Abstract
The standard model of elementary particle physics and the theory of general relativity can be extended by the introduction of a vacuum variable which is responsible for the near vanishing of the present cosmological constant (vacuum energy density). The explicit realization of this vacuum variable can be via a three-form gauge field, an aether-type velocity field, or any other field appropriate for the description of the equilibrium state corresponding to the Lorentz-invariant quantum vacuum. The extended theory has, without fine-tuning, a Minkowski-type solution of the field equations with spacetime-independent fields and provides, therefore, a possible solution of the main cosmological constant problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Weinberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1 (1989).
S. Weinberg, in Critical Dialogues in Cosmology, Ed. by N. Turok (World Sci., Singapore, 1997), p. 195; arXiv:astro-ph/9610044.
F. R. Klinkhamer and G. E. Volovik, Phys. Rev. D 77, 085015 (2008); arXiv:0711.3170.
F. R. Klinkhamer and G. E. Volovik, Phys. Rev. D 78, 063528 (2008); arXiv:0806.2805.
F. R. Klinkhamer and G. E. Volovik, Phys. Rev. D 80, 083001 (2009); arXiv:0905.1919.
M. J. Duff and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Lett. B 94, 179 (1980).
A. Aurilia, H. Nicolai, and P. K. Townsend, Nucl. Phys. B 176, 509 (1980).
S. W. Hawking, Phys. Lett. B 134, 403 (1984).
M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Phys. Lett. B 143, 415 (1984).
M. J. Duff, Phys. Lett. B 226, 36 (1989).
M. J. Duncan and L. G. Jensen, Nucl. Phys. B 336, 100 (1990).
R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, JHEP 0006, 006 (2000); arXiv:hep-th/0004134.
A. Aurilia and E. Spallucci, Phys. Rev. D 69, 105004 (2004); arXiv:hep-th/0402096.
Z. C. Wu, Phys. Lett. B 659, 891 (2008); arXiv:0709.3314.
M. Veltman, Diagrammatica: The Path to Feynman Rules (Cambridge Univ., Cambridge, England, 1994), Appendix E.
N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge Univ., Cambridge, England, 1982).
C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 124, 925 (1961).
A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B 91, 99 (1980).
W. Hu and I. Sawicki, Phys. Rev. D 76, 064004 (2007); arXiv:0705.1158.
S. A. Appleby and R. A. Battye, Phys. Lett. B 654, 7 (2007); arXiv:0705.3199.
A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett. 86, 157 (2007); arXiv:0706.2041.
P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, A. C. Davis, and D. J. Shaw, Phys. Rev. D 78, 104021 (2008); arXiv:0806.3415.
F. R. Klinkhamer and G. E. Volovik, JETP Lett. 88, 289 (2008); arXiv:0807.3896.
F. R. Klinkhamer and G. E. Volovik, Phys. Rev. D 79, 063527 (2009); arXiv:0811.4347.
F. R. Klinkhamer, Phys. Rev. D 81, 043006 (2010), arXiv:0904.3276.
There is no need, here, to dwell on the interpretation of μ0 as a chemical potential [3, 4]. Still, it may be relevant for the future development of the theory that the obtained vacuum can be viewed as a self-sustained system existing at zero external pressure, P ext = 0, and that Eq. (8b) can be read as the integrated form of the thermodynamic Gibbs-Duhem equation, −P = ε −μq, provided the identification μ = dε/dq and the pressure-equilibrium condition P = P ext = 0 hold.
A. D. Dolgov, JETP Lett. 41, 345 (1985).
A. D. Dolgov, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5881 (1997); arXiv:astro-ph/9608175.
A. M. Polyakov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 635 (1991); I. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 3273 (1991); arXiv:hep-th/9109032.
A. M. Polyakov, private communication.
A. I. Larkin and S. A. Pikin, Sov. Phys. JETP 29, 891 (1969); J. Sak, Phys. Rev. B 10, 3957 (1974).
T. Jacobson, in Proceedings of the Conference From Quantum to Emergent Gravity: Theory and Phenomenology, PoS QG-PH, 020 (2007); arXiv:0801.1547.
V. A. Rubakov and P. G. Tinyakov, Phys. Rev. D 61, 087503 (2000); arXiv:hep-ph/9906239.
J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Phys. Rev. D 69, 044026 (2004); arXiv:astro-ph/0309411.
The general term “quintessence” from [36] has, over the years, become associated with a fundamental scalar field and the use of the slightly different term “quinta essential“ for the vacuum field q is to avoid any possible misunderstanding.
R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1582 (1998); arXiv:astro-ph/9708069.
J. J. van der Bij, H. van Dam, and Y. J. Ng, Physica A 116, 307 (1982).
L. Smolin, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084003 (2009); arXiv:0904.4841.
As to the terminology of “main“ cosmological constant problem, we refer to the required cancellation of a huge initial contribution to the gravitating vacuum energy density which is of the order of (E ew)4 or more; see also the discussion under Eq. (3).
A. G. Riess et al. (Supernova Search Team Collab.), Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998); arXiv:astro-ph/9805201.
S. Perlmutter et al. (Supernova Cosmology Project Collab.), Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999); arXiv:astro-ph/9812133.
E. Komatsu et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180, 330 (2009); arXiv:0803.0547.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The article is published in the original.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klinkhamer, F.R., Volovik, G.E. Towards a solution of the cosmological constant problem. Jetp Lett. 91, 259–265 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364010060019
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364010060019