Skip to main content
Log in

A New Measure for Continuity of Care: The Alpha Index

  • Published:
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Continuity of care, and in particular provider continuity, is increasingly becoming a central aim of health care policy in a majority of clinical settings. Over the past three decades, a number of statistics have been introduced to provide a quantitative measure of continuity, but generally speaking, all existing continuity measures each reflect either the concentration of providers or the sequential continuity in a series of patient visits-none reflect both. Since concentration is often considered as important as consecutiveness, an improved index, termed the alpha index, is introduced here. In simple terms, the alpha index is a weighted average of the concentration of providers and the sequential continuity. By combining these two aspects of continuity with a user-specified weight, alpha, this new index can be more satisfactory in evaluating overall levels of continuity of care. In this article, the underlying concepts of this new measure, as well as its statistical properties such as bias and consistency, are discussed analytically. Numerical examples are given to illustrate the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • T. W. Bice and S. B. Boxerman. “A quantitative measure of continuity of care,” Medical Care, 15, pp. 347-349, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Blendon, R. A. Knox, M. Brodie, J. M. Benson and G. Chervinsky. “Americans compare managed care, Medicare, and fee for service,” Journal of American Health Policy, 4, pp. 42-47, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Branscomb, T. Slezak, R. Pae, D. Galas, A. V. Carrano and M. Waterman. “Optimizing restriction fragment fingerprinting methods for ordering large genomic libraries,” Genomics, 8, pp. 351-366, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Breslau and K. Reeb. “Continuity of care in a university-based practice,” Journal of Medical Education, 50, pp. 965-969, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Carrasquillo, D. U. Himmelstein, S. Woolhandler and D. H. Bor. “Can Medicaid managed care provide continuity of care to new Medicaid enrollees? An analysis of tenure on Medicaid,” American Journal of Public Health, 88, pp. 464-466, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. J. Dietrich and K. I. Marton. “Does continuous care from a physician make a difference?” Journal of Family Practice, 15, pp. 929-937, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Ejlertsson and S. Berg. “Continuity-of-care measures: an analytic and empirical comparison,” Medical Care, 22, pp. 231-239, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. J. Emanuel and N. N. Dubler. “Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care,” JAMA, 273, pp. 323-329, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. A. Eriksson. “Continuity-of-care measures: random assignment of patients to providers and the impact of utilization level,” Medical Care, 28, pp. 180-190, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. A. Eriksson and L. G. Mattsson. “Quantitative measurement of continuity of care,” Medical Care, 21, pp. 858-875, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. A. Flocke, K. C. Stange and S. J. Zyzanski. “The impact of insurance type and forced discontinuity on the delivery of primary care,” Journal of Family Practice, 45, pp. 129-135, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Freeman and P. Hjortdahl. “What future for continuity of care in general practice?” BMJ, 314, pp. 1870-1873, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. C. Fu and W. Y. W. Lou. “On the exact distribution of SECON and its application,” Statistica Sinica, 10, pp. 999-1010, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Grumbach. “Continuity of insurance coverage-a precondition for continuity of primary care,” American Journal of Public Health, 88, pp. 348-349, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Gut. An Intermediate Course in Probability. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hall and N. Tideman. “Measures of concentration,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, pp. 162-168, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. E. Hart. “Entropy and other measures of concentration,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Part I, 134, pp. 73-85, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Hoffman, D. Rice and H. Y. Sung. “Persons with chronic conditions. Their prevalence and costs,” JAMA, 276, pp. 1473-1479, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. S. Jellinek and B. Nurcombe. “Two wrongs don't make a right: managed care, mental health, and the marketplace,” JAMA, 270, pp. 1737-1739, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kullback. Information Theory and Statistics. John Wiley, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler. “On information and sufficiency,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22, pp. 79-89, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Y. W. Lou. “The exact distribution of the continuity of care measure NOP,” Statistics and Probability Letters, 48, pp. 361-368, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Robson and R. H. Pain. “Analysis of the code relating sequence to conformation in globular proteins,” Biochemistry Journal, 141, pp. 853-867, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rogers and P. Curtis. “The concept and measurement of continuity in primary care,” American Journal of Public Health, 70, pp. 122-127, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. L. Roos, N. P. Roos, P. Gilbert and J. P. Nicol. “Continuity of care: does it contribute to quality of care?” Medical Care, 18, pp. 174-184, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. M. Ross. Introduction to Probability Models, Fifth Edition. Academic Press, San Diego, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. V. Rubenstein, A. Fink, E. M. Yano, B. Simon, B. Chernof and A. S. Robbins. “Increasing the impact of quality improvement on health: an expert panel method for setting institutional priorities,” The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 21, pp. 420-432, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. M. Shortell, “Continuity of medical care: conceptualization and measurement,” Medical Care, 14, pp. 377-391, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Smedby, G. Eklund, E. A. Eriksson and B. Smedby. “Measures of continuity of care: a register-based correlation study,” Medical Care, 24, pp. 511-518, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Starfield. “Continuous confusion?” American Journal of Public Health, 70, pp. 117-119, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. M. Steinwachs. “Measuring provider continuity in ambulatory care,” Medical Care, 17, pp. 551-565, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Testa and D. C. Simonson. “Health economic benefits and quality of life during improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial,” JAMA, 280, pp. 1490-1496, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. M. Wall. “Continuity of care and family medicine: definition, determinants, and relationship to outcome,” Journal of Family Practice, 13, pp. 655-664, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. M. Wall. “Managed care and discontinuity of primary care providers: is there evidence of poorer outcomes?” Journal of Family Practice, 45, pp. 125-126, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lou, W.Y.W. A New Measure for Continuity of Care: The Alpha Index. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology 1, 277–289 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011447327152

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011447327152

Navigation