Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of crime rate, experience of crime, and fear of crime on residents’ participation in association: studying 25 districts in the City of Seoul, South Korea

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Crime Prevention and Community Safety Aims and scope

Abstract

While the majority of studies on community crime have focused on socio-economic characteristics that lead to high or low rates of crime, the impact of crime on community residents’ social ties has received less attention. This study examines the impact of district-level crime rate, experience of crime, and fear of crime on individual community residents’ participation in association—which has been widely seen as an indicator of social capital—in the city of Seoul, South Korea. Moreover, as recent social capital studies look deeper into the different types of neighborhood crime connected to different types of associations, this study separately examines the impact of total crime, violent crime, and property crime on the respondents’ social, civic engagement, reward-based, and online associations. We find that district-level crime rates negatively correlated with all types of associations, but the difference between violent crime and property crime was minimal. Additionally, individual-level experience of crime significantly decreased residents’ participation in social and online associations. However, fear of crime did not show a significant effect on any type of association.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkowitz, B. 2000. Community and neighborhood organization. In Handbook of community psychology, ed. J. Rappaport, and E. Seidman, 331–357. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J., and W. Rahn. 1997. Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 999–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buonanno, P., D. Montolio, and P. Vanin. 2009. Does social capital reduce crime? The Journal of Law and Economics 52 (1): 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bursik, R.J. 1988. Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology 26 (4): 519–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bursik, R.J., and H.G. Grasmick. 1999. Neighborhoods and Crime. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J.H. 2006. Living in Cyworld: Contextualizing Cy-Ties in South Korea. In Use of blogs (digital formations), ed. A. Bruns and J. Jacobs, 173–186. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.E., and M. Felson 1979. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44 (4): 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L.E., and R. Machalek. 1994. The normalcy of crime: From Durkheim to evolutionary ecology. Rationality and Society 6 (2): 286–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. 2004. Rituals of solidarity and security in the wake of terrorist attack. Sociological Theory 22 (1): 53–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J.E. 1975. The impact of crime. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J.E., D.E. Baer, and E.G. Grabb 2001. Nations of joiners: Explaining voluntary association membership in democratic societies. American Sociological Review 66 (6): 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, J., and K. Newton. 2003. Who trusts? The origins of social trust in seven societies. European Societies 5 (2): 93–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deller, S.C., and M.A. Deller. 2010. Rural crime and social capital. Growth and Change 41 (2): 221–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deller, S.C., and M.A. Deller. 2012. Spatial heterogeneity, social capital, and rural larceny. Rural Sociology 77: 225–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 2014. The rules of sociological method: and selected texts on sociology and its method. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M., and L.E. Cohen. 1980. Human ecology and crime: A routine activity approach. Human Ecology 8 (4): 389–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M.J., M.R. Gottfredson, and J. Garofalo. 1978. Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawdon, J., J. Ryan, and L. Agnich. 2010. Crime as a source of solidarity: a research note testing Durkheim’s assertion. Deviant Behavior 31 (8): 679–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A.J. 1985. Private, parochial, and public social orders: The problem of crime and incivility in urban communities. In The challenge of social control: Citizenship and institution building in modern society, ed. G.D. Suttles and M.N. Zald, 230–242. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, B.P., I. Kawachi, D. Prothrow-Stith, K. Lochner, and V. Gupta. 1998. Social capital, income inequality, and firearm violent crime. Social Science and Medicine 47: 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.Y. 2005. “Bowling together” isn’t a cure-all: The relationship between social capital and political trust in South Korea. International Political Science Review 26 (2): 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S., and P. Keefer. 1997. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1251–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser, R.R. 1978. Social sources of delinquency: An appraisal of analytic models. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauderdale, P. 1976. Deviance and moral boundaries. American Sociological Review 41 (4): 660–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström, M., J. Merlo, and P. Östergren. 2002. Social capital and sense of insecurity in the neighbourhood: a population-based multilevel analysis in Malmö, Sweden. Social Science and Medicine 56 (5): 1111–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A.E., and B.D. Warner. 1991. Functions of crime: A paradoxical process. American Journal of Sociology 96 (6): 1441–1463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., and D. Stolle. 2017. Social capital, civic culture and political trust. In Handbook on political trust, ed. S. Zmerli and T.W.G. van der Meer, 338–352. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lochner, K., I. Kawachi, and B.P. Kennedy. 1999. Social capital: A guide to its measurement. Health & place 5 (4): 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, F.E., P.E. Bellair, A.E. Liska, and J. Liu. 2001. Extending social disorganization theory: Modeling the relationships between cohesion, disorder, and fear. Criminology 39 (2): 293–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. 1918. The psychology of punitive justice. American Journal of Sociology 23 (5): 577–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S.F., and J.R. Blau. 1987. Routine leisure activities and rates of crime: A macro-level analysis. Social Forces 65: 1035–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miethe, T.D., M.C. Stafford, and J.S. Long 1987. Social differentiation in criminal victimization: A test of routine activities/lifestyle theories. American Sociological Review 52 (2): 184–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.D., and N.L. Recker. 2016. Social capital, type of crime, and social control. Crime & Delinquency 62 (6): 728–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.D., and N.L. Recker. 2017. Social capital groups and crime in urban counties. Deviant behavior 38 (6): 655–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, J.H., and S. Kim. 2009. Aging, neighborhood attachment, and fear of crime: Testing reciprocal effects. Journal of Community Psychology 37 (1): 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D.Wayne. 2000. Poisson-Based Regression Analysis of Aggregate Crime Rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 16 (1): 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C., A. Ziersch, K. Arthurson, and F. Baum. 2005. “Danger lurks around every corner”: fear of crime and its impact on opportunities for social interaction in stigmatised Australian suburbs. Urban Policy and Research 23 (4): 393–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D.D., B.B. Brown, and R.B. Taylor. 1996. The ecology of empowerment: Predicting participation in community organizations. Journal of Social Issues 52 (1): 85–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D.D., J. Hughey, and P.W. Speer. 2002. Community psychology perspectives on social capital theory and community development practice. Community Development 33 (1): 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phua, J., and S.A.A. Jin. 2011. ‘Finding a home away from home’: The use of social networking sites by Asia-Pacific students in the United States for bridging and bonding social capital. Asian Journal of Communication 21 (5): 504–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, S. 2005. Informal social networking and community involvement: Determining participation in neighborhood crime watches in Japan. Journal of Political Science 33: 143–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.B., B.A. Lawton, R.B. Taylor, and D.D. Perkins. 2003. Multilevel longitudinal impacts of incivilities: Fear of crime, expected safety, and block satisfaction. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 19 (3): 237–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D.R., and T.R. Clear. 1998. Incarceration, social capital, and crime: Implications for social disorganization theory. Criminology 36 (3): 441–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, R. 1994. Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control by Robert J. Bursik, Jr., and Harold G. Grasmick. American Journal of Sociology 99: 1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C.E., and S.J. Jang. 2000. Neighborhood disorder, fear, and mistrust: The buffering role of social ties with neighbors. American Journal of Community Psychology 28 (4): 401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupasingha, A., S.J. Goetz, and D. Freshwater. 2006. The production of social capital in US counties. The journal of socio-economics 35 (1): 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.J. 2001. Crime and public safety: Insights from community-level perspectives on social capital. In Social capital and poor communities, ed. S. Saegert, J. Thompson, and M. Warrent, 89–114. Russel Sage Foundation. 

