Abstract
Whether they know it or not, ocean transportation intermediaries (OTIs) play a crucial role in the distribution of counterfeit goods across the globe. When these companies provide their services to product counterfeiters, they contribute to the proliferation of criminal schemes, and may expose themselves to criminal and civil liability. This article describes how OTIs can be held liable for intellectual property rights violations when they ship counterfeit goods, a subject that should raise serious concerns for OTIs. Additionally, this article proposes several practices that OTIs can adopt to mitigate their exposure to intellectual property rights liabilities. Adoption of these proposals will mean that OTIs will take on a guardianship role, actively contributing to the fight against product counterfeiting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clapp, J., and I.H. Rowlands. 2014. Corporate social responsibility. In Essential concepts of global environmental governance, ed. J.-F. Morin, and A. Orsini, 42–44. New York: Routledge.
Cohen, L.E., and M. Felson. 1979. Social change and crime trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44: 588–608.
Cornell University Law School Legal Information Institute. (No date). Contributory infringement. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/contributory_infringement. Accessed 4 Jan 2014.
ENTERPOL. 2015. 2015 Situation Report on Counterfeiting in the European Union. https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/2015-situation-report-counterfeiting-in-european-union. Accessed 15 Nov 2016.
Hard Rock Café Licensing Corp v. Concession Services Inc. 1992. 955 F.2d 1150.
International Finance Corporation. 2009. Correspondent account KYC toolkit: A guide to common documentation requirements. Washington, DC.
Inwood Laboratories v. Ives Laboratories. 1982. 456 U.S. 844.
Kayser, S.M., Wheatley, L.J., Li, C.L., Groebl, M., Stoerzinger, G., McCulloch, A., Holmey, F., Band, E. and Fortunet, E. 2014. Combating contributory infringement on the internet. INTA Bulletin, 69(9). http://www.inta.org/INTABulletin/Pages/CombatingContributoryInfringementontheInternet.aspx. Accessed 14 Sep 2014.
Lichtman, D., and W. Landes. 2002. Indirect liability for copyright infringement: An economic perspective. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 16: 395–410.
Maignan, I., B. Hillebrand, and D. McAlister. 2002. Managing socially-responsible buying: How to integrate non-economic criteria into the purchasing process. European Management Journal 20 (6): 641–648.
McCue, M. 2012. Secondary liability for trademark and copyright infringement. Paper presented at the 2012 Utah Cyber Symposium. http://www.lrrlaw.com/secondary-liability-for-trademark-and-copyright-infringement-02-05-2012/#.VRFe4OHNu1k. Accessed 13 March 2015.
Mullins, R.R., M. Ahearne, S.K. Lam, Z.R. Hall, and J.P. Boichuk. 2014. Know your customer: How salesperson perceptions of customer relationship quality form and influence account profitability. Journal of Marketing 78 (6): 38–58.
Park-Poaps, H., and K. Rees. 2010. Stakeholder forces of socially responsible supply chain management orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 92 (2): 305–322.
Ramesh, K. 2014. Role of customer relationship management in Indian banking system. International Journal of Applied Services Marketing Perspectives 2 (4): 645–650.
Tuba, M., and C. van der Westhuizen. 2014. An analysis of the ‘know your customer’ policy as an effective tool to combat money laundering: is it about who or what to know that counts? International Journal of Public Law and Policy 4 (1): 53–70.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection-Office of International Trade. 2013. Intellectual property rights fiscal year 2013 seizure statistics. http://www.cbp.gov/trade/priority-issues/ipr/statistics. Accessed 12 Jan 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kennedy, J.P., Wilson, J.M. Liabilities and responsibilities: ocean transportation intermediaries (OTIs) and the distribution of counterfeit goods. Marit Econ Logist 19, 182–187 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-017-0064-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-017-0064-x