Abstract
Cognition is not a process of mastering truths, i.e., grains of ultimate knowledge. Even in the details, cognition only allows us to get closer to the ultimate truth, not to reach it. Consequently, the real tool of knowledge is not a proof, but a presumption. The latter refers to a certain decision that was successfully established in the past in an appropriate context and therefore can be taken without additional proofs, though only in the absence of serious contradictory evidence. Two paradigms compete within the framework of modern evolutionary biology, i.e., the dominant cladistic paradigm and the often disregarded but indestructible phyletic paradigm, which grew from the traditional view on systematics and evolution. Cladistics corresponds to the genetic (=population-genetic, “synthetic”) theory of evolution, whereas phyletics corresponds to the holistic (=“epigenetic”) one. The cladistic paradigm seemingly offers a strict procedure of objective analysis, but its prerequisites, such as the mandatory dichotomy of a particular phylum combined with the simultaneous disappearance of an ancestor, which disregards the possibility of speciation without divergence, are hardly consistent with the real order of things, and unavoidable sources of subjectivity are also usually ignored. The holistic paradigm does not represent a less clear procedure, but a more complex protocol of analysis, since it not only recognizes the unavoidable elements of subjectivity but also explicitly introduces them into the research protocol as a choice between the conflicting presumptions. Phyletics, as part of the holistic paradigm, provides taxonomic and phylogenetic schemes that are stabler in the long run, and the holistic theory of evolution, together with the adaptive compromise metaphor derived from it, can explain many evolutionary phenomena that are incompatible with the genetic (“synthetic”) theory of evolution, such as the discrete nature of biological diversity, the fundamental nonuniformity of the evolutionary process, and the paradox of the inverse correlation between the evolutionary rate and level of organization, e.g., the highest and lowest rates of the evolution of large mammals and microorganisms, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Activities of the intersectional seminar on the problems of evolution from October 1965 to April 1966, Byull. Mosk. O-va. Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Biol., 1967, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 136–138.
Aristotle, Parts of Animals, Harvard: Harvard Univ. Press, 1937.
Beketov, A.N., Harmony in nature, Russ. Vestn., 1860, vol. 30, pp. 197–240, 534–558.
Belyaev, D.K., The problems in stabilizing and destabilizing selection, in Istoriya i teoriya evolyutsionnogo ucheniya (History and Theory of Evolutionary Doctrine), Leningrad: Nauka, 1974, no. 2, pp. 76–84.
Carson, H.L.T., The genetics of speciation at the diploid level, Am. Nat., 1975, vol. 109, pp. 83–92.
Darwin, C.R., On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, London: Murray, 1859.
Eldredge, N. and Gould, S.J., Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism, in Models in Paleobiology, Schopf, T.J.M., Ed., San Francisco: Freeman & Cooper, 1972, pp. 82–115.
Farrer, D.R., Species and evolution in asexually reproducing independent fern gametophytes, Syst. Bot., 1990, vol. 15, pp. 98–111.
Feder, J.L. and Forbes, A.A., Sequential speciation and the diversity of parasitic insects, Ecol. Entomol., 2010, vol. 35, suppl. 1, pp. 67–76.
Ghiselin, M.T., A radical solution of the species problem, Syst. Zool., 1974, vol. 23, pp. 536–544.
Ghiselin, M.T., Species concepts, individuality and objectivity, Biol. Philos., 1987, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 127–143.
Gidley, J.W., The Lagomorpha, an independent order, Science, 1912, vol. 36, pp. 285–286.
Glickman, S.E., Cunha, G.R., Drea, C.M., Conley, A.J., and Place, N.J., Mammalian sexual differentiation: Lessons from the spotted hyena, Trends Endocrinol. Metabol., 2006, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 349–356.
Gould, S.J. and Eldredge, N., Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered, Paleobiology, 1977, vol. 3, pp. 115–151.
Gressit, J.L., Evolution of endemic Hawaiian cerambycid beetles, Pac. Insects, 1978, vol. 18, pp. 137–167.
Gritsenko, V.V., Kreslavskii, A.G., Mikheev, A.V., Severtsev, A.S., and Solomatin, V.M., Kontseptsii vida i simpatricheskoe vidoobrazovanie (The Concept of a Species and Sympatric Speciation), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1983.
