Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consumer sentiments toward brands: the interaction effect between brand personality and sentiments on electronic word of mouth

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Marketing Analytics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumers can exchange real-time brand opinions through social media, hence requiring brands’ urgent attention. Therefore, can customer sentiments expressed in social media influence electronic word of mouth (e-WOM)? This research identifies customer sentiments’ influence on e-WOM and their differences based on brand personality. Brands have significantly different personalities; thus, we argue that sentiments (e.g., anger, anticipation, disgust, fear) that increase or decrease e-WOM also differ based on brand personality (sincerity, excitement, competence, sophistication, and ruggedness). Data from the top 100 most valuable global brands and more than 50,000 brand tweets were collected. We conducted a sentiment analysis on these tweets to identify customer sentiments. Then, computed regression analyses were performed, and a random forest model was constructed. This study consistently shows that the interaction terms between brand personality and sentiments are crucial to customer sentiments that increase or decrease e-WOM based on brand personality. For example, joy increases and decreases e-WOM of brands with an exciting personality and a competent and sophisticated personality, respectively. Furthermore, we conducted a cluster analysis to identify main brand clusters based on their personality and shed light on brand structure in the marketplace. We also discussed managerial implications and avenues for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D.A. 1996. Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review 38 (3): 102–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J.L. 1997. Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 34 (3): 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, D.A., and A.L. Biel. 2013. Brand equity & advertising: advertising's role in building strong brands. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, P.K., and M. Rafiq. 2003. Internal marketing issues and challenges. European Journal of Marketing 37 (9): 1177–1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alboqami, H., W. Al-Karaghouli, Y. Baeshen, I. Erkan, C. Evans, and A. Ghoneim. 2015. Electronic word of mouth in social media: The common characteristics of retweeted and favourited marketer-generated content posted on Twitter. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising 9 (4): 338–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelis, M.De, A. Bonezzi, A.M. Peluso, D.D. Rucker, and M. Costabile. 2012. On braggarts and gossips: A self-enhancement account of word-of-mouth generation and transmission. Journal of Marketing Research 49 (4): 551–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo, T., P. Neijens, and R. Vliegenthart. 2017. Getting the word out on Twitter: The role of influentials, information brokers and strong ties in building word-of-mouth for brands. International Journal of Advertising 36 (3): 496–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, A., and J.N. Kapferer. 2003. Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality? Journal of Brand Management 11 (2): 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A.M., N. Donthu, and V. Kumar. 2016. Investigating how word-of-mouth conversations about brands influence purchase and retransmission intentions. Journal of Marketing Research 53 (2): 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R.W. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (2): 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. 2011. Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science 22 (7): 891–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., and R. Iyengar. 2013. Communication channels and word of mouth: How the medium shapes the message. Journal of Consumer Research 40 (3): 567–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J., M. Zhang, K. Sobel, and A. Chowdury. 2009. Twitter Power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science Technology. 60 (11): 2169–2188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z.F., C. Hong, and C. Li. 2017. The joint effect of association-based corporate posting strategy and eWOM comment valence on social media. Internet Research. 27 (5): 1066–2243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J.A., and D. Mayzlin. 2006. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research 43 (3): 345–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulides, G. 2009. Branding in the post-internet era. Marketing Theory 9 (1): 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, S.C., and Y. Kim. 2011. Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising 30 (1): 47–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, S.C., and Y. Sung. 2015. Using a consumer socialization framework to understand electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) group membership among brand followers on Twitter. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 14 (4): 251–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, V., and E.A. Chang. 2009. Does chatter matter? The impact of user-generated content on music sales. Journal of Interactive Marketing 23 (4): 300–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, N.R., and H. Smith. 1998. Applied regression analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., A. Bonezzi, and M. De Angelis. 2016. Sharing with friends versus strangers: How interpersonal closeness influences word-of-mouth valence. Journal of Marketing Research 53 (5): 712–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, R., K. Hammond, and M. Wright. 2007. The relative incidence of positive and negative word of mouth: A multi-category study. International Journal of Research in Marketing 24 (2): 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekinci, Y., and S. Hosany. 2006. Destination personality: An application of brand personality to tourism destinations. Journal of Travel Research 45 (2): 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar-Farfan, M., C. Mateluna-Sanchez, and L. Araya-Castillo. 2016. Evolution and description of brand personality models in Latin America. Dimension Empresarial 14 (2): 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felbermayr, A., and A. Nanopoulos. 2016. The role of emotions for the perceived usefulness in online customer reviews. Journal of Interactive Marketing 36: 60–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finne, Å., and C. Grönroos. 2009. Rethinking marketing communication: From integrated marketing communication to relationship communication. Journal of Marketing Communications 15 (2–3): 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finne, Å., and C. Grönroos. 2017. Communication-in-use: Customer-integrated marketing communication. European Journal of Marketing 51 (3): 445–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes. 2019. The World's Most Valuable Brands. Retrieved Jun 15, 2020 from https://www.forbes.com/powerful-brands/list/.

