Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Topsoil Carbon Stock and Soil Physicochemical Properties in Riparian Forests and Agricultural Lands of Southwestern Iran

  • SOIL CHEMISTRY
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 March 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract—

This study aimed to evaluate subsoil carbon stock in different stands of riparian forests. Four different sites in the studied riparian forests located in Behbahan in southern Iran, pure Populus euphratica, Tamarix arceuthoides stands, and mixed T. arceuthoides-P. euphratica stands as well as agricultural lands were examined. One hundred and three soil samples were randomly taken at depths of 0–20 cm from all studied sites. Soil carbon content and the physiochemical properties pH, organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium carbonate, bulk density, and soil texture were determined in the laboratory. The results indicated that soil carbon stocks reach 52.9, 48.5, 25.9, and 25.8 t ha–1 in P. euphratica stands, agricultural lands, mixed T. arceuthoides-P. euphratica stands, and T. arceuthoides stands, respectively. There was no significant difference in soil carbon content between the P. euphratica stands and agricultural lands, but there was a significant difference between T. arceuthoides stands and mixed T. arceuthoides-P. euphratica stands. The high soil carbon content in agricultural lands was probably because of alfalfa and the use of organic fertilizer, like manure, because alfalfa was planted in most of the agricultural lands, and this plant species can store atmospheric nitrogen and, consequently, increase the carbon content in the soil. Furthermore, greater soil biological activity in the P. euphratica stands compared with the T. arceuthoides stands might be responsible for the higher soil carbon content in the P. euphratica stands. The physiochemical properties of soil also play important roles in soil carbon content, the most important of which are soil organic carbon, bulk density, and clay, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

REFERENCES

  1. A. Buras, N. Thevs, S. Zerbe, and M. Wilmking, “Productivity and carbon sequestration of Populus euphratica at the Amu River, Turkmenistan,” Forestry 86, 429–439 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Walkley and I. A. Black, “An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents,” Soil Sci. 63, 251–263 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Bolin, R. Sukumar, P. Ciais, W. Cramer, P. Jarvis, H. Kheshgi, C. Nobre, S. Semenov, and W. Steffen, “Global perspective,” in Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry, Ed. by R. Watson, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000), pp. 23–52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. G. Johnson, P. S. J. Verburg, and J. A. Arnone, “Plant species effects on soil nutrients and chemistry in arid ecological zones,” Oecologia 182, 299–317 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Augustin and L. J. Cihacek, “Relationships between soil carbon and soil texture in the northern great plains,” Soil Sci. 181 (8), 386–392 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. G. Williams, R. L. Scott, T. E. Huxman, D. C. Goodrich, and G. Lin, “Sensitivity of riparian ecosystems in arid and semiarid environments to moisture pulses,” Hydrol. Process. 20, 3191–3205 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. T. Patten, “Riparian ecosystems of semi-arid North America: diversity and human impacts,” Wetlands 18, 498–512 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E. S. Krull, J. A. Baldock, and J. O. Skjemstad, “Soil texture effects on decomposition and soil carbon storage,” in Net Ecosystem Exchange: Cooperative Research, Ed. by M. Kirschbaum and R. Mueller (CRC for Greenhouse Accounting, Canberra, 2001), pp. 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. S. Verry, J. W. Hornbeck, and C. A. Dolloff, Riparian Management in Forests of the Continental Eastern United States (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl, 2000), pp. 1–393.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Wang, Z. Li, H. Xia, B. Zou, N. Li, J. Liu, and W. Zhu, “Effects of nitrogen-fixing and non-nitrogen-fixing tree species on soil properties and nitrogen transformation during forest restoration in southern China,” Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 56 (2), 297–306 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gh. Moradi and H. Vacik, “Relationship between vegetation types, soil and topography in southern forests of Iran,” J. For. Res. 29 (6), 1635–1644 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gh. Moradi, M. R. Marvie Mohadjer, Gh. Zahedi Amiri, A. Shirvany, and N. Zargham, “Life form and geographical distribution of plants in Posthband region, Khonj, Fars Province, Iran,” J. For. Res. 21 (2), 201–206 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. D. Morwin and M. Peach, “Exchangeability of soil potassium in the sand, silt and clay fractions as influenced by the nature of the complementary exchangeable cation,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 15, 125–128 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Sohrabi, S. Bakhtiarvand-Bakhtiari, and K. Ahmadi, “Above- and below-ground biomass and carbon stocks of different tree plantations in central Iran,” J. Arid Land 8 (1), 138–145 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. A. Foley, R. DeFries, G. P. Asner, C. Barford, G. Bonan, S. R. Carpenter, F. S. Chapin, M. T. Coe, G. C. Daily, H. K. Gibbs, J. H. Helkowski, T. Holloway, E. A. Howard, C. J. Kucharik, C. Monfreda, et al., “Global consequences of land use,” Science 309, 570–574 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. E. B. Mouw, J. A. Stanford, and P. B. Alaback, “Influences of flooding and hyporheic exchange on floodplain plant richness and productivity,” River Res. Appl. 25, 929–945 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. F. Reynolds, “Desertification,” in Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, Ed. by S. Levin (Academic, San Diego, CA, 2001), Vol. 2, pp. 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. M. Bremner, and C. S. Mulvaney, “Nitrogen total,” in Method of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Methods, Ed. by R. H. Miller and D. R. Kieney (American Society for Agronomy and Soil Sciences, Madison, WI, 1982), pp. 595–624.