Grodnitskii, D.L., Dve teorii biologicheskoi evolyutsii (Two Theories of Biological Evolution), Krasnoyarsk: Inst. Lesa im. V.N. Sukacheva, Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2000.
Grodnitskii, D.L., Dve teorii biologicheskoi evolyutsii (Two Theories of Biological Evolution), Saratov: Nauchnaya Kniga, 2002, 2nd ed.
Hennig, W., Grundzüge einer Theorie der Phylogenetischen Systematik, Berlin: Deutsch. Zentralverlag, 1950.
Hennig, W., Phylogenetic Systematics, Urbana: Illinois Univ. Press, 1966.
Heraty, J., Ronquist, F., Carpenter, J.M., Hawks, D., Schulmeister, S., et al., Evolution of the hymenopteran megaradiation, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2011, vol. 60, pp. 73–88.
History of Insects, Rasnitsyn, A.P. and Quicke, D.L.J., Eds., Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002.
International Code of Botanical Nomenclature: Adopted by the Twelfth International Botanical Congress, Leningrad, July 1975, Regnum Vegetabile Series vol. 97, Utrecht: Bohnm Schelteme and Holkema, 1978.
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, London: Int. Trust Zool. Nomencl., 1985, 3rd ed.
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, London: Int. Trust Zool. Nomencl., 1999, 4th ed.
Ivanova, L.S., Comparison of parthenogenetic weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) in Siberia, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Novosibirsk: Biol. Inst., Sib. Branch, Acad. Sci. USSR, 1978.
Kjer, K.M., Simon, C., Yavorskaya, M., and Beutel, R.G., Progress, pitfalls and parallel universes: a history of insect phylogenetics, J. R. Soc. Interface., 2016, vol. 13, no. 121, pp. 1–29.
Klopfstein, S., Vilhelmsen, L., Heraty, J.M., Sharkey, M., and Ronquist, F., The hymenopteran tree of life: evidence from protein-coding genes and objectively aligned ribosomal data, PLoS One, 2013, vol. 8, no. 8, p. e69344.
Klyuge, N.Yu., Sovremennaya sistematika nasekomykh. Chast’ 1. Printsipy sistematiki zhivykh orgnaizmov i obshchaya sistema nasekomykh s klassifikatsiei pervichnobeskrylykh i drevnekrylykh (Modern Systematics of Insects, Part 1: Principles of Systematics of Living Organisms and the General System of Insects with Classification of Primary Wingless and Paleopterous Insects), St. Petersburg: Lan’, 2000.
Krasilov, V.A., Phylogenetics and systematics, Materialy simpoziuma “Problemy filogenii i sistematiki” (Proc. Symp. “Problems of Phylogeny and Systematics”), Vladivostok, 1969, pp. 12–30.
Krassilov, V.A., Angiosperm Origins: Morphological and Ecological Aspects, Sofia: Pensoft, 1997.
Krassilov, V.A., Character parallelism and reticulation in the origin of angiosperms, in Horizontal Gene Transfer, Syvanen, M. and Kado, C.I., Eds., San Diego: Academic, 2002, 2nd ed.
Kuhn, T.S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1970, 2nd ed.
Lakatos, I., The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Philos. Pap. vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1978.
Laurin, B. and Bruno, D., L’évolution morphologique: un compromis entre contraintes du dévelopment et ajustements adaptif, C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. 2., 1988, vol. 307, pp. 843–849.
Letsch, H.O., Meusemann K., Wipfler, B., Schütte, K., Beutel, R., and Misof, B., Insect phylogenomics: results, problems and the impact of matrix composition, Proc. R. Soc. B, 2012, vol. 279, pp. 3282–3290.
Linnaeus, C., Philosophia Botanica: In Qua Explicantur Fundamenta Botanica Cum Definitionibus Partium, Exemplis Terminorum, Observationibus Rariorum, Adjectis Figuris Aeneis, Stockholm: G. Kiesewetter, 1751.
Lyubishchev, A.A., On the structure of natural system of organisms, Izv. Biol. Inst., Perm. Univ., 1923, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 99–110.
Lyubishchev, A.A., Systematics and evolution, Trudy Vsesoyuznogo soveshchaniya “Vnutrevidovaya izmenchivost’ nazemnykh pozvonochnykh zhivotnykh i mikroevolyutsiya” (Proc. All-Union Conf. “Intraspecific Variability of Terrestrial Vertebrates and Microevolution”), Sverdlovsk: Ural. Nauchn. Tsentr, Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1966, pp. 54–57.
