Abstract
Physicians, employers, insurers, and benefits adjudicators often rely upon functional capacity evaluations (FCEs) to determine musculoskeletal capacity to perform physical work, often with legal or occupational consequences. Despite their widespread application for several decades, a number of scientific, legal, and practical concerns persist. FCEs are based upon a theoretical model of comparing job demands to worker capabilities. Validity of FCE results is optimal with accurate job simulation and detailed, intensive assessments of specific work activities. When test criteria are unrelated to job performance, or subjective evaluation criteria are employed, the validity of results is questionable. Reliability within a subject over time may be adequate to support the use of serial FCE data collection to measure progress in worker rehabilitation. Evaluation of sincerity of effort, ability to perform complex or variable jobs, and prediction of injury based upon FCE data is problematic. More research, especially studies linking FCE results to occupational outcomes, is needed to better define the appropriate role for these evaluations in clinical and administrative settings.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
National Council on Compensation Insurance. Countrywide workers' compensation experience including certain competitive state funds, first report basis. Boca Raton, FL: NCCI, 1982.
Simpson, SJ, Richlin, D. The role of functional capacity evaluations in occupational health settings. AAOHN J 2003; 51(5): 202-203.
Hoffman, S, Pransky, G. Pre-placement evaluations and the Americans with Disabilities Act: An analysis. J Occup Rehabil 1998; 8: 255-263.
Bigos, SJ, Battie, MC, Fisher, LD, Hansson, TH, Spengler, DM, Nachemson, AL. A prospective evaluation of preemployment screening methods for acute industrial back pain. Spine 1992; 17(8): 922-926.
Chaffin, DB, Herrin, GD, Keyserling, WM. Preemployment strength testing: An updated position. J Occup Med 1978; 20(6): 403-408.
Dempsey, P, Ciriello, V, Clancy, E, McGorry, R, Pransky, G, Webster, B. Quantitative assessment of upper extremity capacity and exposure. Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, 2000, Santa Monica, P5/724-727.
Sinclair, M, Drury, C. On mathematical modelling in ergonomics. Appl Ergon 1979; 10(4): 225-234.
Armstrong, TJ, Franzblau, A, Haig, A, Keyserling, WM, Levine, S, Streilein, K, Ulin, S, Werner, R. Developing ergonomic solutions for prevention of musculoskeletal disorder disability. Assist Technol 2001; 13(2): 78-87.
Innes, E, Straker, L. Reliability of work-related assessments. Work 1999; 13(2): 107-124.
Dusik, LA, Menard, MR, Cooke, C, Fairburn, SM, Beach, GN. Concurrent validity of the ERGOS work simulator versus conventional functional capacity evaluation techniques in a workers' compensation population. J Occup Med 1993; 35(8): 759-767.
Christian, B. Return to work outcomes following accident compensation corporation work capacity assessment. N Z Med J 2002; 115(1153): 209-211.
Ferguson, SA, Marras, WS, Gupta, P. Longitudinal quantitative measures of the natural course of low back pain recovery. Spine 2000; 25(15): 1950-1956.
Dempsey, PG, Ayoub, MM, Westfall, PH. Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity. Ergonomics 1998; 41(8): 1222-1241.
Innes, E, Straker, L. Validity of work-related assessments. Work 1999; 13(2): 125-152.
Abdel-Moty, E, Fishbain, DA, Khalil, TM, Sadek, S, Cutler, R, Rosomoff, RS, Rosomoff, HL. Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity. Clin J Pain 1993; 9(3): 168-173.
Peterson, N, Mumford, M, Borman, W, Jeanneret, P, Fleishman, E, Levin, K, Campion, M, Mayfield, M, Morgenson, F, Pearlman, K, Gowing, M, Lancaster, A, Silver, M, Dye, D. Understanding work using the occupational information network (O∈NET). Pers Psychol 2001; 54(2): 451-492.
Innes, E, Straker, L. Workplace assessments and functional capacity evaluations: Current practices of therapists in Australia. Work 2002; 18(1): 51-66.
Chan, G, Tan, V, Koh, D. Ageing and fitness to work. Occup Med (Lond) 2000; 50(7): 483-491.
