Skip to main content
Log in

Reconstruction of Surface Porous PEEK Decorated with Strontium-doped Calcium Phosphate Coatings for Enhancing Osteogenic Activity

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to reconstruct surface porous structure with hundreds of micrometers and then bio-mineralize Sr-doped Calcium Phosphate (Sr-doped CaP) on Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) profile to enhance its bioactivity. A surface porous structure was prepared on PEEK profile by embedding and acid-etching of SiO2 particles as porogen (SP-PEEK). Then the Sr-doped CaP was further decorated on the porous surface after sulfonation, introduction of Sr-doped CaP crystal seeds and bio-mineralization in 1.5 times simulated body fluid (BSSP-PEEK-CaP/Sr). It was feasible to reconstruct the surface porous structure with hundreds of micrometers on PEEK profile by the present method without damaging its mechanical properties. The Sr-doped CaP crystal seeds effectively promoted the bio-mineralization of bio-inertness PEEK. All as-prepared PEEK did not inhibit the proliferation of cells. ALP of bio-mineralized groups was significantly increased than that of the other groups. The BSSP-PEEK-CaP/Sr obviously affected the morphology and promoted the adhesion and spreading of cells. As a result, the cyto-biocompatibity and bioactivity of PEEK were improved after bio-mineralization. Sr-doped CaP on PEEK most likely was beneficial for cells, which was associated with the increasing of the hydrophilicity on PEEK. This study provided a candidate method to improve the osteogenesis of PEEK implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurtz S M, Devine J N. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, Orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials, 2007, 28, 4845–4869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ma R, Tang T T. Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2014, 15, 5426–5445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Almasi D, Iqbal N, Sadeghi M, Sudin I, Kadir M R A, Kamarul T. Preparation methods for improving PEEK’s bioactivity for orthopedic and dental application: A review. International Journal of Biomaterials, 2016, 2016, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Varanasi V G, Saiz E, Loomer P M, Ancheta B, Uritani N, Ho S P, Tomsia A P, Marshall S J, Marshall G W. Enhanced osteocalcin expression by osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1) exposed to bioactive coating glass (SiO2-CaO-P2O5-MgO-K2O-Na2O system) ions. Acta Biomaterialia, 2009, 5, 3536–3547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong K L, Wong C T, Liu W C, Pan H B, Fong M K, Lam W M, Cheung W L, Tang W M, Chiu K Y, Luk K D K, Lu W W. Mechanical properties and in vitro response of strontium-containing hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composites. Biomaterials, 2009, 30, 3810–3817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lv X K, Wang X H, Tang S C, Wang D L, Yang L L, He A X, Tang T T, Wei J. Incorporation of molybdenum disulfide into polyetheretherketone creating biocomposites with improved mechanical, tribological performances and cytocompatibility for artificial joints applications. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2020, 189, 110819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Novotna Z, Reznickova A, Rimpelova S, Vesely M, Kolska Z, Svorcik V. Tailoring of PEEK bioactivity for improved cell interaction: Plasma treatment in action. RSC Advances, 2015, 52, 41428–41436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng A, Humayun A, Cohen D J, Boyan B D, Schwartz Z. Additively manufactured 3D porous Ti-6Al-4V constructs mimic trabecular bone structure and regulate osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and local factor production in a porosity and surface roughness dependent manner. Biofabrication, 2014, 6, 045007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 2005, 26, 5474–5491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simske S J, Ayers R A, Bateman T A. Porous materials for bone engineering. Materials Science Forum, 1997, 250, 151–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma Z Y, Zhao X Y, Zhao J, Zhao Z L, Wang Q H, Zhang C X. Biologically modified polyether ether ketone as dental implant material. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2020, 8, 620537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cai L, Pan Y K, Tang S C, Li Q, Tang T T, Zheng K, Boccaccini A R, Wei S C, Wei J, Su J C. Macro-mesoporous composites containing PEEK and mesoporous diopside as bone implants: Characterization, in vitro mineralization, cytocompatibility, and vascularization potential and osteogenesis in vivo. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2017, 5, 8337–8352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yuan B, Cheng Q W, Zhao R, Zhu X D, Yuan X, Yang X, Zhang K, Song Y M, Zhang X D. Comparison of osteointegration property between PEKK and PEEK: Effects of surface structure and chemistry. Biomaterials, 2018, 170, 116–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Siddiq A R, Kennedy A R. Porous poly-ether ether ketone (PEEK) manufactured by a novel powder route using near-spherical salt bead porogens: Characterisation and mechanical properties. Materials Science & Engineering C, 2015, 47, 180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Torstrick F B, Safranski D L, Burkus J K, Chappuis J L, Lee C S D, Guldberg R E, Gall K, Smith K E. Getting PEEK to stick to bone: The development of porous PEEK for interbody fusion devices. Techniques in Orthopaedics, 2017, 32, 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Buck E, Li H, Cerruti M. Surface modification strategies to improve the osseointegration of poly(etheretherketone) and its composites. Macromolecular Bioscience, 2020, 20, 2–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao Y, Wong H M, Wang W H, Li P H, Xu Z S, Chong E Y W, Yan C H, Yeung K W K, Chu P K. Cytocompatibility, osseointegration, and bioactivity of three-dimensional porous and nanostructured network on polyetheretherketone. Biomaterials, 2013, 34, 9264–9277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng Y Y, Xiong C D, Wang Z C, Li X Y, Zhang L F. A combination of CO2 laser and plasma surface modification of polyetheretherketone to enhance osteoblast response. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 344, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Evans N T, Torstrick F B, Lee C S D, Dupont K M, Safranski D L, Chang W A, Macedo A E, Lin A S P, Boothby J M, Whittingslow D C, Carson R A, Guldberg R E, Gall K. High-strength, surface-porous polyether-ether-ketone for load-bearing orthopedic implants. Acta Biomaterialia, 2015, 13, 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Landy B C, Vangordon S B, Mcfetridge P S, Sikavitsas V I, Smith M J. Mechanical and in vitro investigation of a porous PEEK foam for medical device implants. Journal of Applied Biomaterials and Functional Materials, 2013, 11, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hahn B D, Park D S, Choi J J, Ryu J, Yoon W H, Choi J H, Kim J W, Ahn C W, Kim H E, Yoon B H. Osteoconductive hydroxyapatite coated PEEK for spinal fusion surgery. Applied Surface Science, 2013, 283, 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Possley D, Baker E, Baker K, Khalil J G. Surface modification techniques to enhance osseointegration of spinal implants. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2020, 28, 988–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Geng Z, Wang R F, Zhuo X L, Li Z Y, Huang Y C, Ma L L, Cui Z D, Zhu S L, Liang Y Q, Liu Y D, Bao H J, Li X, Huo Q Y, Liu Z L, Yang X J. Incorporation of silver and strontium in hydroxyapatite coating on titanium surface for enhanced antibacterial and biological properties. Materials Science & Engineering C: Materials for Biological Applications, 2016, 71, 852–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grover L M, Wright A J, Gbureck U, Bolarinwa A, Song J F, Liu Y, Farrar D F, Howling G, Rose J, Barralet J E. The effect of amorphous pyrophosphate on calcium phosphate cement resorption and bone generation. Biomaterials, 2013, 34, 6631–6637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang S O, Dong Y Q, Chen M K, Xu Y F, Ping J F, Chen W Z, Liang W Q. Recent developments in strontium-based biocomposites for bone regeneration. Journal of Artificial Organs, 2020, 23, 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin K L, Xia L G, Li H Y, Jiang X Q, Pan H B, Xu Y J, Lu W W, Zhang Z Y, Chang J. Enhanced osteoporotic bone regeneration by strontium-substituted calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials, 2013, 34, 10028–10042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bianchi M, Esposti L D, Ballardini A, Liscio F, Berni M, Gambar A, Leeuwenburgh S C G, Sprio S, Tampieri A, Lafisco M. Strontium doped calcium phosphate coatings on poly(etheretherketone) (PEEK) by pulsed electron deposition. Surface & Coatings Technology, 2017, 319, 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohammadi M, Rabiee S M, Hesaraki S. The release behavior, biocompatibility and physical properties of Ald-loaded strontium doped calcium phosphate cement. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2020, 17, 1209–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Luo Y, Chen S S, Shi Y F, Ma J. 3D printing of strontium-doped hydroxyapatite based composite scaffolds for repairing critical-sized rabbit calvarial defects. Biomedical Materials, 2018, 13, 065004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Obrien J, Wilson I, Orton T, Ponan F. Investigation of the Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. European Journal of Biochemistry, 2000, 267, 5421–5426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yakufu M, Wang Z L, Wang Y, Jiao Z X, Guo M, Liu J G, Zhang P B. Covalently functionalized poly(etheretherketone) implants with osteogenic growth peptide (OGP) to improve osteogenesis activity. RSC Advances, 2020, 10, 9777–9785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Takahashi Y, Tabata Y. Effect of the fiber diameter and porosity of non-woven PET fabrics on the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition, 2004, 15, 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Coban O, Bora M O, Avcu E, Sinmazcelik T. The influence of annealing on the crystallization and tribological behavior of MWNT/PEEK nanocomposites. Polymer Composites, 2011, 32, 1766–1771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Goyal R K, Negi Y S, Tiwari A N. Preparation of high performance composites based on aluminum nitride/poly(ether-ether-ketone) and their properties. European Polymer Journal, 2005, 419, 2034–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim H M, Kim Y, Park S J, Rey C, Lee H M, Glimcher M J, Ko J S. Thin film of low-crystalline calcium phosphate apatite formed at low temperature. Biomaterials, 2000, 21, 1129–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Barrere F, Snel M M, Blitterswijk C A V, Groot K D, Layrolle P. Nano-scale study of the nucleation and growth of calcium phosphate coating on titanium implants. Biomaterials, 2004, 25, 2901–2910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tang R K, Wang L J, Orme C A, Bonstein T, Bush P J, Nancollas G H. Dissolution at the nanoscale: Self-preservation of biominerals. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2004, 116, 2751–2755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Christoffersen J, Christoffersen M R, Kolthoff N, Renholdt O. Effects of strontium ions on growth and dissolution of hydroxyapatite and on bone mineral detection. Bone, 1997, 20, 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity. Biomaterials, 2006, 27, 2907–2915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yabutsuka T, Fukushima K, Hiruta T, Takai S, Yao T. Fabrication of bioactive fiber-reinforced PEEK and MXD6 by incorporation of precursor of apatite. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2018, 106, 2254–2265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim M M, Boahene K D O, Byrne P J. Use of customized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in the reconstruction of complex maxillofacial defects. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, 2009, 11, 53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ha S W, Kirch M, Birchler F, Eckert K L, Vonmont H. Surface activation of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and formation of calcium phosphate coatings by precipitation. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine, 1997, 8, 683–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Barkarmo S, Wennerberg A, Hoffman M, Kjellin P, Breding K, Handa P, Stenport V. Nano-hydroxyapatite-coated PEEK implants: A pilot study in rabbit bone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2013, 101, 465–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ma R, Wang J L, Li C X, Ma K, Wei J, Yang P, Guo D G, Wang K Z, Wang W. Effects of different sulfonation times and post-treatment methods on the characterization and cytocompatibility of sulfonated PEEK. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 2020, 35, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Almasi D, Izman S, Assadian M, Ghanbari M, Kadir M R A. Crystalline ha coating on peek via chemical deposition. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 314, 1034–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nguyen T, Jang Y S, Lee M H, Bae T S. Effect of strontium doping on the biocompatibility of calcium phosphate-coated titanium substrates. Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials, 2019, 17, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Niu Y F, Guo L P, Hu F Y, Ren L S, Zhou Q R, Ru J Y, Wei J. Macro-microporous surface with sulfonic acid groups and micro-nano structures of PEEK/nano magnesium silicate composite exhibiting antibacterial activity and inducing cell responses. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2020, 15, 2403–2417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Li Y H, Wang J, He D, Zhu G X, Wu G Y, Chen L. Surface sulfonation and nitrification enhance the biological activity and osteogenesis of polyetheretherketone by forming an irregular nano-porous monolayer. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2019, 31, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wodarski M, Putkonen M, Norek M. Infrared absorption study of Zn-S hybrid and ZnS ultrathin films deposited on porous AAO ceramic support. Coatings, 2020, 10, 459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Eriksson M, Yi L, Hu J F, Gao L, Nygren M, Shen Z J. Transparent hydroxyapatite ceramics with nanograin structure prepared by high pressure spark plasma sintering at the minimized sintering temperature. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2011, 31, 1533–1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Benhabbour S R, Heardown S H, Adronov A. Cell adhesion and proliferation on hydrophilic dendritically modified surfaces. Biomaterials, 2008, 29, 4177–4186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhao X D, Xiong D S, Liu Y T. Improving surface wettability and lubrication of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) by combining with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2018, 82, 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tan J, Wang D H, Cao H L, Qiao Y Q, Zhu H Q, Liu X Y. Effect of local alkaline microenvironment on the behaviors of bacteria and osteogenic cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, 10, 42018–42029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Xu X, Li Y L, Wang L X, Li Y, Pan J J, Fu X M, Luo Z Y, Sui Y, Zhang S Q, Wang L, Ni Y F, Zhang L, Wei S C. Triple-functional polyetheretherketone surface with enhanced bacteriostasis and anti-inflammatory and osseointegrative properties for implant application. Biomaterials, 2019, 212, 98–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Su A P, Sang J L, Ji M S, Lee J H, Wan D K, Kwon I K. Fabrication of 3D printed PCL/PEG polyblend scaffold using rapid prototyping system for bone tissue engineering application. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2018, 15, 435–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wei J H, Igarashi T, Okumori N, Igarashi T, Maetani T, Liu B L, Yoshinari M. Influence of surface wettability on competitive protein adsorption and initial attachment of osteoblasts. Biomedical Materials, 2009, 4, 045002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang S G, Dong Y Q, Chen M K, Xu Y F, Ping J F, Chen W Z, Liang W Q. Recent developments in strontium-based biocomposites for bone regeneration. Journal of Artificial Organs, 2020, 23, 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Nielsen S P. The biological role of strontium. Bone, 2004, 35, 583–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang N, Wang W D, Zhang X Z, Nune K C, Zhao Y, Liu N, Misra R D K, Yang K, Tan L L, Yan J L. The effect of different coatings on bone response and degradation behavior of porous magnesium-strontium devices in segmental defect regeneration. Bioactive Materials, 2021, 6, 1765–1776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study is partly supported by the following programs: National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52035012, 51372210), the Basic Research Foundation Key Project of Sichuan Province (2021JY0046), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2682020ZT91).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuxin Qu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, C., Xiong, X., Cui, R. et al. Reconstruction of Surface Porous PEEK Decorated with Strontium-doped Calcium Phosphate Coatings for Enhancing Osteogenic Activity. J Bionic Eng 18, 927–943 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-021-0060-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-021-0060-9

Keywords

Navigation