Skip to main content
Log in

Forecasting the Japanese macroeconomy using high-dimensional data

  • Article
  • Published:
The Japanese Economic Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares several forecasting methods using high-dimensional macroeconomic data from Japan. The diffusion index (DI) model has been widely used to incorporate the information contained in high-dimensional data for forecasting. We propose two selection methods of the number of latent factors in the DI model and compare the DI model with the vector autoregression (VAR) model whose parameters are estimated by lasso-type methods. We find that the DI model tends to be better for short-horizon forecasting, whereas the VAR model tends to be better for long-horizon forecasting. Moreover, we find that the information exploited for forecasting is similar between the DI and VAR models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Our terminology may be slightly misleading, because we actually use observations in both the training and validation periods to obtain some forecasts. For instance, to obtain \({\hat{y}}_{i,T|T-h, \ldots , T-T_1}^\lambda\), we use the observation \(y_{T-h}\), which belongs to the validation period if \(h < T- T_1\). In this paper, the term “validation period” means that the MSFE is calculated over the period to determine the regularization parameter.

  2. Bai and Ng (2008) proposed an alternative method, which reduces the dimension of \(y_t\) in (4) in a data-driven way before estimating factors.

  3. Due to recent doubt in employment related data credibility in Japan, a few series may be updated. However, the qualitative results of this paper will remain unaffected.

  4. The dataset after transformation and implementation codes are available upon request.

  5. Just for reference, we also compared our rolling window method with the 10-fold cross-validation that splits the sample randomly without taking account the time dependence of the observations. The result did not show a clear difference between the performance of two methods. We do not employ a simple K-fold cross-validation for our prediction problem, because it causes data leakage, that is, it uses the information of future observations to train a prediction model.

  6. Because all variables are normalized to have variance unity, a high MSFE of the AR model implies that the variable is hard to predict.

References

  • Ahn, S. C., & Horenstein, A. R. (2013). Eigenvalue ratio test for the number of factors. Econometrica, 81(3), 1203–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altissimo, F., Cristadoro, R., Forni, M., Lippi, M., & Veronese, G. (2010). New Eurocoin: Tracking economic growth in real time. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 1024–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlot, S., & Celisse, A. (2010). A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics Surveys, 4, 40–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artis, M. J., Banerjee, A., & Marcellino, M. (2005). Factor forecasts for the UK. Journal of Forecasting, 24(4), 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, J. (2003). Inferential theory for factor models of large dimensions. Econometrica, 71(1), 135–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, J., & Ng, S. (2002). Determining the number of factors in approximate factor models. Econometrica, 70(1), 191–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, J., & Ng, S. (2008). Forecasting economic time series using targeted predictors. Journal of Econometrics, 146(2), 304–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., Marcellino, M., & Masten, I. (2008). Forecasting macroeconomic variables using diffusion indexes in short sample with structural change. In: Rapach DE, Wohar ME (eds) Forecasting in the Presence of Structural Breaks and Model Uncertainty, Emerald Group Publishing, chap 4, pp 149–194.

  • Bernanke, B. S., Boivin, J., & Ellasz, P. (2005). Measuring the effects of monetary policy: A factor-augumented vector autoregressive (FAVAR) approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1), 387–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, J., & Giannoni, M. (2006). DSGE models in a data-rich environment, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 12772.

  • Burns, A. F., & Mitchell, W. C. (1946). Measuring Business Cycles. New York: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callot, LAF., & Kock, AB. (2014). Oracle efficient estimation and forecasting with the adaptive lasso and the adaptive group lasso in vector autoregressions. In: Essays in Nonlinear Time Series Econometrics, Oxford University Press.

  • Chamberlain, G., & Rothschild, M. (1983). Arbitrage, factor structure, and mean-variance analysis on large asset markets. Econometrica, 51(5), 1281–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chikamatsu, K., Hirakata, N., Kido, Y., & Otaka, K. (2018). Nowcasting japanese GDPs, Bank of Japan Working Paper Series, No. 18-E-18.

  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistic for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exterkate, P., Groenen, P. J. F., Heij, C., & van Dijk, D. (2016). Nonlinear forecasting with many predictors using kernel ridge regression. International Journal of Forecasting, 32(3), 736–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010). Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software, 33(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannone, D., Reichlin, L., & Small, D. (2008). Nowcasting: The real-time information content of macroeconomic data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55, 665–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayakawa, K., & Kobayashi, Y. (2011). Business cycle analysis using a large-scale macro data. In: Quantitative Analysis of Finance and Business Cycle, Minerva Shobo, pp 91–111, in Japanese.

  • Kowarik, A., Meraner, A., & Templ, M. (2014). Seasonal adjustment with the R packages x12 and x12GUI. Journal of Statistical Software, 62(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Chen, W. (2014). Forecasting macroeconomic time series: LASSO-based approach and their forecast combinations with dynamic factor models. International Journal of Forecasting, 30(4), 996–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludvigson, S. C., & Ng, S. (2009). Macro factors in bond risk premia. Review of Finacial Studies, 22(12), 5027–5067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsilli, C. (2014). Variable selection in predictive MIDAS models, Banque de France Working Paper.

  • Meier, L. (2015). grplasso: Fitting User Specified Models with Group Lasso Penalty. R package version 0.4-5.

  • Nicholson, W. B., Matteson, D. S., & Bien, J. (2017). VARX-L: Structured regularization for large vector autoregressions with exogenous variables. International Journal of Forecasting, 33(3), 627–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onatski, A. (2010). Determing the number of factors from empirical distribution of eigenvalues. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 1004–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff, B. (2008). Analysis of Integrated and Cointegrated Time Series with R. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.R-project.org/, vienna Austria.

  • Shibamoto, M. (2007). An analysis of monetary policy shocks in japan: A factor augumented vector autoregressive approach. Japanese Economic Review, 58(4), 484–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shintani, M. (2005). Nonlinear forecasting analysis using diffusion indexes: An application to japan. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 37(3), 517–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeekes, S., & Wijler, E. (2018). Macroeconomic forecasting using penalized regression. International Journal of Forecasting, 34(3), 408–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, S., & Bickel, PJ. (2011). Large vector auto regressions, arXiv:1106.3915.

  • Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2002a). Forecasting using principal components from a large number of predictors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(460), 1167–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2002b). Macroeconomic forecasting using diffusion indexes. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(2), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, N. R., & Xiong, W. (2018). Big data analytics in economics: What have we learned so far, and where should we go from here? Canadian Journal of Economics, 51(3), 695–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 58(1), 267–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uematsu, Y., & Tanaka, S. (2019). High-dimensional macroeconomic forecasting and variable selection via penalized regression. Econometrics Journal, 22, 34–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, Y. (2019). Bootstrap inference for impulse response functions in factor-augumented vector autoregressions. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 34(2), 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, M., & Lin, Y. (2006). Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 68(1), 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 67(2), 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Kazuhiko Hayakawa and Masahiko Shibamoto for their advice on creating our dataset. We also thank Shigeyuki Hamori, a co-editor, and two anonymous referees for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoya Sueishi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This paper is based on the master’s thesis of the first author. The views expressed in this paper are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the company with whom the first author is associated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakajima, Y., Sueishi, N. Forecasting the Japanese macroeconomy using high-dimensional data. JER 73, 299–324 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42973-020-00041-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42973-020-00041-z

Keywords

JEL classifications

Navigation