Abstract
The aim of this article is to identify the educational interest of Nietzsche’s fundamental philosophical principles. To this end, Nietzsche’s work “The Gay Science” and corresponding references from other fragments of his corpus have been aggregated for the needs of this goal. An analysis of the book’s major propositions indicates an epistemological approach to educational matters, based on knowledge’s refutability and its validation through experimentation. Other parts of this work, stress out the incompatibility of Nietzsche’s philosophy with a democratic education. His philosophical concepts of social order and destiny’s accomplishment are presented in favour of this claim. Finally, the most unique propositions in The Gay Science are unveiled and their potential incorporation into the educational process is proposed. In particular, the values of appearance and fallacy emerge, illuminating the optimistic side of his philosophy. From an educational perspective, these values recommend limiting excess rationalism in classrooms and maintaining students’ learning interest by focusing on their emotional needs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Notes
According to the principle of the content analysis methodology, every script conveys its author’s intentions and principal beliefs (Vamvoukas 2011).
GS, §: 11, 57, 109, 112, 121, 166, 196, 242, 249, 286, 301, 333, 374.
GS, PR 3, §25, 33, 51, 265, 351.
GS, JCR: 1, 3, 7, 8, 12, 14, 21, 23, 28, 32, 40, 43, 49, 60, §: 18, 28, 29, 99, 113, 120, 124,128, 185, 195, 285, 289, 303, 308, 314, 328, 329, 338, 343, 347, 375, 377.
GS, §: 4,13,14, 21,118, 136, 143, 149, 195, 252, 283, 296, 328, 347, 349. It is probably well known that Nietzsche disdains woman nature and exclusively addresses his philosophy to men (GS, §: 66, 68, 70, 72, 119, 325), but we will not become further involved either in the sexism of his philosophy or his debatable antisemitism (§135, §135, §137).
GS, JCR 10, 47, §89, 93, 105, 342, 370; TBT, An Attempt at Self Criticism.
§98, 124, 335, 342, 344, 346, 356, 366 382. Similar to Nehamas’s interpretation on Nietzsche’s objection to the absolutism of morality (Johnson 1996, p. 29).
As Aristotle defines “entelechy” (On the soul, 412a). Maybe in this meaning, Zarathustra’s final words could be explained: “Do I strive after happiness? I strive after my work!” (TSZ, Fourth part, the sign).
GS, JCR 2, 4, PR 4, §: 59, 60, 77, 79, 80, 107, 158, 256, 284, 299, 383.
“We need to discover the fool as much as the hero, in order to preserve our passion for knowledge” (§107, Our ultimate gratitude to art).
This devaluation is consistent to the inconclusiveness of knowledge, which was explained previously.
In response to §346, Our question mark and §382, The great health.
In respect to this view, shouldn’t our universities strive for the systematic evaluation and organization of our vast research data in the field of Sciences of Education? Certainly, we do not intend to propose a prevalence of Positivism in our universities, but the need to maintain a balance among all the epistemological examples in the field of science.
As in one of education’s etymological origin, from the Latin educere, that is, “to extract” (Koumanoudis 1972).
Stolz (2017) also demonstrates the necessity of art for the educational process, in a hypothetical adaptation of Nietzsche philosophy to education, in the terms that culture can potential provoke an existential revelation to an educated person.
As in Aristotle’s: “for the young in age, nothing unpleasant is volitionally tolerable” (Politics, 1964).
Bojesen (2018) is mostly referred to Nietzsche’s late notebooks in order to justify his optimism. In The Gay Science, “happiness and pleasure” are valued equally with struggle and endangerment.