  • Sampson, R.J., and W.B. Groves. 1989. Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology 94 (4): 774–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.J., and S.W. Raudenbush. 1999. Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology 105 (3): 603–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R.J., S.W. Raudenbush, and F. Earls. 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277 (5328): 918–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saegert, S., and G. Winkel. 2004. Crime, social capital, and community participation. American Journal of Community Psychology 34 (3–4): 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C.R., and H.D. McKay. 1942. Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W.G. 1990. Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W.G., and M.G. Maxfield. 1981. Coping with crime: Individual and neighborhood reactions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D., and T. R. Rochon. 1999. The myth of American exceptionalism. In Social capital and European Democracy, ed. Jan van Deth, Marco Maraffi, Ken Newton, and Paul Whiteley, 192–209. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takagi, D., K.I. Ikeda, and I. Kawachi. 2012. Neighborhood social capital and crime victimization: Comparison of spatial regression analysis and hierarchical regression analysis. Social Science and Medicine 75 (10): 1895–1902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi, D., K.I. Ikeda, T. Kobayashi, M. Harihara, and I. Kawachi. 2016. The impact of crime on social ties and civic participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 26 (2): 164–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R.B. 1996. Neighborhood responses to disorder and local attachments: The systemic model of attachment, social disorganization, and neighborhood use value. In Sociological forum, vol. 11, No. 1, 41–74.

  • Wandersman, A., and P. Florin. 2000. Citizen participation. In Handbook of community psychology, ed. J. Pappaport and E. Seidman, 247–272. New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.Q., and G.L. Kelling. 1982. The Police and Neighborhood Safety: Broken Windows. The Atlantic Monthly 127 (2): 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Northeastern University, 915 Renaissance Park, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, USA

    Juheon Lee

  2. Department of Communication, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 650 N. Pleasant St., Amherst, MA, USA

    Sarah Cho

Authors
  1. Juheon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juheon Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J., Cho, S. The impact of crime rate, experience of crime, and fear of crime on residents’ participation in association: studying 25 districts in the City of Seoul, South Korea. Crime Prev Community Saf 20, 189–207 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-018-0047-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-018-0047-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation