energy conditions. When there is a reduction in wind and current speed, finer particles from the rivers settle to the bottom, which is responsible for the higher mud content in the shallower region (15 m depth). The particle size analysis reveals that the mud content increases with depth. The higher amount of mud content in the deeper part of the study area indicates low energy condition prevailing in this region (Anbuselvan and Senthil Nathan 2017, 2018) (Fig. 8).
The Rivers Pennar and Uppateru strongly influence the bottom water characteristics through the input of water that controls the pH, temperature, salinity, oxygen and nutrient-rich layer. The bottom water parameters, such as temperature and pH gradually (10 to 200 m), decreases with depth. The observed salinity value fluctuates within a narrow range, and it remains around 29.5 o/oo at all depths except at 105 m the value is 32.7 o/oo. The submarine groundwater discharge and freshwater input are the causes for lower salinity at the shallower depth (Anbuselvan and Senthil Nathan 2017, 2018). The dissolved oxygen content of bottom water ranging from 3.02 to 5.95 mg/l, shows a decreasing trend with depth. The higher concentration of the dissolved oxygen content in the shallower part is due to the photosynthetic activities of phytoplankton. The bottom water below 100 m depth, is observed to be low-oxygenated due to prevailing low energy conditions.
The most abundant ostracods species present in the shallower region are Hemikrithe orientalis and Lankacythere multifora and are associated with sand to slightly muddy sand. This region exhibits a lower salinity level due to the freshwater input. With an increase in temperature, salinity and water depth, the abundance of ostracod population tends to increase away from the shore region (Zhao et al. 1985). The higher concentration of dissolved oxygen in the shallower part is due to the influence of turbidity action in the nearshore region and also due to photosynthetic activities of phytoplankton. All of these above reasons act as a favourable substrate for the thriving of the species mentioned above. Hemikrithe orientalis was first reported on the Indo-Pacific waters by Van den Bold (1950) in the grey mud at 78.6 m water depth; in Indian waters, they were first recorded by Hussain et al. (2009) and Mostafawi (1992) first reported Lankacythere multifora.
Keijella reticulata, Bairdoppilata paraalcyonicola, Actinocythereis scutigera and Stigmatocythere indica are the most abundant forms in the middle shelf region, where the salinity and dissolved oxygen content are found to be at a moderate level. The sediment in these regions is composed of muddy sand to sandy mud which is a favourable substrate for the thriving of these species. Whatley and Zhao (1988), first reported Keijella reticulata from Malacca strait. In Indian waters, this species was reported from the east coast of India off Cuddalore by Hameed and Achyuthan (2007). The east coast of India is dominantly found to have the occurrence of Keijella reticulata when compared to the west coast of India (Hussain 2017). Maddocks (1969) first reported Bairdoppilata paraalcyonicola from the Mozambique Channel. This species was reported at 73 m depth from off central Bay of Bengal by Nishath et al. (2017) which was one of the most abundant species. Similarly, in our study area, Bairdoppilata paraalcyonicola occur at the middle shelf region, below 100 m depth. Actinocythereis scutigera has been first reported by Brady (1868a, b). In Indian waters, Mohan et al. (2001) reported the dominance of both Actinocythereis scutigera and Keijella reticulata living species at off Karaikkattukuppam owning to their occurrences in tropical and shallow-water forms.
The deeper part consists of the Ostracod species: Pterygocythereis chennaiensis where the sediment is characterised by muddy sand to sandy mud in composition. The salinity in this region is observed to be increasing, whereas the dissolved oxygen content seems to be decreasing due to lower energy conditions prevailing in this region. The thriving environment of most of the living ostracods are not observed under lower oxygen content or at anoxic conditions; very few of the inhabitants over here (Elofson 1941). An earlier researcher reported that a few species of ostracod could survive in an anoxic environment (Elofson 1941). Pterygocythereis chennaiensis was initially reported at the south-east coast of Chennai at off Karaikkattukuppam by Mohan et al. (2001). The distribution and abundance of this species at off Karaikkattukuppam was controlled by water depth, salinity, and calcium carbonate content. Also, they noticed the living population was maximum during April than July, which is possibly due to higher temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen of the bottom waters (Mohan et al. 2002). However, in the present area, Pterygocythereis chennaiensis is found to be more associated with high salinity and low temperature and dissolved oxygen of the bottom water conditions. Hence, we can infer that the overall thriving nature of Pterygocythereis chennaiensis in the study area is mainly influenced by salinity. The characterization of carapace was found to be thinner at the deeper region and thicker at the shallower region which reflects a gradual increase from coarse to fine sediments towards the deeper part; the overall carapace ornamentation is observed to be fresh and shiny. Similar observation was reported in the adjacent area (Nishath et al. 2017), the ostracod population contains only 10% of the carapace and the rest of 90% of open valves. The identified species were observed to be a mixture of adult and juvenile forms; also, they exhibited post-mortem transport referring to thanatocoenosis assemblage (Boomer et al. 2003).
Conclusion
From the 24 surface sediment samples, 21 species of Ostracoda were identified which belongs to 18 genera. The most favourable substrate for the thriving of these ostracods was found to be in mud dominated environment. The abundant forms of ostracod recorded are Keijella reticulata, Bairdoppilata paraalcyonicola and Hemikrithe orientalis. Among these Keijella reticulata is found to be the most abundant form distributed over the entire shelf region of the study area. The maximum population of ostracod observed at 100-200 m water depth, which is characterised by a moderate salinity and low dissolved oxygen content due to the lower energy condition induced in the environment. About 90% of valves and 10% of carapace where observed in the study area, which indicates a slower rate of sedimentation.
Data Availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Anbuselvan N, Senthil Nathan D (2017) Benthic Foraminifera from Shelf Sediments of the Bay of Bengal, Central East Coast, India. Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences, 34(1), 13–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-017-0037-y
Anbuselvan N, Senthil Nathan D (2018) Benthic foraminiferal distribution and biofacies in the shelf part of Bay of Bengal, east coast of India. Mar Biodivers 49(2):691–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-018-0845-1
Baskar K, Sridhar SGD, Sivakumar T, Hussain SM, Maniyarasan S (2015) Temporal variation of Physico-chemical parameters and Ostracoda population, off Rameswaram, Gulf of Mannar, Southeast Coast of Tamil Nadu, India. J Geol Soc India 86:663–670
Baskar, K, Sridhar, SGD, Sivakumar T, Hussain SM (2013) Distribution of Recent benthic Ostracoda off Rameswaram, Palk Strait, Tamil Nadu, south-east coast of India. Geol Soc Ind Spec Publ no.1:125–136
Bhatia SB, Kumar S (1979) Recent Ostracoda from off Karwar, west coast of India. Taxonomy, biostratigraphy and distribution of ostracodes. Proceedings of the VII international symposium on Ostracodes, pp 173-178
Bonaduce G, Ciampo G, Masoli M (1975) Distribution of Ostracoda in the Adriatic Sea. Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli, 40 (suppl.):1-304
Boomer I (2002) Environmental applications of marine and freshwater Ostracoda. In: Haslett SK (ed) Quaternary environmental micropalaeontology, London, pp 115–138
Boomer I, Horne DJ, Slipper IJ (2003) The use of Ostracods in palaeoenvironmental studies, or what can you do with an Ostracod Shell? The Paleontological Society Papers 9:153–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1089332600002199
Brady GS (1868a) Description of Ostracoda. In: Folin D, Périer (eds) Les Fonds de la Mer. Part 1, pp 49–112
Brady GS (1868b) A monograph of the recent British Ostracoda. Trans Linn Soc 26(20):353–495
Brandão SN, Karanovic I (2020) World Ostracoda Database. Pistocythereis bradyi (Ishizaki, 1968) Gou in Gou, Zheng & Huang, 1983. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=462714. Accessed 18 Dec 2020
Cronin TM, Boomer I, Dwyer GS, Rodriguez-Lazaro J (2002) Ostracoda and paleoceanography. Geophysical Monograph Series:99–119. https://doi.org/10.1029/131gm05
Didié C, Bauch HA, Helmke JP (2002) Late Quaternary deep-sea ostracodes in the polar and subpolar North Atlantic: paleoecological and paleoenvironmental implications. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 184(1–2):195–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-0182(02)00259-6
Elakkiya P, Hussain SM, Elumalai K (2013) Distribution of foraminifera and Ostracoda in the Kameshwaram coast, Nagapattinam, South India: implications for recognition of Overwash/extreme wave event deposits. In: Ramkumar M (ed) On a sustainable future of the Earth's natural resources. Springer Earth System Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Elofson O (1941) Zur kenntnis der marionen Ostracoden schwedens mitbesonderer Berucksichtingung des Skageraks, Zool. Bidr. Uppsala Univ., 19:215-534. Espanola de Micropaleontologia, 20(1): 5–37
