Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating aqueous solvation and lipophilicity of small organic molecules: A comparative overview of atom/group contribution methods

  • Published:
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design

Abstract

Methods for the calculation of two properties of interest in drug design, namely free energy of aqueous solvation and lipophilicity (log P), using fragmental methods are reviewed here. Though aqueous solvation free energies are commonly estimated using `whole molecule' methods such as GB/SA and AMSOL, we have recently shown that fragmental approaches can offer high quality predictions as well (for molecules of the size of 20 atoms or less). In the case of log P predictions, the more commonly used ALOGP and CLOGP approaches represent the two extremes of the fragmental constant approach: ALOGP uses atom-sized fragments and no correction factors; CLOGP uses larger fragments and correction factors, which are typically obtained for each series of molecules separately. Anew approach (HLOGP) that uses both smaller (atom-sized) and larger fragments is shown to offer better performance than the other two widely used methods for the prediction of lipophilicity. In this approach, an automated `inventory' of fragments (bonded atom combinations) within a molecule, known as molecular hologram, is used as a composite descriptor and it is used in conjunction with partial least squares for the prediction of aqueous solvation or lipophilicity. It is emphasized that these different methods are useful in different types of drug design applications involving small organic molecules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hine, J. and Mookerjee, P.K., J. Org. Chem., 40 (1974) 292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Still, W.C., Tempczyk, A., Hawley, R.C. and Hendrickson, T., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 6127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cramer, C.J. and Truhlar, D.G., Rev. Comput. Chem., 6 (1995) 1.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujita, T., Iwasa, J. and Hansch, C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86 (1964) 5175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leo, A.J., Chem. Rev., 93 (1993) 1281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sangster, J., Octanol—Water Partition Coefficients: Fundamentals and Physical Chemistry, Wiley, Chichester, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bodor, N., Gabanyi, Z. and Wong, C.-K., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111 (1989) 3783.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bodor, N. and Huang, M.-J., J. Pharm. Sci., 81 (1992) 272.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Viswanadhan, V.N., Rami Reddy, M., Bacquet, R.J. and Erion, M.D., J. Comput. Chem., 14 (1993) 1019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jorgensen, W.L. and Tirado-Rives, J., Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 3 (1995) 123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Viswanadhan, V.N., Ghose, A.K., Chandra Singh, U. and Wendoloski, J.J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 39 (1999) 405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansch, C. and Leo, A.J., Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry, Wiley, New York, NY, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nys, G.G. and Rekker, R.F., Chim. Ther., 8 (1973) 521.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghose, A.K., Viswanadhan, V.N. and Wendoloski, J., J. Phys. Chem., 102 (1998) 3762.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Leo, A.J., personal communication, 1999.

  16. Ghose, A.K. and Crippen, G.M., J. Comput. Chem., 7 (1986) 565.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Viswanadhan, V.N., Ghose, A.K., Revankar, G.R. and Robins, R.K., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 29 (1989) 163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, R., Fu, Y. and Lai, L., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 37 (1997) 615.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gombar, V.K. and Enslein, K., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 36 (1996) 1127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Broto, P., Moreau, G. and Vandycke, C., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 19 (1984) 71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lowis, D.R., HQSAR: A New Highly Predictive QSAR Technique, Tripos Technical Note, Tripos Associates, St. Louis, MO, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Viswanadhan, V.N., Ghose, A.K. and Wendoloski, J.J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., submitted.

  23. Jorgenson, W.L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J.D., Impey, R. and Klein, M., J. Chem. Phys., 79 (1984) 926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Meng, E.C., Caldwell, J.W. and Kollman, P.A., J. Phys. Chem., 100 (1996) 2367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Barnard, J.M. and Downs, G.M., Fingerprint Description Package, 3.1 version, Barnard Chemical Information Ltd., Sheffield, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Unity Reference Manual, Tripos Associates, St. Louis, MO, 1997.

  27. Jorgenson, W.L. and Tirado-Rives, J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1998) 1657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. SYBYL, modeling software available from Tripos Associates, St. Louis, MO, 1998.

  29. Cerius2, modeling software available from MSI, San Diego, CA, 1999.

  30. Furet, P., Sele, A. and Cohen, N.C., J. Mol. Graph., 6 (1988) 182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Viswanadhan, V.N., Rami Reddy, M., Wlodawer, A., Varney, M.D. and Weinstein, J.N., J. Med. Chem., 39 (1996) 705.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghose, A.K. and Crippen, G.M., J. Med. Chem., 28 (1985) 333.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ghose, A.K., Viswanadhan, V.N., Sanghvi, Y.S., Nord, L.D., Willis, R.C., Revankar, G.R. and Robins, R.K., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86 (1989) 8242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ghose, A.K. and Crippen, G.M., Mol. Pharmacol., 37 (1990) 725.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Viswanadhan, V.N., Ghose, A.K. and Weinstein, J.N., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1039 (1991) 356.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Viswanadhan, V.N., Ghose, A.K. & Wendoloski, J.J. Estimating aqueous solvation and lipophilicity of small organic molecules: A comparative overview of atom/group contribution methods. Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design 19, 85–98 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008767505932

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008767505932

Navigation