Lindstrom, I, Ohlund, C, Nachemson, A. Validity of patient reporting and predictive value of industrial physical work demands. Spine 1994; 19(8): 888-893.
Jones, T, Kumar, S. Functional capacity evaluation of manual materials handlers: A review. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25(4–5): 179-191.
Bilzon, JL, Allsopp, AJ, Tipton, MJ. Assessment of physical fitness for occupations encompassing load-carriage tasks. Occup Med (Lond) 2001; 51(5): 357-361.
Svensson, T, Karlsson, A, Alexanderson, K, Nordqvist, C. Shame-inducing encounters. Negative emotional aspects of sickness-absentees' interactions with rehabilitation professionals. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13(3): 183-195.
Colella, A, DeNisi, AS, Varma, A. The impact of ratee's disability on performance judgments and choice as partner: The role of disability-job fit stereotypes and interdependence of rewards. J Appl Psychol 1998; 83(1): 102-111.
Isernhagen, S. Functional capacity evaluation: Rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehabil 1992; 2(3): 157-168.
Smith, RL. Therapists' ability to identify safe maximum lifting in low back pain patients during functional capacity evaluation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994; 19(5): 277-281.
Ting, W, Wessel, J, Brintnell, S, Maikala, R, Bhambhani, Y. Validity of the Baltimore therapeutic equipment work simulator in the measurement of lifting endurance in healthy men. Am J Occup Ther 2001; 55(2): 184-190.
Mazanec, DJ. The injured worker: Assessing “return-to-work” status. Cleve Clin J Med 1996; 63(3): 166-171.
Schonstein, E, Kenny, DT. The value of functional and work place assessments in achieving a timely return to work for workers with back pain. Work 2001; 16(1): 31-38.
King, PM, Tuckwell, N, Barrett, TE. A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther 1998; 78(8): 852-866.
Curtis, L, Mayer, TG, Gatchel, RJ. Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration. Part III: Isokinetic and isoinertial lifting capacity. Spine 1994; 19(4): 401-405.
Hazard, RG, Fenwick, JW, Kalisch, SM, Redmond, J, Reeves, V, Reid, S, Frymoyer, JW. Functional restoration with behavioral support. A one-year prospective study of patients with chronic low-back pain. Spine 1989; 14(2): 157-161.
Rainville, J, Ahern, DK, Phalen, L, Childs, LA, Sutherland, R. The association of pain with physical activities in chronic low back pain. Spine 1992; 17(9): 1060-1064.
Boadella, JM, Sluiter, JK, Frings-Dresen, MH. Reliability of upper extremity tests measured by the Ergos work simulator: A pilot study. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13(4): 219-232.
Innes, E, Straker, L. A clinicians' guide to work-related assessments: 3—Administration and interpretation problems. Work 1998; 11(2): 207-219.
Newton, M, Waddell, G. Trunk strength testing with iso-machines. Part 1: Review of a decade of scientific evidence. Spine 1993; 18(7): 801-811.
Isernhagen, SJ, Hart, DL, Matheson, LM. Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation. Work 1999; 12(2): 145-150.
Rainville, J, Sobel, J, Hartigan, C, Monlux, G, Bean, J. Decreasing disability in chronic back pain through aggressive spine rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev 1997; 34(4): 383-393.
Hazard, RG, Reid, S, Fenwick, J, Reeves, V. Isokinetic trunk and lifting strength measurements: Variability as an indicator of effort. Spine 1988; 13(1): 54-57.
Jay, MA, Lamb, JM, Watson, RL, Young, IA, Fearon, FJ, Alday, JM, Tindall, AG. Sensitivity and specificity of the indicators of sincere effort of the EPIC lift capacity test on a previously injured population. Spine 2000; 25(11): 1405-1412.
Robinson, M, Geisser, M, Hanson, C, O'Conner, P. Detecting submaximal efforts in grip strength testing with the coefficient of variation. J Occup Rehabil 1993; 3: 45-50.
Lechner, DE, Bradbury, SF, Bradley, LA. Detecting sincerity of effort: A summary of methods and approaches. Phys Ther 1998; 78(8): 867-888.
Innes, E, Tuckwell, N, Straker, L, Barrett, T. Test–retest reliability on nine tasks of the Physical Work Performance Evaluation. Work 2002; 19(3): 243-253.
Hirsch, G, Beach, G, Cooke, C, Menard, M, Locke, S. Relationship between performance on lumbar dynamometry and Waddell score in a population with low-back pain. Spine 1991; 16(9): 1039-1043.
Grabiner, M, Jeziorowski, J, Divekar, A. Isokinetic measurements of trunk extension and flexion performance collected with the Biodex Clinical Data Station. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990; 11: 590-598.
Croft, PR, MacFarlane, GJ, Papageorgiou, AC, Thomas, E, Silman, AJ. Outcome of low back pain in general practice: A prospective study. BMJ 1998; 316(7141): 1356-1359.
van den Hoogen, HJ, Koes, BW, van Eijk, JT, Bouter, LM, Deville, W. On the course of low back pain in general practice: A one year follow up study. Ann Rheum Dis 1998; 57(1): 13-19.
Waddell, G, McCulloch, JA, Kummel, E, Venner, RM. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine 1980; 5(2): 117-125.
Reneman, MF, Jorritsma, W, Dijkstra, SJ, Dijkstra, PU. Relationship between kinesiophobia and performance in a functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13(4): 277-285.
Beimborn, DS, Morrissey, MC. A review of the literature related to trunk muscle performance. Spine 1988; 13(6): 655-660.
Cooke, C, Menard, MR, Beach, GN, Locke, SR, Hirsch, GH. Serial lumbar dynamometry in low back pain. Spine 1992; 17(6): 653-662.
Matheson, LN, Isernhagen, SJ, Hart, DL. Relationships among lifting ability, grip force, and return to work. Phys Ther 2002; 82(3): 249-256.
Ruan, CM, Haig, AJ, Geisser, ME, Yamakawa, K, Buchholz, RL. Functional capacity evaluations in persons with spinal disorders: Predicting poor outcomes on the Functional Assessment Screening Test (FAST). J Occup Rehabil 2001; 11(2): 119-132.
Spieler, EA, Barth, PS, Burton, JF, Jr, Himmelstein, J, Rudolph, L. Recommendations to guide revision of the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. American Medical Association. JAMA 2000; 283(4): 519-523.
Menard, MR, Cooke, C, Locke, SR, Beach, GN, Butler, TB. Pattern of performance in workers with low back pain during a comprehensive motor performance evaluation. Spine 1994; 19(12): 1359-1366.
Reisine, S, McQuillan, J, Fifield, J. Predictors of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis patients. A five-year followup. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38(11): 1630-1637.
Loisel, P, Poitras, S, Lemaire, J, Durand, P, Southiere, A, Abenhaim, L. Is work status of low back pain patients best described by an automated device or by a questionnaire? Spine 1998; 23(14): 1588-1594.
Cohen, JE, Goel, V, Frank, JW, Gibson, ES. Predicting risk of back injuries, work absenteeism, and chronic disability. The shortcomings of preplacement screening. J Occup Med 1994; 36(10): 1093-1099.
Dempsey, P. How to choose a strength-testing program. Ergonomics in Design, April 1999, pp. 18-23.
42 United States Code § 19102(2)(C).
Hansson, TH, Bigos, SJ, Wortley, MK, Spengler, DM. The load on the lumbar spine during isometric strength testing. Spine 1984; 9(7): 720-724.
Strege, DW, Cooney, WP, Wood, MB, Johnson, SJ, Metcalf, BJ. Chronic peripheral nerve pain treated with direct electrical nerve stimulation. J Hand Surg [Am] 1994; 19(6): 931-939.
Frings-Dresen, MH, Sluiter, JK. Development of a job-specific FCE protocol: The work demands of hospital nurses as an example. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13(4): 233-248.
Reneman, MF, Dijkstra, PU. Introduction to the special issue on functional capacity evaluations: From expert based to evidence based. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13(4): 203-206.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pransky, G.S., Dempsey, P.G. Practical Aspects of Functional Capacity Evaluations. J Occup Rehabil 14, 217–229 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOOR.0000022763.61656.b1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOOR.0000022763.61656.b1