Flemming B (2000) A revised textural classification of gravel-free muddy sediments on the basis of ternary diagrams. Cont Shelf Res 20(10–11):1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-4343(00)00015-7
Folk RL (1954) The distinction between grain size and mineral composition in sedimentary-rock nomenclature. J Geol 62(4):344–359. https://doi.org/10.1086/626171
Ganesan P, Hussain SM, Mohan SP (2008) Influence of environmental parameters on the distribution of ostracoda in Tamiraparani estuary and off Punnaikayal, Tamil Nadu, south-east coast of India. Fifth International Conference on Environmental Micropaleontology, Microbiology and Meiobenthology, pp91–92
Guha DK (1982) The study of ostracodes, how important they are in oil exploration. In Indian colloquium on micropaleontology and stratigraphy (pp. 579-584)
Hameed, Achyuthan H (2007) Recent Ostracoda in the Cuddalore estuary, East coast of TamilNadu, India. Mar Mesop 22(2):181–195
Hartmann G, Puri BS (1974) Summary of Neontological and paleontological classification of Ostracoda, Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen, museum und Institute 70, 7-73
Horne DJ (2007) A mutual temperature range method for quaternary palaeoclimatic analysis using European nonmarine Ostracoda. Quat Sci Rev 26(9–10):1398–1415
Hussain SM (1998) Recent benthic ostracoda from the Gulf of Mannar, off Tuticorin, Southeast coast of India. J Paleontol Soc India 43:1–22
Hussain SM (2017) An overview of Ostracoda studies from the freshwater, marginal marine and marine ecosystems of Andaman and Nicobar Islands and the coasts of India. Micropaleontology and its applications. Scientific Publishers (India), pp135-162
Hussain SM, Cassey KE (2016) Distribution of Foraminifera and Ostracoda in the North Chennai Coast (Ennore to Thiruvanmiur), Tamilnadu ; Implications on Microenvironment. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Science 43(3):416–424
Hussain SM, Rajeshwara Rao N (1996) Faunal affinity, zoogeographic distribution and review on recent Ostracoda from the east and west coasts of India. Bull Pure Appl Sci 15:37–50
Hussain SM, Ganesan P, Ravi G, Mohan SP, Sridhar SGD (2007) Distribution of Ostracoda in marine and marginal marine habitats of Tamil Nadu and adjoining areas, southern east coast of India and Andaman Island: environmental implication. Indian J Mar Sci 36(4):369–377
Hussain SM, Krishnamurthy R, Suresh Gandhi M, Ilayaraja K, Ganesan P, Mohan SP (2006) Micropalaeontological investigations on tsunamigenic sediments of Andaman Islands. Curr Sci 9:1655–1667
Hussain SM, Ragothaman V, Manivannan V (1996) Distribution and species diversity of recent benthic ostracoda from the Gulf of Mannar, off Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu. J Paleontol Soc India 4l:17–20
Hussain SM, Ravi G, Mohan SP, Rajeshwara Rao N (2004) Recent benthic ostracoda from the inner shelf off Chennai, south-east coast of india – implication on microenvironments. Environmental Micropaleontology, Microbiology and Meiobenthology 1:105–121
Hussain SM, Ravi G, Mohan SP, Rajeshwara Rao N (2009) Distribution of Recent Ostracoda in the Bay of Bengal, off Karikkattukuppam (near Chennai), southeast coast of India-Implication for Biodiversity. Gond Geol Magz 24(1):35–39
Jain SP (1978) Recent Ostracoda from Mandvi Beach, west coast of India. Bulletin Indian Geologists' Association 11:89–139
Jones TR, Hinde GJ (1849) A monograph of the Entomostraca of the cretaceous formation of England. By T Rupert Jones. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.46365
Kingma JT (1948) Contributions to the knowledge of the young-Caenozoic Ostracoda from the Malayan region. University of Utrecht, pp 1–118pp
Lachenal AM (1989) Écologie des Ostracodes du domaine méditerranéen: application au Golfe di Gabès (Tunisie Orientale). Le variations du niveau marin epuis 30000 ans. Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de Lyon, 108. 239 pp.