  19. J. Mirzaei, M. Moradi, and F. Seyedi, “Carbon sequestration in the leaf, litter and soil of eucalyptus camaldulensis, Prosopis juliflora and Ziziphus spina-christi species,” Ecopersia 4 (3), 1481–1491 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Six and K. Paustian, “Aggregate-associated soil organic matter as an ecosystem property and a measurement tool,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 68, A4–A9 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K. E. Dybala, V. Matzek, T. Gardali, and N. E. Seavy, “Carbon sequestration in riparian forests: a global synthesis and meta-analysis,” Global Change Biol. 25, 57–67 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L. A. B. Giese, W. M. Aust, R. K. Kolka, and C. C. Trettin, “Biomass and carbon pools of disturbed riparian forests,” For. Ecol. Manage. 180, 493–508 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. L. Batlle-Bayer, N. H. Batjes, and P. S. Bindraban, “Changes in organic carbon stocks upon land use conversion in the Brazilian Cerrado: a review,” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 137 (1–2), 47–58 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. L. Omoro, M. Starr, and P. K. Pellikka, “Tree biomass and soil carbon stocks in indigenous forests in comparison to plantations of exotic species in the Taita Hills of Kenya,” Silva. Fenn. 47 (2), 935 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Rustad, J. Campbell, G. Marion, R. Norby, M. Mitchell, A. Hartley, J. Cornelissen, and J. Gurevitch, “A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming,” Oecologia 126, 543–562 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. L. Vesterdal, N. Clarke, B. D. Sigurdsson, and P. Gundersen, “Do tree species influence soil carbon stocks in temperate and boreal forests?” For. Ecol. Manage. 309, 4–18 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. J. Salinas, G. Blanca, and A. T. Romero, “Evaluating riparian vegetation in semi-arid Mediterranean watercourses in the south-eastern Iberian Peninsula,” Environ. Conserv. 27 (1), 24–35 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Lemenih, E. Karltun, and M. Olsson, “Assessing soil chemical and physical property responses to deforestation and subsequent cultivation in smallholders farming system in Ethiopia,” Agric. Ecosist. Environ. 105, 373–386 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Moradi, F. Imani, H. R. Naji, S. Moradi Behbahani, and M. T. Ahmadi, “Variation in soil carbon stock and nutrient content in sand dunes after afforestation by Prosopis juliflorain the Khuzestan province (Iran),” iForest 10, 585–589 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Moradi, H. R. Naji, F. Imani, S. Moradi Behbahani, and M. T. Ahmadi, “Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi changes by afforestation in sand dunes,” J. Arid Environ. 140, 14–19 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Pato, A. Salehi, Gh. Zahedi Amiri, and A. Banj Shafiei, “Soil carbon stock and its relationship with physical and chemical characteristics in soil of different land-uses in Zagros region,” J. For. Wood Prod. 69 (4), 747–756 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. T. Vasbieva, “Effect of long-term application of organic and mineral fertilizers on the organic carbon content and nitrogen regime of soddy-podzolic soil,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52, 1422–1428 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319110139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. N. Haghdoost, M. Akbarinia, and S. M. Hosseini, “Land-use change and carbon stocks: a case study, Noor County, Iran,” J. For. Res. 24, 461–469 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. N. Thevs, S. Zerbe, A. Buras, E. Kuhnel, N. Abdusalih, and A. Ovezberdyyeva, “Structure and wood biomass of near-natural floodplain forests along the Central Asian rivers Tarim and Amu River,” Forestry 85, 193–202 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. P. R. Day, “Particle fractionation and particle size analysis,” in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Agronomy Monograph Series no. 9.1, Ed. by A. Klute (American Society for Agronomy and Soil Sciences, Madison, WI, 1965), pp. 545–566.

