Skip to main content
Log in

Discrimination and Disidentification: The Fair-Start Defense of Affirmative Action

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Fair-Start Defense justifies affirmative action preferences as a response to harms caused by race- and sex-based discrimination. Rather than base a justification for preferences on the traditional appeal to self-esteem, I argue they are justified in virtue of the effects institutional discrimination has on the goals and aspirations of its victims. In particular, I argue that institutional discrimination puts women and blacks at an unfair competitive disadvantage by causing academic disidentification. Affirmative action is justified as a means of negating this unfair disadvantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Himma, K.E. Discrimination and Disidentification: The Fair-Start Defense of Affirmative Action. Journal of Business Ethics 30, 277–289 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006401619357

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006401619357

Keywords

Navigation