Maddocks RF (1969) Recent ostracodes of the family Pontocyprididae chiefly from the Indian Ocean. Smithsonian Contrib Zool 7:1–56. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810282.7
Madhupratap M, Achuthankutty CT, Sree Kumaran Nair SR, Nair VR (1981) Zooplankton abundance of the Andaman Sea. Indian J Mar Sci 10:258–261
Martens K, Horne DJ (2009) Ostracoda. Encyclopedia of Inland Waters, pp 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012370626-3.00184-8
Martínez-García B, Pascual A, Rodríguez-Lázaro J, Martín-Rubio M, Rofes J (2013) The Ostracoda (Crustacea) of the Tina Menor estuary (Cantabria, southern Bay of Biscay): distribution and ecology. J Sea Res 83:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2013.03.014
Mohammed AH (2006) The vertical distribution of recent benthic ostracoda in Marakkanam and Odinur, east coast, South India. Barsch J Sci 24(1):103–111
Mohan SP, Ravi G, Hussain SM, Rajeshwara Rao N (2001) Recent ostracoda from the bay of Bengal, off Karikkattukuppam (near Chennai), Southeast coast of India. J Paleontol Soc India 46:1–14
Mohan SP, Ravi G, Hussain SM, Rao NR (2002) Distribution of Recent benthic Ostracoda off Karikkattukuppam (near Chennai), southeast coast of India
Mohapatra GP, Rao BR, Biswas NR (1992) Morphology and surface sediments of the eastern continental shelf off Peninsular India. Geol Surv India Spec Pub 29:229–243
Moore RC (Editor) (1961) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology: Arthropoda 3: Crustacea, Ostracoda; by RH Benson...[et Al.].. Pt. Q. Geological Society of America and Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, pp 442
Mostafawi N (1992) Rezente Ostracoden aus dem mittleren Sunda-Schelf, zwischen der Malaiischen Halbinsel und Borneo. Senckenb Lethaea 72:129–168
Murray JW (2006) Ecology and applications of benthic foraminifera. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511535529
Naidu TY, Varma KU, Shyam Sunder VV (1997) Diversity and distribution of recent ostracoda in the continental shelf sediments off Pentakota and Kalingapatnam, central east coast of India. J Geol Soc India 50:727–738
Neale JW (1964) Ostracods as ecological and palaeoecological indicators (ed. L. Califano, et al.), pp 347^307. [Stazione Zoologica di Napoli, no. 33, supplement]. Ostracoda of Malacca Straits (part II). Revista
Nishath NM, Hussain SM, Rajkumar A (2015) Distribution of Ostracoda in the sediments of the northwestern part of the Bay of Bengal, India-implications for microenvironment. J Palaeontol Soc India 60(2):27–33
Nishath NM, Hussain SM, Neelavnnan K, Thejasino S, Saalim S, Rajkumar A (2017) Ostracod biodiversity from shelf to slope oceanic conditions, off central Bay of Bengal, India. Palaeogeogr, Palaeoclimatol, Palaeoecol 483:70–82
Oertli HJ (1971) The aspects of ostracod faunas - a possible new tool in petroleum sedimentology, Bull Centre Rech PauSNPA, 5, Suppl, 137-151.Ostracoda of Malacca Straits (part II). Revista
Pejrup M (1988) The triangular diagram used for classification of estuarine sediments: a new approach. Tide-influenced sedimentary environments and facies, pp 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7762-5_21
Pokorný V (1998). Ostracodes. Introduction to Marine Micropaleontology, 109–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044482672-5/50004-0
Puri HS (1954) Contribution to the study of the Miocene of the Florida panhandle. Part 3: Ostracoda. Florida Geological Survey, Geological Bulletin 36:215–345
Rao KL (1979) Indian Water Wealth and its Assessment Uses. New Delhi, Orient Longman Ltd, p 267
Reineck HE, Siefert W (1980) Faktoren der Schilickbildungim Sahlenburger Watt und Neuwerker Watt. Die KuK ste 35:26–51
Ruggieri G (1962) Gli Ostracodi marini del Tortoniano (Miocene medio-superiore) de Enna nella Sicilia Orientale. Palaeontographia Italica 56:1–68
Ruiz F, Abad M, Olías M, Galán E, González I, Aguilá E, Hamoumi N, Pulido I, Cantano M (2006) The present environmental scenario of the Nador lagoon (Morocco). Environ Res 102(2):215–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2006.03.001
