Abstract
A heated capillary inlet for an electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) interface was compared with shorter versions of the inlet to determine the effects on transmission and ionization efficiencies for low-flow (nano) electrosprays. Five different inlet lengths were studied, ranging from 6.4 to 1.3 cm. As expected, the electrospray current transmission efficiency increased with decreasing capillary length due to reduced losses to the inside walls of the capillary. This increase in transmission efficiency with shorter inlets was coupled with reduced desolvation of electrosprayed droplets. Surprisingly, as the inlet length was decreased, some analytes showed little or no increase in sensitivity, while others showed as much as a 15-fold gain. The variation was shown to be at least partially correlated with analyte mobilities, with the largest gains observed for higher mobility species, but also affected by solution conductivity, flow rate, and inlet temperature. Strategies for maximizing sensitivity while minimizing biases in ion transmission through the heated capillary interface are proposed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
El-Faramawy, A.; Siu, K. W. M.; Thomson, B. A. Efficiency of Nano-Electrospray Ionization. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 16, 1702–1707.
Schmidt, A.; Karas, M.; Dulcks, T. Effect of Different Solution Flow Rates on Analyte Ion Signals in Nano-ESI MS, or: When Does ESI Turn into Nano-ESI? J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 14, 492–500.
Covey, T. R.; Thomson, B. A.; Schneider, B. B. Atmospheric Pressure Ion Sources. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2009, DOI 10.1002/mas. 20246.
Kebarle, P.; Verberk, U. H. Electrospray: From Ions in Solution to Ions in the Gas Phase, What We Know Now. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2009, DOI 10.1002/mas. 20247.
Gale, D. C.; Smith, R. D. Small Volume and Low Flow-Rate Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry of Aqueous Samples. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1993, 7, 1017–1021.
Wilm, M. S.; Mann, M. Electrospray and Taylor-Cone Theory, Dole’s Beam of Macromolecules at Last? Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1994, 136, 167–180.
Wilm, M.; Mann, M. Analytical Properties of the Nanoelectrospray Ion Source. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 1–8.
Fernandez de la Mora, J.; Loscertales, I. The Current Emitted by Highly Conducting Taylor Cones. J. Fluid Mech 1994, 260, 155–184.
Page, J. S.; Kelly, R. T.; Tang, K.; Smith, R. D. Ionization and Transmission Efficiency in an Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry Interface. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 18, 1582–1590.
Emmett, M. R.; White, F. M.; Hendrickson, C. L.; Shi, S. D. -H.; Marshall, A. G. Application of Micro-Electrospray Liquid Chromatography Techniques to FT-ICR MS to Enable High-Sensitivity Biological Analysis. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 9, 333–340.
Shen, Y.; Tolic, N.; Masselon, C.; Pasa-Tolic, L.; Camp, D. G.; Hixson, K. K.; Zhao, R.; Anderson, G. A.; Smith, R. D. Ultrasensitive Proteomics Using High-Efficiency On-Line Micro-SPE-NanoLC-NanoESI MS and MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 144–154.
Shen, Y.; Tolic, N.; Masselon, C.; Pasa-Tolic, L.; Camp, D. G.; Lipton, M. S.; Anderson, G. A.; Smith, R. D. Nanoscale Proteomics. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 378, 1037–1045.
Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Fundamentals, Instrumentation, and Applications; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, 1997; 107–136.
Chowdhury, S. K.; Katta, V.; Chait, B. T. An Electrospray-Ionization Mass Spectrometer with New Features. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1990, 4, 81–87.
Busman, M.; Sunner, J.; Vogel, C. R. Space-Charge-Dominated Mass-Spectrometry Ion Sources—Modeling and Sensitivity. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1991, 2, 1–10.
Lin, B. W.; Sunner, J. Ion Transport by Viscous Gas Flow Through Capillaries. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 5, 873–885.
Page, J. S.; Tolmachev, A. V.; Tang, K.; Smith, R. D. Theoretical and Experimental Evaluation of the Low m/z Transmission of an Electrodynamic Ion Funnel. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 17, 586–592.
Kelly, R. T.; Page, J. S.; Luo, Q.; Moore, R. J.; Orton, D. J.; Tang, K.; Smith, R. D. Chemically Etched Open Tubular and Monolithic Emitters for Nanoelectrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 7796–7801.
Tomlinson, E.; Jefferies, T. M.; Riley, C. M. Ion-Pair High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1978, 159, 315–358.
Marginean, I.; Kelly, R. T.; Prior, D. C.; LaMarche, B. L.; Tang, K.; Smith, R. D. Analytical Characterization of the Electrospray Ion Source in the Nanoflow Regime. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 6573–6579.
Wutz, M.; Adam, H.; Walcher, W. Theory and Practice of Vacuum Technology; Vieweg: Braunschweig, 1989; p. 96.
Mason, E. A.; McDaniel, E. W. Transport Properties of Ions in Gases; Wiley: New York, 1988; pp 77–78.
Baker, E. S.; Clowers, B. H.; Li, F. M.; Tang, K.; Tolmachev, A. V.; Prior, D. C.; Belov, M. E.; Smith, R. D. Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry Performance Using Electrodynamic Ion Funnels and Elevated Drift Gas Pressures. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 18, 1176–1187.
Henderson, S. C.; Valentine, S. J.; Counterman, A. E.; Clemmer, D. E. ESI/Ion Trap/Ion Mobility/Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Rapid and Sensitive Analysis of Biomolecular Mixtures. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 291–301.
Batchelor, G. K. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1967; p. 233.
Yang, F.; Jaitly, N.; Jayachandran, H.; Luo, Q.; Monroe, M. E.; Du, X.; Gritsenko, M. A.; Zhang, R.; Anderson, D. J.; Purvine, S. O.; Adkins, J. N.; Moore, R. J.; Mottaz, H. M.; Ding, S. -J.; Lipton, M. S.; Camp, D. G.; Udseth, H. R.; Smith, R. D.; Rossie, S. Applying a Targeted Label-Free Approach Using LC MS AMT Tags to Evaluate Changes in Protein Phosphorylation Following Phosphatase Inhibition. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 4489–4497.
Guo, X.; Bruins, A. P.; Covey, T. R. Method to Reduce Chemical Background Interference in Atmospheric Pressure Ionization Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry Using Exclusive Reactions with the Chemical Reagent Dimethyl Disulfide. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 4013–4021.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Published online September 2, 2009
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Page, J.S., Marginean, I., Baker, E.S. et al. Biases in ion transmission through an electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry capillary inlet. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 20, 2265–2272 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2009.08.018
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2009.08.018