Abstract
General relativity has a geometric and a field interpretation. If angular momentum conservation is invoked in the geometric interpretation to explain experiments, the causality principle is violated. The field interpretation avoids this problem by allowing faster-than-light propagation of gravity in forward time. All existing experiments are in agreement with that interpretation. This implies the existence of real superluminal propagation and communication of particles and fields, free of causality problems. The introduction of real physical faster-than-light propagation into gravitation, electrodynamics and quantum theory has important consequences for physics.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
A. Aspect, Phys. Lett. A 54 (1974).
T. Van Flandern, Phys. Lett. A 250, 1-11 (1998); Meta Research Bulletin 9, 1-9 (2000).
Ph. Droz-Vincent, N. Cufaro-Petroni, and J. P. Vigier, Nuov. Cim. Lett. 31, 415 (1981). The introduction of superluminal quantum interactions between time-like particle paths in quantum mechanics is discussed in a recent book: J. P. Vigier and the Stochastic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Apeiron, Montreal, 2000).
H. Puthoff, “Polarizable-vacuum (PV) approach to general relativity,” Found. Phys. 32(6) (2002).
A. Ghosh, Progress in New Cosmologies (Plenum Press, New York, 1993).
N. Graneau, D. Roscoe, and T. Phipps, Jr., Eur. Phys. J. D in press, 2000.
W. Walker and J. Dual, “Phase speed of longitudinally oscillating gravitational fields,” in Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves (World Scientific, 1997); web archive version at 〈http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9706082〉; full exposition in W. Walker, Gravitational Interaction Studies, ETH Dissertation #12289, Zürich, Switzerland (1997); update in W. D. Walker, “Experimental evidence of near-field superluminal propagating electromagnetic fields,” 〈http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0009023〉.
T. Van Flandern, MetaRes. Bull. 9, 1-9 (2000); see 〈http://metaresearch.orgP.
R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984), p. 67.
R. P. Feynman, Feynman Lectures on Gravitation (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1995), p. 113.
W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973), pp. 177, 997, 1080, and 1095.
H. A. Lorentz, Lectures on Theoretical Physics, Vol. III, “The principle of relativity for uniform translations,” (Macmillan, London, 1931), pp. 208-211.
Am. J. Phys. 41, 1068-1077 (1973).
Phys. Lett. A 175, 269-272 (1993).
G. E. Marsch and C. Nissim-Sabat, Phys. Lett. A 262, 103-106 (1999).
M. Ibison, H. E. Puthoff, and S. R. Little, 〈http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/9910050P.
T. Van Flandern, Phys. Lett. A 262, 261-263 (1999).
S. Carlip, Phys. Lett. A 267, 81-87 (2000).
A. Eddington, Space, Time &;;; Gravitation (1920); reprinted by Cambridge University Press, 1987, p. 109.
F. de Felice, Gen. Rel. Grav. 2, 347-357 (1971).
R. Mansouri and R. U. Sexl, Gen. Rel. Grav. 8, 497 (1977).
T. Van Flandern, Open Questions in Relativistic Physics, F. Selleri, ed. (Apeiron, Montreal, 1998), pp. 81-90.
A. Einstein, L. Infeld, and B. Hoffmann, Ann. Math. 39, 65-100 (1938).
H. P. Robertson and T. W. Noonan, Relativity and Cosmology (Saunders, Philadelphia, 1938).
J. M. A. Danby, Fundamentals of Celestial Mechanics (Willmann-Bell, Richmond, 1988), p. 125.
R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. II (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1963), p. 21.
W. Walker, 〈http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0001063〉, pp. 5-6 (electrical) &;;; pp. 14-15 (gravitational).
T. Van Flandern (2002), in Pushing Gravity: New Perspectives on Le Sage's Theory of Gravitation, M. Edwards, ed. (Apeiron, Montreal, 2002), pp. 93-122.
D. McCarthy, Odjmenck@aol.comP, USENET discussions in sci.physics.relativity, April 2000.
W. Kinney, A. Melchiorri, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D 63, 023505 (2000).
E. A. Lange et al., Phys. Rev. D 63, 042001 (2001).
P. Laplace, Mécanique Céleste (1799-1825 edition reprinted in English translation by Chelsea Publishing, New York, 1966), pp. 45-50.
T. Van Flandern, Dark Matter, Missing Planets and New Comets (North Atlantic Books, Berkeley, 1993; 2nd edn., 1999), pp. 45-50.
D. M. Greenberger and A. W. Overhauser, Scientific American 242, 66 (May 1980).
C. W. Sherwin and R. D. Rawcliffe, Report I-92 of March 14, 1960 of the Consolidated Science Laboratory (University of Illinois, Urbana); obtainable from U.S. Department of Commerce's Clearinghouse for Scientific and Technical Information, document AD 625706.
T. E. Phipps, Jr., Heretical Verities (Classic Non-fiction Library, Urbana, 1986), pp. 273-282.
M. A. Rowe et al., “Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection,” Nature 409, 791-794 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Flandern, T., Vigier, JP. Experimental Repeal of the Speed Limit for Gravitational, Electrodynamic, and Quantum Field Interactions. Foundations of Physics 32, 1031–1068 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016530625645
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016530625645