Sars GO (1866) Oversigt af Norges marine Ostracoder. Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-Selskabet i Christiania 1865(1):1–130
Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423
Sridhar SGD (1996) Ecology, distribution and systematics of Recent Ostracoda from the Palk Bay, off Rameswaram, Tamil Nadu, Published Ph.D. thesis, University of Madras, Chennai
Sridhar SGD, Hussain SM, Kumar V, Periakali P (1998) Benthic Ostracoda responses to sediments in the Palk Bay, off Rameswaram, southeast coast of India. J Indian Association Sediment 17(2):187–195
Sylvester-Bradley PC (1946) XXIII.—some ostracod genotypes. Ann Mag Nat Hist 13(99):192–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222934608654541
Titterton R, Whatley R (1988) Recent Bairdiinae (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from the Solomon Islands. J Micropalaeontol 7(2):111–142. https://doi.org/10.1144/jm.7.2.111
Van den Bold WA (1950) LXXXIV.—Hemikrithe, a new genus of Ostracoda from the Indopacific. Ann Mag Nat Hist 3(34):900–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222935008654722
Van Morkhoven, FPCM (1963) Post-Palaeozoic Ostracoda: Their morphology, Taxonomy and Economic Use, Elsevier, New York 478, pp 763 tfs
Whatley RC, Zhao Q (1988) The recent Whatley, R.C. and Zhao, Q. 1988. The recentostracoda of Malacca Straits (part II). Revista Espanola de MicropaleontologiaL, 20(1): 5–37
Yassini I (1979) The littoral system Ostracodes from the bay of Bou-Ismail, Algiers, Algeria. Rev Esp Micropaleontol 11(3):353–416
Zhao Q, Wang P, Zhang Q (1985) Ostracoda in bottom sediments of the South China Sea, off Guangdong Province, China: their taxonomy and distribution. Mar Micropal China, pp 296-317
Zhao Q, Whatley RC (1989) Recent podocopid Ostracoda of the Sedili River and Jason Bay, southeastern Malay peninsula. Micropaleontology. 35:168–187
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful National Institute of Ocean Technology, Chennai (Ministry of Earth sciences, Government of India) for sample collection. We thank (NIOT) Vessel management cell Head Mr. D. Rajashekar, Mr. N. Ravi Scientist C and Project scientific assistant Mr. Thiruvathi Babu for their help and support. A special thanks to Prof.S.M. Hussain, Madras University; who helped in the identification process. The authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which greatly improved this article. The author’s express a sense of gratitude to CIF (Central Instrumentation Facilities) Pondicherry University. The authors thank Hari Krishnan P.R, PhD Scholar, Dept. Of Earth Sciences, and Pondicherry University for the technical support in the GIS software analyses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ASN and TSP gave the idea and prepared the outlines and draft of the manuscript and designed the figures along with comprehensive tables. SND and SMH did critical editing and reviewing of the whole manuscript. The authors have read and approved the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Compliance with ethical standards, the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
No animal testing was performed during this study.
Sampling and Field Studies
All necessary permits for sampling and observational field studies have been obtained by the authors from the competent authorities and are mentioned in the acknowledgements, if applicable. The study is compliant with CBD and Nagoya protocols.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent to Publish
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Priyanka, T.S.A., N, A., D, S.N. et al. Recent Ostracoda from the shelf sediments of Southwestern part of Bay of Bengal: Implication on Microenvironments. Thalassas 37, 65–79 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-020-00275-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-020-00275-z