Lyubishchev, A.A., Problemy formy, sistematiki i evolyutsii organizmov (Shapes, Systematics, and Evolution of Organisms), Moscow: Nauka, 1982.
Mamkaev, Yu.V., Comparison of morphological differences in the lower and higher groups of the same phylogenetic stem, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1968, vol. 29, pp. 48–55.
Mao, M., Gibson, T., and Dowton, M., Higher-level phylogeny of the Hymenoptera inferred from mitochondrial genomes, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2015, vol. 84, pp. 34–43.
Mayr, E., Populations, Species, and Evolution: An Abridgment of Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard: Harvard Univ. Press, 1970.
McCune, A.R., Evolutionary novelty and atavism in the Semionotus complex: relaxed selection during colonization of an expanding lake, Evolution, 1990, vol. 44, pp. 71–85.
Meyen, S.V., Geography of macroevolution of the plants, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1987, vol. 48, pp. 291–309.
Misof, B., Liu, S., Meusemann, K., Peters, R.S., Donath, A., et al., Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution, Science, 2014, vol. 346, pp. 763–767.
Nevesskaja, L.A., History of the genus Didacna (Bivalvia: Cardiidae), Paleontol. J., 2007, vol. 41, suppl. 9, pp. 861–949.
Nevesskaja, L.L., Goncharova, I.A., Il’ina, L.B., Paramonova, N.P., Popov, S.V., et al., History of the Neogene molluscs of Paratethys, Tr. Paleontol Inst., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1986, vol. 220.
Nevesskaja, L.A., Paramonova, N.P., and Popov, S.V., History of Lymnocardiinae (Bivalvia, Cardiidae), Paleontol. J., 2001, vol. 35, suppl. 3, pp. 147–217.
Nevesskaja, L.L., Goncharova, I.A., Il’ina, L.B., and Popov, S.V., Evolutionary transformations of malacofauna in the Neogene basins of Paratethys as an example of the development of island-type ecosystems, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2009, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 396–414.
Payne, A., Barden, P.M., Wheeler, W.C., and Carpenter, J.M., Direct optimization, sensitivity analysis, and the evolution of the hymenopteran superfamilies, Am. Mus. Novit., 2013, vol. 3789, pp. 1–19.
Peters, R.S., Krogmann, L., Mayer, Ch., Donath, A., Gunkel, S., et al., Evolutionary history of the hymenoptera, Curr. Biol., 2017, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1–6.
Plejel, F. and Rose, G.W., Ceci n’est pas une pipe: names, clades and phylogenetic nomenclature, J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res., 2002, vol. 41, pp. 162–174.
Poljansky, G.I., Some aspects of the species in asexually reproducing Protozoa, Protozoology, 1977, vol. 3, pp. 17–23.
Polyanskii, V.I., Species of lower algae, in Komarovskie chteniya (Komarov’s Readings), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1956.
Polyanskii, Yu.I., Intraspecific differentiation and the structure of plant species, Vestn. Leningr. Gos. Univ., 1957, no. 21, pp. 45–64.
Ponomarenko, A.G. and Rasnitsyn, A.P., Phenetic and phylogenetic systems, Zool. Zh., 1971, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 5–14.
Popper, K., The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Routledge, 2002.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., The origin and evolution of lower Hymenoptera, Tr. Paleontol Inst., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1969, vol. 123.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Tахonomic analysis and other taxometric methods, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1972, vol. 33, pp. 60–76.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., The origin and evolution of Hymenoptera insects, Tr. Paleontol Inst., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1980, vol. 174.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Parataxon and paranomenclature, Paleontol. Zh., 1986a, no. 3, pp. 11–21.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Inadaptation and evadaptation, Paleontol. Zh., 1986b, no. 1, pp. 3–7.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Temps of evolution and theory of evolution (hypothesis of adaptive compromise), in Evolyutsiya i biotsenoticheskie krizisy (Evolution and Biocenotic Crisis), Moscow: Nauka, 1987, pp. 46–64.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Phylogenetics, in Sovremennaya paleontologiya (Modern Paleontology), Moscow: Nedra, 1988a, vol. 1, pp. 480–497.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., An outline of evolution of the hymenopterous insects (order Vespida), Orient. Insects, 1988b, vol. 22, pp. 115–145.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Principles of nomenclature and the nature of the taxon, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1992, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 307–313.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Conceptual issues in phylogeny, taxonomy, and nomenclature, Contrib. Zool., 1996, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 3–41.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Evolutionary process and taxonomy methods, Tr. Russ. Entomol. O-va, 2002, vol. 73.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Ontology of evolution and methodology of taxonomy, Paleontol. J., 2006, vol. 40, suppl. 6, pp. 679–737.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Molecular phylogenetics, morphological cladistics, and fossil record, Entomol. Rev., 2010, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 263–298.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., When life never thought of dying, Priroda (Moscow), 2012, no. 9, pp. 39–48.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Classification methods: approaches of Procrustes, Plato, and Linnaeus, Tr. Zool. Inst., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2013a, no. 2, pp. 66–71.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Folk and scientific systematics, Priroda (Moscow), 2013b, no. 4, pp. 86–90.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Aristov, D.S., and Rasnitsyn, D.A., Insects of the Permian and Early Triassic (Urzhumian–Olenekian ages) and the problem of the Permian–Triassic biodiversity crisis, Paleontol. J., 2013c, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 793–823.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Aristov, D.S., and Rasnitsyn, D.A., Dynamics of insect diversity during the Early and Middle Permian, Paleontol. J., 2015, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 1282–1309.
Rasnitsyn, A.P., Bashkuev, A.S., Kopylov, D.S., Lukashevich, E.D., Ponomarenko, A.G., et al., Sequence and scale of changes in the terrestrial biota during the Cretaceous (based on materials from fossil resins), Cretaceous Res., 2016, vol. 61, pp. 234–255.
Rausch, R.L., Cestodes in mammals: the zoogeography of some parasite-host assemblages, Mém. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat. Ser. A, 1982, vol. 123, pp. 179–183.
Rautian, A.S., The nature of genotype and inheritance, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1993, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 132–149.
Rotondo, G.M., Springer, V.G., Scott, G.A.J., and Schlanger, S.O., Plate movement and island integration—a possible mechanism in the formation of endemic biotas, with special reference to the Hawaiian Islands, Syst. Zool., 1981, vol. 30, pp. 12–21.
Schmalhausen, I.I., Factors of Evolution: The Theory of Stabilizing Selection, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1987.
Schram, F.R., Method and madness in phylogeny, in Crustacean Phylogeny, Schram, F.R., Ed., Rotterdam: Balkema, 1983, pp. 331–350.
Sharkey, M.J., Carpenter, J.M., Vilhelmsen, L., Heraty, J., Liljeblad, J., et al., Phylogenetic relationships among superfamilies of Hymenoptera, Cladistics, 2012, vol. 28, pp. 80–112.
Sharp, D., Insects, in The Cambridge Natural History, London: Macmillan, 1901, vol. 6.
Shishkin, M.A., Individual development and natural selection, Ontogenez, 1984, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 115–136.
Shishkin, M.A., Individual development and the theory of evolution, in Evolyutsiya i biotsenoticheskie krizisy (Evolution and Biocenotic Crisis), Moscow: Nauka, Moscow: Nauka, 1987, pp. 76–124.
Shishkin, M.A., Evolution as an epigenetic process, in Sovremennaya paleontologiya (Modern Paleontology), Moscow: Nedra, 1988a, vol. 1, pp. 142–169.
Shishkin, M.A., Patterns of evolution of ontogenesis, in Sovremennaya paleontologiya (Modern Paleontology), Moscow: Nedra, 1988b, vol. 1, pp. 169–209.
Shishkin, M.A., Development and lessons of evolutionism, Russ. J. Dev. Biol., 2006, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 146–162.
Shishkin, M.A., Evolutionary theory and scientific thinking, Paleontol. J., 2010, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 601–613.
Shvarts, S.S., Ekologicheskie zakonomernosti evolyutsii (Ecological Pattern of Evolution), Moscow: Nauka, 1980.
Shvarts, E.A., Sokhranenie bioraznoobraziya: soobshchestva i ekosistemy (Conservation of Biodiversity: Communities and Ecosystems), Moscow: KMK, 2004.
Silvestro, D., Warnock, R.C.M., Gavryushkina, A., and Stadler, T., Closing the gap between palaeontological and neontological speciation and extinction rate estimates, Nat. Commun., 2018, vol. 9, p. 5237.
Simpson, G.G., Tempo and Mode in Evolution, New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1944.
Smuts, J.C., Holism and Evolution, Cape Town: N&S Press, 1987.
Stanley, S.M., A theory of evolution above the species level, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 1975, vol. 72, pp. 646–650.
Stoeckle, M.Y. and Thaler, D.S., Why should mitochondria define species?, Hum. Evol., 2018, vol. 33, pp. 1–30.
Sundberg, P. and Pleijel, F., Phylogenetic classification and the definition of taxon names, Zool. Scr., 1994, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 19–25.
Suno-Uchi, N., Sasaki, F., Chiba, S., and Kawata, M., Morphological stasis and phylogenetic relationships in tadpole shrimps, Triops (Crustacea: Notostraca), Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 1997, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 439–457.
Tasch, P., Branchiopoda, in Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part R: Arthropoda, Lawrence, KS: Univ. of Kansas Press, 1969, vol. 4, pp. 128–191.
Vakhrameev, V.A. and Kotova, I.Z., The ancient angiosperms and related plants from the Lower Cretaceous of Transbaikalia, Paleontol. Zh., 1977, no. 4, pp. 101–109.
Valen van, L., Integration of species: stasis and biogeography, Evol. Theory, 1982, vol. 6, pp. 99–112.
Weismann, A., Lektsii po evolyutsionnoi teorii (Lectures on the theory of Evolution), Moscow: Izd. M. i S. Sabashnikovykh, 1905, vol. 1.
Wang, Y.-H., Engel, M.S., Rafael, J.A., Wu, H.-Y., Rédei, D., et al., Fossil record of stem groups employed in evaluating the chronogram of insects (Arthropoda: Hexapoda), Sci. Rep., 2016, vol. 6, p. 38939.
Wilson, R.W., Rodent origin, in Papers on Fossil Rodents: In Honor of Albert Elmer Wood, Black, C.C. and Dawson, M.R., Eds., Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Sci. Ser. 33, Los Angeles: Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles Cty., 1989, pp. 3–6.
Woese, C.R., Microevolution in the microscopic world, in Molecules and Morphology in Evolution: Conflict or Compromise?, Patterson, C., Ed., Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987, pp. 177–202.
Zavarzin, G.A., Specific evolution of prokaryotes, in Evolyutsiya i biotsenoticheskie krizisy (Evolution and Biocenotic Crisis), Tatarinov, L.P. and Rasnitsyn, A.P., Eds., Moscow: Nauka, 1987, pp. 144–158.
Zherikhin, V.V., Biocenotic regulation of evolution, Paleontol. Zh., 1987, no. 1, pp. 3–12.
Zherikhin, V.V., Cladistics in palaeontology: problems and constraints, Proc. I Int. Palaeoentomol. Conf. Moscow, 1998, Bratislava: AMBA Projects Int., 1999, pp. 193–199.
Zherikhin, V.V., Insect trace fossils, in History of Insects, Rasnitsyn, A.P. and Quicke, D.L.J., Eds., Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002, pp. 303–324.
Zherikhin, V.V. and Rasnitsyn, A.P., Biocenotic regulation of evolution, Materialy simpoziuma “Mikro- i makroevolyutsiya,” 2–5 sentyabrya 1980 g. (Proc. Symp. “Micro- and Macroevolution,” September 2–5, 1980), Tartu, 1980, pp. 77–81.
Zherikhin, V.V., Ponomarenko, A.G., and Rasnitsyn, A.P., Vvedenie v paleoentomologiyu (Introduction into Paleoenthomology), Moscow: KMK, 2008.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to take this opportunity to express my sincere gratitude to V.E. Gokhman (Moscow State University, Moscow) for the editing of the text and for valuable advice and A.V. Khramov and Lukashevich (Paleontological Institute, Moscow, Russia) for discussion and healp in reading manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Statement on the welfare of humans or animals. This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Translated by M. Batrukova
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rasnitsyn, A.P. Philosophy of Evolutionary Biology. Biol Bull Rev 11, 1–26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086421010060
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086421010060