Abstract
Student views about knowing and learning physics have been probed with the Views About Sciences Survey (VASS) along six conceptual dimensions, and classified into four distinct profiles: expert, high transitional, low transitional, and folk. As an aid to interpreting VASS results, this article provides a qualitative analysis of student responses to items within each of the six dimensions and a quantitative analysis of their relation to students' profiles. Students with an expert profile are chiefly scientific realists and critical learners. Students with a folk profile are primarily naive realists and passive learners. Students with transitional profiles hold mixtures of these views. Student profiles correlate significantly with physics achievement. Indeed, they may be major determinants of what students learn in physics courses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aikenhead, G.S.: 1987, ‘High-school Graduates' Beliefs About Science-Technology-Society. III. Characteristics and Limitations of Scientific Knowledge’, Science Education 71(2), 145–161.
American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1990, Science for All Americans. Project 2061, Oxford University Press, New York.
American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1993, Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Project 2061, Oxford University Press, New York.
American Institute of Physics: 1996, Overcoming Inertia: High School Physics in the 1990s, AIP, College Park.
Arons, A.B.: 1984, ‘Student Patterns of Thinking and Reasoning. Parts II & III’, The Physics Teacher 22, 21–26 & 88–93.
Arons, A.B.: 1993, ‘Guiding Insight and Inquiry in the Introductory Physics Laboratory’, The Physics Teacher 31, 278–282.
Baker, D.R. & Piburn, M.: 1991, ‘Process Skills Acquisition, Cognitive Growth, and Attitude Change of Ninth Grade Students in a Scientific Literacy Course’, J. Res. Science Teaching 28(5), 423–436.
Chi, M.T.H, Feltovich, P.J. & Glaser, R.: 1981, ‘Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices’, Cognitive Science 5, 121–152.
Cobern, W.W.: 1993, ‘College Students' Conceptualizations of Nature: An Interpretive World View Analysis’, J. Res. Science Teaching 30(8), 935–951.
Ebenezer, J.V. & Zoller, U.: 1993, ‘The No Change in Junior Secondary Students Attitudes Toward Science in a Period of Curriculum Change: A Probe into the Case of British Columbia’, School Science and Mathematics 93(2), 96–102.
Edmondson, K.M. & Novak, J.D.: 1993, ‘The Interplay of Scientific Epistemological Views, Learning Strategies, and Attitudes of College Students’, J. Res. Science Teaching 30(6), 547–559.
Gunstone, R.: 1991, ‘Constructivism and Metacognition: Theoretical Issues and Classroom Studies’, in Duit, R., Goldberg, F. & Niedderer, H. (eds.), Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies, Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften, Kiel, 1992, 129–140.
Hake, R.: In press, ‘Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses’, American Journal of Physics.
Halloun, I.: 1996, ‘Views About Science and Physics Achievement. The VASS Story’, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education, American Institute of Physics Press, College Park, MD, 1997.
Halloun, I. & Hestenes, D.: 1985, ‘The Initial Knowledge State of College Physics Students’, Am. J. Physics 53(11), 1043–1055.
Halloun, I. & Hestenes, D.: 1985, ‘Common Sense Concepts About Motion’, Am. J. Physics 53(11), 1056–1065.
Halloun, I. & Hestenes, D.: 1996, ‘Views About Sciences Survey’, Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Saint Louis, Missouri, USA. ERIC Document No. ED394840.
Halloun, I. & Hestenes, D.: 1997, VASS Profiles and Physics Achievement. Manuscript in preparation.
Halloun, I., Osborn Popp, S. & Hestenes, D.: 1997, Validation of the Views About Sciences Survey, Manuscript in preparation.
Hammer, D.: 1994, ‘Epistemological Beliefs in Introductory Physics’. Cognition and Instruction 12(2), 151–183.
Hestenes, D, Wells, M. & Swackhamer, G.: 1992, ‘Force Concept Inventory’, The Physics Teacher 30, 141–158.
Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D.P. & Simon, H.A.: 1980, ‘Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems’, Science 208, 1335–1342.
McDermott, L.: 1993, ‘How we Teach and How Students Learn — A Mismatch?’, Am. J. Physics 61(4), 295–298.
Meichtry, Y.J.: 1993, ‘The Impact of Science Curricula on Student Views About the Nature of Science’, J. Res. Science Teaching 30(5), 429–443.
National Center for Education Statistics: 1994, The Condition of Education-1994, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
The National Commission on Excellence in Education: 1983, A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
National Research Council: 1996, National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
National Science Board: 1993, Science & Engineering Indicators-1993, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
National Science Teachers Association: 1995, Scope, Sequence, and Coordination of Secondary School Science. Volume 3. A High School Framework for National Science Education Standards, NSTA, Washington, DC.
Novak, J.D. (ed.): 1987, Proceedings of the Second International Seminar. Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, New York.
Novak, J.D. (ed.): 1994, Proceedings of the Third International Seminar. Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University, New York.
Reif, F.: 1987, ‘Instructional Design, Cognition, and Technology: Applications to the Teaching of Scientific Concepts’, J. Res. Science Teaching 24(4), 309–324.
Reif, F. & Allen, S.: 1992, ‘Cognition for Interpreting Scientific Concepts. A Study of Acceleration’, Cognition and Instruction 9(1), 1–44.
Reif, F. & Larkin, J.H.: 1991, ‘Cognition in Scientific and Everyday Domains: Comparison and Learning Implications’, J. Res. Science Teaching 28(9), 733–760.
Schibeci, R.A. & Riley, J.P.: 1986, ‘Influence of Students' Background and Perceptions on Science Attitudes and Achievement’, J. Res. Science Teaching 23(3), 177–187.
Simpson, R.D. & Oliver, J.S.: 1985, ‘Attitude Toward Science and Achievement Motivation Profiles of Male and Female Science Students in Grades Six Through Ten’, Science Education 69(4), 511–526.
Songer, N.B. & Linn, M.C.: 1991, ‘How do Students' Views of Science Influence Knowledge Integration?’, J. Res. Science Teaching 28(9), 761–784.
Strnad, J.: 1986, ‘On Some New Trends in Physics Teaching’, European Journal of Physics 7, 11–16.
Tobias, S.: 1990, They're Not Dumb, They're Different. Stalking the Second Tier, Research Corporation, Tucson.
Van Heuvelen, A.: 1991, ‘Learning to Think Like a Physicist: A Review of Research-based Instructional Strategies’, Am. J. Physics 59(10), 891–897.
Viennot, L.: 1985, ‘Analyzing Students Reasoning in Science: A Pragmatic View of Theoretical Problems’, European Journal of Science Education 7(2), 151–162.
Wells, M., Hestenes, D. & Swackhamer, G.: 1995, ‘A Modeling Method for High School Physics Instruction’, Am. J. Physics 63(7), 606–619.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halloun, I., Hestenes, D. Interpreting VASS Dimensions and Profiles for Physics Students. Science & Education 7, 553–577 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008645410992
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008645410992