Abstract
Group role-playing and collaborative exercises are exciting ways to diversify college students' classroom experience and to incorporate active learning into your teaching. This article reports the results of two experiments that compared the effectiveness of role-playing and collaborative activities to teacher-centered discussions and lectures. Using both history and political science classes, we show that the students who participated in the role-plays and collaborative exercises did better on subsequent standard evaluations than their traditionally instructed peers. Presented here is a discussion of active learning, descriptions of the two experiments, and an explanation of the outcomes and implications of the study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-Eric Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC.: George Washington University.
DeNeve, K. M., & Heppner, M. J. (1997). Role play simulations: The assessment of an active learning technique and comparisons with traditional lectures. Innovative Higher Education 21, 231–246.
Elliot, L. B. (1993). Using debates to teach the psychology of women. Teaching of Psychology 20, 35–38.
Gallup, G. (1965–66). Polling public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly 29, 547.
Gamson, Z. F. (1991). A brief history of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. In A. W. Chickering & Z. F. Gamson (Eds.), Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, No. 47 (pp. 5–12). San Fransico: Jossey-Bass.
Jaques, D. (1992). Learning in groups. Houston: Gulf.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ladousse, G. P. (1987). Role play. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—outcomes and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 (1), 4–11.
McKeachie, W. J. (1999). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Miller, J. E., & Groccia, J. E. (1997). Are four heads better than one? A comparison of cooperative and traditional teaching formats in an introductory biology course. Innovative Higher Education 21, 253–273.
Montgomery, K., Brown, S., & Deery, C. (1997). Simulations: Using experiential learning to add relevancy and meaning to introductory courses. Innovative Higher Education 21, 217–229.
Schaftel, F. R., & Schaftel, G. (1976). Role playing for social values. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Somers, J. A., & Holt, M. E. (1993). What's in a game? A Study of games as an instructional method in an adult education class. Innovative Higher Education 17, 243–257.
Sutherland, T., & Bonwell C. (1996). The active learning continuum: Choosing activities to engage students in the classroom. In T. Sutherland and C. Bonwell (eds.), Using active learning in college classes: A range of options for faculty, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 67 (pp. 3–17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Van Ments, M. (1994). The effective use of role play. London: Kogan Page.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCarthy, J.P., Anderson, L. Active Learning Techniques Versus Traditional Teaching Styles: Two Experiments from History and Political Science. Innovative Higher Education 24, 279–294 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000047415.48495.05
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000047415.48495.05