Skip to main content
Log in

Why Don't People Change? A Psychoanalytic Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Psychotherapy Integration

Abstract

From a psychoanalytic perspective, a central reason that people do not easily change is their fear of the dangers that they believe, at some level, change entails. These dangers include relinquishment of infantile wishes and fantasies, anxiety that would be experienced were defenses weakened, guilt, fantasies that change would harm a parental figure or threaten a vital relationship. Other factors that prevent change and maintain the sameness of behavior include defenses, unconscious pathogenic beliefs, devotion and loyalty to early figures, stable internal working models of self, other, and prototypic interactions, and emitting cues that elicit responses from others that confirm these working models. Finally, 1 discuss some selective psychoanalytic research on therapeutic change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, F., & French, T. M. (1946). Psychoanalytic therapy: Principles and application. New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (1988). The contribution of mother-infant mutual influence to the origins of self and object representations. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 5(4), pp. 305-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A., & Shadduck, C. B. (1991). Object choice revisited. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 8(1), pp. 59-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss (Vol. 1: Attachment). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss (Vol. 2: Separation). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, I. (1987). New perspective on attachment relations: Security, communication, and internal working models. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd ed., pp. 1061-1100). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, J., & Freud, S. (1893–1895). Studies in hysteria. Standard edition (Vol. 2, pp. 3-319). London: Hogarth Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. (1989). How research on child maltreatment has informed the study of child development: Perspectives from developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & V. Carlson (Eds.), Child maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect (pp. 377-431). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, H. (1972). A quantitative study of a psychoanalysis. In R. R. Holt & E. Peterfreund (Eds.), Psychoanalysis and contemporary science (Vol. 1, pp. 237-257). New York: The Macmillan Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. G. (1990). Repression and the inaccessibility of emotional memories. In J. L. Singer (Ed.), Repression and dissociation. (pp. 387-403). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewald, P. A. (1982). Psychoanalytic perspectives on resistance. In P. Wachtel (Ed.), Resistance: Psychodynamic and behavioral approaches (pp. 45-68). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagle, M. N. (1995). The developmental perspectives of attachment theory and psychoanalysis. In S. Goldberg, R. Muir, & J. Kerr (Eds.), Attachment theory: Social, developmental, & clinical perspectives (pp. 123-150). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagle, M. N. (1996). Attachment research and psychoanalytic theory. In J. M. Masling & R. F. Bornstein (Eds.) Psychoanalytic perspectives on developmental psychology. (pp. 105-144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagle, M. N., & Wolitzky, D. L. (1989). The idea of progress in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought, 12, 27-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating, and working through. Standard edition (Vol. 12, pp. 145-156.) London: Hogarth Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1915). A case of paranoia running counter to the psychoanalytic theory of the disease. Standard edition (Vol. 14, pp. 261-272). London: Hogarth Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. Standard edition (Vol. 18, pp. 3-64). London: Hogarth Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. Standard edition (Vol. 19, pp. 3-66). London: Hogarth Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1926). Inhibitions, symptoms, and anxiety. Standard edition (Vol. 20, pp. 77-175). London: Hogarth Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1939). Moses and monotheism. Standard edition (Vol. 23, pp. 3-137). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garduk, E. L., & Haggard, E. A. (1972). Immediate effects on patients of psychoanalytic interpretations. Psychological Issues, 7 (Monograph 28).

  • Graff, H., & Luborsky, L. (1977). Long-term trends in transference and resistance: A quantitative analytic method applied to four psychoanalyses. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 25, 471-490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. R., & Mitchell, S. A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603-618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunbaum, A. (1984). The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haffner, R. J. (1984) The marital repercussions of behavior therapy for agoraphobia. Psychotherapy, 21, 530-542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, J. L., & Willie, D. R. (1986). The influence of attachment pattern on developmental changes in peer interaction from the toddler to the preschool period. Child Development, 57, 338-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1976). Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewald, H. (1980). Papers on psychoanalysis, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky, L., Sackeim, H., & Christoph, P. (1979). The state conducive to momentary forgetting. In J. Kihlstrom & F. Evans (Eds.), Functional disorders of memory (pp. 325-353). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P., Mintz, J., & Aurbach, A. D. (1988). Who will benefit from psychology? Predicting therapeutic outcomes. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1984) Predicting rejection of her infant from mother's representation of her own experience: Implications for the abused-abusing intergenerational cycle. Child Abuse & Neglect, 8, 203-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M., Kaplan, K., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and adulthood. A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development [Vol. 50 (1–2, Serial No. 209); pp. 66-104].

  • Malan, D. H. (1963). A study of brief psychotherapy. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell, A. (1983, May 14 and 15). Self presentation and self preservation of the self: An overview of the more recent knowledge of the narcissistic personality. Presented to “Narcissism, Masochism, and the Sense of Guilt in Relating to the Therapeutic Process. Symposium. Sponsored by the Department of Psychiatry, Letterman General Hospital, the Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group, and the Extension Division of the San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute.

  • Morgan, R. W., Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. (1982). Predicting the outcomes of psychotherapy by the Penn Helping Alliance Rating Method. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 397-402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K., & Gruendel, J. (1981). General event representations: Basic building blocks in cognitive development. In M. E. Lamb & A. Brown (Eds.) Advances in developmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 131-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W., Kiecolt-Glaser, J., & Glaser, R. (1988). Disclosure of trauma and immune functions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 239-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajecki, D. W., Lamb, M. E. & Obmascher, P. (1978). Toward a general theory of infantile attachment: A comparative review of aspects of the social bond. The Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 3, 417-464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, L. (1993). Personal communication.

  • Rubinstein, B. R. (1976). On the possibility of a strictly clinical psychoanalytic theory: An essay in the philosophy of psychoanalysis. In M. M. Gill & P. S. Holzman (Eds.), Psychology versus metapsychology: Psychoanalytic essays in memory of G. S. Klein. New York: International Universities Press, pp. 229-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, H. (1982). Resistance as process. In P. L. Wachtel (Ed.) Resistance: Psychodynamic and behavioral approaches. (pp. 25-43). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, R., Crits-Christoph, P., & Connolly, M. B. (1991). The resistance scale: Background and psychometric properties. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 8, 195-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberschatz, G., Fretter, P. B., & Curtis, J. T. (1986). How do interpretations influence the process of psychotherapy? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 646-652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberschatz, G., Curtis, J. T., & Nathans, S. (1989). Using the patient's plan to assess progress in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 26, 40-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speisman, J. D. (1957). The relationship between depth of interpretation and verbal expressions of resistance in psychotherapy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

  • Sroufe, L. A. (1990). An organizational perspective of the self. In: D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 281-307). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachey, J. (1934). The nature of the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 15, 127-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strupp, H. (1973). Psychotherapy: Clinical, research, and theoretical issues. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strupp, H., & Binder, J. (1984). Psychotherapy in a new key. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel, P. L. (1982). Vicious circles: The self and the rhetoric of emerging and unfolding. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 18, 259-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waelder, R. (1960). Basic theory of psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J., Sampson, H., & the Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group. (1986). The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observations, and empirical research. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, D. A. (1990). The construct validity of the repressive coping style. In J. L. Singer (Ed.) Repression and dissociation (pp. 337-386). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational process and the facilitating environment. New York: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eagle, M. Why Don't People Change? A Psychoanalytic Perspective. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration 9, 3–32 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023254726930

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023254726930

Navigation