Skip to main content
Log in

MHD Model of the Interaction of a Coronal Mass Ejection with the Hot Jupiter HD 209458b

  • Published:
Astronomy Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most hot Jupiters have extended envelopes of gas that spread beyond their Roche lobes. A typical envelope is weakly gravitationally bound to the planet and, therefore, its structure and properties are strongly affected by stellar wind disturbances, for example, coronal mass ejections. Earlier, we performed gas-dynamic modeling of the interaction of a narrow coronal mass ejection (CME) with the envelope of the hot Jupiter HD 209458b. In this study, we investigate the influence of the planet’s magnetic field and stellar wind on the structure and dynamics of the HD 209458b envelope exposed to a similar CME. For this, an MHD model of the CME interaction with the envelope was developed. It was assumed that the field of the planet had a generally accepted value and corresponded to 1/10 of the magnetic moment of Jupiter. The field of the star was assumed to be weak (10–3 G), which ensured the super-Alfvén flow of the stellar wind around the planet. The comparison of the MHD simulation with gas-dynamic calculations shows that, for the adopted values of the fields of the planet and the star, the effect of the magnetic field on the envelope is not decisive and the qualitative picture of the flow does not change. At the same time, taking magnetic fields into account leads to a change in the quantitative characteristics of the envelope and the mass loss rate, which can be important in determining the evolutionary status of the exoplanet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. D. Charbonneau, T. M. Brown, D. W. Latham, and M. Mayor, Astrophys. J. 529, L45 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Vidal-Madjar, A. Lecavelier des Etangs, J.-M. Desert, G. E. Ballester, et al., Nature (London, U.K.) 422, 143 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. D. V. Bisikalo, P. V. Kaigorodov, D. E. Ionov, and V. I. Shematovich, Astron. Rep. 57, 715 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Bisikalo, P. Kaygorodov, D. Ionov, V. Shematovich, et al., Astrophys. J. 764, 19 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. L. Linsky, H. Yang, K. France, C. S. Froning, et al., Astrophys. J. 717, 1291 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. D. V. Bisikalo and A. A. Cherenkov, Astron. Rep. 60, 183 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Cherenkov, D. Bisikalo, L. Fossati, and C. Möstl, Astrophys. J. 846, 31 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. P. V. Kaigorodov, E. A. Ilyina, and D. V. Bisikalo, Astron. Rep. 63, 365 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. S. Arakcheev, A. G. Zhilkin, P. V. Kaigorodov, D. V. Bisikalo, and A. G. Kosovichev, Astron. Rep. 61, 932 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. K. G. Kislyakova, M. Holmström, H. Lammer, et al., Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 346, 981 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. G. Zhilkin and D. V. Bisikalo, Astron. Rep. 63, 550 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. G. Zhilkin, D. V. Bisikalo, and P. V. Kaygorodov, Astron. Rep. 64, 259 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. G. Zhilkin and D. V. Bisikalo, Astron. Rep. 64, 563 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. G. Zhilkin, D. V. Bisikalo, and P. V. Kaigorodov, Astron. Rep. 64, 159 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. D. V. Bisikalo, A. G. Zhilkin, and A. A. Boyarchuk, Gas Dynamics of Close Binary Stars (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. G. Zhilkin, D. V. Bisikalo, and A. A. Boyarchuk, Phys. Usp. 55, 115 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. T. Tanaka, J. Comp. Phys. 111, 381 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. K. G. Powell, P. L. Roe, T. J. Linde, T. I. Gombosi, and D. L. de Zeeuw, J. Comp. Phys. 154, 284 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. A. Cherenkov, D. V. Bisikalo, and A. G. Kosovichev, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 605 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. D. V. Bisikalo, V. I. Shematovich, P. V. Kaigorodov, and A. G. Zhilkin, Gaseous Envelopes of Exoplanets– Hot Jupiters (Nauka, Moscow, 2020) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. J. Owens and R. J. Forsyth, Living Rev. Solar Phys. 10, 5 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. E. N. Parker, Astrophys. J. 128, 664 (1958).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. E. J. Weber and L. Davis, Jr., Astrophys. J. 148, 217 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. V. B. Baranov and K. V. Krasnobaev, Hydrodynamic Theory of Cosmic Plasma (Nauka, Moscow, 1977) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. L. Withbroe, Astrophys. J. 325, 442 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. W. M. Farrell, J. S. Halekas, R. M. Killen, G. T. Delory, et al., J. Geophys. Res. Planets 117, E00K04 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. C. Möstl, K. Amla, J. R. Hall, P. C. Liewer, et al., Astrophys. J. 787, 119, (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Y. D. Liu, J. D. Richardson, C. Wang, and J. G. Luhmann, Astrophys. J. 788, L28, (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. P. Cargo and G. Gallice, J. Comput. Phys. 136, 446 (1997).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. S. R. Chakravarthy and S. Osher, AIAA Papers No. 85-0363 (1985).

  31. A. G. Zhilkin, A. V. Sobolev, D. V. Bisikalo, and M. M. Gabdeev, Astron. Rep. 63, 751 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Dedner, F. Kemm, D. Kroner, C.-D. Munz, T. Schnitzer, and M. Wesenberg, J. Comp. Phys. 175, 645 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. C. Argiroffi, F. Reale, et al., Nat. Astron. 3, 742 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank P.V. Kaigorodov and V.I. Shematovich for valuable comments and useful discussions. The study was carried out using the equipment of the Center for Shared Use “Complex for Modeling and Data Processing of Mega-Class Research Installations” of the National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, http://ckp.nrcki.ru/, as well as computing facilities of the Interdepartmental Supercomputer Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the Government of the Russian Federation and the Ministry of Higher Education and Science of the Russian Federation for the support (grant 075-15-2020-780 (no. 13.1902.21.0039)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Zhilkin.

Additional information

Translated by M. Chubarova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhilkin, A.G., Bisikalo, D.V. & Kolymagina, E.A. MHD Model of the Interaction of a Coronal Mass Ejection with the Hot Jupiter HD 209458b. Astron. Rep. 65, 676–692 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063772921090092

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063772921090092

Keywords:

Navigation