Abstract
The article presents the results of monitoring the socioeconomic development of Altai krai in the context of economic instability. The features of development of a typical agroindustrial region are revealed. Along with the characteristics of the dynamics of real sector of the economy, shifts in the investment sphere of the krai, changes in the standard of living, state of the labor market, etc., were considered. It was concluded that under conditions of a structural crisis, the regional economy, compared with the economy of the “average Russian” region, turned out to be more adapted, with a less pronounced reaction to deterioration of the external economic situation. For Altai krai, the lagging nature of crisis in combination with a faster exit from it is noted. Relatively low adaptation of the regional labor market and insufficient growth rates of living standards to overcome the historically established lag behind Russia were also recorded.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aliev, B.Kh. and Alimirzoeva, M.G., Socioeconomic parameters of Russian regions and their transition to sustainable development, Reg. Ekon.: Teor. Prakt., 2011, no. 25 (208), pp. 41–45.
Bondarev, A.E., Monitoring of the socioeconomic development of the region: the system of indicators, Reg.: Ekon. Sotsiol., 2013, no. 3 (79), pp. 111–120.
Gadzhiev, Yu.A. and Akopov, V.l., Socioeconomic development of the northern regions of Russia, Ekon. Reg., 2011, no. 3, pp. 80–88.
Inshakov, O.V. and Mitrofanova, I.V., Socioeconomic indicators of the development of the southern regions of Russia: trends and forecasts, Reg. Ekon.: Teor. Prakt., 2007, no. 14 (53), pp. 14–23.
Kopylova, Yu.V., Socioeconomic sphere of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug: problems and prospective development, Vestn. Omsk. Univ., Ser.: Ekon., 2014, no. 2, pp. 121–127.
Kostyleva, L.V. and Dubinichev, R.V., Inequality of the population and its impact on the socioeconomic development of the region, Ekon. Sots. Peremeny: Fakty, Tendentsii, Prognoz, 2009, no. 4, pp. 95–103.
Mau, V.A., Waiting for a new model of growth: Russia’s social and economic development in 2013, Vopr. Ekon., 2014, no. 2, pp. 4–32.
Mau, V.A., Russia’s social and economic policy in 2014: finding new frontiers, Vopr. Ekon., 2015, no. 2, pp. 5–31.
Mau, V.A., Economic policy 2010: looking for innovation, Vopr. Ekon., 2011, no. 2, pp. 4–22.
Suspitsyn, S.A., The socioeconomic development of the Siberian regions: priorities, positions, and self-development potential, in Regional’noe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie: diagnostika, planirovanie i monitoring sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov Sibiri (Regional and Municipal Governance: Diagnostics, Planning, and Monitoring of Socioeconomic Development of Siberian Regions), Novosibirsk: Inst. Ekon. Org. Prom. Proizvod., Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2016, pp. 329–358.
Shevyakov, A.Yu., The transformation of distribution relations as a reqired condition for the socioeconomic development of Russian regions, Ekon. Reg., 2011, no. 1, pp. 7–14.
Tsyrenova, E.D., Bordoev, D.G., and Tsyrenov, A.R., Baikal region in the economic and social development of Russia, Vestn. Vost.-Sib. Gos. Univ. Tekhnol. Uprav., 2015, no. 4, pp. 107–112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
A more detailed version of the article published in Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya, 2018, no. 1 (97), pp. 69–92.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trotskovskii, A.Y., Perekarenkova, Y.A. Altai Krai under Conditions of Economic Instability: Key Trends and Features of Development. Reg. Res. Russ. 9, 44–52 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970519010106
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970519010106