References
Allen A (2017) Awaiting education: Friedrich Nietzsche on the future of our educational institutions. Philos Inquiry Edu 24(2):197–210
Allen A (2018) The end of education: Nietzsche, Foucault, Genealogy. Philos Inquiry Edu 25:47–65
Allina B (2018) The development of STEAM educational policy to promote student creativity and social empowerment. Arts Educ Policy Rev 119(2):77–87
Aristotle (1964) The Politics. Oxford University Press
Aristotle (2000) On the soul. Zetros, Thessaloniki
Babich B (2019) Nietzsche (as) educator. Educ Philos Theory 51(9):871–885
Bojesen E (2018) A new version of optimism for education. Stud Philos Educ 37(1):5–14
Dawkins R (2008) The selfish gene. Katoptro, Athens
Debesse M, Mialaret G (1980) Educational sciences. Diptycho, Athens
Farré MN (2014) Saber, sen i trobar: Ramon de Cornet and the Consistory of the Gay Science. SVMMA Rev Cultures Medievals 3:176–194
Fitzsimons P (2007) Nietzsche, ethics and education. In: Pters M, Freeman-Moir J (eds) An account of difference, vol 8. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam
Gadamer H-G, Adorno T, Horkheimer M (2003) On Nietzsche. Indiktos, Athens
Golomb J (1985) Nietzsche’s early educational thought. J Philos Educ 9(2):99–105
Gregory M (2001) The perils of rationality: Nietzsche, Peirce and education. Educ Philos Theory 33(1):23–34
Hellenic Republic (1985) Law 1566. Government Paper, 167
Irwin R (2003) Heidegger and Nietzsche; the question of value and Nihilism in relation to education. Stud Philos Educ 22:227–244
Johnson P (1996) Nietzsche reception today. Radic Philos 80:24–33
Johnston J (1998) Nietzsche as educator: a reexamination. Educ Theory 48(1):67–83
Jonas M (2010) When teachers must let education hurt: Rousseau and Nietzsche on compassion and the educational value of suffering. J Philos Educ 44(1):45–60
Jonas M (2018) Nietzsche on inequality, education and human flourishing. In: Smeyers P (ed) International handbook of philosophy of education. Springer, Cham, pp 295–304
Kameas N, Albanidis P (2014) The ancient Greek ideal of “fair play” in the light of Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy. In Sports in Education form Antiquity to Modern times: 18th international congress of the European Committee for sports history. European Committee for Sports History, Edessa, pp 76–82
Kechagias C (2009) The nature of thesis among the hellenic apprehension of world. Herodotos, Athens
Kechagias C, Antoniou A (2019) Goddess Athena as leader and mentor in Homeric epics. Women, Business and Leadership. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Koumanoudis S (1972) Dictionary Latin-Greek. Gregory, Athens
Malafantis K (2005) Pedagogy of literature. Gregory, Athens
Matsagouras E (2003) Theory and practice of teaching. Theory of Teaching. Personal theory as a context of reflective-critical analysis, vol I. Gutenberg, Athens
Maturana U, Varela F (1992) The tree of Knowledge. Biological origins of human cognition. Katoptro, Athens
Mintz A (2004) The disciplined schooling of the free spirit: educational theory in Nietzsche's middle period. Philos Educ 163–170
Nietzsche F (2007) Ecce Homo: How to become what you are. Oxford University Press Inc., New York
Nietzsche F (1996) The Gay science. Eksantas, Athens
Nietzsche F (2006) On the future of our educational institutes. Printa, Athens
Nietzsche F (2008a) The Gay science. Cambridge University Press, New York
Nietzsche F (2008b) The birth of tragedy. Vanias, Thessaloniki
Nietzsche F (2010) Thus spoke Zarathustra. Panoptikon, Thessaloniki
Pestalozzi JH (1900) How Gertrude teaches her children. Swan Sonnenschein & Co, London
Petrou A (2011) Projections on philosophy of education. In: Mauroedis G (ed) Introduction on sciences of education. Gregore, Athens, pp 319–340
Piaget J, Inhelder B (1990) Psychology of the child. Zacharopoulos, Athens
Ramaekers S (2001) Teaching to Lie and Obey Nietzsche on education. J Philos Educ 35(2):255–268
Reboul O (2002) Philosophy of education. In: Mialaret G (ed) Introduction to sciences of education. Typotheto, Athens, pp 52–62
Ridley A (1998) Nietzsche’s conscience: six character studies from the genealogy. Cornell University Press, New York
Rosenow E (1973) What is free education? The educational significance of Nietzsche’s Thought. Educ Theory 23(4):354–370
Sassone L (1996) Philosophy across the curriculum: a democratic Nitzschean Pedagogy. Educ Theory 46(4):511–524
Small R (2016) Friedrich Nietzsche. Reconciling knowledge and life. Springer, London
Stolz S (2017) Nietzsche on aesthetics, educators and education. Stud Philos Educ 36:683–695
Thornton S (2021) Karl Popper. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Standford University
Tzani M (2006) Daylong elementary school pilot. Herodios, Athens
Vamvoukas M (2011) Methodology of scientific paedagogic research. In: Mauroedis G (ed) Introduction on sciences of education. Gregore, Athens
Yacek D (2014) Going to school with F. Nietzsche. The self in Service of Noble Culture. Stud Philos Educ 33(4):391–411
Yacek D (2019) The problem of student disengagement. Struggle, Escapism and Nietzsche’s Birth of Tragedy. Philos Inquiry Educ 26(1):64–87
Funding
No funding support has been granted for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author declares that there is no conflict or competing interest in this research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skordis, I., Kechagias, CT. & Antoniou, AS. Letting Nietzsche inside schools? Educational potential and an acknowledgement of the optimism of his philosophy. SN Soc Sci 1, 157 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00158-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00158-x