Abstract
Proposed in this article is one possible framework for classifying multiple types of ethical issues in risk communication research and practice to help continue a discussion initiated in 1990 by Morgan and Lave. Some of the questions that each stage of the process for planning risk communication strategies appears to pose for ethics are discussed (e.g., selecting issues to be communicated, knowing the issue, dealing with constraints). Also discussed briefly are some issues raised by the possibility that risk communicators aspire to the status of a profession. The purpose is to foster discussion rather than issue a conclusive statement on the topic, because its very nature makes a definitive pronouncement indefensible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
M. G. Morgan and L. Lave, "Ethical Considerations in Risk Communication Practice and Research," Risk Anal. 10355-358 (1990).
H. Jungermann, "Ethical Dilemmas in Risk Communication," in D. M. Messick and A. E. Tenbrunsel (eds.)Codes of Con-duct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethicspp. 300-317 (Russell Sage, New York, 1996).
J. Valenti and L. Wilkins, "An Ethical Risk Communication Protocol for Science and Mass Communication," Public Un-derstand. Sci. 4177-194 (1995).
O. Ehart, "Can Risk Analysis Ethics Improved Public Policy?" (Society for Risk Analysis, 7-10 December, Washing-ton, D.C.) (1997).
K. K. Pflugh, J. A. Shaw, and B. B. Johnson, Establishing Dialogue: Planning for Successful Environmental Manage-ment; A Guide to Effective Communication Planning(Division of Science and Research, New Jersey Department of Environ-mental Protection and Energy, Trenton, 1992).
B. B. Johnson, "Institutional Constraints on Evaluating Risk Communications" (Society for Risk Analysis, Savannah, Georgia, December 5-8) (1993).
B. B. Johnson, "Accounting for the Social Context of Risk Communication," Sci.Technol.Stud. 5103-111 (1987).
P. Sandman, Personal communication (1998).
A. P. Fiske and P. E. Tetlock, "Taboo Trade-offs: Reactions to Transactions That Transgress the Spheres of Justice," Political Psychology 18255-297 (1997).
K. E. Rowan, "The Technical and Democratic Approaches to Risk Situations: Their Appeal, Limitations, and Rhetorical Alternative," Argumentation 8391-409 (1994).
R. Briggs, "An Ethical Dilemma," Philadelphia Inquirer10 October (1995).
B. J. Hance, C. Chess, and P. M. Sandman, Improving Dialogue with Communities: A Guide for Government Risk Communica-tion(New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, 1988).
B. Tracy, "DEPE Taught How to Manipulate Public Opinion" [letter to the editor]. Gloucester Times3 November (1993).
J. F. Stratman, C. Boykin, M. C. Holmes, M. J. Laufer, M. Breen, "Risk Communication, Metacommunication, and Rhe-torical Stases in the Aspen-EPA Superfund Controversy," J Bus Tech Commn 95-41 (1995).
M. R. English, Siting Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities: The Public Policy Dilemma(Quorum Books, New York, 1992).
O. Renn, T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, Fairness and Compe-tence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environ-mental Discourse(Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995).
C. L. Soskolne and A. Light, "Towards Ethics Guidelines for Environmental Epidemiologists," Sci.Total Environ. 184137-147 (1996).
C. E. Metcalf, "Presidential Address: Research Ownership, Communication of Results, and Threats to Objectivity in Cli-ent-Driven Research," J.Policy Anal.Manage. 17153-163 (1998).
B. B. Johnson, "Advancing Understanding of Knowledge's Role in Lay Risk Perception," RISK: Issues Health Safety 4189-212 (1993).
B. B. Johnson and P. Slovic, "Explaining Uncertainty in Health Risk Assessment: Initial Studies of Its Effects on Risk Percep-tion and Trust," Risk Anal. 15485-494 (1995).
T. Webler, D. Levine, H. Rakel, and O. Renn, "The Group Delphi: A Novel Attempt at Reducing Uncertainty," Technol. Forecasting Soc.Change 39253-263 (1991).
B. Fischhoff, "Public Values in Risk Research," AAA Political and Social Science 54575-84 (1996).
A. Bostrom, C. J. Atman, B. Fischhoff, and M. G. Morgan, "Evaluating Risk Communications: Completing and Correct-ing Mental Models of Hazardous Processes, Part II," Risk Anal. 14789-798 (1994).
F. R. Johnson, A. Fisher, V. K. Smith, and W. H. Desvousges, "Informed Choice or Regulated Risk? Lessons from a Study in Radon Risk Communication," Environment 3012-15, 30-35 (1988).
P. Thompson, "The Ethics of Truth Telling and the Problem of Risk" (Society for Risk Analysis, New Orleans, 10 Decem-ber) (1996).
R. E. Fox, "Charlatanism, Scientism, and Psychology's Social Contract," Am.Psychol. 51777-784 (1996).
J. R. Walton, J. M. Stearns, and C. T. Crespy, "Integrating Ethics into the Public Administration Curriculum: A Three-Step Process," J.Policy Anal.Manage. 16470-483 (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, B.B. Ethical Issues in Risk Communication: Continuing the Discussion. Risk Anal 19, 335–348 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007084108903
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007084108903