Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transient simulation and analysis of the simultaneous load rejection process in pumped storage power stations using a 1-D-3-D coupling method

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The load rejection imposes a danger in the pumped storage hydropower plants (PSPs), especially when two or more pump turbines reject their loads simultaneously. In this paper, the simultaneous load rejection scenarios in the PSPs are simulated and analyzed by using a 1-D, 3-D coupling method. The PSP pipe system is modeled by using the 1-D method of characteristics (MOC) and one pump turbine is modeled by using the 3-D computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The simulated flow and head are transmitted between the 1-D, 3-D regions through the interfaces between these two regions. By assuming that the installed pump turbines are of the same type and the corresponding branch pipes have the same properties, the variations of the transient pressures and the flowrates in different pump turbines will be identical. Therefore, only one pump turbine is modeled by the CFD in this study. A new branching junction boundary is proposed to assign the simulated dynamic pressures and flowrates obtained by the 3-D model to other pump turbines. The 1-D-3-D coupling method is validated by experiments with only one pump turbine rejecting its load. The simultaneous load rejection of two pump turbines is then simulated and validated by comparing the results with those of the 1-D simulation. By building only one pump turbine 3-D model, a large amount of computational resources can be saved. The simultaneous load rejection scenario is then analyzed and compared with the single load rejection scenario. Higher water hammer pressures and a larger rotational speed occur in the simultaneous load rejection scenario, which leads to larger pressure pulsations in the pump turbine. The larger pressure pulsations can be further explained by the flow patterns in the runner channels, in which heavier flow separations and vortexes can be observed in the simultaneous load rejection scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang J. B., Yang J. D. 1-D MOC simulation software for hydraulic transients: TOPsys [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, 163(1): 012081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang L. G., Zhou D. Q. CFD research on runaway transient of pumped storage power station caused by pumping power failure [J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2013, 52(5): 052027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeng W., Yang J., Hu J. Pumped storage system model and experimental investigations on S-induced issues during transients [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2017, 90: 350–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeng W., Yang J., Guo W. Runaway instability of pump-turbines in S-shaped regions considering water compressibility [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2015, 137(5): 051401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu J., Yang J., Zeng W. et al. Constant-speed oscillation of a pump turbine observed on a pumped-storage model system [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2019, 141(5): 051109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Olimstad G., Nielsen T., Børresen B. Dependency on runner geometry for reversible-pump turbine characteristics in turbine mode of operation [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2012, 134(12): 121102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruprecht A., Helmrich T. Simulation of the water hammer in a hydro power plant caused by draft tube surge [C]. ASME/JSME 2003 4th Joint Fluids Summer Engineering Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2003, 2811–2816.

  8. Wu D., Yang S., Wu P. et al. MOC-CFD coupled approach for the analysis of the fluid dynamic interaction between water hammer and pump [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2015, 141(6): 06015003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang X. X., Cheng Y. G. Simulation of hydraulic transients in hydropower systems using the 1-D-3-D coupling approach [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2012, 24(4): 595–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang X. X., Cheng Y. G., Yang J. D. et al. Simulation of the load rejection transient process of a francis turbine by using a 1-D-3-D coupling approach [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2014, 26(5): 715–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang Z., Cheng Y., Xia L. et al. Evolutions of flow patterns and pressure fluctuations in a prototype pumpturbine during the runaway transient process after pump-trip [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 152: 1149–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaudhry M. H. Applied hydraulic transients [M]. 3 Editon, New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Huai W. X., Wang Z. W., Qian Z. D. et al. Numerical simulation of sandy bed erosion by 2D vertical jet [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(12): 3265–3274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Menter F. R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications [J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598–1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li Z. W, Huai W. X., Qian Z. D. Study on the flow field and concentration characteristics of the multiple tandem jets in crossflow [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2012, 55(10): 2778–2788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zeng W., Yang J., Hu J. et al. Guide-vane closing schemes for pump-turbines based on transient characteristics in s-shaped region [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2016, 138(5): 051302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schafer R. W. What is a Savitzky-Golay filter? [J]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2011, 28(4): 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fu X. L., Li G. D., Li D. Y. et al. Influence of nonlinear pulsating characteristic on the simulation of the load rejection process in a pump-turbine [C]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 240(8): 082003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Trivedi C., Cervantes M. J., Gandhi B. K. et al. Transient pressure measurements on a high head model Francis turbine during emergency shutdown, total load rejection, and runaway [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2014, 136(12): 121107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu J., Yang J., Zeng W. et al. Transient pressure analysis of a prototype pump turbine: Field tests and simulation [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2018, 140(7): 071102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hasmatuchi V., Farhat M., Roth S. et al. Experimental evidence of rotating stall in a pump-turbine at off-design conditions in generating mode [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2011, 133(5): 051104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Widmer C., Staubli T., Ledergerber N. Unstable characteristics and rotating stall in turbine brake operation of pump-turbines [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2011, 133(4): 041101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xia L., Cheng Y., Yang Z. et al. Evolutions of pressure fluctuations and runner loads during runaway processes of a pump-turbine [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2017, 139(9): 091101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang W., Yang J., Guo W. et al. A mathematical model and its application for hydro power units under different operating conditions [J]. Energies, 2015, 8(9): 10260–10275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang C., Yang J. D. Water hammer simulation using explicit-implicit coupling methods [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2015, 141(4): 04014086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Y., Yang J., Yang J. et al. Transient simulations in hydropower stations based on a novel turbine boundary [J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016, 1504659.

  27. Xia L. S., Cheng Y. G., Yang J. D. et al. Evolution of flow structures and pressure fluctuations in the S-shaped region of a pump-turbine [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2019, 57(1): 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Z., Zhu B., Wang X. et al. Pressure fluctuations in the s-shaped region of a reversible pump-turbine [J]. Energies, 2017, 10(1): 96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Y. N., Wang X. Y., Zhang Y. N. et al. Comparisons and analyses of vortex identification between Omega method and Q criterion [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2019, 31(2): 224–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Open Research Fund Program of the State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Whan University (Grant No. 2017SDG01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Zeng.

Additional information

Biography

Cheng-cheng Yin (1997-), Male, Master, E-mail: ccyin@whu.edu.cn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, Cc., Zeng, W. & Yang, Jd. Transient simulation and analysis of the simultaneous load rejection process in pumped storage power stations using a 1-D-3-D coupling method. J Hydrodyn 33, 979–991 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-021-0087-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-021-0087-8

Key words

Navigation