  • Fortin, D., M. Uncles, S. Burton, and A. Soboleva. 2011. Interactive or reactive? Marketing with Twitter. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 28 (7): 491–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuens, M., B. Weijters, and K. De Wulf. 2009. A new measure of brand personality. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 26 (2): 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godes, D., and D. Mayzlin. 2009. Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Science 28 (4): 721–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, K.Y., C.S. Heng, and Z. Lin. 2013. Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user-and marketer-generated content. Information Systems Research 24 (1): 88–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, R.E., and D. Horowitz. 2006. Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. Journal of Interactive Advertising 6 (2): 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guido, G., and A.M. Peluso. 2015. Brand anthropomorphism: Conceptualization, measurement, and impact on brand personality and loyalty. Journal of Brand Management 22 (1): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haikel-Elisabeth, M., Z. Zhao, B. Ivens, and A. Brem. 2019. When is brand content shared on Facebook? A field study on online Word-of-Mouth. International Journal of Market Research. 61 (3): 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., K.P. Gwinner, G. Walsh, and D.D. Gremler. 2004. Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing 18 (1): 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilhan, B.E., R.V. Kübler, and K.H. Pauwels. 2018. Battle of the brand fans: Impact of brand attack and defense on social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing 43: 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interbrand. 2018. Best Global Brands 2018. Retrieved Jun 15, 2020 from https://www.interbrand.com/best-brands/best-global-brands/2018/ranking/.

  • Jansen, B.J., M. Zhang, K. Sobel, and A. Chowdury. 2009. Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (11): 2169–2188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E., Y. Sung, and H. Kang. 2014. Brand followers’ retweeting behavior on Twitter: How brand relationships influence brand electronic word-of-mouth. Computers in Human Behavior 37: 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., and P. Gupta. 2012. Emotional expressions in online user reviews: How they influence consumers' product evaluations. Journal of Business Research 65 (7): 985–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Könsgen, R., M. Schaarschmidt, S. Ivens, and A. Munzel. 2018. Finding meaning in contradiction on employee review sites—Effects of discrepant online reviews on job application intentions. Journal of Interactive Marketing 43: 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, E.S., and Y. Sung. 2011. Follow me! Global marketers’ Twitter use. Journal of Interactive Advertising 12 (1): 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., D.H. Park, and I. Han. 2008. The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 7 (3): 341–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.K., K.J. Back, and J.Y. Kim. 2009. Family restaurant brand personality and its impact on customer's emotion, satisfaction, and brand loyalty. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 33 (3): 305–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liaw, A., and M. Wiener. 2002. Classification and regression by random Forest. R News 2 (3): 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvin, S.W., R.E. Goldsmith, and B. Pan. 2008. Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management 29 (3): 458–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. 2012. Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies 5 (1): 1–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, A., and R. Castaño. 2019. Consumer behavior on social media: A thematic exploration and an agenda for future inquiry. Business Governance and Society, 281–301. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, M., R. Peres, and R. Shachar. 2013. On Brands and Word of Mouth. Journal of Marketing Research 50 (4): 427–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, M., R. Peres, and R. Shachar. 2014. A data set of brands and their characteristics. Marketing Science 33 (4): 609–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maehle, N., C. Otnes, and M. Supphellen. 2011. Consumers' perceptions of the dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Consumer Behavior 10 (5): 290–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malar, L., H. Krohmer, W. Hoyer, and B. Nyffenegger. 2011. Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing. 75 (4): 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C.H., and W.D. Perreault Jr. 1991. Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 28 (3): 268–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad, S.M., and P.D. Turney. 2013. Crowdsourcing a word–emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence 29 (3): 436–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., W. Wasserman, and M.H. Kutner. 1989. Applied regression models. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawle, J., and P. Cooper. 2006. Measuring emotion—Lovemarks, the future beyond brands. Journal of Advertising Research 46 (1): 38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, K., Y. Chen, A.M. Kaplan, B. Ognibeni, and K. Pauwels. 2013. Social media metrics—A framework and guidelines for managing social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing 27 (4): 281–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polyorat, K. 2011. The influence of brand personality dimensions on brand identification and word-of-mouth: The case study of a university brand in Thailand. Asian Journal of Business Research 1: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutchik, R. 1984. Emotions: A general psychoevolutionary theory. Approaches to Emotion 1984: 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schau, H.J., A.M. Muñiz Jr., and E.J. Arnould. 2009. How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing 73 (5): 30–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schivinski, B., and D. Dabrowski. 2016. The effect of social media communication on consumer perceptions of brands. Journal of Marketing Communications 22 (2): 189–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., and J.N. Sheth. 2004. Web-based marketing: The coming revolution in marketing thought and strategy. Journal of Business Research 57 (7): 696–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.N., E. Fischer, and C. Yongjian. 2012. How does brand-related user-generated content differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter? Journal of Interactive Marketing 26 (2): 102–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soboleva, A., S. Burton, G. Mallik, and A. Khan. 2017. ‘Retweet for a Chance to…’: An analysis of what triggers consumers to engage in seeded eWOM on Twitter. Journal of Marketing Management 33 (13–14): 1120–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sook Kwon, E., E. Kim, Y. Sung, and C. Yun Yoo. 2014. Brand followers: Consumer motivation and attitude towards brand communications on Twitter. International Journal of Advertising 33 (4): 657–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J.E. 2006. Emotions and sentiments. Handbook of social psychology, 309–335. Boston: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temporal, P. 2000. Branding in Asia: The creation, development, and management of Asian brands for the global market. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, D.M., C. Crocker, and C.G. Marketo. 2010. Linking sensory characteristics to emotions: An example using dark chocolate. Food Quality and Preference 21 (8): 1117–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, M., D.J. MacInnis, and C. Whan Park. 2005. The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 15 (1): 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirunillai, S., and G.J. Tellis. 2012. Does chatter really matter? Dynamics of user-generated content and stock performance. Marketing Science 31 (2): 198–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahdati, H., and S.H. Mousavi Nejad. 2016. Brand personality toward customer purchase intention: The intermediate role of electronic word-of-mouth and brand equity. Asian Academy of Management Journal 21 (2): 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noort, G., and L.M. Willemsen. 2012. Online damage control: The effects of proactive versus reactive webcare interventions in consumer-generated and brand-generated platforms. Journal of Interactive Marketing 26 (3): 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S.L., and R.F. Lusch. 2017. Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing 34 (1): 46–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, L.T., and R.L. Wakefield. 2018. Anxiety and ephemeral social media use in negative eWOM creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing 41: 44–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., B.J. Jansen, and A. Chowdhury. 2011. Business engagement on Twitter: A path analysis. Electronic Markets 21 (3): 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the helpful and constructive comments made by Ashwin Malshe, Joey Campbell, Michael Sanchez, and Dan Sass from University of Texas at San Antonio.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tecnologico de Monterrey, Business School, Monterrey, Mexico

    Alberto Lopez, Eva Guerra, Beatriz Gonzalez & Sergio Madero

Authors
  1. Alberto Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eva Guerra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beatriz Gonzalez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sergio Madero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Lopez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lopez, A., Guerra, E., Gonzalez, B. et al. Consumer sentiments toward brands: the interaction effect between brand personality and sentiments on electronic word of mouth. J Market Anal 8, 203–223 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00085-5

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00085-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation