Skip to main content
Log in

Distributions of the Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity of Charged Particles in pp Collisions at 0.9 TeV

  • Fields, Particles, and Nuclei
  • Published:
JETP Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have studied the charged particles spectra for the pseudorapidity region of ∣η∣ < 2.5, the multiplicity of charged particles, its dependence on pT as well as on η and the relation between average pT and charged particles multiplicity in pp collisions at √s = 0.9 TeV. For simulations, we have used the EPOS-LHC, EPOS-1.99, QGSJETII-04, and SIBYLL-2.3c models and compared their predictions with the experimental data of ATLAS experiment. For the pT distribution, predictions of the Sibyll-2.3c are matching with the experimental data in a region of 0.5 GeV/c < pT < 0.8 GeV/c and EPOS-1.99 model results are near to the experimental data for 0.5 GeV/c < pT < 1.5 GeV/c. For the case of average pT, EPOS-LHC, and Sibyll-2.3c predictions are closer to the experimental data. For the pseudorapidity charged particle density distributions, QGSJETII-04 model predictions are better describing the experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Gell-Mann, 1961 CTSL-20 (1962); Phys. Rev. 125, 1067 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Ne’eman, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. D. Bjorken and E. A. Paschos, Nucl. Phys. 26, 214 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann, and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. B 47, 365 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Coleman and D. J. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 851 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Abe, D. Amidei, G. Apollinari, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 613 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Abe, D. Amidei, G. Apollinari, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 157 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Pierog and K. Werner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 171101 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Ajaz, S. Ullah, Y. Ali, and H. Younis, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33, 1850038 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Ajaz, Y. Ali, S. Ullah, Q. Ali, and U. Tabassam, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33, 1850079 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Ullah, Y. Ali, M. Ajaz, U. Tabassam, and Q. Ali, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1850108 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Ullah, M. Ajaz, and Y. Ali, Eur. Phys. Lett. 123, 31001 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 61, 064910 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. U. Tabassam, Y. Ali, S. Ullah, M. Ajaz, Q. Ali, M. Suleymanov, A. S. Bhatti, and R. Suleymanov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 27, 1850036 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Schukraft, Nucl. Phys. A 553, 31 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Takahashi, in Proceedings of the CERN Latin-American School of High Energy Physics, Natal, Brazil, CERN-2013-003 (2011), p. 273. https://doi.org/10.5170/CERN-2013-003.273 https://doi.org/10.5170/CERN-2013-003.273

  17. J. D. Bjorken, FERMILAB-Pub-82/59-THY (Fermi Natl. Accel. Labor., USA, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Shi (STAR Collab.), J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 422, 012002 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Aamodt, B. Abelev, A. Quintana, et al. (ALICE Collab.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252302 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Ajaz, M. Tufail, and Y. Ali, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34, 1950100 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Ajaz, M. Bilal, Y. Ali, M. K. Suleymanov, and K. H. Khan, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34, 1950090 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Carliy, K. Rabbertz, and S. Schumann, arXiv:1506.03239v2 [hep-ex] (2015).

  23. B. Abelev, J. Adam, D. Adamová, et al. (ALICE Collab.), Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2662 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Pierog and K. Werner, in Proceedings of the 31st International Cosmic Ray Conference ICRC, Lodz, 2009.

  25. F. Riehn, R. Engel, A. Fedynitch, T. K. Gaisser, and T. Stanev, EPJ Web Conf. 99, 12001 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Pierog, Iu. Karpenko, J. M. Katzy, E. Yatsenko, and K. Werner, Phys. Rev. C 92, 034906 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. K. Werner, F. M. Liu, and T. Pierog, Phys. Rev. C 74, 044902 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Hladik, H. J. Drescher, S. Ostapchenko, T. Pierog, and K. Werner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3506 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. N. N. Kalmykov, S. S. Ostapchenko, and A. I. Pavlov, Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys. 58, 1966 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. B. Kaidalov and K. A. Ter-Martirosyan, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 39, 979 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. Ostapchenko, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 151, 143 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. G. Aad, E. Abat, B. Abbott, et al. (ATLAS Collab.), Phys. Lett B 688, 21 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Ali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, Q., Ali, Y., Haseeb, M. et al. Distributions of the Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity of Charged Particles in pp Collisions at 0.9 TeV. Jetp Lett. 109, 495–498 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364019080010

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364019080010

Navigation