Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling and simulating the impact of forgetting and communication errors on delays in civil infrastructure shutdowns

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Engineering Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Handoff processes during civil infrastructure operations are transitions between sequential tasks. Typical handoffs constantly involve cognitive and communication activities among operations personnel, as well as traveling activities. Large civil infrastructures, such as nuclear power plants (NPPs), provide critical services to modern cities but require regular or unexpected shutdowns (i.e., outage) for maintenance. Handoffs during such an outage contain interwoven workflows and communication activities that pose challenges to the cognitive and communication skills of handoff participants and constantly result in delays. Traveling time and changing field conditions bring additional challenges to effective coordination among multiple groups of people. Historical NPP records studied in this research indicate that even meticulous planning that takes six months before each outage could hardly guarantee sufficient back-up plans for handling various unexpected events. Consequently, delays frequently occur in NPP outages and bring significant socioeconomic losses. A synthesis of previous studies on the delay analysis of accelerated maintenance schedules revealed the importance and challenges of handoff modeling. However, existing schedule representation methods could hardly represent the interwoven communication, cognitive, traveling, and working processes of multiple participants collaborating on completing scheduled tasks. Moreover, the lack of formal models that capture how cognitive, waiting, traveling, and communication issues affect outage workflows force managers to rely on personal experiences in diagnosing delays and coordinating multiple teams involved in outages. This study aims to establish formal models through agent-based simulation to support the analytical assessment of outage schedules with full consideration of cognitive and communication factors involved in handoffs within the NPP outage workflows. Simulation results indicate that the proposed handoff modeling can help predict the impact of cognitive and communication issues on delays propagating throughout outage schedules. Moreover, various activities are fully considered, including traveling between workspaces and waiting. Such delay prediction capability paves the path toward predictive and resilience outage control of NPPs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Monem M, Hegazy T (2013). Enhancing construction as-built documentation using interactive voice response. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(7):895–898

    Google Scholar 

  • AbouRizk S (2010). Role of simulation in construction engineering and management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(10):1140–1153

    Google Scholar 

  • Abourizk S M, Hague S A, Ekyalimpa R (2016). Construction Simulation: An Introduction Using Simphony. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzraiee H, Zayed T, Moselhi O (2013). Assessment of construction operations productivity rate as computed by simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference: Simulation—Making Decisions in A Complex World. IEEE Press, 3225–3236

  • Alzraiee H, Zayed T, Moselhi O (2015). Dynamic planning of construction activities using hybrid simulation. Automation in Construction, 49: 176–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R B, Tweney R D (1997). Artifactual power curves in forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 25(5):724–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry I A, Khan A A (2016). A research survey: Review of flexible job shop scheduling techniques. International Transactions in Operational Research, 23(3):551–591

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke N J (2015). Team cognition as interaction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6):415–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke N J, Gorman J C, Myers C W, Duran J L (2013). Interactive team cognition. Cognitive Science, 37(2):255–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke N J, Gorman J C, Winner J L (2008). Team cognition. In: Durso F T, Nickerson R S, Dumais S T, Lewandowsky S, Perfect T J, eds. Handbook of Applied Cognition, 2nd ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke N J, Salas E E, Kiekel P A, Bell B (2005). Advances in measuring team cognition. In: Salas E, Fiore S M, eds. Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors that Drive Process and Performance, 83–106

  • Demir M, McNeese N J, Cooke N J (2017). Team situation awareness within the context of human-autonomy teaming. Cognitive Systems Research, 46: 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang D, Chen Y, Wong L (2006). Safety climate in construction industry: A case study in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(6):573–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Germain S (2015). Use of collaborative software to improve nuclear power plant outage management. In: International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human Machine Interface Technologies. Charlotte, NC, US: Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy, 608–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Germain S, Farris R K, Whaley A M, Medema H D, Gertman D I (2014). Guidelines for implementation of an advanced outage control center to improve outage coordination, problem resolution, and outage risk management. Technical Report. Idaho National Laboratory

  • Gorman J C, Cooke N J, Winner J L (2006). Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments. Ergonomics, 49(12–13):1312–1325

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman J C, Hessler E E, Amazeen P G, Cooke N J, Shope S M (2012). Dynamical analysis in real time: Detecting perturbations to team communication. Ergonomics, 55(8):825–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadavi S M H (2008). Risk-based, genetic algorithm approach to optimize outage maintenance schedule. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 35(4): 601–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Heo G, Park J (2010). A framework for evaluating the effects of maintenance-related human errors in nuclear power plants. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 95(7):797–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu D, Mohamed Y (2010). State-based simulation mechanism for facilitating project schedule updating. In: Construction Research Congress 2010: Innovation for Reshaping Construction Practice, 369–378

  • Jan S H, Tserng H P, Ho S P (2013). Enhance construction visual as-built schedule management using BIM technology. International Journal of Civil Science and Engineering, 7(11):812–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang I, Ryum A, Ali M, Al S, Jun S, Gook H, Hyun P (2013). An empirical study on the basic human error probabilities for NPP advanced main control room operation using soft control. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 257: 79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Park J (2012). Reduction of test and maintenance human errors by analyzing task characteristics and work conditions. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 58: 89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundakcı N, Kulak O (2016). Hybrid genetic algorithms for minimizing makespan in dynamic job shop scheduling problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 96: 31–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S H, Pena-Mora F (2005). System dynamics approach for error and change management in concurrent design and construction. In: Proceedings of the 37th Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE, 1508–1514

  • Liao P C, Lei G, Fang D, Liu W (2014). The relationship between communication and construction safety climate in China. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 18(4):887–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd R L (2003). A survey of crane operating experience at US nuclear power plants from 1968 through 2002. Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • Loftus G R (1985). Evaluating forgetting curves. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(2):397–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Love P E D, Li H (2000). Quantifying the causes and costs of rework in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 18(4):479–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu M (2003). Simplified discrete-event simulation approach for construction simulation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(5):537–546

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendall A R, Noble J S, Klein C M (2008). Scheduling maintenance activities during planned outages at nuclear power plants. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory, Applications and Practice, 15(1):53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Neboyan V, Lederman L (1987). Human factors in the operation of nuclear power plants improving the way man and machines work together. International Atomic Energy Agency Bulletin, 29(4):27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Nembhard D A (2000). The effects of task complexity and experience on learning and forgetting: A field study. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 42(2):272–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Nembhard D A, Bentefouet F (2012). Parallel system scheduling with general worker learning and forgetting. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(2):533–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Promsorn P, Soponsakulrat P, Adulyanukosol C, Kaiyarit P, Chinda T (2015). Identifying root causes of construction accidents: Nonhuman error factors. International Journal of Computing, Communications & Instrumentation Engineering, 2(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyy P (2001). An analysis of maintenance failures at a nuclear power plant. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 72(3):293–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozinat A, Wynn M T, van der Aalst W M P, ter Hofstede A H M, Fidge C J (2009). Workflow simulation for operational decision support. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 68(9):834–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks R, Perlman A, Barak R (2013). Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality. Construction Management and Economics, 31(9):1005–1017

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambasivan M, Soon Y W (2007). Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 25(5):517–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott M J, Guntuku S C, Huan Y, Lin W, Ghinea G (2015). Modelling human factors in perceptual multimedia quality: On the role of personality and culture. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 481–490

  • Seo J O, Lee S H, Seo J (2016). Simulation-based assessment of workers’ muscle fatigue and its impact on construction operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(11):04016012–04016063

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart P R, Shadbolt N R (2012). Modelling the dynamics of team sensemaking: A constraint satisfaction approach. Knowledge Systems for Coalition Operations, 1–10

  • Sun Z, Zhang C, Tang P (2018a). Simulation-based optimization of communication protocols for reducing delays during nuclear power plant outages. In: Construction Research Congress 2018: Infrastructure and Facility Management, 455–464

  • Sun Z, Zhang C, Tang P, Wang Y, Liu Y (2018b). Bayesian network modeling of airport runway incursion occurring processes for predictive accident control. In: Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering. Cham: Springer, 669–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Techera U, Hallowell M, Littlejohn R, Rajendran S (2018). Measuring and predicting fatigue in construction: Empirical field study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(8):04018062

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Eckardt B (1995). What Is Cognitive Science? Massachusetts: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Eckardt B (2001). Multidisciplinarity and cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 25(3):453–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker P H, Verhagen F C M, van Bloois J T, Sutton III W R (2003). Reducing refueling outage duration by optimizing core design and shuffling sequence. In: Advances in Nuclear Fuel Management III (ANFM 2003). Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, 1–16

  • Wang Y, Liu Y, Sun Z, Tang P (2018). A Bayesian-entropy network for information fusion and reliability assessment of national airspace systems. In: Proceeding of the 10th Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, 10(1)

  • Zhang C, Tang P, Cooke N, Buchanan V, Yilmaz A, Germain S, Boring R, Akca-Hobbins S, Gupta A (2017). Human-centered automation for resilient nuclear power plant outage control. Automation in Construction, 82: 179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Tang P, Yilmaz A, Cooke N, Chasey A, Jones S (2016). Automatic crane-related workflow control for nuclear plant outages through computer vision and simulation. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC). Auburn, AL: Department of Construction Economics & Property, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Tam G M, Shi J J (2002). Simulation-based methodology for project scheduling. Construction Management and Economics, 20(8): 667–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Li N, Jiang Z, Fang D, Anumba C J (2019). An agent-based modeling approach for understanding the effect of worker-management interactions on construction workers’ safety-related behaviors. Automation in Construction, 97: 29–43

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA

    Zhe Sun

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA, 15213, USA

    Pingbo Tang

  3. The Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA

    Cheng Zhang

Authors
  1. Zhe Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cheng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pingbo Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pingbo Tang.

Additional information

This research is supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Nuclear Engineering University Program (NEUP) under Award No. DE-NE0008403. DOE’s support is acknowledged. Any opinions and findings presented are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of DOE.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Z., Zhang, C. & Tang, P. Modeling and simulating the impact of forgetting and communication errors on delays in civil infrastructure shutdowns. Front. Eng. Manag. 8, 109–121 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0084-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0084-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation