Abstract
Strategy descriptions like the ``Take The Best''-heuristic (G. Gigerenzer et al., 1991), the weighted additive rule, and the equal weight decision rule are competing theories about information integration in multi-attribute decision tasks. Behavioral decision research is confronted with the problem of drawing conclusions about unobservable decision strategies from behavioral data. Although there has been considerable progress due to methodical traditions like `Structural Modeling' and `Process Tracing', these paradigms have certain limitations in testing specific hypotheses about individual strategies. Some of these problems are summarized briefly. A deductive method for classifying individual response patterns is introduced. Predictions about regression coefficients are deduced from competing substantial hypotheses about strategies for decision making. These can be tested at the level of individual participants. The validity of this classification procedure is demonstrated with a Monte Carlo simulation. Some useful applications of the method are described, limitations of the method and potential generalizations are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press.
Anderson, N. H. (1982). Methods of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press.
Beach, L. R. & Mitchell, T. R. (1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review 3: 439-449.
Björkman, M. (1994). Internal cue theory: Calibration and resolution of confidence in general knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 58: 386-405.
Brehmer, B. (1988). The development of Social Judgment Theory. In: B. Brehmer & C. R. B. Joyce (eds), Human Judgment: The SJT View, Vol. 54, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 13-40.
Brehmer, B. (1994). The psychology of linear judgement models. Acta Psychologica 87: 137-154.
Bröder, A. (2000a). A methodological comment on behavioral decision research. Psychologische Beiträge 42: 645-662.
Bröder, A. (2000b). Assessing the empirical validity of the “Take The Best”-heuristic as a model of probabilistic inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 29: 1332-1346.
Bröder, A. (2000c). “Take The Best-Ignore The Rest”. Wann entscheiden Menschen begrenzt rational? [“Take The Best-Ignore The Rest”. When do people decide boundedly rational?]. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Buchner, A., Faul, F. & Erdfelder, E. (1996). G Power: A priori, Post-hoc, and Compromise Power Analyses for the Macintosh (Version 2.1.1) [Computer program]. Trier, Germany: University of Trier.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist 34: 571-582.
Dawes, R. M. & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin 81: 95-106.
Einhorn, H. J. (1970). The Use of Nonlinear, Noncompensatory Models in Decision Making.
Fishburn, P. (1974). Lexicographic order, utilities and decision rules: a survey. Management Science 20: 1442-1471.
Ford, J. K., Schmitt, N., Schechtman, S. L., Hults, B. M. & Doherty, M. L. (1989). Process tracing methods: contributions, problems, and neglected research problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43: 75-117.
Gigerenzer, G. (1981). Messung und Modellbildung in der Psychologie. Müchen: Reinhardt.
Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 103: 650-669.
Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). Betting on one good reason: The Take The Best heuristic. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd & the ABC Research Group (eds), Simple heuristics that make us smart. (pp. 75-95). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., Czerlinski, J. & Martignon, L. (1999). How good are fast and frugal heuristics? In J. Shanteau, B. A. Mellers, & D. A. Schum (eds), Decision Science and Technology: Reflections on the Contributions of Ward Edwards. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 81-103.
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U. & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review 98: 506-528.
Gigerenzer,G., Todd, P. M., and the ABC Research Group (eds), 1999. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hoffrage, U., Martignon, L. & Hertwig, R. (1997). Does “Judgment Policy Capturing” Really Capture the Policies? Poster, presented at the 16th conference on Subjective Probability, Utility, and Decision Making (SPUDM); University of Leeds, August.
Johnson, E. J. & Payne, J. W. (1985). Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Science 31: 395-414.
Martignon, L. & Hoffrage, U.(1999). Where and why is Take The Best fast, frugal, and fit? A case study in ecological rationality. In: G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd and the ABC Research group (eds), Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 119-140.
Maule, A. J. & Svenson, O. (1993). Theoretical and empirical approaches to behavioral decision making and their relation to time constraints. In: O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (eds), Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and decision Making. New York, NY, US: Plenum Press, pp. 3-25.
Oaksford, M. R. & Chater, N. (1993). Reasoning theories and bounded rationality. In: K. I. Manktelow & D. E. Over (eds), Rationality: Psychological and Philosophical Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 31-60.
Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16: 366-387.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14: 534-552.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 43: 87-131.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rieskamp, J. & Hoffrage, U. (1999). When do people use simple heuristics and how do we know this? In: G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd & the ABC Research Group (eds), Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 141-167.
Slovic, P. & Lichtenstein, S. (1971). Comparison of Bayesian and Regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6: 649-744.
Svenson, O. (1983). Decision rules and information processing in decision making. In: L. Sjöberg, T. Tyszka & J. Wise (eds), Human Decision Making. Bodafors, S: Doxa, pp. 131-162.
Svenson, O. & Maule, A. J. (eds) (1993), Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making. New York: Plenum Press.
Thorngate, W. (1980). Efficient decision heuristics. Behavioral Science 25: 219-225.
Wainer, H. (1976). Estimating coefficients in linear models: It don't make no nevermind. Psychological Bulletin 83: 213-217.
Westenberg, M. R. M. & Koele, P. (1994). Multi-attribute evaluation processes: Methodological and conceptual issues. Acta Psychologica 87: 65-84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bröder, A. Take The Best, Dawes' Rule, and Compensatory Decision Strategies: A Regression-based Classification Method. Quality & Quantity 36, 219–238 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016080517126
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016080517126