  36. R. Jandl, M. Lindner, L. Vesterdal, B. Bauwens, R. Baritz, F. Hagedorn, D. W. Johnson, K. Minkkinen, and K. A. Byrne, “How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration?” Geoderma 137, 253–268 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. R. Lal, “Global potential of soil carbon sequestration to mitigation the greenhouse effect,” Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 22 (2), 151–184 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. S. Bhandari and S. Bam, “Comparatives study of soil organic carbon (SOC) under forest, cultivated and barren land: a case of Chovar Village, Kathmandu,” Nepal J. Sci. Technol. 14 (2), 103–108 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. S. Moradi Behbahani, M. Moradi, R. Basiri, and J. Mirzaei, “Sand mining disturbances and their effects on the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a riparian forest of Iran,” J. Arid Land. 9 (6), 837–849 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. S. R. Olsen, C. V. Cole, F. S. Watanabe, and L. A. Dean, Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate, USDA Circular vol. 939 (US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 1954), pp. 1–19.

  41. T. N. Hollingsworth, A. G. Schuur, F. S. Chapin, and M. D. Walker, “Plant community composition as a predictor of regional soil carbon storage in Alaskan boreal black spruce ecosystems,” Ecosystems 11, 629–642 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. U. Mishra, R. Lal, B. Slater, F. Calhoun, D. Liu, and M. van Meirvenne, “Predicting soil organic carbon stock using profile depth distribution functions and ordinary kriging,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73 (2), 614–621 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. V. I. Nikitishen and V. I. Lichko, “Nitrogen budget in agroecosystems on gray forest soils under long-term fertilization,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 41, 429–440 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229308040091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. X. Wei, M. Shao, W. Gale, and L. Li, “Global pattern of soil carbon losses due to the conversion of forests to agricultural land,” Sci. Rep. 4, 4062 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. X. Y. Sun, G. X. Wang, M. Huang, R. Y. Chang, and F. Ran, “Forest biomass carbon stocks and variation in Tibet’s carbon-dense forests from 2001 to 2050,” Sci. Rep. 6, 34687 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Y. Yang, Y. Chen, Z. Li, and Y. Chen, “Land-use/cover conversion affects soil organic-carbon stocks: a case study along the main channel of the Tarim River, China,” PloS One 13 (11), e0206903 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Z. Avazpoor, M. Moradi, R. Basiri, J. Mirzaei, R. Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, and R. Kerry, “ Soil enzyme activity variations in riparian forests in relation to plant species and soil depth,” Arab. J. Geosci. 12, 708 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4910-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Special thanks to the Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of technology and its staffs for their support during this work. Ruhollah Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi has been supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation under the grant number: Ref3.4-1164573-IRN-GFHERMES-P.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology, P.O. Box 6361647189, Khuzestan, Iran

    M. Forogh Nasab & M. Moradi

  2. School of Natural Resources and Desert Studies, Yazd University, P.O. Box 89168-69511, Yazd, Iran

    Gh. Moradi

  3. Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Ardakan University, P.O. Box 89518-95491, Yazd, Iran

    R. Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi

  4. Department of Geosciences, Soil Science and Geomorphology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    R. Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi

Authors
  1. M. Forogh Nasab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Moradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gh. Moradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Moradi.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

The original online version of this article was revised: The name of the fourth author should read R. Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forogh Nasab, M., Moradi, M., Moradi, G. et al. Topsoil Carbon Stock and Soil Physicochemical Properties in Riparian Forests and Agricultural Lands of Southwestern Iran. Eurasian Soil Sc. 53, 1389–1395 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320100075

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320100075

Keywords:

Search

Navigation